RESUMO
Background: Hand hygiene and its significance for reducing the spread of infection is well evidenced and has been brought into sharp focus following the COVID-19 pandemic. Although a crucial clinical skill in ensuring safe healthcare, little is known regarding nursing students' effectiveness of hand hygiene practice. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on hand hygiene practice, designed by the research team for first year pre-registration nursing students. Particular emphasis was placed upon hand drying technique and time. Methodology: 825 nursing students were observed and assessed for their hand hygiene practice in a clinical suite at a university setting. Nursing students were observed for compliance against set outcome measures involving hand hygiene preparation, hand and wrist washing technique, hand drying technique and time. Data were analysed quantitatively using SPSS. Results: The educational intervention had a significant impact on the clinical skills learning of nursing students. 779 students passed the assessment at the first attempt (94.4%). Of the 46 students that failed to meet the necessary criteria, 45 satisfied the criteria at the second attempt; giving an overall optimal compliance of 99.9%. 99.6% of students complied with recommended hand drying standards. Conclusion: This study offers an important contribution to the development and delivery of nursing education programmes. The educational intervention improved compliance with recommended hand hygiene technique and practice. Lack of attention to hand drying may negate effective hand hygiene in healthcare.
RESUMO
We evaluated the use of the Product Enhanced Reverse Transcriptase (PERT) assay as a means of detecting virus in retroviral vectors products pseudotyped with Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus (GALV) and Vesicular Stomatitis Virus G (VSVG) envelopes. PERT provides greater standardization than the S+/L- assay which has been used extensively in virus detection. A challenge is that PERT will also detect residual retroviral vectors as vector particles contain reverse transcriptase. Vector products were cultured for 3 weeks on HEK293 cells to amplify any potential virus. In addition, vector supernatant and end-of-production cells were spiked with GALV to evaluate for inhibition by the test article. Results of PERT and the S+/L- assay were compared. PERT and S+/L- assays were both effective in detecting virus. Vector supernatants were negative at the end of 3 weeks of culture by PERT for both GAVL and VSVG pseudotyped vector. In contrast, end-of-production cells were positive by PERT due to persistent vector producing cells. A one-week culture of cell-free media obtained at the 3 weeks timepoint allowed distinction of virus-free test articles from those with virus. The PERT assay is suitable for detecting replication competent retrovirus in vector products pseudotyped with GALV and VSVG envelopes.