Characterizing the Heart Rate Effects From Administration of Sugammadex to Reverse Neuromuscular Blockade: An Observational Study in Patients.

BACKGROUND: Reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) with sugammadex can cause marked bradycardia and asystole. Administration of sugammadex typically occurs in a dynamic period when anesthetic adjuvants and gas concentrations are being titrated to achieve emergence. This evaluation examined the heart rate (HR) responses to sugammadex to reverse moderate to deep NMB during a steady-state period and sought mechanisms for HR changes. METHODS: Patients with normal sinus rhythm, who were undergoing elective surgery that included rocuronium for NMB, were evaluated. After surgery, while at steady-state surgical depth anesthesia with sevoflurane and mechanical ventilation, patients received either placebo or 2 or 4 mg/kg of sugammadex to reverse moderate to deep NMB. Study personnel involved in data analysis were blinded to treatment. Continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded from the 5 minutes before and 5 minutes after sugammadex/placebo administration. R-R intervals were converted to HR and averaged in 1-minute increments. The maximum prolongation of an R-R interval after sugammadex was converted to an instantaneous HR. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were evaluated: 8 received placebo, and 38 and 17 received 2 and 4 mg/kg sugammadex. Age, body mass index, and patient factors were similar in groups. Placebo did not elicit HR changes, whereas sugammadex caused maximum instantaneous HR slowing (calculated from the longest R-R interval), ranging from 2 to 19 beats/min. There were 7 patients with maximum HR slowing >10 beats/min. The average HR change and 95% confidence interval (CI) during the 5 minutes after 2 mg/kg sugammadex were 3.1 (CI, 2.3-4.1) beats/min, and this was not different from the 4 mg/kg sugammadex group (4.1 beats/min [CI, 2.5-5.6]). HR variability derived from the standard deviation of consecutive R-R intervals increased after sugammadex. CONCLUSIONS: Sugammadex to reverse moderate and deep NMB resulted in a fast onset and variable magnitude of HR slowing in patients. A difference in HR slowing as a function of dose did not achieve statistical significance. The observational nature of the investigation prevented a full understanding of the mechanism(s) of the HR slowing.

How an Audit-and-Feedback-Based Educational Program Contributed to a Reduction in Environmentally Harmful Waste Anesthetic Gases Among Anesthesiology Residents.

Background Waste anesthetic gases (WAGs) contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. US anesthesiology resident education on how to reduce WAG-associated emissions is lacking, so we developed an electronic audit-and-feedback-based program to teach residents to reduce fresh gas flow (FGF) and WAG-associated emissions. Objective To assess the program's effectiveness, we measured individual and combined mean FGF of residents during their first, second, and last weeks of the 4-week rotation; then, we calculated the extrapolated annual emissions based on the combined resident mean FGFs. Resident attitudes toward the program were surveyed. Methods During 4-week rotations at a teaching hospital, anesthesia records were scanned to extract resident-assigned cases, FGF, and volatile anesthetic choice during the 2020-2021 academic year. Forty residents across 3 training years received weekly FGF data and extrapolated WAG-associated emissions data via email. Their own FGF data was compared to the low-flow standard FGF of ≤1 liter per minute (LPM) and to the FGF data of their peer residents on rotation with them. An online survey was sent to residents at the end of the project period. Results Between their first and last weeks on rotation, residents decreased their mean FGF by 22% (1.83 vs 1.42 LPM; STD 0.58 vs 0.44; 95% CI 1.67-2.02 vs 1.29-1.56; P<.0001). Ten of 18 (56%) residents who responded to the survey reported their individual case-based results were most motivating toward practice change. Conclusions An audit-and-feedback-based model for anesthesiology resident education, designed to promote climate-conscious practices with administration of volatile anesthetics, was effective.

New Opioid Persistence in Veterans Following Major and Minor Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Opioids are often a mainstay of managing postsurgical pain. Persistent use of opioids for more than 90 days after surgery is problematic, and the incidence of this adverse outcome has been reported in the civilian population ranging from 0.4% to 7%. Veterans compose a special population exposed to trauma and stressful situations and consequently face increased risk for habit-forming behavior and drug overdose. This evaluation determined the prevalence of opioid persistence after surgery and its relationship to patient characteristics in a military veteran population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed on 1,257 veterans who were opioid naive and had undergone a surgical procedure between January 2017 and May 2018. Patient characteristics, health conditions, and discharge opioid medications were recorded, and the incidence of persistent opioid use beyond 90 days was determined. RESULTS: The incidence of opioid persistence following major (3.3%) and minor (3.4%) procedures was similar. The incidence in patients younger than 45 years (3.3%), between 45 and 64 years (4.3%), and 65 years and older (2.2%) was also determined to be similar. Univariate patient factors associated with an increased risk for persistent opioid use include cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.11-4.09), mental health disorders (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.17-4.60), and substance use disorders (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.09-4.00). CONCLUSIONS: Among a cohort of over 1,200 opioid-naïve veterans undergoing surgery at a VA Medical Center, just over 3% went on to develop persistent opioid use beyond 3 months following their procedure. Persistent use was not found to be related to the type of procedure (major or minor) or patient age. Significant patient-level risk factors for opioid persistence were cancer and a history of mental health and substance use disorders.