Erythropoietin Resistance Index and the Affecting Factors in Children with Peritoneal Dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are used to treat anemia in CKD. Erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) is a useful tool used to evaluate the response to ESAs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the causes of high ERI in children undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). METHOD: Patients who had been on PD for at least 1 year were included in this retrospective study. Demographic characteristics, residual kidney function (RKF), adequacy of dialysis, peritoneal glucose exposure, the number and reason for hospitalization, and medications were recorded. Anemia and laboratory parameters that may affect anemia were noted by taking the average of laboratory values in the last follow-up year (time-averaged). The weekly ESA dose was proportioned to the annual average hemoglobin value and body weight to calculate the ERI in terms of U/kg/week/g/dL. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the study. The mean ESA dose and ERI value were 119.8 ± 66.22 U/kg/week and 13.01 ± 7.52 U/kg/week/g/dL, respectively. It was determined that the patients <5 years of age have very high ERI value, and these patients need 2 times more ESA than those >10 years of age. Absence of RKF, large number of hospitalization, and ACEI use were also found to affect the ERI value negatively. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that the most important factor affecting ERI value is young age. We also reveal that absence of RKF, large number of hospitalization, and ACEI use are also important variables affecting the ERI value.

Could mini-PET be used to instead of 4 h original-PET to assess peritoneal permeability in children on peritoneal dialysis?

BACKGROUND: Original peritoneal equilibration test (PET) is an implementation that requires hard work for peritoneal dialysis (PD) staff. Therefore, several authors have attempted to validate short and fast PET protocols, with controversial results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance between the mini-PET and original PET in children. METHODS: In 26 stable continuous ambulatory PD patients, we performed an original PET with 2.27% (4 h) and a mini-PET with 3.86% glucose PD fluid (1 h) and compared ultrafiltration (UF) and small solute transports obtained with the two methods. RESULTS: Twenty-six children, 14 males, mean age 11.4 ± 5.6 (range 2.5-19 years), were included. Meantime on PD at time of enrollment was 35.2 ± 24.5 months (range 6-84 months). Based on the 4-h creatinine D/P data, the number of the patients within each transport category was as follow: high, 5; average, 18; low, 3. Kappa test showed a significant concordance between original PET and mini-PET (k=0.610). Based on the 4-h glucose D/D0 data, the number of the patients within each transport category was as follow: high, 5; average, 17; low, 4. Kappa test showed a moderate agreement between original PET and mini-PET (0.514, p=0.000). When Pearson correlation analysis between original PET and mini-PET was performed, there were significant positive correlations between original 2.27% PET and mini-PET (r=0.720, p=0.000, r=0.638, p=0.000, respectively). When comparing the numeric results of mini-PET and 4 h of original PET for D/Creatinine, by simple regression analysis, we found statistically significant correlation among PETs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we showed concordance between the mini-PET and original PET. The 3.86% mini-PET is simple and fast methods to assess free water transport. This also gives information about total UF and small solute transports and it is in good agreement with the original PET.