Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Intern Med J ; 41(1b): 82-9, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21272172

RESUMO

Utilization of risk-stratification tools in the setting of neutropenic fever is currently limited by inadequate knowledge and lack of awareness. Within this context, the approach to management of low-risk patients with neutropenic fever is inconsistent with the available evidence across many Australian treating centres. These clinical guidelines define and clarify an accepted standard of care for this patient group given the current evidence base. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index is presented as the preferred risk assessment tool for determining patient risk. Suitability of ambulatory care within specific patient populations is discussed, with defined eligibility criteria provided to guide clinical decision-making. Detailed recommendations for implementing appropriate ambulatory strategies, such as early discharge and outpatient antibiotic therapy, are also provided. Due consideration is given to infrastructural requirements and other supportive measures at a resourcing and operational level. An analysis of the relevant health economics is also presented.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Neutropenia/complicações , Gestão de Riscos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Austrália , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Institutos de Câncer/normas , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Alta do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica , Recidiva , Risco
2.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 21(5): 501-4, 1998 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9781609

RESUMO

Locoregional recurrence is a harbinger of disseminated disease, and historically the estimated 5-year survival when treated with local therapy only varies between 21% and 37%. The role of systemic treatment after local treatment is unclear at present. The authors investigated the results of systemic chemotherapy for these patients after complete local surgical resection. Data on 80 patients were evaluable for toxicity, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival. Sixty-four patients received doxorubicin-based treatments, four received methotrexate-based combinations, and 12 received tamoxifen only. Among the 68 patients treated with cytostatics, there were two possible treatment-related deaths. Two patients developed grade 3 neutropenia, four developed grade 3 vomiting, and 42 had grade 2 toxicity. The 2- and 5-year disease free survival at a mean follow-up period of 5.5 years were 56% and 38%, respectively. The projected median TTF was 32 months (95% confidence interval, 23-82). Two- and 5-year overall survival were 86% and 62%, respectively, with a projected median survival of 93 months (7.75 years; 95% confidence interval, 64-177). These results show systemic therapy improved TTF and survival for patients with stage IV, no-evidence-of-disease breast cancer. Randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and define optimal therapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA