Treatment strategies for simple elbow dislocation - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment concepts for simple elbow dislocation involve conservative and surgical approaches. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the superiority of one treatment strategy over the other by a qualitative analysis in adult patients who suffered simple elbow luxation. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and following the suggestions for reporting on qualitative summaries was performed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus, including variations and combinations of the following keywords: elbow, radiohumeral, ulnohumeral, radioulnar, luxation, and therapy. Seventeen studies that performed a randomized controlled trial to compare treatment strategies as conservative or surgical procedures were included. Reviews are not selected for further qualitative analysis. The following outcome parameters were compared: range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (Quick-DASH), recurrent instability, pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and time to return to work (RW). RESULTS: Early mobilization after conservative treatment strategies showed improved ROM compared to immobilization for up to 3 weeks after surgery with less extension deficit in the early mobilization group (16° ± 13°. vs. 19.5° ± 3°, p < 0.05), as well as excellent clinical outcome scores. Surgical approaches showed similar results compared to conservative treatment, leading to improved ROM (115 vs. 118 ± 2.8) and MEPS: 95 ± 7 vs. 92 ± 4. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment with early functional training of the elbow remains the first-line therapy for simple elbow dislocation. The surgical procedure provides similar outcomes compared to conservative treatment regarding MEPS and ROM for patients with slight initial instability in physical examination and radiographs. People with red flags for persistent instability, such as severe bilateral ligament injuries and moderate to severe instability during initial physical examination, should be considered for a primary surgical approach to prevent recurrent posterolateral and valgus instability. Postoperative early mobilization and early mobilization for conservatively treated patients is beneficial to improve patient outcome and ROM.

Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance is significantly decreased by medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy.

PURPOSE: While medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) has been used to address patella instability combined with valgus malalignment, its impact on patellofemoral parameters remains uncharted. Hence, this study seeks to establish a three-dimensional (3D) planning of MCWDFO and measure its effect on the tibial tubercle - trochlear groove distance (TTTG) through simulation and calculation. METHODS: MCWDFO with a stepwise increment of one-degree varisation (1°-15°) was performed on 3D surface models of 14 lower extremities with valgus malalignment and 24 lower extremities with neutral alignment of the lower limb, resulting in a total of 608 simulations. Anatomic landmarks were employed to measure hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), TTTG, and femoral torsion for each simulation. A mathematical formula was adopted to calculate TTTG changes following MCWDFO, and subsequently the mean simulated and calculated TTTG values were compared. Following a standardised protocol, MCWDFO was performed without rotational changes. RESULTS: MCWDFO exhibited an almost linear reduction in TTTG, at a rate of approximately -1.05 ± 0.13 mm per 1° of varisation, demonstrating a strong negative correlation (R = -0.83; p < 0.001). Limb alignment did not exert an influence on TTTG change; however, it correlated with tibial plateau width. The mean difference between the simulated and calculated TTTG values amounted to 0.03 ± 0.03 mm per 1° varisation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The TTTG distance is linearly reduced by 1.05 mm for every 1° of varisation within the varus correction range of 0°-15° during MCWDFO. Patients with combined valgus and patellar instability may benefit from MCWDFO due to frequently pathological TTTG. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, descriptive laboratory study.

Low postoperative complication rate with high survival rate and good clinical outcome 9 years after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee joint.

PURPOSE: To investigate postoperative complications and associated risk factors for failure following autologous chondrocyte transplantation ("ACT") as well as its long-term survival and clinical function. It was hypothesized that ACT is a safe technique for cartilage repair with a low incidence of postoperative complications and rare rates of revision surgery combined with a high long-term survival and good to excellent clinical outcome in long-term-follow-up. METHODS: All patients undergoing ACT-Cs of the knee joint between 2006 and 2012 at the author's institution were included in this retrospective study. Concomitant procedures had been performed if necessary. Early postoperative complications, revision surgeries, failure and risk factors for those events were evaluated 6 months after the surgery. Long-term clinical outcome was assessed using the Lysholm Score, the Tegner Score, a 10-grade scale for satisfaction and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at a minimum follow-up of 9 years postoperatively. Long-term survival was calculated using revision surgeries, clinical failures and conversion procedures to create a Kaplan-Meier analysis. A subgroup analysis for different defect locations was performed. 139 patients were included in this study (27% female/ 73%male; age 26.7 [21.7; 35.2] years). The median defect size was 4.0 [3.0; 6.0] cm2 (40% medial femoral condyle (MFC), 17% lateral femoral condyle (LFC), 36% patella, 19% trochlea). 97 (70%) of the patients had undergone previous surgery and 84 (60%) underwent concomitant procedures. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 8% of patients had complications (4% bleeding, 2% arthrofibrosis, 2% infection), 7% of patients needed revision surgery. 12% of patients had a prolonged deficit in ROM, that did not require revision surgery. No significant difference in terms of complications was found between the patellofemoral and femorotibial group. Patients demonstrated good patient reported long-term outcomes 9-15 years after the index surgery (Tegner: 4.7 ± 1.8; VAS: 2.4 ± 2.1; Lysholm: 80 ± 14; satisfaction with operation: 7.3 ± 1.9). Survival rates were 88% at 9 years, 85% at 11 years, and 85% at 13 years after the index procedure. Reasons for failure included debridement of ACT (n = 4; 5%), revision ACT (n = 3, 3%), conversion to total knee arthroplasty (n = 3, 3%) and conversion to High tibial osteotomy (HTO) (n = 1; 1%)). CONCLUSION: The present study indicates ACT as an effective treatment option for femorotibial- as well as patellofemoral cartilage defects with a high long-term survival and low conversion rate as well as good long-term results regarding knee function and satisfaction. Postoperative complications needing revision surgery are rare. Prolongated deficits of range of motion appear frequently up to six months especially in patellofemoral defects, but can often be successfully addressed by intensified physiotherapy without requiring an arthrolysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Improved Clinical Outcome and High Rate of Return to Low-Impact Sport and Work After Knee Double Level Osteotomy for Bifocal Varus Malalignment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate return to sport (RTS) and work (RTW), as well as clinical outcomes following double level osteotomy (DLO) via combined medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy and lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy for bifocal symptomatic varus malalignment, and to compare these outcome parameters between patients undergoing a single surgery and those undergoing a two-stage procedure. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent DLO for symptomatic varus malalignment between 12/2007 and 03/2018 were enrolled. Patients converted to arthroplasty (n = 3) during follow-up were excluded. Outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, which were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. RTS and RTW were evaluated by questionnaire. Outcome measures were compared between DLO performed in a single- versus a two-stage surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (mean age: 44.2 ± 12.6 years), who underwent DLO for varus malalignment (10.1° ± 2.9°) were included at a mean follow-up of 56.9 ± 35.3 months (range: 24-148). Compared to preoperatively, these patients significantly improved in IKDC (50.4 ± 13.9 to 66.1 ± 15.4; P < .001), WOMAC (29.7 ± 19.2 to 11.8 ± 13.5; P < .001) and Lysholm (53.6 ± 23.6 to 73.1 ± 23.6; P = .002) scores at final follow-up. For the WOMAC score, 78% of the patients included reached the minimally important clinical difference, along with a significant reduction of the VAS for pain (5.0 ± 3.0 to 2.5 ± 2.4; P < .001). Postoperatively, 96% of patients returned to sport after 7.7 ± 4.8 months, but at a lower frequency (P = .010) and to fewer disciplines (P = .005) with a shift to low-impact sports. 90% of the patients returned to work at a mean 5.9 ± 9.4 months, with 79% reporting a similar or superior working ability. Patients undergoing a two-stage procedure recovered to full physical working ability at a significantly longer duration, as compared to a single-stage procedure (9.8 ± 3.8 vs 9.0 ± 13.1 months; P = .047). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients undergoing DLO for symptomatic varus malalignment, who were not converted to arthroplasty, experienced clinically significant functional improvement at mid-term follow-up. Return to sport and work rates in these patients were high; however, a shift to lower-impact sports disciplines was observed. Similar clinical outcomes can be expected when performing DLO in a single surgery or a two-stage procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series; Level IV.

High return to sports and return to work rates after anatomic lateral ankle ligament reconstruction with tendon autograft for isolated chronic lateral ankle instability.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes as well as return to sports (RTS) and return to work (RTW) rates following anatomic lateral ankle ligament reconstruction with a tendon autograft for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) in a high-risk population, and to compare these outcome parameters between patients having received a gracilis tendon autograft (GT) and free split peroneus brevis tendon (PBT) autograft. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients, who were diagnosed with CLAI, presenting with ≥ 1 risk factor (ligamentous hyperlaxity, insufficient substance of native ligament and/or high-demand athlete), who underwent ankle ligament reconstruction with a tendon autograft between January 2011 and December 2018, were included in this retrospective study. At 63.7 ± 28.0 months (24-112), 23 patients with a mean age of 29.7 ± 10.9 years were available for follow-up. The Karlsson Score, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the Tegner Activity Scale and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were collected at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. RTS and RTW were evaluated by questionnaire. A subgroup analysis with regard to the graft used for ankle ligament reconstruction (GT versus PBT) was performed. RESULTS: Patients reported a Karlsson score of 82.1 ± 17.5 (37-100), a FAOS score of 87.8 ± 8.4 (73-99), a median Tegner activity scale of 5.0 (IQR 4-6) and a VAS for pain of 0.5 ± 0.9 (0-4) at rest and of 2.0 ± 2.1 (0-7) during activities at final follow-up. Postoperatively, 96% of patients had returned to sports after 8.3 ± 6.2 months. All patients (100%) had returned to work at 3.5 ± 5.7 (0-24) months, with 87% reporting an equal or improved working ability compared to that preoperatively. Postoperatively, exercise hours per week were significantly reduced compared to preoperatively in patients with a split PBT (n = 12; 13.0 ± 12.9 to 5.6 ± 6.4 h, p = 0.038) autograft as opposed to patients with a GT autograft (n = 11; 13.1 ± 8.7 to 12.4 ± 7.1 h, n.s.). No other group differences were observed. CONCLUSION: Good patient-reported outcomes as well as excellent RTS and RTW rates can be achieved in high-risk patients undergoing ankle ligament reconstruction with a tendon autograft for CLAI. These results may be helpful in preoperatively managing patients' expectations regarding sports- and work-related outcomes and provide tangible data on the expectable time frame of the individual return to sports and work trajectory. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Excellent clinical and radiological outcomes after both open flake refixation and autologous chondrocyte implantation following acute patella dislocation and concomitant flake fractures.

PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging results of patients undergoing patella stabilization with either open flake refixation (oFR) or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and concomitant soft tissue patella stabilization after sustaining primary, acute patella dislocation with confirmed chondral and/or osteochondral flake fractures. It was hypothesized that refixation will lead to better results than ACI at mid-term follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify all patients undergoing oFR or ACI after sustaining (osteo-)chondral flake fractures and concomitant soft tissue patella stabilization following primary, acute patella dislocation between 01/2012 and 09/2018 at the author's institution. Patients were excluded if they were aged < 14 years or > 30 and had previous knee surgeries at the index knee. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Tegner activity score, Kujala score, subjective IKDC score, and the KOOS score at a minimum follow-up of 24 months postoperatively. MR images were assessed using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) 2.0 knee score. Thirty patients were included in the study, with 16 patients assorted to the oFR group and 14 patients to the ACI group (Follow-up 81%). RESULTS: Demographic data did not show significant group differences (oFR: 6 females, 10 males; age 26.9 ± 5.6 years, FU: 57 months (27-97 months); ACI: 9 females, 5 males; age 25.5 ± 4.9 years, FU: 51 months (29-91 months); n.s.). Defect location was similar in both groups (oFR: 12 × patella/4 × lateral femoral condyle; ACI: 12/2; n.s.). Both groups showed excellent clinical outcomes, with no statistically significant difference between both the groups (oFR group vs. ACI group: Tegner: 5.1 ± 1.8 vs. 5.1 ± 1.4; Kujala: 86.1 ± 12.6 vs. 84.9 ± 9.1; IKDC: 83.8 ± 15.0 vs. 83.6 ± 11.3; KOOS: 83.3 ± 14.0 vs. 83.6 ± 12.0; n.s.). One patient in each group suffered a patella re-dislocation and needed revision surgery. The MOCART 2.0 score showed good results for the oFR group (68.2 ± 11.1) and the ACI group (61.1 ± 16.9) while no significant differences were noted between both the groups. The inter-rater reliability was excellent (0.847). CONCLUSION: Open refixation of (osteo-)chondral fragments in patients after sustaining acute patella dislocation with (osteo)-chondral flake fractures led to good clinical and radiological results at a minimum follow of 24 months, showing that it is a good surgical option in the treatment algorithm. However, if open refixation is not possible, ACI may be an excellent fallback option in these younger patients with equally good clinical and radiological outcomes, but requiring a second minimally invasive surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits.

PURPOSE: To determine the sensorimotor and clinical function of patients with confirmed successful outcome after either undergoing acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization, Bankart repair (BR), or rotator cuff repair (RC), and to compare these measures to the contralateral, healthy side without history of previous injuries or surgeries of the upper extremity. It was hypothesized that patients of each interventional group would have inferior sensorimotor function of the shoulder joint compared to the contralateral, healthy side, while presenting with successful clinical and functional outcomes. METHODS: Three intervention groups including ten patients who had confirmed successful clinical and functional outcomes after either undergoing ACJ stabilization, BR, or RC were evaluated postoperatively at an average follow-up of 31.7 ± 11.6 months. Additionally, a healthy control group (CG) of ten patients was included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley (CM) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Sensorimotor function was assessed by determining the center of pressure (COP) of the shoulder joint in a one-handed support task in supine position on a validated pressure plate. RESULTS: Each interventional group demonstrated excellent clinical outcome scores including the CM Score (ACJ 83.3 ± 11.8; BR 89.0 ± 10.3; RC 81.4 ± 8.8), ASES Score (ACJ 95.5 ± 7.0; BR 92.5 ± 9.6; RC 96.5 ± 5.2), and VAS (ACJ 0.5 ± 0.9; BR 0.5 ± 0.8; RC 0.5 ± 0.8). Overall, the CG showed no significant side-to-side difference in COP, whereas the ACJ-group and the BR-group demonstrated significantly increased COP compared to the healthy side (ACJ 103 cm vs. 98 cm, p = 0.049; BR: 116 cm vs. 102 cm, p = 0.006). The RC-group revealed no significant side-to-side difference (120 cm vs. 108 cm, n.s.). CONCLUSION: Centre of pressure measurement detected sensorimotor functional deficits following surgical treatment of the shoulder joint in patients with confirmed successful clinical and functional outcomes. This may indicate that specific postoperative training and rehabilitation protocols should be established for patients who underwent surgery of the upper extremity. These results underline that sensorimotor training should be an important component of postoperative rehabilitation and physiotherapeutic activities to improve postoperative function and joint control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps or hamstring autografts leads to similar results after 4 years: good objective stability but low rate of return to pre-injury sport level.

PURPOSE: Due to the increased importance of revision ACL reconstruction, this study aims to evaluate the outcome 4 years after the surgery, compare two revision strategies and identify factors that influence the results. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients who received a revision ACL reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. All patients were assessed with an average follow-up of 4.4 years (range 3.3-5.5 years). The results of patients treated with a quadriceps autograft were compared with those treated with a hamstring autograft. RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of patients had a KT-1000 side-to-side difference of ≤ 5 mm (mean 1.7 ± 2.0 mm). Pivot-shift test was absent or minor in 95%. In the SLTH-test, 70% of patients reached 90% of the contralateral side. The mean Lysholm score on follow-up was 83 ± 12 (56% excellent/good). The mean IKDC 2000 subjective evaluation score was 81 ± 14 (58% normal/almost normal). The median Tegner activity score was 6 (range 3-10), a median of 2 levels worse than before the first injury. Return to sport rate was 89% but only 34% of patients reached their pre-injury sport level. Most common cause for this reduction was fear of another injury. Three patients suffered a re-rupture. Patients with a hamstring autograft performed pivoting sports more often, but had worse pivot-shift results compared to those with a quadriceps autograft. No significant influence was seen for other parameters. Young, male patients with a high activity level and no chondral damage had the best results. CONCLUSION: Through revision ACL reconstruction, the goal of stabilizing the knee can be achieved in the majority of patients. However, a good function and a high activity level are significantly less common in these patients. The main reason for this is fear of a renewed ACL-injury. Both quadriceps and hamstring autografts were able to achieve a good outcome. Young, male, patients with a normal BMI, a high activity level and without cartilage damage seem to benefit the most from revision ACL surgery. The discrepancy between the good laxity restoration and the lower activity rate should therefore be a main point in clinical counseling when deciding for or against revision ACL-Reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Evaluation of Conventional MR Imaging of the Shoulder in the Diagnosis of Lesions of the Biceps Pulley.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of conventional MR imaging (MRI) of the shoulder in evaluating biceps pulley lesions using arthroscopy as the standard of reference. METHODS: In a retrospective study, MR examinations of 68 patients with arthroscopically proven torn or intact biceps pulley were assessed for the presence of pulley lesions by three radiologists. The following criteria were evaluated: displacement of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) relative to the subscapularis tendon (displacement sign), subluxation/dislocation of the LHBT, the integrity of the superior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL) and the coracohumeral ligament (CHL), lesions of the supraspinatus (SSP) and subscapularis (SSC) tendons adjacent to the rotator interval, presence of biceps tendinopathy and subacromial bursitis. RESULTS: There were 42 patients with pulley lesions in the study group. Conventional MR imaging showed an overall sensitivity of 95.2%, 88.1% and 92.9%, a specificity of 61.5%, 73.1%, and 80.8% and an accuracy of 82.4%, 82.4% and 88.2% in the diagnosis of pulley lesions. Interobserver agreement was substantial (multirater k = 0.75). Biceps tendinopathy (97.6%, 95.2%, 97.6%), defects of the SGHL (86.3%, 81.0%, 88.1%) and the displacement sign (88.1%, 81.0%, 85.7%) were the most sensitive diagnostic criteria. Subluxation/dislocation of the LHBT was insensitive (78.6%, 42.9%, 33.3%), but specific (69.2%, 100,0%, 96.2%). CONCLUSION: In the diagnosis of pulley lesions, conventional MR imaging is reproducible and shows high sensitivity and accuracy but moderate specificity.

Multicentric development and validation of a multi-scale and multi-task deep learning model for comprehensive lower extremity alignment analysis.

Osteoarthritis of the knee, a widespread cause of knee disability, is commonly treated in orthopedics due to its rising prevalence. Lower extremity misalignment, pivotal in knee injury etiology and management, necessitates comprehensive mechanical alignment evaluation via frequently-requested weight-bearing long leg radiographs (LLR). Despite LLR's routine use, current analysis techniques are error-prone and time-consuming. To address this, we conducted a multicentric study to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for fully automated leg alignment assessment on anterior-posterior LLR, targeting enhanced reliability and efficiency. The DL model, developed using 594 patients' LLR and a 60%/10%/30% data split for training, validation, and testing, executed alignment analyses via a multi-step process, employing a detection network and nine specialized networks. It was designed to assess all vital anatomical and mechanical parameters for standard clinical leg deformity analysis and preoperative planning. Accuracy, reliability, and assessment duration were compared with three specialized orthopedic surgeons across two distinct institutional datasets (136 and 143 radiographs). The algorithm exhibited equivalent performance to the surgeons in terms of alignment accuracy (DL: 0.21 ± 0.18°to 1.06 ± 1.3°vs. OS: 0.21 ± 0.16°to 1.72 ± 1.96°), interrater reliability (ICC DL: 0.90 ± 0.05 to 1.0 ± 0.0 vs. ICC OS: 0.90 ± 0.03 to 1.0 ± 0.0), and clinically acceptable accuracy (DL: 53.9%-100% vs OS 30.8%-100%). Further, automated analysis significantly reduced analysis time compared to manual annotation (DL: 22 ± 0.6 s vs. OS; 101.7 ± 7 s, p ≤ 0.01). By demonstrating that our algorithm not only matches the precision of expert surgeons but also significantly outpaces them in both speed and consistency of measurements, our research underscores a pivotal advancement in harnessing AI to enhance clinical efficiency and decision-making in orthopaedics.