Supine versus lateral position for total hip replacement: accuracy of biomechanical reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Restoration of normal hip anatomy and biomechanics is a key surgical goal for success in total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence, if any, that patient positioning in the supine and lateral decubitus positions has in achieving this goal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single center multi-surgeon case-matched series from a tertiary level referral center of patients undergoing primary unilateral THA for osteoarthritis between April 2018 and December 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Patients (n = 200) were divided into two matched groups: supine (anterior approach, n = 100) and lateral decubitus (direct lateral or posterior/SuperPATH™ approaches, n = 100). Post-operative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were analyzed using a previously validated software (SurgiMap, Nemaris Inc., USA) for parameters of reconstruction of the hip in the coronal plane; leg length discrepancy, vertical and horizontal displacement of the center of rotation, femoral offset, and total offset. RESULTS: Mean absolute leg length discrepancy in the supine group was 0.6 ± 3.3 mm (95% [CI] - 0.1 to 1.2 mm) versus 2.4 ± 3.8 mm (95% [CI] 1.6 to 3.1) in the lateral decubitus position (p < 0.001). The center of rotation was displaced medially by a mean of 3.2 ± 2.7 mm in the supine group versus 1.3 ± 4.0 mm in the lateral decubitus group (p < 0.001). For a surgical target of reconstructing both leg length and total offset within 5 mm of native anatomy, the supine group was more than twice as likely to achieve these goals with fewer outliers (OR 2.631, 95% [CI] 1.901-3.643) (76% v 30%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Total hip arthroplasty through the anterior approach in the supine position is more consistent and accurate for the restoration of leg length and total offset. Further study is required to assess how this translates with outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III-retrospective cohort study.

Association of muscle fiber type with measures of obesity: A systematic review.

Obesity derives from an extended period of positive energy imbalance due to a complex interplay of environmental and biological factors. Muscle fiber type and physiology have been hypothesized to affect metabolism and energy expenditure and thus to affect an individual's propensity to gain weight. However, there have been conflicting reports regarding a relationship between muscle fiber type and obesity. Here, we systematically reviewed literature investigating this topic from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Of these, 32 articles were included in our final review and analysis. Most studies (22/32) reported a significant relationship between muscle fiber-type proportion and a measure of obesity. Overall, there was a significant negative relationship between the proportion of type I fibers and body mass index (BMI) and a significant positive relationship between the proportion of type IIX fibers and BMI. Moreover, between-group comparisons indicated a greater prevalence of type IIX fibers and a lower prevalence of type I fibers in patients living with obesity relative to lean individuals. These significant relationships were confirmed in a meta-analysis of these data. The causal nature of these associations remains to be evaluated.