RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Developing countries have a significantly higher incidence of breast cancer in patients younger than 40 years as compared to developed countries. This study aimed to examine if young age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for worse survival outcomes in breast cancer as well as the effect of age on Disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) after adjusting for various tumor characteristics, local and systemic treatments. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of prospective cohort of patients from two existing databases. We identified patients with breast cancer aged 40 years or less and we matched them to those older than 40 years. We also matched based on stage and molecular subtypes. In cohort 1, we matched at a ratio of 1:1, while in cohort 2 we matched at a ratio of 1:3. RESULTS: In cohort 1, Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly shorter for those younger than 40 years (75.6% and 92.7% respectively; p < 0.03). On multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy was found to be significant, while age was not found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. Local recurrence free survival at 5 years was similar between both age categories. Only hormonal therapy is a significant predictor for LRFS at 5 years. In the second cohort, DFS and LRFS at 3 years were similar between those younger and those older than 40 years. On multivariate analysis, no factor including age was found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. CONCLUSION: Data in the literature is controversial on the effect of young age on breast cancer prognosis. Our findings could not demonstrate that age is an independent prognostic factor in our population. There is a need for outcomes from larger, prospective series that have longer follow-ups and more data from our region.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Feminino , Adulto , Líbano/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Prognóstico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Resultado do Tratamento , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
The Mediterranean Region registers an increasing prevalence of obesity. The region lacks a diet screener to assess obesogenic nutrients. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of the Modified Mediterranean Prime Screen (MMPS) in estimating obesogenic nutrients' intake among women of reproductive age, as compared with a culturally validated Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), in Lebanon. We developed the MMPS consisting of thirty-two food/beverage items specific to the Lebanese Mediterranean culture. The MMPS and FFQ were administered in two visits (2 weeks-6 months apart), face to face and via telephone during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The reproducibility and validity of the MMPS were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Pearson's correlations, respectively. The study included 143 women, aged 31·5 (sd 4·6) years, BMI 24·2 (sd 4·0) kg/m2, 87 % with university education and 91 % food secure. The reproducibility of the MMPS was moderate for energy and all assessed nutrients except for SFA (ICC = 0·428). The agreement of the MMPS with the reference FFQ was adequate for energy and obesogenic nutrients. Yet, the Pearson correlations for energy-adjusted nutrient intake were low for trans-fatty acids (0·294) and PUFA (0·377). The MMPS can be a time-efficient tool for dietary assessment of energy and many obesogenic nutrients. Future studies should validate the MMPS across the lifespan and re-evaluate it after updating the fatty acid profiles in the culturally specific food composition tables.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bilateral neck exploration (BNE) is the traditional approach to sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. With the availability of the preoperative imaging techniques and intraoperative parathyroid hormone assays, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) is fast becoming the favoured surgical approach. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) guided by preoperative imaging and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring versus bilateral neck exploration (BNE) for the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search of all databases was 21 October 2019. There were no language restrictions applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing MIP to BNE for the treatment of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism in persons undergoing surgery for the first time. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance. Two review authors independently screened for inclusion, extracted data and carried out risk of bias assessment. The content expert senior author resolved conflicts. We assessed studies for overall certainty of the evidence using the GRADE instrument. We conducted meta-analyses using a random-effects model and performed statistical analyses according to the guidelines in the latest version of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. MAIN RESULTS: We identified five eligible studies, all conducted in European university hospitals. They included 266 adults, 136 participants were randomised to MIP and 130 participants to BNE. Data were available for all participants post-surgery up to one year, with the exception of missing data for two participants in the MIP group and for one participant in the BNE group at one year. Nine participants in the MIP group and 11 participants in the BNE group had missing data at five years. No study had a low risk of bias in all risk of bias domains. The risk ratio (RR) for success rate (eucalcaemia) at six months in the MIP group compared to the BNE group was 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.03; P = 0.43; 5 studies, 266 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A total of 132/136 (97.1%) participants in the MIP group compared with 129/130 (99.2%) participants in the BNE group were judged as operative success. At five years, the RR was 0.94 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.08; P = 0.38; 1 study, 77 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A total of 34/38 (89.5%) participants in the MIP group compared with 37/39 (94.9%) participants in the BNE group were judged as operative success. The RR for the total incidence of perioperative adverse events was 0.50, in favour of MIP (95% CI 0.33 to 0.76; P = 0.001; 5 studies, 236 participants; low-certainty evidence). Perioperative adverse events occurred in 23/136 (16.9%) participants in the MIP group compared with 44/130 (33.9%) participants in the BNE group. The 95% prediction interval ranged between 0.25 and 0.99. These adverse events included symptomatic hypocalcaemia, vocal cord palsy, bleeding, fever and infection. Fifteen of 104 (14.4%) participants experienced symptomatic hypocalcaemia in the MIP group compared with 26/98 (26.5%) participants in the BNE group. The RR for this event comparing MIP with BNE at two days was 0.54 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.92; P = 0.02; 4 studies, 202 participants). Statistical significance was lost in sensitivity analyses, with a 95% prediction interval ranging between 0.17 and 1.74. Five out of 133 (3.8%) participants in the MIP group experienced vocal cord paralysis compared with 2/128 (1.6%) participants in the BNE group. The RR for this event was 1.87 (95% CI 0.47 to 7.51; P = 0.38; 5 studies, 261 participants). The 95% prediction interval ranged between 0.20 and 17.87. The effect on all-cause mortality was not explicitly reported and could not be adequately assessed (very low-certainty evidence). There was no clear difference for health-related quality of life between the treatment groups in two studies, but studies did not report numerical data (very low-certainty evidence). There was a possible treatment benefit for MIP compared to BNE in terms of cosmetic satisfaction (very low-certainty evidence). The mean difference (MD) for duration of surgery comparing BNE with MIP was in favour of the MIP group (-18 minutes, 95% CI -31 to -6; P = 0.004; 3 studies, 171 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The 95% prediction interval ranged between -162 minutes and 126 minutes. The studies did not report length of hospital stay. Four studies reported intraoperative conversion rate from MIP to open procedure information. Out of 115 included participants, there were 24 incidences of conversion, amounting to a conversion rate of 20.8%. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The success rates of MIP and BNE at six months were comparable. There were similar results at five years, but these were only based on one study. The incidence of perioperative symptomatic hypocalcaemia was lower in the MIP compared to the BNE group, whereas the incidence of vocal cord paralysis tended to be higher. Our systematic review did not provide clear evidence for the superiority of MIP over BNE. However, it was limited by low-certainty to very low-certainty evidence.
Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/diagnóstico por imagem , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/cirurgia , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Paratireoidectomia/métodos , Adulto , Viés , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/sangue , Hipocalcemia/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Pescoço/cirurgia , Esvaziamento Cervical/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Paratireoidectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Paralisia das Pregas Vocais/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The substantial increase in the burden of non-communicable diseases in general and osteoporosis in particular, necessitates the establishment of efficient and targeted diagnosis and treatment strategies. This chapter reviews and compares different tools for osteoporosis screening and diagnosis; it also provides an overview of different treatment guidelines adopted by countries worldwide. While access to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density (BMD) is limited in most areas in the world, the introduction of risk calculators that combine risk factors, with or without BMD, have resulted in a paradigm shift in osteoporosis screening and management. To-date, forty eight risk assessment tools that allow risk stratification of patients are available, however only few are externally validated and tested in a population-based setting. These include Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool; Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument; Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation; Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada calculator; Fracture Risk Assessment Calculator (FRAX); Garvan; and QFracture. These tools vary in the number of risk factors incorporated. We present a detailed analysis of the development, characteristics, validation, performance, advantages and limitations of these tools. The World Health Organization proposes a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-BMD T-score ≤ -2.5 as an operational diagnostic threshold for osteoporosis, and many countries have also adopted this cut-off as an intervention threshold in their treatment guidelines. With the introduction of the new fracture assessment calculators, many countries chose to include fracture risk as one of the major criteria to initiate osteoporosis treatment. Of the 52 national guidelines identified in 36 countries, 30 included FRAX derived risk in their intervention threshold and 22 were non-FRAX based. No universal tool or guideline approach will address the needs of all countries worldwide. Osteoporosis screening and management guidelines are best tailored according to the needs and resources of individual counties. While few countries have succeeded in generating valuable epidemiological data on osteoporotic fractures, to validate their risk calculators and base their guidelines, many have yet to find the resources to assess variations and secular trends in fractures, the performance of various calculators, and ultimately adopt the most convenient care pathway algorithms.
Assuntos
Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Absorciometria de Fóton , África/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Algoritmos , Ásia/epidemiologia , Densidade Óssea , Osso Esponjoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Saúde Global , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , América Latina/epidemiologia , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etnologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Estudos de Validação como AssuntoRESUMO
The International Society for Clinical Densitometry Official Revised Positions on reporting of densitometry results in children represent current expert recommendations to assist health care providers determine which skeletal sites should be measured, which, if any, adjustments should be made, reference databases to be used, and the elements to include in a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry report. The recommended scanning sites remain the total body less head and the posterior-anterior spine. Other sites such as the proximal femur, lateral distal femur, lateral vertebral assessment, and forearm are discussed but are only recommended for specific pediatric populations. Different methods of interpreting bone density scans in children with short stature or growth delay are presented. The use of bone mineral apparent density and height-adjusted Z-scores are recommended as suitable size adjustment techniques. The validity of appropriate reference databases and technical considerations to consider when upgrading software and hardware remain unchanged. Updated reference data sets for all contemporary bone densitometers are listed. The inclusion of relevant demographic and health information, technical details of the scan, Z-scores, and the wording "low bone mass or bone density" for Z-scores less than or equal to -2.0 standard deviation are still recommended for clinical practice. The rationale and evidence for the development of the Official Positions are provided. Changes in the grading of quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, and worldwide applicability represent a change in current evidence and/or differences in opinion of the expert panelists used to validate the position statements for the 2013 Position Development Conference.
Assuntos
Absorciometria de Fóton/normas , Adolescente , Determinação da Idade pelo Esqueleto/normas , Composição Corporal , Estatura , Criança , Documentação/normas , Humanos , Pediatria/normas , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Terminologia como AssuntoRESUMO
This retrospective study investigates the prevalence of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) among patients admitted with hip and shaft fractures at a tertiary referral center in Beirut, Lebanon. We analyzed electronic medical records and radiology studies of patients aged above 40 admitted with hip and shaft fractures between January 2006 and December 2019. Fractures were confirmed by ICD9 or ICD10 codes. All cases were reviewed by radiologists, and AFFs were identified according to the 2013 revised ASBMR criteria. We identified 1366 hip and shaft fracture patients, of which 14 female patients had 19 AFFs. This represents a prevalence of 1.0% among all hip and shaft fractures patients and 1.7% among all female hip and shaft fracture patients. Bilateral AFFs were found in 5 of the 14 patients. Patients with AFF tended to be younger, with a mean age of 74.3 (±8.6) yr compared to 78.0 (±10.6) for patients with non-AFF fractures. A total of 36% of AFF patients had a prior history of non-traumatic fracture at first admission. A high percentage of patients with AFFs reported intake of proton pump inhibitors (42.9%) and glucocorticoids (21.4%). Bisphosphonate exposure was noted in 64.3% of AFF patients. None of the AFF patients were active smokers or consumed alcohol regularly. BMD assessments were available for 7 AFF patients, indicating osteoporosis in 4 and osteopenia in 3 cases. Hip axis length measurements showed no significant difference between AFF patients (N = 7) and sex and age-matched controls (N = 21). The study underlines the prevalence and characteristics of AFFs in Lebanon, which is consistent with the numbers reported in the literature (0.32%-5%). A larger prospective study that includes hospitals across the nation is needed to gain a more comprehensive view of the prevalence of AFFs in the Lebanese population.
RESUMO
Bone mass and body composition traits are genetically programmed, but the timing and gender and site specificities of their heritability are unclear. Mother-child correlations of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content, lean mass, and fat mass were studied in 169 premenopausal mothers and their 239 children. Heritability estimates of lean mass, fat mass, BMD, and area were derived for each gender and pubertal stage. There were significant correlations for most densitometry-derived variables at the spine, hip, femoral neck (FN), and total body (r=0.192-0.388) in mother-postmenarcheal daughter pairs, for bone areas at all sites in early puberty (r=0.229-0.508) and for volumetric-derived density at FN and spine (r=0.238-0.368) in mother-son pairs. Fat mass correlations were significant in both genders after puberty (r=0.299-0.324) and lean mass in postmenarcheal girls only (r = 0.299). Heritability estimates varied between 21% and 37% for mother-daughter and 18% and 35% for mother-son pairs for density-derived variables and between 26% and 40% for body composition variables. Maternal inheritance of bone traits is expressed in early-pubertal boys for several skeletal site traits but consistently involves most site traits in girls and boys by late puberty. Body composition inheritance is more variable.
Assuntos
Composição Corporal/genética , Osso e Ossos/fisiologia , Padrões de Herança , Adolescente , Adulto , Densidade Óssea/genética , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mães , Núcleo Familiar , Puberdade/fisiologia , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Integrating shared decision making between patients and physicians and incorporating their values and preferences in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is of critical importance to optimize CPG implementation and treatment adherence. This applies to many debilitating diseases, including hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate patient and physician values, preferences, and attitudes to better inform CPGs to treat HCM in adults. METHODS: We followed a mixed-methods approach. We conducted a systematic review using 5 databases to identify studies reporting on patient and physician values, costs and resources, feasibility, acceptability, and equity regarding HCM treatment. We also gathered data from different countries on the cost of multiple treatment modalities. We collected data on outcome prioritization from the CPG Working Group. Similarly, we collected data from patients with HCM regarding outcome prioritization and administered a questionnaire to evaluate their attitudes and perceptions toward treatment as well as treatment acceptability and feasibility. RESULTS: In the systematic review, we included 2 cross-sectional surveys conducted on the same population of physicians who agreed that treating HCM alleviates symptoms and improves quality of life; however, harms and benefits should be thoroughly considered when deciding on the duration of treatment. We also included 2 studies on cost showing that intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate is more cost-effective than a combination of IV bisphosphonate and calcitonin and administration of IV zoledronic acid at home is more cost-effective than other IV bisphosphonates. The cost of zoledronic acid, denosumab, and cinacalcet varied widely among countries and types (brand vs generic). Both the CPG Working Group and patients with HCM agreed that the most important outcomes when deciding on treatment were survival and resolution of HCM, but there was some variability in the ratings for other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Using mixed methods, CPG developers can obtain meaningful information regarding evidence to decision criteria. In the case of HCM CPGs, this approach has provided the required contextual information and supported the development of evidence-based recommendations.
Assuntos
Hipercalcemia , Neoplasias , Adulto , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/terapia , Hipercalcemia/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This work aims to review and discuss controversial topics in the field of vitamin D, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and COVID-19. METHODS: The International Conferences "Controversies in Vitamin D" are a series of workshops that started in 2017 featuring international experts and leaders in vitamin D research and clinical practice. The fifth annual conference was held in Stresa, Italy, September 15 to 18, 2021. EVIDENCE: Before the event, participants reviewed available studies on their assigned topic, drafted a related abstract, and presented their findings at the time of the conference. Relevant literature that became available since was also discussed within the panel and updated accordingly. CONSENSUS: Before the event, the drafted abstracts had been merged to prepare a preliminary document. After the conference presentations, in-depth discussions in open sessions led to consensus. The document was subsequently modified according to discussions and up-to-date literature inclusion. CONCLUSIONS: There is quite consistent evidence for an association between low 25 OH vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and poor COVID-19 outcomes, despite heterogeneous publications of variable quality. However, the low vitamin D status in COVID-19 patients might also reflect reverse causality. Vitamin D supplementation might have a positive role in COVID-19 prevention. The evidence supporting a beneficial effect of vitamin D treatment in decreasing the risk of COVID-19 complications is conflicting. Conclusive statements regarding the beneficial effect of vitamin D in this context await high-quality, randomized controlled trials.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Deficiência de Vitamina D , Humanos , Consenso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Vitaminas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) is the most common metabolic complication of malignancies, but its incidence may be declining due to potent chemotherapeutic agents. The high mortality associated with HCM has declined markedly due to the introduction of increasingly effective chemotherapeutic drugs. Despite the widespread availability of efficacious medications to treat HCM, evidence-based recommendations to manage this debilitating condition are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines for the treatment of adults with HCM. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of clinical experts, together with experts in systematic literature review, identified and prioritized 8 clinical questions related to the treatment of HCM in adult patients. The systematic reviews (SRs) queried electronic databases for studies relevant to the selected questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations. An independent SR was conducted in parallel to assess patients' and physicians' values and preferences, costs, resources needed, acceptability, feasibility, equity, and other domains relevant to the Evidence-to-Decision framework as well as to enable judgements and recommendations. RESULTS: The panel recommends (strong recommendation) in adults with HCM treatment with denosumab (Dmab) or an intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate (BP). The following recommendations were based on low certainty of the evidence. The panel suggests (conditional recommendation) (1) in adults with HCM, the use of Dmab rather than an IV BP; (2) in adults with severe HCM, a combination of calcitonin and an IV BP or Dmab therapy as initial treatment; and (3) in adults with refractory/recurrent HCM despite treatment with BP, the use of Dmab. The panel suggests (conditional recommendation) the addition of an IV BP or Dmab in adult patients with hypercalcemia due to tumors associated with high calcitriol levels who are already receiving glucocorticoid therapy but continue to have severe or symptomatic HCM. The panel suggests (conditional recommendation) in adult patients with hypercalcemia due to parathyroid carcinoma, treatment with either a calcimimetic or an antiresorptive (IV BP or Dmab). The panel judges the treatments as probably accessible and feasible for most recommendations but noted variability in costs, resources required, and their impact on equity. CONCLUSIONS: The panel's recommendations are based on currently available evidence considering the most important outcomes in HCM to patients and key stakeholders. Treatment of the primary malignancy is instrumental for controlling hypercalcemia and preventing its recurrence. The recommendations provide a framework for the medical management of adults with HCM and incorporate important decisional and contextual factors. The guidelines underscore current knowledge gaps that can be used to establish future research agendas.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Hipercalcemia , Neoplasias , Humanos , Adulto , Hipercalcemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipercalcemia/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Multiple changes occur across various endocrine systems as an individual ages. The understanding of the factors that cause age-related changes and how they should be managed clinically is evolving. This statement reviews the current state of research in the growth hormone, adrenal, ovarian, testicular, and thyroid axes, as well as in osteoporosis, vitamin D deficiency, type 2 diabetes, and water metabolism, with a specific focus on older individuals. Each section describes the natural history and observational data in older individuals, available therapies, clinical trial data on efficacy and safety in older individuals, key points, and scientific gaps. The goal of this statement is to inform future research that refines prevention and treatment strategies in age-associated endocrine conditions, with the goal of improving the health of older individuals.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Osteoporose , Humanos , Idoso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Hormônios , Osteoporose/etiologia , Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Envelhecimento , Glândula TireoideRESUMO
CONTEXT: The risk of fragility fractures is increased in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Numerous biochemical markers reflecting bone and/or glucose metabolism have been evaluated in this context. This review summarizes current data on biochemical markers in relation to bone fragility and fracture risk in diabetes. METHODS: Literature review by a group of experts from the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) focusing on biochemical markers, diabetes, diabetes treatments and bone in adults. RESULTS: Although bone resorption and bone formation markers are low and poorly predictive of fracture risk in diabetes, osteoporosis drugs seem to change bone turnover markers in diabetics similarly to non-diabetics, with similar reductions in fracture risk. Several other biochemical markers related to bone and glucose metabolism have been correlated with BMD and/or fracture risk in diabetes, including osteocyte-related markers such as sclerostin, HbA1c and advanced glycation end products (AGEs), inflammatory markers and adipokines, as well as IGF-1 and calciotropic hormones. CONCLUSION: Several biochemical markers and hormonal levels related to bone and/or glucose metabolism have been associated with skeletal parameters in diabetes. Currently, only HbA1c levels seem to provide a reliable estimate of fracture risk, while bone turnover markers could be used to monitor the effects of anti-osteoporosis therapy.
RESUMO
SUMMARY: Twenty-nine children with malignancies and age, gender-matched controls were prospectively studied over 14 months. Patients had higher parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and fat mass, lower bone mass, and bone mass increments at follow-up than controls. Lean mass, age at diagnosis, systemic and intrathecal therapy were predictors of bone mass changes on adjusted analyses. INTRODUCTION: Children with hematologic malignances have low bone mass. We prospectively investigated anthropometric, clinical, and hormonal predictors of changes in bone mass in children receiving cancer therapy. METHODS: Twenty-nine children, mean age of 9 ± 2.9 years and 32 age and gender-matched controls, were studied. Seven had completed their course 40 ± 22 weeks prior, while 22 were still receiving therapy for 80 ± 28 weeks. Age at diagnosis, calcium intake, exercise activity, systemic corticosteroids in dexamethasone (Dex) dose, and methotrexate (MTX), and intrathecal MTX therapy received within follow-up period were assessed. Routine chemistries, PTH, 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OHD), bone remodeling markers, bone mass, and body composition were measured at baseline and 14 months. RESULTS: Patients had lower exercise activity, sun exposure, and bone markers levels than controls. They had higher PTH levels and fat mass, lower bone mass at the spine, hip, and total body, and lower increments at these sites on follow-up. Predictors of bone mass changes on univariate analyses were: age at diagnosis (R = -0.50 to -0.44, p < 0.05), Dex-MTX doses (R = -0.58 to -0.41, p < 0.05), intrathecal therapy (p < 0.03),% changes in lean mass (R = 0.37 to 0.54, p < 0.04), 25-OHD levels (R = 0.39, p < 0.03), and PTH levels (R = -0.47 to -0.41, p < 0.05). Lean mass, age at diagnosis, systemic and intrathecal therapy were predictors of bone mass changes on adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into the pathophysiology of bone loss in children receiving cancer therapy and possible interventions to optimize their skeletal health.
Assuntos
Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Absorciometria de Fóton , Fatores Etários , Antropometria/métodos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas/fisiopatologia , Remodelação Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Articulação do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Vértebras Lombares/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypovitaminosis D is associated with Sarcopenic Obesity (SO), but evidence from randomized Vitamin D 3 (VD3) trials is scarce. OBJECTIVE: Compare the effect of VD3 supplementation, at two doses, on SO indices at 12 months. METHODS: Overweight older adults (>65 years) with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) of 10-30 ng/mL were recruited in this double-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial (clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT01315366). All subjects received 1000 mg calcium citrate/day and underwent total body Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for body composition assessment. Low Dose Group (LDG) and High Dose Group (HDG) received 600 IU -Institute of Medicine (IOM) Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)- and 3750 IU VD3/day, respectively. RESULTS: Mean age was 71 ± 4.6 years, 55% females, BMI: 30.2 ± 4.5 Kg/m2, and 43% had metabolic syndrome. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups. At 12 months, 248 participants had body composition data, 122 in LDG and 126 in HDG. Proportions of patients with diminished muscle mass, muscle strength, and visceral adiposity did not differ between the 2 groups at baseline or 12 months. Similarly, no significant differences were noted in the proportion of patients with SO at study entry (1.8% in LDG vs 1.6% HDG; p = 0.99) and at 12 months (3.7% in LDG vs. 0.9% HDG; p = 0.18) across arms. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly VD3, at the daily equivalent of 3750 IU/day, did not improve indices of sarcopenia nor adiposity compared to the IOM RDA dose in adults.
Assuntos
Sarcopenia , Absorciometria de Fóton , Idoso , Colecalciferol/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade/complicações , Sarcopenia/etiologia , Vitamina D , Vitaminas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are routinely used to treat postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Although AIs improve breast cancer outcomes, they increase the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the effect of antiresorptive drugs on AI induced bone loss in postmenopausal women with non-metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: We searched four databases until November 4th 2020. We included Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antiresorptive drugs in postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with AI. Two authors screened studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias independently and in duplicate. RESULTS: We identified 14 RCTs: 7 on zoledronic acid, 6 on oral bisphosphonates and 1 on denosumab. The mean difference in bone mineral density (BMD) was 5% at the lumbar spine and 4% at the total hip, at 12â¯months, favoring zoledronic acid compared to control. The certainty of the evidence was low for lumbar spine and moderate for total hip BMD. Similarly, the mean difference was 3% at the lumbar spine and 2% at the total hip, favoring oral bisphosphonates with moderate certainty. The mean difference was 6% at the lumbar spine, and 4% at the total hip BMD favoring denosumab compared to placebo. In addition, zoledronic acid resulted in a mean difference in bone turnover marker levels of -35-41%, and the relarive risk for morphometric vertebral fractures was 0.7 [0.3-1.4], compared to control. Denosumab reduced fracture incidence by 50% compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests a protective effect of antiresorptive drugs on BMD and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with non-metastatic breast cancer on AI. However, data on fracture risk reduction remains unclear.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Remodelação Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
This narrative review summarizes data on classical and nonclassical manifestations of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). It is based on a rigorous literature search, inclusive of a Medline search for systematic reviews from 1940 to December 2020, coupled with a targeted search for original publications, covering four databases, from January 2013-December 2020, and relevant articles from authors' libraries. We present the most recent information, identify knowledge gaps, and suggest a research agenda. The shift in the presentation of PHPT from a predominantly symptomatic to an asymptomatic disease, with its varied manifestations, has presented several challenges. Subclinical nephrolithiasis and vertebral fractures are common in patients with asymptomatic disease. The natural history of asymptomatic PHPT with no end organ damage at diagnosis is unclear. Some observational and cross-sectional studies continue to show associations between PHPT and cardiovascular and neuropsychological abnormalities, among the different disease phenotypes. Their causal relationship is uncertain. Limited new data are available on the natural history of skeletal, renal, cardiovascular, neuropsychological, and neuromuscular manifestations and quality of life. Normocalcemic PHPT (NPHPT) is often diagnosed without the fulfillment of rigorous criteria. Randomized clinical trials have not demonstrated a consistent long-term benefit of parathyroidectomy (PTX) versus observation on nonclassical manifestations. We propose further refining the definition of asymptomatic disease, into two phenotypes: one without and one with evidence of target organ involvement, upon the standard evaluation detailed in our recommendations. Each of these phenotypes can present with or without non-classical manifestations. We propose multiple albumin-adjusted serum calcium determinations (albumin-adjusted and ionized) and exclusion of all secondary causes of high parathyroid hormone (PTH) when establishing the diagnosis of NPHPT. Refining the definition of asymptomatic disease into the phenotypes proposed will afford insights into their natural history and response to interventions. This would also pave the way for the development of evidence-based guidance and recommendations. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Primário , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/complicações , Estudos Transversais , Qualidade de Vida , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Paratireoidectomia , Hormônio Paratireóideo , Cálcio , Doenças Assintomáticas , AlbuminasRESUMO
CONTEXT: The growing number of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MAs) on vitamin D (±â calcium) for fracture prevention has led to contradictory guidelines. OBJECTIVE: This umbrella review aims to assess the quality and explore the reasons for the discrepancy of SR/MAs of trials on vitamin D supplementation for fracture risk reduction in adults. METHODS: We searched 4 databases (2010-2020), Epistemonikos, and references of included SRs/MAs, and we contacted experts in the field. We used A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) for quality assessment. We compared results and investigated reasons for discordance using matrices and subgroup analyses (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019129540). We included 13 SR/MAs on vitamin D and calcium (Ca/D) and 19 SR/MAs on vitamin D alone, compared to placebo/control. RESULTS: Only 2 from 10 SRs/MAs on Ca/D were of moderate quality. Ca/D reduced the risk of hip fractures in 8 of 12 SRs/MAs (relative risk [RR] 0.61-0.84), and any fractures in 7 of 11 SR/MAs (RR 0.74-0.95). No fracture risk reduction was noted in SRs/MAs exclusively evaluating community-dwelling individuals or in those on vitamin D alone compared to placebo/control. Discordance in results between SRs/MAs stems from inclusion of different trials, related to search periods and eligibility criteria, and varying methodology (using intention to treat, per-protocol, or complete case analysis from individual trials). CONCLUSION: Ca/D reduces the risk of hip and any fractures, possibly driven by findings from institutionalized individuals. Individual participant data meta-analyses of patients on Ca/D with sufficient follow-up periods, and subgroup analyses, would unravel determinants for a beneficial response to supplementation.
Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Fraturas Ósseas , Vitamina D , Humanos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Metanálise como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Vitamina D/administração & dosagemRESUMO
In an effort to enhance the trustworthiness of its clinical practice guidelines, the Endocrine Society has recently adopted new policies and more rigorous methodologies for its guideline program. In this Clinical Practice Guideline Communication, we describe these recent enhancements-many of which reflect greater adherence to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to guideline development-in addition to the rationale for such changes. Improvements to the Society's guideline development practices include, but are not limited to, enhanced inclusion of nonendocrinologist experts, including patient representatives, on guideline development panels; implementation of a more rigorous conflict/duality of interest policy; a requirement that all formal recommendations must be demonstrably underpinned by systematic evidence review; the explicit use of GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks; greater use and explanation of standardized guideline language; and a more intentional approach to guideline updating. Lastly, we describe some of the experiential differences our guideline readers are most likely to notice.
Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
Osteoporosis is a serious worldwide epidemic. FRAX® is a web-based tool developed by the Sheffield WHO Collaborating Center team, that integrates clinical risk factors and femoral neck BMD and calculates the 10 year fracture probability in order to help health care professionals identify patients who need treatment. However, only 31 countries have a FRAX® calculator. In the absence of a FRAX® model for a particular country, it has been suggested to use a surrogate country for which the epidemiology of osteoporosis most closely approximates the index country. More specific recommendations for clinicians in these countries are not available. In North America, concerns have also been raised regarding the assumptions used to construct the US ethnic specific FRAX® calculators with respect to the correction factors applied to derive fracture probabilities in Blacks, Asians and Hispanics in comparison to Whites. In addition, questions were raised about calculating fracture risk in other ethnic groups e.g., Native Americans and First Canadians. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) in conjunction with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) assembled an international panel of experts that ultimately developed joint Official Positions of the ISCD and IOF advising clinicians regarding FRAX® usage. As part of the process, the charge of the FRAX® International Task Force was to review and synthesize data regarding geographic and race/ethnic variability in hip fractures, non-hip osteoporotic fractures, and make recommendations about the use of FRAX® in ethnic groups and countries without a FRAX® calculator. This synthesis was presented to the expert panel and constitutes the data on which the subsequent Official Positions are predicated. A summary of the International Task Force composition and charge is presented here.