Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 15(11): 1081-1088, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28981179

RESUMO

The diagnosis of Sweet's syndrome (SS) is based on a set of criteria that requires the presence of two major and at least two minor criteria. In some cases, however, the diagnosis is not as straightforward due to the absence of certain criteria. The objective of the present study was to review the clinical, histopathological, and laboratory features of the current diagnostic criteria for SS, and to evaluate their validity in the cases reported in the literature as well as in 40 patients treated at our institution. Our comprehensive review of the current criteria for SS reveals that the two major criteria have been consistently present in all cases - including ours - since the first description of SS in 1964. With regard to the minor criteria, on the other hand, there has been marked variability between different studies, and many cases failed to fulfill the requirement of showing two minor criteria. In order to simplify the diagnosis, avoid misdiagnosis, and allow for prompt treatment, we propose two sets of revised diagnostic criteria for SS. The first set comprises constant clinical and histopathological features that must be present and are by themselves sufficient for the diagnosis of SS to be established. The second set includes variable features whose absence does not warrant ruling out SS.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Sweet/diagnóstico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutrófilos/fisiologia , Pele/patologia , Síndrome de Sweet/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Sweet/imunologia , Síndrome de Sweet/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol ; 13(10): 24-27, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33584953

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata and vitiligo vulgaris are common autoimmune diseases whose pathophysiology are not completely elucidated. Genetic susceptibility, immunological background, and stress have significant roles in their pathogenesis. Although macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is crucial for the maintenance of immune privilege in certain sites, it can upregulate different inflammatory cytokines and contribute to the pathogenesis of different autoimmune diseases. There is controversy about its role in alopecia and no adequate data about its role in vitiligo. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the serum level of MIF in alopecia areata and vitiligo and its relationship with different variables of both diseases. METHOD: Serum level of MIF was measured in 20 patients with vitiligo, 22 patients with alopecia areata, and 20 controls by ELISA. RESULTS: MIF was significantly higher in alopecia areata (8.477±4.1761ng/mL) and vitiligo vulgaris (3.930±2.7071ng/mL) compared to controls (0.725±0.5108 ng/mL) (P<0.01). In addition, MIF levels were positively correlated with the severity of alopecia areata and vitiligo. CONCLUSION: The MIF has an active role in the pathogenesis of alopecia areata and vitiligo and could be a target for the treatment of both diseases.

3.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 27(6): 515-519, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27043168

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment of uremic pruritus (UP) is a big challenge. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy, appropriate dosing regimen and safety of gabapentin on UP in hemodialysis (HD) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four uremic patients undergoing HD and complaining of UP were randomly classified into two equal groups. Gabapentin group: 27 patients received gabapentin capsules starting with 100 mg and gradually titrated up to a maximum of 300 mg after each HD session for one month. Placebo group: 27 patients received placebo thrice weekly after each HD session. Severity of pruritus was measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and 5-D pruritus scale. RESULTS: In gabapentin group, 88.9% of patients responded well to gabapentin versus 22.2% in placebo group. A highly statistical difference was detected in favor of gabapentin group (p< 0.001). The frequency of the use of the lowest dose (100 mg thrice weekly) was significantly higher than other doses (p < 0.0001). Adverse effects were mild and tolerated. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin is a promising and a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with UP. We recommend it as a first line therapy with a maintenance post-HD dose of 100-300 mg. We also recommend the 5-D scale in the assessment of the severity of pruritus.


Assuntos
Aminas/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/uso terapêutico , Prurido/tratamento farmacológico , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Gabapentina , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prurido/etiologia , Uremia/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA