How to Draw on Narrative to Mitigate Ageism.

Ageism is so structurally integrated and normalized in US health care that it is generally unnoticed by clinicians, despite its effects on the medical care and lives of older adults. Clinicians often lack time, incentives, and opportunities to pause and fully consider the perspective of older adults, especially those with mental illness. As a result, clinicians might infantilize older adults and pathologize or dismiss their preferences, values, and capacity for growth. This commentary on a case proposes a narrative-based ethical approach to shift clinicians' perception of older adults as suffering from the inevitable and unsolvable problems of aging to experiencing a need for dignity and the possibility of continued personal growth.

An Innovative Program Using Magic to Provide Early Clinical Experiences for Preclinical Medical Students: Goals, Experiences, and Results of the MagicAid Program.

Objective: Effectively training medical students in compassion, communication, and empathy is essential in fostering a holistic approach to patient care. We sought to address this by implementing an early clinical experience service learning program for medical students in the initial years of their medical education. Methods: Medical students at Stony Brook University initiated, designed, and facilitated the volunteer program, which provides students a framework to learn magic therapy and engage with pediatric patients. The program includes an introductory presentation, training course, and organized bedside sessions with patients. To evaluate the program, a sample of participants partook in a focus group, written questionnaire, and/or online survey. Results: From 2015 to 2020, 130 students participated in magic therapy rounds, engaging 1391 patients. Nine themes of student benefit emerged from qualitative analysis, including acquisition of familiarity with the hospital and healthcare team, cultivation of communication skills, contribution to improvement of patient affect, development of empathic qualities and techniques, and improvement in psychological health. Students were very satisfied with their experiences and viewed the activity as helpful for patients, parents, staff, and themselves. Conclusions: The program engaged students in compassionate patient care within a holistic approach to patient care early in training. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01456-y.

Doctors disciplined for professional misconduct in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2009.

OBJECTIVES: To describe professional discipline cases in Australia and New Zealand in which doctors were found guilty of professional misconduct, and to develop a typology for describing the misconduct. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective analysis of disciplinary cases adjudicated in five jurisdictions (New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia and New Zealand) in 2000-2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of the cases (setting, misconduct type, patient outcomes, disciplinary measure imposed), characteristics of the doctors involved (sex, specialty, years since qualification) and population-level case rates (by doctor characteristics). RESULTS: The tribunals studied disciplined 485 doctors. Male doctors were disciplined for misconduct at four times the rate of their female colleagues (91 versus 22 cases per 100 000 doctor-years). Obstetrics and gynaecology and psychiatry were the specialties with the highest rates (224 and 178 cases per 100 000 doctor-years). The mean age of disciplined doctors did not differ from that of the general doctor population. The most common types of offences considered as the primary issue were sexual misconduct (24% of cases), illegal or unethical prescribing (21%) and inappropriate medical care (20%). In 78% of cases, the tribunal made no mention of any patient having experienced physical or mental harm as a result of the misconduct. Penalties were severe, with 43% of cases resulting in removal from practice and 37% in restrictions on practice. CONCLUSIONS: Disciplinary cases in Australia and New Zealand have features distinct from those studied internationally. The recent nationalisation of Australia's medical boards offers new possibilities for tracking and analysing disciplinary cases to improve the safety and quality of health care.

A Magic Therapy Program to Alleviate Anxiety in Pediatric Inpatients.

OBJECTIVES: Hospitalization generates increased psychological discomfort for children and their caregivers. This anxiety can affect the patient-caretaker response to the health care team and the course of treatment. We aim to evaluate the impacts of a magic therapy program, organized and facilitated by medical students, on alleviating pediatric inpatient and caregiver anxiety. METHODS: Patients aged 5 to 16 years admitted to an inpatient pediatric unit and their caregivers were eligible for inclusion. Patient-caregiver pairs were randomly assigned to a magic therapy intervention group or a control group. Anxiety was measured before and after the intervention by using validated self-report tools. The Facial Image Scale and Venham Picture Test were used to measure anxiety for young patients, the short State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Facial Image Scale were used for older patients, and the short State-Trait Inventory was used for caregivers. A subset of the intervention group was reevaluated at 1 hour posttherapy. Health professionals were also surveyed regarding their opinions of the program. RESULTS: One hundred patients and 90 caregivers were enrolled. The patient magic group's standardized anxiety was reduced by 25% (n = 47; P < .001) posttherapy. The caregiver magic group's anxiety was reduced by 24% (n = 34; P < .001). Data suggest that anxiety reductions lasted through at least 1 hour posttherapy. Physicians (n = 9), nurses (n = 8), and pediatric residents (n = 20) supported program continuance, reported favorable impressions, and suggested patient, caregiver, and staff benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of a magic therapy program into pediatric inpatient care was feasible and successful in decreasing patient and caretaker anxiety. Health care professionals support the program's continuance.

Removal of doctors from practice for professional misconduct in Australia and New Zealand.

OBJECTIVE: To examine how disciplinary tribunals assess different forms of misconduct in deciding whether to remove doctors from practice for professional misconduct. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multivariable regression analysis of 485 cases in which tribunals found doctors guilty of professional misconduct. The cases came from four Australian states (New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia) and New Zealand and were decided over a 10-year period (1 January 2000 - 30 September 2009). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type of misconduct, the tribunal's explanation for why the misconduct occurred, and the disciplinary measure imposed. RESULTS: 43% of the cases resulted in removal of the offending doctor from practice, 37% in restrictions on practice and 19% in non-restrictive sanctions. The odds of removal were very high in cases involving sexual relationships with patients (OR 22.59; 95% CI 10.18 to 50.14) and moderately high in cases involving inappropriate sexual conduct (not in the context of a relationship), commission of criminal offences, and forms of inappropriate conduct unrelated to patients. Cases in which the misconduct was judged to be due to willful wrongdoing (OR 17.14; 95% CI 8.62 to 34.09), incompetence (OR 6.02; 95% CI 2.87 to 12.63) and issues in the doctor's personal life (OR 4.17; 95% CI 2.07 to 8.41) also had higher odds removal from practice. CONCLUSION: Tribunals in Australia and New Zealand tend to remove doctors from practice for behaviours indicative of character flaws and lack of insight, rather than behaviours exhibiting errors in care delivery, poor clinical judgement or lack of knowledge. The generalisability of these findings to regulatory regimes for health practitioners in other countries should be tested.

Ameliorating attention problems in children with sickle cell disease: a pilot study of methylphenidate.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study examined whether methylphenidate (MPH) was effective in enhancing cognitive performance and attention for children with sickle cell disease (SCD) with cerebrovascular complications who evidence attention problems. METHODS: In this multisite, pilot study, we evaluated 2 separate double-blind controlled clinical trials, including a laboratory trial of the short-term efficacy of MPH, with the second study a 3-week home/school crossover trial evaluating the efficacy of MPH. The laboratory trial included 14 participants between the age of 7 and 16 years. Assessments included measures of sustained attention, reaction time, executive functions, and verbal memory. The home/school trial included 20 participants. The outcome measures were parent and teacher ratings of attention. The first study compared MPH with placebo, while the second trial compared placebo, low-dose (LD) MPH, and moderate-dose MPH. RESULTS: In the laboratory trial, significant effects were revealed for measures of memory and inhibitory control. Parent and teacher reports from the home/school trial indicate that moderate-dose MPH produced superior improvement in attention relative to the placebo and LD MPH. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulant medication positively impacted select measures of memory and inhibitory control in some children with SCD. Attention, as rated by parent and teachers, was improved for a greater number of children and adolescents on higher doses of MPH relative to LD MPH and placebo. Stimulant medication may provide an effective intervention for some children with SCD and cerebrovascular complications who demonstrate attention problems.

Unsedated upper endoscopy in children.

BACKGROUND: EGD is essential to the investigation and treatment of GI disorders in children. Although safe, EGD has the potential for complications, in particular cardiopulmonary abnormalities associated with intravenous sedation. EGD is often performed in adults without sedation. Unsedated EGD is occasionally performed in children but has not been subjected to study. This study assessed the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of unsedated EGD in children. METHODS: Selected, highly motivated children requiring EGD were offered the choice of sedation or no sedation for the procedure. Children recorded scores for pain (face scale) and anxiety (vertical visual analogue scale) before and after EGD. In addition, the times required to prepare the patient, perform the EGD, and recover the patient were recorded. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gender, or pre-EGD pain scores between children selecting sedation or no sedation. However, children selecting sedation had significantly higher pre-EGD anxiety scores than those who chose no sedation. Successful completion of EGD was similar for sedated (96.3%) and unsedated (95.2%) children. Post-EGD scores for anxiety were significantly decreased in those receiving sedation and unchanged in children who received no sedation. There was no significant change in post-EGD pain score in either group. Nearly 80% of children undergoing unsedated EGD would elect to forego sedation if EGD was needed again. Total procedure time was significantly longer in sedated versus unsedated children, reflecting longer preparation and recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Unsedated EGD can be performed safely and successfully in children with good patient tolerance. There was a significant decrease in total procedure time for children who have unsedated EGD. Unsedated EGD should be considered a viable option for motivated children.