Real-World Experience of Tofacitinib and Baricitinib Use in Alopecia Areata in Greek Population: A Retrospective Analysis With Focus on Safety.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) seems to revolutionize the field of alopecia areata (AA) therapeutics. However, real-world data are still missing. OBJECTIVES: To provide evidence about effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in AA in real-world settings and describe baseline disease characteristics and patients profiles that are considered good candidates for JAKi in the daily practice. Furthermore, we intended to investigate potential correlations between baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the databases of two tertiary Hospitals in Greece, to identify individuals of any age currently being treated with systemic JAKi for severe AA. RESULTS: We identified 42 individuals, including 3 adolescents. In our cohort, 52.3% (22/42) were under tofacitinib and 47.6% (20/42) under baricitinib treatment. Efficacy analysis was performed on the subgroup of 30 patients that had completed at least a 3-month follow-up on treatment. In the latter group, mean time on treatment was 10 months. Mean Severity of Alopecia Tool and mean Dermatology Life Quality Index scores decreased from 84.46% and 12.86 at baseline, to 43.26% and 6.63, respectively. Complete response (CR) was recorded in 4 (13.33%), partial in 12 (40%) and no response in 14 patients (46.66%), correspondingly. Seventeen out of 42 (40.5%) individuals in total, reported at least 1 adverse event. No patient required hospitalization. Among 15 patients (35.7%) who got COVID-19, one suffered from serious infection. The 3 adolescents achieved CR with no significant adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data suggest efficacy and safety of JAKi in severe forms of AA. Tolerability is optimal in younger individuals.

Narrative Review of Drug-Associated Nail Toxicities in Oncologic Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Nail toxicity represents one of the most common cutaneous adverse effects of both classic chemotherapeutic agents and new oncologic drugs, including targeted treatments and immunotherapy. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to provide a comprehensive literature review of nail toxicities derived from conventional chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapies (EGFR inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors, BRAF and MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including clinical presentation, implicated drugs and approaches for prevention and management. METHODS: Retrieved literature from PubMed registry database was reviewed to include all articles published up to May 2021 relevant to the clinical presentation, diagnosis, incidence, prevention, and treatment of oncologic treatment-induced nail toxicity. The internet was searched for relevant studies. RESULTS: A wide spectrum of nail toxicities is associated with both, conventional and newer anticancer agents. The frequency of nail involvement, especially with immunotherapy and new targeted agents remains unknown and patients with different cancer types receiving different regimens may develop the same nail disorder, whereas patients with the same type of cancer under the same chemotherapeutic treatment may develop different types of nail alterations. The underlying mechanisms of the varying individual susceptibility and the diverse nail responses to various anticancer treatments need further investigation. CONCLUSION: Early recognition and treatment of nail toxicities can minimize their impact, allowing better adherence to conventional and newer oncologic treatments. Dermatologists, oncologists and other implicated physicians should be aware of these burdensome adverse effects in order to guide management and prevent impairment of patients' quality of life.