[Conventional and non-conventional dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease]. / Dysplasies conventionnelles et non conventionnelles compliquant les maladies inflammatoires chroniques de l'intestin.

Compared to the general population, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), both ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD), are at increased risk of developing some cancers, particularly colorectal cancers (CRC). CRCs, the vast majority of which are adenocarcinomas, develop from a precancerous lesion called dysplasia (or intraepithelial neoplasia) via an inflammation-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence. The advancements of new endoscopic techniques, including visualisation and resection techniques, has led to a reclassification of dysplasia lesions into visible and invisible lesions and their therapeutic management, with a more conservative approach to the colorectal setting. In addition, besides conventional dysplasia, of intestinal phenotype, classically described in IBD, non-conventional dysplasias (as opposed to conventional dysplasia of intestinal phenotype) are now described, including at least seven subtypes. Recognition of these unconventional subtypes, which are still poorly known from pathologists, is becoming crucial, as some of these subtypes appear to be at high risk of developing advanced neoplasia (i.e. high-grade dysplasia or CRC). This review briefly describes the macroscopic features of dysplastic lesions in IBD, as well as their therapeutic management, followed by the clinicopathological features of these dysplastic lesions, with particular emphasis on the new subtypes of unconventional dysplasia, both from a morphological and molecular point of view.

Inflammatory/juvenile-like polyps in neurofibromatosis type 1 associated with epithelial dysplasia.

The term "juvenile-like (inflammatory/hyperplastic) mucosal polyps" (JLIHMP) has been recently introduced to describe a spectrum of polypoid lesions in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). Due to the scarce number of reported cases and histopathological similarities with entities such as sporadic/syndromic juvenile polyps or inflammatory fibroid polyps, this entity remains a subject of debate. We describe herein a case of multiple JLIHMPs in a patient with NF-1, and we document the presence of low-grade dysplasia within one of these polyps.

[Hereditary gastric cancer syndromes and their association with specific histological subtypes]. / Prédispositions génétiques au cancer gastrique et leur association au type histologique.

About 5% of gastric cancers are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. Histology is paramount in this context, as major susceptibility genes are associated with specific subtypes. Germline pathogenic variants in CDH1 and CTNNA1 cause Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC). Major advances have been made in the past ten years regarding HDGC. Penetrance estimates for diffuse cancer are now lower than previously thought, at 30-40%. Surveillance upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is now an acceptable alternative to prophylactic total gastrectomy. Indeed, its sensitivity in detecting advanced disease is satisfactory assuming it is performed by an expert and according to a specific protocol. The risk of intestinal-type gastric cancer is increased in patients with Lynch syndrome, although it is much lower than the risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer. Intestinal-type gastric cancers are also observed in excess in patients with hereditary polyposis, the main one being APC-associated familial adenomatous polyposis. The main and most clinically relevant manifestations in patients with polyposes remain colorectal and duodenal polyps and carcinomas, well ahead of gastric cancer. Finally, recent data point towards increased gastric cancer risk in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Validation of MSIntuit as an AI-based pre-screening tool for MSI detection from colorectal cancer histology slides.

Mismatch Repair Deficiency (dMMR)/Microsatellite Instability (MSI) is a key biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC). Universal screening of CRC patients for MSI status is now recommended, but contributes to increased workload for pathologists and delayed therapeutic decisions. Deep learning has the potential to ease dMMR/MSI testing and accelerate oncologist decision making in clinical practice, yet no comprehensive validation of a clinically approved tool has been conducted. We developed MSIntuit, a clinically approved artificial intelligence (AI) based pre-screening tool for MSI detection from haematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained slides. After training on samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), a blind validation is performed on an independent dataset of 600 consecutive CRC patients. Inter-scanner reliability is studied by digitising each slide using two different scanners. MSIntuit yields a sensitivity of 0.96-0.98, a specificity of 0.47-0.46, and an excellent inter-scanner agreement (Cohen's κ: 0.82). By reaching high sensitivity comparable to gold standard methods while ruling out almost half of the non-MSI population, we show that MSIntuit can effectively serve as a pre-screening tool to alleviate MSI testing burden in clinical practice.

Prognostic value of primary tumor sidedness in patients with non-metastatic IBD related CRC - Is it the exception to the rule?

BACKGROUND: Although primary tumor sidedness (PTS) has a known prognostic role in sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC), its role in Inflammatory Bowel Disease related CRC (IBD-CRC) is largely unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of PTS in patients with IBD-CRC. METHODS: All eligible patients with surgically treated, non-metastatic IBD-CRC were retrospectively identified from institutional databases at ten European and Asian academic centers. Long term endpoints included recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression as well as propensity score analyses were performed to evaluate whether PTS was significantly associated with RFS and OS. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were included in the analysis, of which 32.4% had right-sided (RS) tumors and 67.6% had left-sided (LS) tumors. PTS was not associated with OS and RFS even on univariable analysis (5-year OS for RS vs LS tumors was 68.0% vs 77.3%, respectively, p = 0.31; 5-year RFS for RS vs LS tumors was 62.8% vs 65.4%, respectively, p = 0.51). Similarly, PTS was not associated with OS and RFS on propensity score matched analysis (5-year OS for RS vs LS tumors was 82.9% vs 91.3%, p = 0.79; 5-year RFS for RS vs LS tumors was 85.1% vs 81.5%, p = 0.69). These results were maintained when OS and RFS were calculated in patients with RS vs LS tumors after excluding patients with rectal tumors (5-year OS for RS vs LS tumors was 68.0% vs 77.2%, respectively, p = 0.38; 5-year RFS for RS vs LS tumors was 62.8% vs 59.2%, respectively, p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to sporadic CRC, PTS does not appear to have a prognostic role in IBD-CRC.