Large variations in atrial fibrillation screening practice after ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack in Sweden: a survey study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is given high priority in clinical guidelines. However, patient selection, electrocardiogram (ECG) modality and screening duration remains undecided and current recommendations vary. METHODS: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical practice of AF screening after ischemic stroke or TIA at Swedish stroke units. In collaboration with the stakeholders of the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke) a digital survey was drafted, then tested and revised by three stroke consultants. The survey consisted of 17 multiple choice/ free text questions and was sent by e-mail to the medical directors at all stroke units in Sweden. RESULTS: All 72 stroke units in Sweden responded to the survey. Most stroke units reported that ≥ 75% of ischemic stroke (69/72 stroke units) or TIA patients (67/72 stroke units), without previously known AF, were screened for AF. Inpatient telemetry ECG was the method of first-choice in 81% of the units, but 7% reported lack of access. A variety of standard monitoring durations were used for inpatient telemetry ECG. The second most common choice was Holter ECG (17%), also with considerable variations in monitoring duration. Other AF screening modalities were used as a first-choice method (handheld and patch ECG) but less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice for AF screening after ischemic stroke or TIA differed between Swedish stroke units, both in choice of AF screening methods as well as in monitoring durations. There is an urgent need for evidence and evidence-based recommendations in this field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Validation of a novel smartphone-based photoplethysmographic method for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics: the SMARTBEATS study.

AIMS: In the current guidelines, smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) is not recommended for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), without a confirmatory electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Previous validation studies have been performed under supervision in healthcare settings, with limited generalizability of the results. We aim to investigate the diagnostic performance of a smartphone-PPG method in a real-world setting, with ambulatory unsupervised smartphone-PPG recordings, compared with simultaneous ECG recordings and including patients with atrial flutter (AFL). METHODS AND RESULTS: Unselected patients undergoing direct current cardioversion for treatment of AF or AFL were asked to perform 1-min heart rhythm recordings post-treatment, at least twice daily for 30 days at home, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running the CORAI Heart Monitor PPG application simultaneously with a single-lead ECG recording (KardiaMobile). Photoplethysmography and ECG recordings were read independently by two experienced readers. In total, 280 patients recorded 18 005 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings. Sufficient quality for diagnosis was seen in 96.9% (PPG) vs. 95.1% (ECG) of the recordings (P < 0.001). Manual reading of the PPG recordings, compared with manually interpreted ECG recordings, had a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 97.7%, 99.4%, and 98.9% with AFL recordings included and 99.0%, 99.7%, and 99.5%, respectively, with AFL recordings excluded. CONCLUSION: A novel smartphone-PPG method can be used by patients unsupervised at home to achieve accurate heart rhythm diagnostics of AF and AFL with very high sensitivity and specificity. This smartphone-PPG device can be used as an independent heart rhythm diagnostic device following cardioversion, without the requirement of confirmation with ECG.

Atrial fibrillation incidence after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention: the prospective AFAF cohort study.

Objectives. Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in patients with ischemic heart disease. This study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting surgery during 30 days of follow-up. Design. This was a prospective multi-center cohort study on atrial fibrillation incidence following percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for stable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart rhythm was monitored for 30 days postoperatively by in-hospital telemetry and handheld thumb ECG recordings after discharge were performed. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation 30 days after the index procedure. Results. In-hospital atrial fibrillation occurred in 60/123 (49%) coronary artery bypass graft and 0/123 percutaneous coronary intervention patients (p < .001). The cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation after 30 days was 56% (69/123) of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and 2% (3/123) of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (p < .001). CABG was a strong predictor for atrial fibrillation compared to PCI (OR 80.2, 95% CI 18.1-354.9, p < .001). Thromboembolic stroke occurred in-hospital in one coronary artery bypass graft patient unrelated to atrial fibrillation, and at 30 days in two additional patients, one in each group. There was no mortality. Conclusion. New-onset atrial fibrillation during 30 days of follow-up was rare after percutaneous coronary intervention but common after coronary artery bypass grafting. A prolonged uninterrupted heart rhythm monitoring strategy identified additional patients in both groups with new-onset atrial fibrillation after discharge.

Sensitivity and specificity of handheld one lead ECG detecting atrial fibrillation in an outpatient clinic setting.

AIMS: To validate the sensitivity and specificity of the Zenicor One handheld ECG device for detection of atrial fibrillation in an outpatient clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients attending outpatient clinics at Danderyd Hospital (n = 220) were examined with one lead handheld ECG immediately after standard care 12­lead ECG recording. Twelve recordings were excluded (atrial flutter or pacing) or missing. The recordings were dichotomously categorized as "atrial fibrillation" or "not atrial fibrillation" by two senior cardiologists. In cases of diverging interpretations, a third senior cardiologist had the deciding vote. Sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing atrial fibrillation was calculated with 12­lead ECG as gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation with one lead handheld ECG and 12­lead ECG as gold standard was 98% and 99% respectively. CONCLUSION: In a health-care outpatient setting, Zenicor One handheld ECG had high sensitivity and specificity for detection of atrial fibrillation when compared with 12­lead ECG.

Adherence to a handheld device-based atrial fibrillation screening protocol is associated with clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence and adherence consistency to the handheld ECG device-based screening protocol and their association with adverse cerebral and cardiovascular outcomes in two systematic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening programmes. METHODS: In 2012 (Systematic ECG Screening for Atrial Fibrillation Among 75-Year Old Subjects in the Region of Stockholm and Halland, Sweden (STROKESTOP) study) and 2016 (Stepwise mass screening for atrial fibrillation using N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (STROKESTOP II) study), half of all 75- and 76-year-old inhabitants of up to two Swedish regions were invited to participate in a systematic AF screening programme. Participants were instructed to perform 30-second measurements twice daily in STROKESTOP and four times daily in STROKESTOP II for 2 weeks. Adherence was defined as the number of measurements performed divided by the number of measurements asked, whereas adherence consistency was defined as the number of days with complete registrations. RESULTS: In total, 6436 participants (55.7% female) from STROKESTOP and 3712 (59.8% female) from STROKESTOP II were included. Median adherence and adherence consistency were 100 (92-100)% and 12 (11-13) days in STROKESTOP and 90 (75-98)% and 8 (3-11) days in STROKESTOP II. Female sex and lower education were factors associated with both optimal adherence and adherence consistency in both studies. In STROKESTOP, low adherence and adherence consistency were associated with higher risk of adverse cerebral and cardiovascular outcomes (HR for composite primary endpoint 1.30 (1.11 to 1.51), p=0.001), including stroke (HR 1.68 (1.22 to 2.32), p=0.001) and dementia (1.67 (1.27 to 2.19), p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to twice daily handheld ECG measurements in STROKESTOP was higher than to four times daily measurements in STROKESTOP II. Female sex and lower educational attainment were associated with ≥100% adherence and adherence consistency. Low adherence and adherence consistency were associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes.

Randomised, siteless study to compare systematic atrial fibrillation screening using enrichment by a risk prediction model with standard care in a Swedish population aged ≥ 65 years: CONSIDERING-AF study design.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and confers an increased risk of mortality, stroke, heart failure and cognitive decline. There is growing interest in AF screening; however, the most suitable population and device for AF detection remains to be elucidated. Here, we present the design of the CONSIDERING-AF (deteCtiON and Stroke preventIon by moDEl scRreenING for Atrial Fibrillation) study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: CONSIDERING-AF is a randomised, controlled, siteless, non-blinded diagnostic superiority trial with four parallel groups and a primary endpoint of identifying AF during a 6-month study period set in Region Halland, Sweden. In each group, 740 individuals aged≥65 years will be included. The primary objective is to compare the intervention of AF screening enrichment using a risk prediction model (RPM), followed by 14 days of a continuous ECG patch, with no intervention (standard care). Primary outcome is defined as the incident AF recorded in the Region Halland Information Database after 6 months as compared with standard care. Secondary endpoints include the difference in incident AF between groups enriched or not by the RPM, with and without an invitation to 14 days of continuous ECG recording, and the proportions of oral anticoagulation treatment in the four groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05838781.