Diagnostic reference levels in spinal CT: Jordanian assessments and global benchmarks.

BACKGROUND: To reduce radiation dose and subsequent risks, several legislative documents in different countries describe the need for Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Spinal radiography is a common and high-dose examination. Therefore, the aim of this work was to establish the DRL for Computed Tomography (CT) examinations of the spine in healthcare institutions across Jordan. METHODS: Data was retrieved from the picture archiving and communications system (PACS), which included the CT Dose Index (CTDI (vol) ) and Dose Length Product (DLP). The median radiation dose values of the dosimetric indices were calculated for each site. DRL values were defined as the 75th percentile distribution of the median CTDI (vol)  and DLP values. RESULTS: Data was collected from 659 CT examinations (316 cervical spine and 343 lumbar-sacral spine). Of the participants, 68% were males, and the patients' mean weight was 69.7 kg (minimum = 60; maximum = 80, SD = 8.9). The 75th percentile for the DLP of cervical and LS-spine CT scans in Jordan were 565.2 and 967.7 mGy.cm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrates a wide range of variability in CTDI (vol)  and DLP values for spinal CT examinations; these variations were associated with the acquisition protocol and highlight the need to optimize radiation dose in spinal CT examinations.

The prevalence of harassment of diagnostic radiography and radiation therapy students whilst on clinical placement in the Republic of Ireland.

Objective: To determine if student radiographers and radiation therapists experience harassment (verbal, physical or sexual) while on clinical placement and their awareness of policies in place to report such incidents.Methods: An online questionnaire developed from the World Health Organisation's questionnaire on workplace violence in healthcare and the higher education authority (HEA) national survey of student experiences of sexual violence and harassment in Irish HEIs was used. Undergraduate and postgraduate diagnostic radiography and radiation therapy students in the Republic of Ireland to be included and have completed a minimum of four weeks of clinical placement. Our of 256 students, 98 filled out the survey.Results: Forty-one per cent (n = 40) of students reported experiencing at least one incident of harassment. Thirteen per cent reported experiencing two forms of harassment, and 2 students reported experiencing verbal, physical and sexual harassment. Verbal harassment (n = 33) and sexual (n = 16) were the most common form of harassment while physical harassment was experienced 7 participants. Ninety-one per cent (n = 88) of participants reported they don't believe they have received sufficient training in dealing with incidents of physical, verbal or sexual harassment.Conclusion: Harassment of student radiographers and radiation therapists is occurring while on placement. Male patients are the modal perpetrator, and most incidents go unreported. Students are not empowered to report an incident of harassment and are sometimes unaware of how to report harassment.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for localising peripherally inserted central catheter tips in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chest radiography after peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in infants is the reference standard method for verifying catheter tip position. The utilisation of ultrasound (US) for catheter placement confirmation in the neonatal and paediatric population has been the focus of many recent studies. OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of US for peripherally inserted central catheter tip confirmation in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search of multiple databases. The study selection yielded eight articles, all of which had acceptable quality and homogeneity for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity values were reported together with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: After synthesising the eligible studies, we found that US had a sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI 91.9-97.4%) and specificity of 71.4% (95% CI 59.4-81.6%) for confirming catheter tip position. CONCLUSION: Analyses indicated that US is an excellent imaging test for localising catheter tip position in the NICU when compared to radiography. Ultrasonography is a sensitive, specific and timely imaging modality for confirming PICC tip position. In cases where US is unable to locate malpositioned PICC tips, a chest or combined chest-abdominal radiograph should be performed.

Aneurysm Growth After Endovascular Sealing of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (EVAS) with the Nellix Endoprosthesis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the incidence of post endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth, and its association with stent migration, in a cohort of patients with differing compliance to old and new Instructions For Use (IFU). METHODS: A retrospective single centre study was conducted to review the computed tomography (CT) and clinical data of elective, infrarenal EVAS cases, performed as a primary intervention, between December 2013 and March 2018. All included patients had a baseline post-operative CT scan at one month and at least one year follow up. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of AAA growth and its association with stent migration. AAA growth was defined as a ≥5% increase in aortic volume between the lowermost renal artery and the aortic bifurcation post EVAS at any time during follow up, in comparison to the baseline CT scan. Migration was defined according to the ESVS guidelines, as > 10 mm downward movement of either Nellix stent frame in the proximal zone. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were eligible for inclusion in the study (mean age 76 ± 7.4 years; 58 men). AAA growth was identified in 50 of 76 patients (66%); adherence to IFU did not affect its incidence (mean growth within IFU-2016 compliant cohort vs. non-compliant: 16% vs. 13%, p = .33). Over time, the incidence of AAA growth increased, from 32% at one year to 100% at four years. AAA growth by volume was progressive (p < .001), as its extent increased over time. Migration was detected in 16 patients and there was a statistically significant association with AAA growth (13 patients displayed migration and AAA growth, p = .036). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with EVAS are prone to AAA growth, irrespective of whether their aortic anatomy is IFU compliant. AAA growth by volume is associated with stent migration. Clinicians should continue close surveillance post EVAS, regardless of whether patients are treated within IFU.

Stent Frame Movement Following Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in the Abdominal Aorta.

PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence and extent of stent frame movement after endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) in the abdominal aorta and its relationships to aneurysm growth and the instructions for use (IFU) of the Nellix endograft. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted to review the clinical data and computed tomography (CT) images of 75 patients (mean age 76±7.6 years; 57 men) who underwent infrarenal EVAS and had a minimum 1-year follow-up. The first postoperative CT scan at 1 month and the subsequent scans were used to measure the distances between the proximal end of the stent frames and a reference visceral vessel using a previously validated technique. Device migration was based on the Society of Vascular Surgery definition of >10-mm downward movement of either Nellix stent frame in the proximal landing zone; a more conservative proximal displacement measure (downward movement ⩾4 mm) was also recorded. Patients were categorized according to adherence to the old (2013) or new (2016) Nellix IFU. Aneurysm diameter was measured for each scan; a change ⩾5 mm was deemed indicative of aneurysm growth. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 24 months (range 12-48), proximal displacement ⩾4 mm occurred in 42 (56%) patients and migration >10 mm in 16 (21%), with similar incidences in the right and left stent frames. Proximal displacement was significantly more frequent among patients whose anatomy did not conform to any IFU (p=0.025). Presence of aneurysm growth ⩾5 mm was observed in 14 (19%) patients and was significantly associated with proximal displacement ⩾4 mm (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Infrarenal EVAS may be complicated by proximal displacement and migration, particularly when performed outside the IFU. The definition of migration used for endovascular aneurysm repair may be inappropriate for EVAS; a new consensus on definition and measurement technique is necessary.

Temporal Changes in Intraluminal Thrombus Volume Within Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Implications for Planning Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing.

PURPOSE: To explore whether or not there are temporal changes in the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and intraluminal thrombus (ILT) volumes between planning and implantation of the endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) device and how these changes influence lumen volume. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 51 AAA patients (mean age 76±7.1 years; 36 men) in whom 2 serial preoperative computed tomography angiograms (CTAs) had been performed within 1 to 18 months before fenestrated endovascular repair. The 2 preoperative CTAs were analyzed to identify changes in total sac, ILT, and lumen volumes. RESULTS: Over a median 7.0 months (interquartile range 4, 10), 46 (90%) of 51 AAAs increased in volume between the 2 CTAs. ILT volume increased in 44 aneurysms. In contrast, lumen volume increased in 31 and decreased in 20 AAAs. There was a strong correlation between changes in AAA volume and ILT volume (rs=0.859, p<0.001), which remained significant after adjustment for initial volumes (rs=0.815; p<0.001). There was no correlation between the time interval separating the 2 CTAs and changes in AAA volume (rs=0.115; p=0.421), changes in ILT volume (rs=0.084; p=0.599), or changes in lumen volume (rs=0.060; p=0.676). The AAA growth rate (defined as the change in AAA size/days between CTAs) showed a weak correlation with ILT volume (rs=0.272, p=0.054), which disappeared after adjustment for initial AAA size (rs=-0.002, p=0.991). Between the 2 CTAs, 12 aneurysms crossed the new <1.4 Nellix maximum aorta/lumen diameter ratio. CONCLUSION: As AAAs grow, the increase in aortic volume is largely occupied by additional ILT formation, with minimal change in lumen volume. These changes may alter the suitability of the aneurysm for the Nellix device and could have implications for EVAS planning and device deployment.

A novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality, between and within different x-ray units in a series of hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality (IQ) to evaluate adult chest x-ray (CXR) imaging among several hospitals. METHODS: CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to acquire images in eight hospitals (17 digital x-ray units) using local adult CXR protocols. IQ was represented by image quality figure inverse (IQFinv), measured using CDRAD analyser software. Signal to noise ratio, contrast to noise ratio and conspicuity index were calculated as additional measures of IQ. Incident air kerma (IAK) was measured using a solid-state dosimeter for each acquisition. Figure of merit (FOM) was calculated to provide a single estimation of IQ and radiation dose. RESULTS: IQ, radiation dose and FOM varied considerably between hospitals and x-ray units. For IQFinv, the mean (range) between and within the hospitals were 1.42 (0.83-2.18) and 1.87 (1.52-2.18), respectively. For IAK, the mean (range) between and within the hospitals were 93.56 (17.26-239.15) µGy and 180.85 (122.58-239.15) µGy, respectively. For FOM, the mean (range) between and within hospitals were 0.05 (0.01-0.14) and 0.03 (0.02-0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested method for comparing IQ and dose using FOM concept along with the new proposed FOM, is a valid, reliable and effective approach for monitoring and comparing IQ and dose between and within hospitals. It is also can be beneficial for the optimisation of x-ray units in clinical practice. Further optimisation for the hospitals/x-ray units with low FOM are required to minimise radiation dose without degrading IQ.

Clinical Outcome after Endovascular Sealing of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to present the clinical outcome of endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) with the Nellix endoprosthesis in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated in our institution. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single center, observational cohort study. A departmental database was interrogated to extract demographics, clinical information, and outcome of all patients treated with EVAS between December 2013 and December 2015. Outcome measures included technical success (successful device deployment and absence of any endoleak at completion angiography), mortality, major complications, incidence of endoleaks, aneurysm rupture, and reintervention. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (49 men) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 78 (6.9) years were successfully treated with EVAS, with no 30-day mortality. The cohort included 1 patient with ruptured aneurysm, 9 patients with late complications of previous aortoiliac repairs (2 open, 7 endovascular), and 4 patients who required a total of 9 visceral chimneys for juxtarenal aneurysms. Six patients (9%) suffered major postoperative complications and 4 (6%) required intervention. There were no early or late endoleaks or aneurysm ruptures. After a median (range) follow-up of 12 (0-24) months, there was no aneurysm-related mortality; 2 patients (3%) required late aneurysm-related interventions. CONCLUSIONS: EVAS can be performed with good outcomes up to 2 years postoperatively. Longer follow-up on larger cohorts is needed to prove the efficacy of this technique.

Migration of the Nellix endoprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: This study reports the incidence and sequelae of migration of the Nellix (Endologix Inc, Irvine, Calif) endoprosthesis after endovascular aneurysm sealing. METHODS: A review was performed of the follow-up imaging of all endovascular aneurysm sealing patients in a university hospital endovascular program who had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The first postoperative and latest follow-up computed tomography scans were used to measure the distances between the proximal and distal borders of the stent grafts relative to reference vessels using a previously validated technique. Device migration was based on previously established criteria and defined as any stent graft movement of ≥4 mm related to a predefined reference vessel. Device movement in a caudal direction was given a positive value, and movement in a cranial direction was denoted by a negative value. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (35 stent grafts) were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective review. The mean preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was 57 mm (standard deviation [SD], 5; range, 50-67 mm) and aortic neck length was 30 mm (SD, 16; range, 6-62 mm). Proximal migration, according to study definitions, was identified in six stent grafts (17%), all in a caudal direction. At 1 year the mean proximal migration distance was +6.6 mm (SD, 1.6; range, +4.7-+9.2 mm). Migration occurred in a single stent graft in four patients and bilaterally in one. No distal migration occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal migration of the Nellix endoprosthesis does occur and was without any sequelae in our series. Further investigations into the long-term positional stability of the Nellix device, together with a more thorough understanding of the etiology and consequences of migration, are required.

Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Is Associated With Reduced Radiation Exposure and Procedure Time Compared With Standard Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

PURPOSE: To compare indirect measures of radiation exposure and operating time between endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: The study compared 32 consecutive patients (mean age 78 years; 21 men) with AAA who underwent standard EVAS with 32 consecutive patients (mean age 78 years; 25 men) treated with EVAR between November 2013 and May 2015. Electronic medical records and image archiving databases were interrogated to retrieve relevant information and scans. Screening time and dose area product (DAP) were the primary outcome measures. Data are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Correlations were tested with the Spearman rank coefficient (ρ). RESULTS: The screening time was shorter in EVAS than in EVAR [16 (IQR 14, 20) vs 32 (IQR 26, 38) minutes; p<0.001]. DAP was lower in EVAS than in EVAR [54 (IQR 42, 77) vs 111 (IQR 75, 157) Gy∙cm(2); p<0.001]. Digital subtraction angiography delivered 20% (IQR 15%, 28%) of the DAP in EVAS compared with 14% (IQR 11%, 19%) in EVAR (p<0.001), but the absolute time used on digital subtraction was marginally lower in EVAS than in EVAR [1.07 (IQR 0.52, 1.23) vs 1.19 (IQR 0.70, 1.39) minutes; p=0.037]. The operating time was shorter for EVAS [121 (IQR 105, 146) vs 162 (IQR 145,186) minutes; p<0.001]. There was a moderate correlation between DAP and screening time (ρ=0.597, p<0.001), fluoroscopy time (ρ=0.595, p<0.001), digital subtraction time (ρ=0.301, p=0.015), and operating time (ρ=0.512, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: EVAS is associated with reduced radiation exposure and operating room usage compared with EVAR, which may have safety and financial implications.

Type IIIb Endoleak and Relining: A Mathematical Model of Distraction Forces.

PURPOSE: To examine the changes in distraction force following relining of a conventional abdominal aortic stent-graft with a type IIIb endoleak using the Nellix endovascular sealing device compared to a unilateral stent-graft. METHODS: Relining is often used to repair type IIIb endoleaks, but the consequences to graft stability are unknown. A mathematical model was constructed based on pressure and volume flow through the stent-grafts, incorporating recognized distraction force equations. Steady flow was presumed at peak systolic pressures to calculate the maximum distraction force, with gravity ignored. Distraction forces for 28- to 36-mm-diameter stent-graft bodies with 16-mm limbs were calculated and compared to forces following relining with single and double Nellix devices or the Renu unilateral device. RESULTS: Distraction forces for the 28-, 32-, and 36-mm stent-grafts prior to relining were 5.99, 10.21, and 14.99 N, respectively. Similar forces were reported after relining with bilateral Nellix devices (5.86, 10.08, and 14.86 N, respectively). However, use of a unilateral Nellix increased the distraction forces to 9.92, 14.14, and 18.92 N, respectively. These were comparable to the increase observed after relining with a Renu unilateral stent-graft (9.87, 14.09, and 18.86 N, respectively). The proportional increase in distraction force for a unilateral relining ranged from 26% to 66%, with the greatest increase noted in the smaller diameter main bodies. CONCLUSION: Relining a stent-graft with a type IIIb endoleak using bilateral Nellix devices does not increase the distraction force. However, a unilateral Nellix device or the Renu system could theoretically increase the distraction force by up to 66%, potentially risking migration and type Ia endoleak. In clinical practice, these results suggest that a relining with bilateral Nellix may have benefits over the Renu unilateral stent-graft.

Multicenter retrospective investigation into migration of fenestrated aortic stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Fenestrated stent grafts are subject to the same hemodynamic forces that have resulted in migration of standard infrarenal stent grafts. Outcome data for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair consist of short-term and midterm efficacy studies where migration was generally poorly investigated. This study investigated the migration of fenestrated stent grafts in patients treated by fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A total of 154 patients were retrospectively enrolled from nine sites across the United Kingdom. Patients had been treated with a Zenith fenestrated endograft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) between 2003 and 2010. Patients were required to have a baseline (first) postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan and at least one additional CT scan available. Measurements from the proximal stent graft to the superior mesenteric artery and from the distal stent graft to the iliac bifurcation were performed on the first postoperative CT scan. These measurements were repeated on all subsequent CT scans, and differences between the baseline and subsequent CT scans for the same anatomical location were suggestive of device migration. Migration was defined as cranial (-) or caudal (+) movement of the stent graft of ≥4 mm. RESULTS: Proximal migration (median, +6.0 mm; range, +4.1 to +10.0 mm) was evident in 33 patients (21%). The probability of being free from proximal migration at 12, 24, and 36 months was estimated as 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75%-89%), 77% (95% CI, 70%-85%), and 77% (95% CI, 70%-85%), respectively. Of 259 limbs assessed, 34 (13%) showed evidence of cranial migration (median, -6.1 mm; range, -21.3 to -4.1 mm). The observed probability of being free from any iliac limb migration at 12, 24, and 36 months was 85% (95% CI, 79%-92%), 82% (95% CI, 75%-90%), and 65% (95% CI, 52%-80%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal migration occurs in approximately one-third of patients by 4 years, all migration was caudal in direction, with 60% <6.0 mm in length. Clinical sequelae were infrequent, with no statistically significant differences in the number of complications or reinterventions in patients with and without proximal migration.

Observations on surveillance imaging after endovascular sealing of abdominal aortic aneurysms with the Nellix system.

PURPOSE: To describe and interpret the findings of computed tomography images acquired before and after endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) with the Nellix endoprosthesis and consider the potential implications of these findings on EVAS planning and performance. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of perioperative imaging from 30 consecutive patients (median age 79 years; 19 men) undergoing elective EVAS at our center between December 2013 and November 2014. The images were systematically reviewed specifically looking for endobag collapse, aortic thrombus compression, and aortic wall disruption according to definitions set a priori. RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality or endoleak after the EVAS procedure. Endobag collapse, which could potentially result in type II endoleak if occurring near a patent side branch, was seen in the endobags of 12 patients. Aortic thrombus compression, which affects the accuracy of preoperative volume measurements in predicting the amount of polymer needed to perform EVAS, was seen in 15 patients. There was one aortic wall disruption, which could potentially result in intraoperative hemorrhage, though this did not occur in this case. CONCLUSION: These observations and their potential implications should help clinicians in planning and performing EVAS, as well as in interpreting postoperative imaging.

Changes in Aortic Volumes Following Endovascular Sealing of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With the Nellix Endoprosthesis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects on aortic volumes of endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) with the Nellix device. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients (mean age 78±7 years; 17 men) with abdominal aortic aneurysms containing thrombus were treated with EVAS. Their pre- and post-EVAS computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed to document volume changes in the entire aneurysmal aorta, the lumen, and the intraluminal thrombus. The changes are reported as the mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Total aortic volume was greater on postoperative scans by a mean 17 mL (95% CI 10.0 to 23.5, p<0.001). The volume occupied by the endobags was greater than the preoperative lumen volume by a mean 28 mL (95% CI 24.7 to 31.7, p=0.002). Postoperatively, the aortic volume occupied by thrombus had decreased by a mean 11 mL (95% CI 4.7 to 18.2, p<0.001). There were good correlations between changes in aneurysm and thrombus volumes (r=0.864, p<0.001), between the planning CT/EVAS time interval and the change in aneurysm volume (r=0.640, p=0.001), and between the planning CT/EVAS time interval and the change in thrombus volume (r=0.567, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: There are significant changes in aortic volumes post EVAS. These changes may be a direct consequence of the technique and have implications for the planning and performance of EVAS.

Diagnostic Reference Levels of Radiographic and CT Examinations in Jordan: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: A comprehensive search was performed to examine the literature on diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for computed tomography (CT) and radiography examinations that are performed routinely in Jordan. EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for the search. The acronym "DRL" and the additional phrase "dose reference levels" were used to search for articles in literature. Seven papers that reported DRL values for radiography and CT scans in Jordan were identified. One study reported DRLs for conventional radiography, two studies reported CT DRLs in pediatrics, and the remaining four studies provided DRL values for adult CT scans. The most popular techniques for determining the DRLs were the entrance surface dose, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose-length product (DLP) values. Variations in Jordanian DRL values were noted across both modalities. Lower radiation doses and less variation in DRL values may be achieved by educating and training radiographers to better understand dose reduction strategies. To limit dose variance and enable dosage comparison, CT DRLs must be standardized in accordance with the guidelines of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).

Effects of body part thickness on low-contrast detail detection and radiation dose during adult chest radiography.

INTRODUCTION: Differences in patient size often provide challenges for radiographers, particularly when choosing the optimum acquisition parameters to obtain radiographs with acceptable image quality (IQ) for diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the effect of body part thickness on IQ in terms of low-contrast detail (LCD) detection and radiation dose when undertaking adult chest radiography (CXR). METHODS: This investigation made use of a contrast detail (CD) phantom. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was utilised to approximate varied body part thicknesses (9, 11, 15 and 17 cm) simulating underweight, standard, overweight and obese patients, respectively. Different tube potentials were tested against a fixed 180 cm source to image distance (SID) and automatic exposure control (AEC). IQ was analysed using bespoke software thus providing an image quality figure inverse (IQFinv ) value which represents LCD detectability. Dose area product (DAP) was utilised to represent the radiation dose. RESULTS: IQFinv values decreased statistically (P = 0.0001) with increasing phantom size across all tube potentials studied. The highest IQFinv values were obtained at 80 kVp for all phantom thicknesses (2.29, 2.02, 1.8 and 1.65, respectively). Radiation dose increased statistically (P = 0.0001) again with increasing phantom thicknesses. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that lower tube potentials provide the highest IQFinv scores for various body part thicknesses. This is not consistent with professional practice because radiographers frequently raise the tube potential with increased part thickness. Higher tube potentials did result in radiation dose reductions. Establishing a balance between dose and IQ, which must be acceptable for diagnosis, can prevent the patient from receiving unnecessary additional radiation dose.

An investigation into the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of radiation protection in interventional radiology and cardiac catheter-laboratories.

BACKGROUND: According to current literature, there is a lack of information regarding the radiation protection (RP) practices of interventional radiology (IR) and cardiology catheter laboratory (CCL) staff. This study aims to determine the RP practices of staff within IR and CCLs internationally and to suggest areas for improvement. METHODS: A cross-sectional study in the form of an online questionnaire was developed. Participation was advertised via online platforms and through email. Participants were included if they were healthcare professionals currently working in IR and CCLs internationally. Questionnaire design included Section 1 demographic data, Section 2 assessed RP training and protocols, Section 3 surveyed the use of different types of RP lead shields, both personal and co-worker use and Section 4 assessed other methods of minimising radiation dose within practice. Questions were a mix of open and closed ended, descriptive statistics were used for closed questions and thematic analysis was employed for open ended responses. RESULTS: A total of 178 responses to the questionnaire were recorded with 130 (73 %) suitable for analysis. Most respondents were female (n = 94, 72 %) and were radiographers (n = 97, 75 %). Only 68 (53 %) had received training, the majority receiving this in-house (n = 54, 79 %). 118 (98 %) of respondents had departmental protocols in place for RP. Radiology managers (n = 106, 82 %) were most likely to contribute to such protocols. Multiple methods of dose minimisation exist, these include low-dose fluoroscopy, staff rotation, radiation dose audits and minimal time in the controlled areas. Respondents reported that lead apron shields were wore personally by 99 % of respondents and by co-workers in 95 % of cases. CONCLUSION: The practices of RP by IR and CCL staff in this survey was variable and can be improved. The unavailability of basic radiation protection tools and RP specific training courses/modules were some of the reasons for sub-optimal self-protection against ionising radiation reported by respondents.

An investigation into the current perceptions of Irish Radiographers regarding patient-practitioner communication.

INTRODUCTION: Many of the tasks performed by radiographers rely on effective communication with patients. This study aims to evaluate radiographers' experiences communicating with patients to determine what communication skills they believe they have, challenges they encounter and any familiarity with communication tools. It also assesses their willingness to accept further training and utilise recognised scripted communication tools, such as AIDET (Acknowledge, Introduce, Duration, Explanation and Thank you). METHODS: Data were collected using an online survey deployed using the MS Forms platform. The survey consisted of 42 questions: 12 qualitative 'open-ended' questions and 30 'close-ended' quantitative questions. The survey remained open between March and May 2022. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative responses using thematic content analysis. Cross distribution analysis, basic percentages, and graphic bar charts were used for quantitative data analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and nine radiographers completed the questionnaire. Quantitative analysis found that 84 % (n = 87) of radiographers had not received additional post-qualification training in patient communication. Five communication themes emerged from the thematic analysis; (1) Expectations, (2) Education, (3) Improvements, (4) Errors, and (5) Communication Tools. The scripted communication tool AIDET, according to 86 % (n = 89) of respondents, was perceived to be potential helpful in improving radiographer-patient interactions. CONCLUSION: Radiographers do not believe they have received adequate training for communicating with patients and would like to receive additional training and education. AIDET could be a useful communication tool as a starting guide for less experienced radiographers. There is a need for further studies that explore the use and effectiveness of scripted communication tools in radiographers' communications skills. In addition, additional post-registration training opportunities need to be available for radiographers in patient communication.

Radiographers' perceptions of the experiences of patients with dementia attending the radiology department.

BACKGROUND: Patients with dementia frequently present to the Radiology Department. However, stigmas have been recorded amongst radiographers surrounding imaging persons with dementia (PwD). This study aimed to investigate the impact of PwD attending the Radiology Department for imaging and the resultant effects to all patients, radiographers, and the Department from the perspectives of the examining radiographer. METHODS: A paper-based questionnaire of radiographers' perceptions and experiences of individual examinations 'termed an interaction form' was created and made available in a public hospital in Ireland for a period of eight weeks. Radiographers completed the interaction form collecting data regarding individual imaging examinations of PwD. The form comprised sixteen closed and one open-ended question on the radiographers' individual perspectives of PwDs' abilities and distress levels, carers and comforters and their role in the examination, what the radiographer found helpful in the interaction, and any adverse events. Data were analysed using a combination of descriptive analysis and thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-three interaction forms were completed by the participating radiographers. The modality most commonly represented in the survey was general X-ray (58%). Radiographers reported 84% of examinations for PwD required extra time, with 27% of examinations required repeat imaging and 69% of patients appeared distressed. A carer helped facilitate the completion of 77% of examinations. Qualitative data indicated that distractive and communicative techniques were used by radiographers to make the patient feel more comfortable and help with examination success. CONCLUSION: PwD often require more time for radiological examinations, they often need repeat imaging and re-scheduling of an examination at a more appropriate time. These factors need to be considered when scheduling and performing radiological examinations. Patient distress was frequently encountered, this area may benefit from further research and dedicated practitioner training which could help drive improvements in patient experience.

Evolving radiographic practice: Identifying possible skill requirements for future radiographers practicing in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

AIM: This study aims to identify the prospective skill requirements for future radiographers practising in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Such information will inform educational institutions, healthcare organisations, and policymakers in developing effective strategies. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving currently practising radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists, sonographers, and radiation therapists in the UAE (n =74). A comprehensive survey questionnaire was developed and validated through piloting and expert consultations. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were collected through purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, Chi-square tests, and factor analysis were employed in the data analysis. RESULTS: The results showed that 73%, 47.3%, 43.2%, 40.5%, 39.2%, 33.8% interested in radiology safety, image interpretation, interprofessional and interpersonal skills, research and managerial skills, Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) administration and AI (Artificial Intelligence) and, clinical supervision and assessment, respectively. The factor analysis showed four factors factor considered for CPD training are training settings (15.12), training topics (1.88), CPD credits (1.72) and, presenter and expenses (1.49). CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on the CPD requirements and aspirations of radiographers in the UAE, offering insights into their preferences and challenges. These findings can inform strategies for improving CPD opportunities and ensuring that radiographers are equipped to meet the evolving healthcare demands in the UAE, including performing enhanced practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Development of flexible and comprehensive CPD programmes tailored to radiographers' career interests is required. Employers should provide financial support and flexibility in training options. Regulatory bodies should continue to mandate CPD, fostering a culture of lifelong learning. Supportive work environments, interdisciplinary collaboration, and technological fluency are crucial. Emphasising patient-centred care, research opportunities, and continuous assessment further enhances radiography practice.