Effects of antiresorptive medications on tooth root formation and tooth eruption in paediatric patients.

Tooth eruption is a pivotal milestone for children's growth and development. This process involves with the formation of the tooth root, the periodontal ligament (PDL) and the alveolar bone, as the tooth crown penetrates the bone and gingiva to enter the oral cavity. This review aims to outline current knowledge of the adverse dental effects of antiresorptive medications. Recently, paediatric indications for antiresorptive medications, such as bisphosphonates (BPs), have emerged, and these agents are increasingly used in children and adolescents to cure pathological bone resorption associated with bone diseases and cancers. Since tooth eruption is accompanied by osteoclastic bone resorption, it is expected that the administration of antiresorptive medications during this period affects tooth development. Indeed, several articles studying human patient cohorts and animal models report the dental defects associated with the use of these antiresorptive medications. This review shows the summary of the possible factors related to tooth eruption and introduces the future research direction to understand the mechanisms underlying the dental defects caused by antiresorptive medications.

Colour stability of 3D-Printed orthodontic brackets using filled resins.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of common beverages and accelerated aging on the colour stability of filled resins, which could potentially be used for fabrication of 3D-printed orthodontic brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GR-17.1 (shades A1, A2, and A3), and GR-10 Guide resins (pro3dure medical, Eden Prairie, MN) were printed on an Asiga MAX UV printer into discs 2 mm thick, with a diameter of 10 mm, and then post-print processed as per manufacturer's instructions. Discs were immersed in 5 mL of coffee, tea, red wine, or distilled water for 7 days. Another group was subjected to accelerated aging in accordance with ISO Standard 4892-2. Ten samples were produced per resin, per treatment condition. Colour measurements were taken on the discs before and after treatment using a spectrophotometer against white and black reference tiles to assess colour and translucency differences with the CIEDE2000 colour difference formula. RESULTS: While initial colour of the printed resin discs was acceptable, all resin groups underwent significant colour change during the experiment. Red wine and coffee produced the greatest colour and translucency change, followed by tea, with accelerated aging producing the least change in colour and translucency. CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed resins tested underwent significant changes in colour and translucency following exposure to endogenous and exogenous sources of staining, which may affect their acceptability for fabrication of aesthetic orthodontic brackets.

Effect of Material and Pad Abrasion on Shear Bond Strength of 3D-Printed Orthodontic Brackets.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of printing material and air abrasion of bracket pads on the shear bond strength of 3D-printed plastic orthodontic brackets when bonded to the enamel of extracted human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Premolar brackets were 3D-printed using the design of a commercially available plastic bracket in two biocompatible resins: Dental LT Resin and Dental SG Resin (n = 40/material). 3D-printed brackets and commercially manufactured plastic brackets were divided into two groups (n = 20/group), one of which was air abraded. All brackets were bonded to extracted human premolars, and shear bond strength tests were performed. The failure types of each sample were classified using a 5-category modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) scoring system. RESULTS: Bracket material and bracket pad surface treatment presented statistically significant effects for shear bond strengths, and a significant interaction effect between bracket material and bracket pad surface treatment was observed. The non-air abraded (NAA) SG group (8.87 ± 0.64 MPa) had a statistically significantly lower shear bond strength than the air abraded (AA) SG group (12.09 ± 1.23 MPa). In the manufactured brackets and LT Resin groups, the NAA and AA groups were not statistically significantly different within each resin. A significant effect of bracket material and bracket pad surface treatment on ARI score was observed, but no significant interaction effect between bracket material and pad treatment was found. CONCLUSION: 3D-printed orthodontic brackets presented clinically sufficient shear bond strengths both with and without AA prior to bonding. The effect of bracket pad AA on shear bond strength depends on the bracket material.

Diverse stem cells for periodontal tissue formation and regeneration.

The periodontium is comprised of multiple units of mineralized and nonmineralized tissues including the cementum on the root surface, the alveolar bone, periodontal ligament (PDL), and the gingiva. PDL contains a variety of cell populations including mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (MSCs) termed PDLSCs, which contribute to periodontal regeneration. Recent studies utilizing mouse genetic models shed light on the identities of these mesenchymal progenitors in their native environment, particularly regarding how they contribute to homeostasis and repair of the periodontium. The current concept is that mesenchymal progenitors in the PDL are localized to the perivascular niche. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analyses reveal heterogeneity and cell-type specific markers of cells in the periodontium, as well as their developmental relationship with precursor cells in the dental follicle. The characteristics of PDLSCs and their diversity in vivo are now beginning to be unraveled thanks to insights from mouse genetic models and scRNA-seq analyses, which aid to uncover the fundamental properties of stem cells in the human PDL. The new knowledge will be highly important for developing more effective stem cell-based regenerative therapies to repair periodontal tissues in the future.

Midsagittal Plane First: Building a Strong Facial Reference Frame for Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation.

PURPOSE: A facial reference frame is a 3-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system that includes 3 perpendicular planes: midsagittal, axial, and coronal. The order in which one defines the planes matters. The purposes of this study are to determine the following: 1) what sequence (axial-midsagittal-coronal vs midsagittal-axial-coronal) produced more appropriate reference frames and 2) whether orbital or auricular dystopia influenced the outcomes. METHODS: This study is an ambispective cross-sectional study. Fifty-four subjects with facial asymmetry were included. The facial reference frames of each subject (outcome variable) were constructed using 2 methods (independent variable): axial plane first and midsagittal plane first. Two board-certified orthodontists together blindly evaluated the results using a 3-point categorical scale based on their careful inspection and expert intuition. The covariant for stratification was the existence of orbital or auricular dystopia. Finally, Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed. RESULTS: The facial reference frames defined by the midsagittal plane first method was statistically significantly different from ones defined by the axial plane first method (P = .001). Using the midsagittal plane first method, the reference frames were more appropriately defined in 22 (40.7%) subjects, equivalent in 26 (48.1%) and less appropriately defined in 6 (11.1%). After stratified by orbital or auricular dystopia, the results also showed that the reference frame computed using midsagittal plane first method was statistically significantly more appropriate in both subject groups regardless of the existence of orbital or auricular dystopia (27 with orbital or auricular dystopia and 27 without, both P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The midsagittal plane first sequence improves the facial reference frames compared with the traditional axial plane first approach. However, regardless of the sequence used, clinicians need to judge the correctness of the reference frame before diagnosis or surgical planning.

Functional characterization of ATF1, GREM2 AND WNT10B variants associated with tooth agenesis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the functional effects of ATF1, WNT10B and GREM2 gene variants identified in individuals with tooth agenesis (TA). SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) were used as an in vitro model system to test the effect of TA-associated variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasmid constructs containing reference and mutant alleles for ATF1 rs11169552, WNT10B rs833843 and GREM2 rs1414655 variants were transfected into SHED for functional characterization of variants. Allele-specific changes in gene transcription activity, protein expression, cell migration and proliferation, and expression of additional tooth development genes (MSX1, PAX9 and AXIN2) were evaluated. Data analyses were performed using Student's t-test. P-values ≤ .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Mutant variants resulted in significantly decreased transcriptional activity of respective genes (P < 0.05), although no changes in protein localization were noted. Expression of MSX1 was significantly decreased in ATF1- and GREM2-mutant cells, whereas PAX9 or AXIN2 mRNA expression was not significantly altered. Mutant WNT10B had no significant effect on the expression of additional TA genes. ATF1- and GREM2-mutant cells presented increased cell migration. Cell proliferation was also affected with all three mutant alleles. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that ATF1, WNT10B and GREM2 mutant alleles have modulatory effects on gene/protein function that may contribute to TA.

Validity of Medical Insurance Guidelines for Orthognathic Surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the medical insurance guidelines for orthognathic surgery used by the major American medical insurance companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study assessed the validity of the medical insurance guidelines for orthognathic surgery used by Aetna, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS), Cigna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare (UHC). To evaluate the validity, we calculated the approval and denial rates of the 5 guidelines when we used them to assess the medical necessity for a control group of carefully selected patients. Patients were included in the control group if they met the criteria of a "prudent provider," crafted for this study. All rejected cases were analyzed to determine the root cause of the denials. The validity of the guidelines was also ascertained by determining their completeness and correctness. RESULTS: The current study proves that no insurance guideline is in agreement with the criteria of a "prudent provider." When applied to carefully chosen patients, the requirements of BCBS, Aetna, Humana, and Cigna produce modest rejection rates of 6 to 12%. UHC is an outlier. Its guideline rejects 86% of patients, a rate about 7 times higher than its peers. Insurance guidelines disqualified patients for 3 different reasons: 1) no significant jaw deformity, 2) no demonstrable health impairment, and 3) the etiology of the condition is not a covered benefit. Additional evaluations demonstrate that the private insurance guidelines are incomplete, and at times, incorrect. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the medical insurance guidelines for orthognathic surgery used by the major American medical insurance plans need revision. The most consequential flaw was considering etiology in judging medical necessity. Fortunately, only one company adopted this policy. Moreover, all guidelines have omissions and errors in the way jaw deformity is determined and how health impairment is determined.

Effect of print orientation on the dimensional accuracy of orthodontic aligners printed 3-dimensionally.

INTRODUCTION: Fabrication of orthodontic aligners directly via 3-dimensional (3D) printing presents the potential to increase the efficiency of aligner production relative to traditional workflows; however tunable aspects of the 3D-printing process might affect the dimensional fidelity of the fabricated appliances. This study aimed to investigate the effect of print orientation on the dimensional accuracy of orthodontic aligners printed directly with a 3D printer. METHODS: A digitally designed aligner of 500 µm thickness was printed in 3D in Grey V4 (Formlabs, Somerville, Mass) resin at 8 angulations at 45° intervals (n = 10 per angulation) using a stereolithography 3D printer. Each aligner was scanned with an optical scanner, and all but the intaglio surface of each scan was digitally removed. Each resultant scan file was superimposed onto the isolated intaglio of the designed master aligner file. The dimensional deviation was quantified with Geomagic Control software (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC), and data were analyzed using R statistical software (version 2018; R Core Team, Vienna, Austria) (P <0.05). RESULTS: Print angle showed a statistically significant effect on standard deviation, average positive deviation, absolute average negative deviation, and percentage of points out of bounds (tolerance bounds defined as ±250 µm) (P <0.05). Qualitative analysis of the 3D surface deviation maps indicated that the 0° and 90° groups showed less deviation and appeared to be the most accurate in the anterior regions. Overall, the majority of the print angle groups studied were not printed within clinically acceptable tolerance ranges, with the major exception being the 90° group, which printed nominally within clinically acceptable tolerance ranges. CONCLUSIONS: With the workflow applied, print orientation significantly affects the dimensional accuracy of directly 3D-printed orthodontic aligners. Within the limitations of this study, printing at the 90° angulation would be advised as it is the group with the most accurate prints relative to the 7 other orientations investigated, although not all differences were statistically significant.

Potentialities and limitations of computer-aided design and manufacturing technology in the nonextraction treatment of Class I malocclusion.

INTRODUCTION: Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems have assisted orthodontists to position brackets virtually. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a CAD-CAM system could predict the orthodontic treatment outcome of patients with Angle Class I malocclusion with mild crowding or spacing and with no need for orthodontic extraction. METHODS: Using the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation (ABO-CRE) and color map superimposition, the treated occlusion was compared with the virtual final occlusion of 24 young adults with Class I occlusion. Using eXceed software (eXceed, Witten, Germany), we created the final occlusion prediction for each patient (virtual set up group). A digital model of the final occlusion of each patient was created (treated occlusion group). ABO-CRE score was used to compare groups. In addition, a color map was created for all subjects to access the mean and range values between the virtual set up model and treated occlusion model of each patient. Random and systematic errors were calculated. In addition, chi-square and t test were used. RESULTS: Comparisons between virtual set up occlusion and treated occlusion showed statistically significant differences in 3 out of 7 measurements: interproximal contact score was larger for treated than virtual occlusion (0.45 mm and 0.04 mm, respectively), and the treated occlusion showed larger values than the virtual occlusion for occlusal contacts (14.13 mm and 7.62 mm, respectively) and overjet (7.37 mm and 0.66 mm, respectively). Although the treated occlusion showed a larger score than the virtual occlusion (50.41 mm and 34.58 mm, respectively), there is no significant difference between both. Root angulation decreased (from 1.95 ± 1.29 to 0.65 ± 0.71) because of the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: ABO-CRE overall score presents no difference between groups. In addition, CAD-CAM setup occlusion closely predicts the final teeth alignment and leveling with interarch relationships showing less ABO-CRE score deduction.

Colour stability of 3D-printed resin orthodontic brackets.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the colour stability of polymeric resins that could be used to 3D-print orthodontic brackets. DESIGN: In vitro, laboratory study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated via 3D printing using three resins: Dental LT; Dental SG; and Clear. Five conditions were evaluated for each resin (n = 10 per treatment per resin) to assess its corresponding effect on colour and translucency: immersion in (1) red wine, (2) coffee, (3) tea and (4) distilled water (control), and (5) exposure to accelerated aging. Colour and translucency measurements were made before and after exposure using a spectrophotometer. Mean colour differences (ΔE00) and changes in translucency parameter (ΔTP00) were calculated for each sample using the CIEDE2000 colour difference formula. RESULTS: Statistically significant effects of the resin material, the treatment condition and interactions effects of material and condition were observed for ΔE00 and ΔTP00 (P < 0.001). The most pronounced changes in colour (ΔE00) were a result of the staining effects of wine on all three resins, ranging from 14.5 ± 0.6 to 20.8 ± 1.2. Dental LT, Dental SG and Clear resins all showed changes in colour when exposed to certain staining agents. Dental SG and Clear resins exhibited changes in colour with aging, while the colour of Dental LT resin remained stable with aging. CONCLUSIONS: The colour changes of the resins investigated does not support their use in 3D-printed aesthetic bracket applications.

Clinical Evaluation of Digital Dental Articulation for One-Piece Maxillary Surgery.

PURPOSE: Methods for digital dental alignment are not readily available to automatically articulate the upper and lower jaw models. The purpose of the present study was to assess the accuracy of our newly developed 3-stage automatic digital articulation approach by comparing it with the reference standard of orthodontist-articulated occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty pairs of stone dental models from double-jaw orthognathic surgery patients who had undergone 1-piece Le Fort I osteotomy were used. Two experienced orthodontists manually articulated the models to their perceived final occlusion for surgery. Each pair of models was then scanned twice-while in the orthodontist-determined occlusion and again with the upper and lower models separated and positioned randomly. The separately scanned models were automatically articulated to the final occlusion using our 3-stage algorithm, resulting in an algorithm-articulated occlusion (experimental group). The models scanned together represented the manually articulated occlusion (control group). A qualitative evaluation was completed using a 3-point categorical scale by the same orthodontists, who were unaware of the methods used to articulate the models. A quantitative evaluation was also completed to determine whether any differences were present in the midline, canine, and molar relationships between the algorithm-determined and manually articulated occlusions using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Finally, the mean ± standard deviation values were computed to determine the differences between the 2 methods. RESULTS: The results of the qualitative evaluation revealed that all the algorithm-articulated occlusions were as good as the manually articulated ones. The results of the repeated measures ANOVA found no statistically significant differences between the 2 methods [F(1,28) = 0.03; P = .87]. The mean differences between the 2 methods were all within 0.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have demonstrated that dental models can be accurately, reliably, and automatically articulated using our 3-stage algorithm approach, meeting the reference standard of orthodontist-articulated occlusion.

Effect of print orientation and duration of ultraviolet curing on the dimensional accuracy of a 3-dimensionally printed orthodontic clear aligner design.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the effect of print orientation and ultraviolet (UV) light curing duration on the dimensional accuracy of a clear aligner design fabricated directly using 3-dimensional (3D) printing. METHODS: A master clear aligner design file was 3D printed on a stereolithography printer using 3 different build angles with respect to the build platform: parallel (Horizontal), perpendicular (Vertical), and 45° (45-Degree) (n = 10/group). The 45° orientation then was used to print aligners for 3 postprint processing treatment groups: 0 minutes of UV light and heat exposure (No Cure); 20 minutes of UV light exposure at 80oC (20 Minute), and 40 minutes of UV light exposure at 80oC (40 Minute) (n = 10/group). Each part was digitally scanned and superimposed with the input file for 3D deviation analysis. A generalized linear mixed model and post-hoc Tukey contrasts were applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Difficulties were encountered in optical scanning of 3D-printed aligners, resulting in the exclusion of some samples and the No Cure group from the analysis. The average positive and negative deviations were not statistically significantly different among the print orientations, and postprint processing conditions were analyzed and fell within limits of clinical acceptability (0.250 mm). Color deviation maps illustrated localized areas of dimensional deviation that may affect the clinical utility of the printed aligner design. CONCLUSIONS: The print orientation and postprint curing duration have little effect on the overall accuracy of the 3D-printed aligner design under the conditions investigated. However, the potential effects of location-specific deviations on the clinical utility of 3D-printed aligners should be considered in future studies.

Analysis of the thickness of 3-dimensional-printed orthodontic aligners.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the effect of digitally designed aligner thickness on the thickness of the corresponding 3-dimensional (3D)-printed aligner. METHODS: Digitally designed aligners of 3 different thicknesses (0.500 mm, 0.750 mm, and 1.000 mm) were 3D printed in 2 different resins-Dental LT (n = 10 per group) and Grey V4 (n = 10 per group)-using a stereolithography format 3D printer. The Dental LT aligners were coated with a contrast spray and scanned with an optical scanner. The Grey V4 aligners were scanned before and after the application of the spray. Aligner scans were superimposed onto the corresponding digital design file. Average wall thickness across the aligner for each specimen was measured with metrology software. RESULTS: Superimpositions showed that 3D-printed aligners were thicker overall than the corresponding design file. The Dental LT aligners had the largest thickness deviation, whereas the Grey V4 without spray had the smallest. For the 0.500-mm, 0.750-mm, and 1.000-mm groups, Dental LT average thickness deviation from the input file was 0.254 ± 0.061 mm, 0.267 ± 0.052 mm, and 0.274 ± 0.034 mm, respectively, and average thickness differences between the Grey V4 with and without spray was 0.076 ± 0.016 mm, 0.070 ± 0.036 mm, and 0.080 ± 0.017 mm, respectively. These results indicate that the excess thickness in the Dental LT groups could not be attributed to spray alone. CONCLUSIONS: Fabrication of clear aligners directly by 3D printing with the workflow applied resulted in an increased thickness that may deleteriously affect the clinical utility of the aligners.

Both the Observer's Expertise and the Subject's Facial Symmetry Can Affect Anatomical Position of the Head.

PURPOSE: It is easier to judge facial deformity when the patient's head is in anatomic position. The purposes of this study were to determine 1) whether a group of expert observers would agree more than a group of nonexperts on what is the correct anatomic position of the head, 2) whether there would be more variation in the alignment of an asymmetrical face compared with a symmetrical one, and 3) whether the alignments of experts would be more repeatable than those of nonexperts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one orthodontists (experts) and 31 dental students (nonexperts) were recruited for this mixed-model study. They were shown randomly oriented 3-dimensional head photographs of an adult with a symmetrical face and an adolescent with an asymmetrical face. In viewing software, the observers oriented the images into anatomic position. They repeated the orientations 4 weeks later. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear model and Bland-Altman plots. The primary predictor variables were experience and symmetry status. The outcome variable was the anatomic position of the head. The other variables of interest included time and orientation direction. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between measurements completed by experts and nonexperts (F1,60 = 14.83; P < .01). The interaction between expertise and symmetrical status showed a statistically significant difference between symmetrical and asymmetrical faces in the expert and nonexpert groups (F1,60 = 9.93; P = .003). The interaction between expertise and time showed a statistically significant difference in measurement over time in the expert and nonexpert groups (F1,60 = 4.66; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that experts can set a head into anatomic position better than nonexperts. In addition, facial asymmetry has a profound effect on the ability of an observer to align a head in the correct anatomic position. Moreover, observer-guided alignment is not reproducible.

Efficacy of the mini tooth positioner in improving orthodontic finishes.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the mini tooth positioner in improving the quality of orthodontic treatment outcomes, as measured by the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) cast-radiograph evaluation (CRE). METHODS: Thirty patients were treated prospectively with a minipositioner for 4-6 weeks immediately after debond. Sixteen patients who had received a maxillary vacuum-formed retainer (VFR) and fixed mandibular canine-to-canine retainer at time of debond were enrolled retrospectively as control subjects. Models from time of debond (T1) were graded with the use of the ABO CRE and compared with models obtained 4-6 weeks after debond (T2) for each group. RESULTS: For the minipositioner group, the overall CRE score improved significantly by an average of 6.77 points. Significant improvements were noted in the categories of alignment and rotations (-0.68), marginal ridges (-1.40), buccolingual inclination (-0.45), overjet (-0.97), and occlusal contacts (-3.00). For the control group, overall CRE score improved significantly by an average of 1.16 points. Only the categories of overjet (-0.38) and occlusal contacts (-1.22) showed significant improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The minipositioner is an effective tool in improving the overall finish of orthodontic treatment. In the 4-6 weeks after debond evaluated in this study, the minipositioner significantly outperformed the maxillary VFR/mandibular fixed canine-to-canine retainer in improving final treatment outcomes.

Referral patterns of pediatric dentists and general practitioners to orthodontists based on case complexity.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this research were to investigate and compare general and pediatric dentists' subjective judgments of orthodontic case complexity and to determine how their perceptions of case complexity influence their decisions to refer the patient to an orthodontist. METHODS: Twenty pediatric dentists and 21 general dentists participated in the study. Pretreatment orthodontic records of 20 patients with a variety of malocclusions and a range of American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index (DI) scores were used. Respondents were asked about their background and training in orthodontics. They were also asked to identify the subjective complexity of each case with the use of a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS) and whether they would refer the patient to an orthodontic specialist. A mixed-model multivariate data analysis was used to evaluate the subjective case complexity with the use of fixed factors such as DI score, type of panel member, experience, annual continuing education rate, and gender. Generalized linear mixed models were used to investigate the referral patterns of the general dentists and pediatric dentists. Level of significance was set at P < 0.05 for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: General dentists appeared to provide more overall orthodontic treatment than pediatric dentists; many general dentists provide limited orthodontic treatment and clear aligner therapy (P < 0.05). The perceived complexity score for cases was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.82). The association between DI score and perceived complexity was similar in both groups (P = 0.183) and there was a high correlation between DI and VAS score in the sample (r = 0.71; 95% Cl 0.38-0.87). Pediatric dentists had higher referral rates for cases with DI scores both below and above 20. Significant differences were noted between the pediatric and general dentists in the individual case referral decision as evaluated by the DI (P < 0.037) and VAS (P < 0.042) scores. CONCLUSIONS: General dentists provided more orthodontic care than the pediatric dentists. Both groups identified case complexity similarly, with only minor differences, but pediatric dentists had higher referral rates to orthodontic specialists regardless of the initial case complexity.

Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models.

INTRODUCTION: Many variables can affect the accuracy of 3D-printed orthodontic models, and the effects of different printing parameters on the clinical utility of the printed models are just beginning to be understood. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed orthodontic models with the use of the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation grading system. METHODS: Twelve cases were scanned using a desktop model scanner and 3D-printed using a stereolithography-based printer at three different layer heights (25, 50, and 100-µm; n = 12 per group). All models were scored by eleven graders using the Cast-Radiograph Evaluation grading system. All models were scored a second time, at least two weeks later. RESULTS: No statistically significant effects of print layer height were found on the scoring of the models for any of the grading metrics or total score. 3D-printed models of each layer height were highly positively correlated with stone models for the total score, with the strongest correlation found with models printed at 100-µm. CONCLUSIONS: 100-µm layer height 3D-printed models are potentially clinically acceptable for the purposes of evaluation of treatment outcomes, diagnosis and treatment planning, and residency training.

Comparison of automated grading of digital orthodontic models and hand grading of 3-dimensionally printed models.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging workflows in orthodontics enable automated analysis of digital models and production of physical study models from digital files for the evaluation of treatment outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the automated assessment of digital orthodontic models and the hand grading of 3D-printed models with the use of the American Board of Orthodontics cast-radiograph evaluation (ABO CRE) system. METHODS: Plaster models from 15 cases were scanned with the use of a desktop model scanner to create digital models from which physical models were produced with the use of a stereolithography-based 3D printer. All digital models from each case were graded with the use of an automated software tool (SureSmile), and 3D-printed models were scored by hand with the use of the ABO CRE grading system. All hand-graded models were scored a second time at least 2 weeks later. RESULTS: SureSmile gave statistically significantly higher scores to alignment and rotations (P < 0.001), overjet (P < 0.001), occlusal contacts (P < 0.001), and total score (P < 0.001). Hand grading scored higher in buccolingual inclination (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in marginal ridges, occlusal relationships, and interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Scores assessed in an automated manner by SureSmile are generally significantly greater than those assessed by hand grading.

Further evidence for the role of WNT10A, WNT10B and GREM2 as candidate genes for isolated tooth agenesis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of single nucleotide variants in the candidate genes WNT10A, WNT10B and GREM2 with isolated tooth agenesis. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A total of 435 Caucasian individuals (88 cases with isolated tooth agenesis and 347 unrelated controls) were ascertained at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry. Clinical and radiographic examination by orthodontists confirmed the diagnosis of tooth agenesis. Genetic evaluation excluded syndromic forms of tooth agenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saliva samples were collected as source of genomic DNA. Fourteen variants in/nearby WNT10A, WNT10B and GREM2 were genotyped to test for association with tooth agenesis. Genotyping was performed using TaqMan chemistry in a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Allelic and haplotype frequencies were compared among cases and controls using chi-square tests as implemented in PLINK v.1.06. Bonferroni correction was used and P ≤ 0.004 indicates statistical differences between groups. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between individual SNPs and SNP combinations in WNT10A, WNT10B and GREM2 SNPs with isolated tooth agenesis (P < 0.004). CONCLUSION: Our findings further support a role for variants in WNT10A, WNT10B and GREM2 genes in the aetiology of isolated tooth agenesis. Functional studies are necessary to investigate the biological effects of these gene variants in tooth agenesis phenotypes.

Silver diamine fluoride and bond strength to enamel in vitro: A pilot study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if pre-treatment with silver diamine fluoride (SDF) adversely affects the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel. METHODS: 30 extracted non-carious permanent molar teeth were embedded in acrylic resin cylinders with buccal surfaces exposed and randomly divided equally into two groups. The experimental enamel surfaces were treated with 38% SDF applied for 1 minute between phosphoric acid etch and metal orthodontic bracket bonding with Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive. Control groups were treated with 37% phosphoric acid etch followed by bonding. All samples were subjected to 500 thermocycles between 5°C and 55°C prior to shear load testing. Mean values and standard deviations of shear bond strengths for each group were analyzed using a general linear model at P< 0.05. Characteristics of bond failure were also recorded via Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) and analyzed using an ordinal logistic regression at P< 0.05. RESULTS: No significant difference in shear bond strength to enamel was observed between the control and experimental groups (P= 0.65). Comparison of ARI did demonstrate a significant difference between the groups (P= 0.013); SDF significantly altered the characteristic of bond failure, resulting in more adhesive remaining bonded to enamel after failure. No silver staining of treated surfaces was observed. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The application of SDF to etched non-carious enamel in vitro prior to orthodontic bracket bonding does not adversely affect bond strength.