The diagnostic utility of transthoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in the real world of the Italian Registry on Infective Endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: The choice of the imaging modality (transthoracic [TTE] vs. transesophageal echocardiography [TEE]) for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) depends on different variables. Aim of the present study is to provide updated data on the diagnostic sensitivity and the clinical usefulness of TTE vs. TEE from the Italian Registry on IE (RIEI). METHODS: The RIEI has enrolled consecutive cases of IE in every participating centre, evaluating diagnostic and therapeutic data from a real world practice perspective. RESULTS: From July 2007 to October 2010, 658 consecutive cases with definite IE according to Duke criteria have been enrolled in the RIEI (483 males). The following diagnostic echocardiographic exams were performed: 616 TTE (94%) and 476 TEE (72%). A positive TTE was recorded in 399 cases (65%), an uncertain TTE in 108 cases (17%), and a negative TTE in 109 cases (18%). For TEE, a positive study was reported in 451 cases (95%), uncertain in 13 cases (2.7%), and negative in 12 cases (2.5%) (P < 0.001). This difference is not evident in patients with tricuspid valve IE or i.v. drug addiction, and in Streptococcus bovis or Streptococcus viridans IE. TTE was significantly more performed before the admission and earlier than TEE during admission (P = 0.000). TTE was mainly responsible for the initial diagnosis in 59%. TEE contributed to changing the therapeutic approach in 42%. CONCLUSIONS: In the real world, TTE is performed earlier and more commonly, and it is the major echocardiographic tool for the initial diagnosis. TEE confirms its superior diagnostic sensitivity in most cases, although it is relatively underused.

Mortality and timing of surgery in the left-sided infective endocarditis: an Italian multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: Observational studies on early surgery in infective endocarditis have conflicting results. This study aims to compare the treatment strategies for early surgery (within 2 weeks of diagnosis) and late surgery/medical therapy in terms of survival among patients with the left-sided infective endocarditis. METHODS: This study included patients with the left-sided infective endocarditis registered between 2006 and 2010 in the Italian Registry of Infective Endocarditis (RIEI). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the effect of these treatment strategies on overall survival and included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with treatment, risk factors for mortality and early surgery as a time-dependent covariate to avoid indication and immortal time biases. RESULTS: Among the 502 patients included, 184 (36.7%) underwent early surgery. Of the remaining 318 patients, 138 underwent late surgery. The early surgery group had fewer patients with comorbidities and with enterococcus as the causative microorganism, but this group had more complicated cardiac conditions. No difference in mortality risk was estimated between the treatment groups including early surgery as time-dependent variables (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.63), while a distorted and overestimated beneficial effect of surgery was estimated considering surgery as a non-time-dependent variable (adjusted hazard ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not confirm a better overall survival in patients undergoing early surgery. However, even with the use of statistical techniques to control biases, we could not draw definitive conclusions that early surgery is not beneficial. Our results need to be assessed by randomized trials before any changes in clinical practice can be recommended.

[An alarming problem in the therapy of infective endocarditis: the development of antibiotic-resistant strains]. / Un problema allarmante nella terapia delle endocarditi infettive: lo sviluppo di antibiotico-resistenza.

We shall focus on infective endocarditis due to Enterococcus spp and Staphylococcus aureus, both able to develop resistance to antibiotics with different mechanisms. Vancomycin-resistant strains produce some of the most challenging nososocomial infections. Enterococci develop resistance practically to all classes of antibiotics. Vancomycin-resistant strains, in the '90s, passed from 2% to more than 25%. Five types of vancomycin-resistance were reported (from van A to van E), linked to the presence of certain classes of genes regulating the production of abnormal precursors of peptidoglycan which inhibit the action of vancomycin. Staphylococcus aureus is a fearful organism whose infections can reach a mortality rate of 80%. In 1943, as soon as penicillin G was introduced into therapy, Staphylococcus strains producers of beta-lactamase were identified. After beta-lactamase-resistant penicillins were introduced into therapy, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus strains appeared in the '60s. In 1996 the first strain of methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was isolated. In 2001, in Japan, the first case of infective endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin and non-responsive to vancomycin was described. The resistance is connected to an increased synthesis of the cell wall, which thickens reducing the activity of vancomycin.

[New etiologies responsible for infective endocarditis with negative blood cultures]. / Etiologie emergenti responsabili di endocarditi infettive con emocolture negative.

The prevalence of infective endocarditis with negative blood cultures varies in the different series from 5 to 25%. There are certain explanations of negative blood culture endocarditis: previous incorrect antibiotic therapy before obtaining blood samples (antibiotic treatment inhibits the growth of germs, and therefore bacteremia, without sterilizing the vegetations); infective endocarditis due to fastidious microorganism, that is of difficult cultivation and identification; infective endocarditis due to cell-dependent organism (e.g. Coxiella burnetii); infective endocarditis due to fungi; non-infectious involvement of the endocardium (at times with vegetations) during the course of certain disease. We underline three etiologies (Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella species and Whipple's disease bacterium) because their study have constituted the stimulus for the introduction into clinical evaluation of patients with suspected infective endocarditis of different diagnostic approaches, based on a correct sequential application of blood cultures, serodiagnosis and molecular microbiology.

Clinical epidemiology in Italian Registry of Infective Endocarditis (RIEI): Focus on age, intravascular devices and enterococci.

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology of infective endocarditis (IE) is changing due to a number of factors, including aging and health related comorbidities and medical procedures. The aim of this study is to describe the main clinical, epidemiologic and etiologic changes of IE from a large database in Italy. METHODS: We prospectively collected episodes of IE in 17 Italian centers from July 2007 to December 2010. RESULTS: We enrolled 677 patients with definite IE, of which 24% health-care associated. Patients were male (73%) with a median age of 62 years (IQR: 49-74) and 61% had several comorbidities. One hundred and twenty-eight (19%) patients had prosthetic left side IE, 391 (58%) native left side IE, 94 (14%) device-related IE and 54 (8%) right side IE. A predisposing cardiopathy was present in 50%, while odontoiatric and non odontoiatric procedures were reported in 5% and 21% of patients respectively. Symptoms were usually atypical and precocious. The prevalent etiology was represented by Staphylococcus aureus (27%) followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS, 21%), Streptococcus viridans (15%) and enterococci (14%). CNS and enterococci were relatively more frequent in patients with intravascular devices and prosthesis and S. viridans in left native valve. Diagnosis was made by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in 62% and 94% of cases, respectively. The in-hospital mortality was 14% and 1-year mortality was 21%. CONCLUSION: The epidemiology is changing in Italy, where IE more often affects older patients with comorbidities and intravascular devices, with an acute onset and including a high frequency of enterococci. There were few preceding odontoiatric procedures.

The prophylaxis of infective endocarditis: a joint position study of the Italian Federation of Cardiologists and the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis of patients believed to be at a risk of developing infective endocarditis has been recently revisited with limited indications compared with the previous body of knowledge in use by the medical community. As a consequence, most of the healthcare specialists in cardiology and infectious diseases have doubts related to the enormous change that has been proposed. In this study, we report the results of an Italian consensus of experts in cardiology and infectious diseases, with the aim to offer a national document that illustrates the reasons for such a change through the review of the basis of infective endocarditis prophylaxis, the historical background, and the reasons for the change, providing practical conclusions and illustrating grey areas. METHODS: The main guidelines published on the topic of antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis were discussed as well as the risk of anaphylaxis. Overall, the group agreed that the evidence for prophylaxis is weak and limited to few case-control studies, expert opinion, clinical experience, and descriptive studies. RESULTS: The 'downgrading' of the indications for prophylaxis is mainly due to a cultural change and a more critical attitude towards available published data. Although the group acknowledge the critical view of the previously published guidelines, it seems to be more practical to consider the issue of prophylaxis without the evidence required by guidelines but rather as a consensus document based on the available data. CONCLUSION: Contemporary guidelines on infective endocarditis prophylaxis challenge previous recommendations based on a low level of evidence. The main recommendation of the study group is to underline that prophylaxis may often be based on adequate education without the administration of antibiotics, which only remains suggested, following the usual practice, in patients with heart diseases, when the risk of a complicated prognosis following infective endocarditis may be anticipated.

Italian health idiocies.

We present a case of rather bizarre Italian health administrative contradiction: the greater the dysfunction the greater the productivity, efficiency and efficacy.

Infective endocarditis in the real world: the Italian Registry of Infective Endocarditis (Registro Italiano Endocardite Infettiva - RIEI).

In the last 30 years, major improvements have been made in understanding the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis. Nevertheless, mortality still remains high, close to 30-40% at 1 year, and its reduction remains the main challenge. Moreover, important epidemiological changes have been recorded. Social changes in Western countries have led to an increase in the mean length of life, and thus in degenerative valvular diseases, whereas rheumatic heart disease has almost disappeared. Increasing medicalization has led to a rise in complications and diseases related to longer hospital stay, surgical therapies and other invasive interventions. At the same time, there is an increase in immunosuppressive therapies, diseases such as cancer, diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency that may enhance the disease. Further knowledge is needed for specific subgroups to improve both treatment and prognosis. Nevertheless, randomized trials are lacking to guide the management of the disease, and the role and indications of antibiotic prophylaxis are still the subject of debate. International multicenter studies are providing new important findings based on the experience of tertiary centers; these results may reflect referral biases. The proposal of an Italian national registry on infective endocarditis (RIEI) will overcome these limitations and provide a wide picture of the national presentation of the disease. The aim of the registry is to improve the management of infective endocarditis, through a better understanding of demographic, clinical, therapeutic and prognostic features of the disease in the real world. The background, rationale, aims and expected results of the registry are reviewed.

B-type natriuretic peptide as a marker of asymptomatic re-stenosis after coronary implantation of a paclitaxel-eluting stent.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was the detection of asymptomatic coronary re-stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We studied 26 subjects who had been recently implanted with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent by both a conventional exercise test and the determination of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. RESULTS: At control coronary angiography, nine months after initial PCI, six patients had re-stenosis and 20 were re-stenosis free. We found that re-stenosis was best predicted by the combination of a basal plasma BNP level > or = 50 pg/ml and a positive or uncertain conventional exercise test (positive likelihood ratio of the combination = 10). The best predictor of absence of re-stenosis was a low (< 50 pg/ml) plasma BNP level (negative likelihood ratio = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Accordingly, basal BNP level testing can be recommended in the follow-up evaluation of coronary patients after PCI, to improve both the detection and the exclusion of asymptomatic re-stenosis.