Can TBS reference values be a valid indicator for clinical vertebral fracture? A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Trabecular bone score (TBS) is partially independent of fracture risk. Reference values for TBS have not been established in official guidelines, and thus clinicians often have difficulty interpreting TBS results. This study aimed to investigate whether reference values for TBS could be a valid indicator for clinical vertebral fracture (CVF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 231 women with CVF and 563 women without CVF aged 60-90 years who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during 2019-2023. They were divided into osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal groups according to bone mineral density of the lumbar spine. Reference values for TBS were defined as low (≤ 1.23), intermediate (1.23-1.31), and high (≥ 1.31). RESULTS: Among patients without anti-osteoporosis treatment (n = 476), the proportion with low TBS was 36.7% in the CVF group and 10.7% in the control group. The proportion with CVF was higher in the low TBS group than in the intermediate and high TBS groups, especially in the osteoporosis group (p < 0.001). The odds ratio for CVF was higher in the low TBS group than in the intermediate and high especially in patients with normal BMD and osteoporosis. The TBS cut-off values for incidence of CVF in the osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal groups were 1.224, 1.319, and 1.322, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The reference value for low TBS (≤ 1.23) was useful as an indicator for CVF, especially in patients with osteoporosis. It is expected that reference values for TBS will be established in official guidelines in the future.

Impact of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Structural Properties on Postmenopausal Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction There has been no study on bone structural properties in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan. This study investigated bone mineral density (BMD) and bone structural properties in Japanese postmenopausal women with RA. Methods The study had a cross-sectional design and included 119 postmenopausal women aged 50-80 years with RA symptoms for more than five years. BMD, trabecular bone score (TBS), and results of hip structure analysis (HSA) were measured on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. The control group consisted of 288 women aged 50-80 years without RA. The RA group and control group using bisphosphonates were compared after propensity score matching for age, body mass index, and fracture history. Women in the RA group were also compared according to the use of glucocorticoids (GCs). Results After the propensity matching score, there were no other significant differences in BMD, TBS, and HSA parameters between the RA group and the control group. In the RA group, the TBS was lower in patients on GCs than those not on GCs (1.272 vs 1.313, p=0.008). There were no other significant differences in BMD and HSA parameters between patients in the RA group according to the use of GCs. Conclusion Although there were no differences in BMD, the TBS was lower in patients on GCs than those not on GCs in the RA group. It is thus important for physicians who administer GCs to treat patients with RA to be aware of not only BMD but also TBS.