Dialysis modality, humoral response to vaccine, and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk: Comparative prospective evaluation.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccinations have a central role in decreasing severe SARS-CoV-2 disease complications. This study investigated the long-term humoral immune response to BNT162b2 vaccine among hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and their relative risk for COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This prospective, observational study included maintenance HD and PD patients who had received at least two BNT162b2 vaccine doses. Levels of antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured 6 and 12 months after the first vaccine dose, and 2-3 weeks after the third and fourth vaccine doses. Patients were divided according to dialysis modality (HD or PD). Humoral response was evaluated at different time points among different vaccine regimens (two vs. three vs. four doses of vaccine). An adjusted multivariate model was used to assess cumulative risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Eighty-seven HD and 36 PD patients were included. Among them, 106 (86%) received at least three vaccine doses. Both HD and PD patients demonstrated marked increases in humoral response 2-3 weeks after the third dose (mean anti-S antibody increased from 452 ± 501 AU/mL to 19,556 ± 14,949 AU/mL, p < 0.001). By 6 months after the third dose, antibody titers had declined significantly (mean anti-S antibody 9841 ± 10,493 AU/mL, p < 0.001). HD patients had higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection than PD patients (OR 4.4 [95% CI 1.4-13.6], p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, the most important predictor for SARS-CoV-2 infection was dialysis modality. CONCLUSION: This study found a high antibody response rate after the third and fourth doses of BNT162b2 vaccine among dialysis patients. Hemodialysis as dialysis modality is an important predictor of COVID-19 infection, despite similar humoral responses to vaccine in peritoneal dialysis.

Acute Kidney Injury and Rehabilitation Outcomes among Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is growing rapidly, along with the increasing geriatric population. CKD patients have higher incidence of fractures, stroke, and hospitalizations requiring rehabilitation. This is accompanied with the need for suitable rehabilitation programs to decrease disability and improve functionality to help elderly CKD patients maintain independence in activities of daily living. Considering that survivors of acute kidney injury (AKI) tend to experience decreased quality of life with increased frailty, rehabilitation in the elderly with kidney injury becomes even more complex. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of AKI on the outcomes of rehabilitation among elderly patients with CKD. METHODS: For this retrospective, observational study, the electronic medical records of all patients who were hospitalized in the rehabilitation department were reviewed. We assessed functional status at the beginning and end of rehabilitation, renal outcome, and all-cause mortality among elderly patients with CKD who experienced an AKI and compared them to those who did not have an AKI. RESULTS: The study cohort included 183 elderly patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD. Patients with AKI (23% of study cohort) had a higher prevalence of heart failure and lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, as compared with patients who did not have AKI. They were admitted to rehabilitation at a poorer functional capacity and were also discharged with lower functional independence measure scores. Overall odds ratio for all-cause death among patients with AKI versus without AKI was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.6-6.5; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: AKI and CKD are interrelated syndromes. AKI was prevalent among elderly CKD patients and was associated with worse rehabilitation outcomes and higher mortality compared to similar patients without AKI.

The Clinical Significance of LDL-Cholesterol on the Outcomes of Hemodialysis Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background and objectives: Dyslipidemia is one of the most important modifiable risk factors in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in the general population, but its importance in the hemodialysis (HD) population is uncertain. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes HD patients hospitalized due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the period 2015-2020 with lipid profile data during ACS. A control group with preserved kidney function was matched. Risk factors for 30-day and 1-year mortality were assessed. Results: Among 349 patients included in the analysis, 246 were HD-dependent ("HD group"). HD group patients had higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease than the control group. At ACS hospitalization, lipid profile and chronic statin treatment were comparable between groups. Odds ratios for 30-day mortality in HD vs. control group was 5.2 (95% CI 1.8-15; p = 0.002) and for 1-year, 3.4 (95% CI 1.9-6.1; p <0.001). LDL and LDL < 70 did not change 30-day and 1-year mortality rates in the HD group (p = 0.995, 0.823, respectively). However, survival after ACS in HD patients correlated positively with nutritional parameters such as serum albumin (r = 0.368, p < 0.001) and total cholesterol (r = 0.185, p < 0.001), and inversely with the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP; r = -0.348, p < 0.001) and neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR; r = -0.181, p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that heart failure was the only significant predictor of 1-year mortality (OR 2.8, p = 0.002). LDL < 70 mg/dL at ACS hospitalization did not predict 1-year mortality in the HD group. Conclusions: Despite comparable lipid profiles and statin treatment before and after ACS hospitalization, mortality rates were significantly higher among HD group. While malnutrition-inflammation markers were associated with survival of dialysis patients after ACS, LDL cholesterol was not. Thus, our study results emphasize that better nutritional status and less inflammation are associated with improved survival among HD patients.

Arterial thrombosis in Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms predicts second cancer: a case-control study.

Patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) are prone to the development of second cancers, but the factors associated with these events have been poorly explored. In an international nested case-control study, we recruited 647 patients with carcinoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer, hematological second cancer, and melanoma diagnosed concurrently or after MPN diagnosis. Up to 3 control patients without a history of cancer and matched with each case for center, sex, age at MPN diagnosis, date of diagnosis, and MPN disease duration were included (n = 1234). Cases were comparable to controls for MPN type, driver mutations and cardiovascular risk factors. The frequency of thrombosis preceding MPN was similar for cases and controls (P = .462). Thrombotic events after MPN and before second cancer were higher in cases than in controls (11.6% vs 8.1%; P = .013), because of a higher proportion of arterial thromboses (6.2% vs 3.7%; P = .015). After adjustment for confounders, the occurrence of arterial thrombosis remained independently associated with the risk of carcinoma (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.41), suggesting that MPN patients experiencing arterial events after MPN diagnosis deserve careful clinical surveillance for early detection of carcinoma. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03745378.

Humoral Response to Pfizer BNT162b2 Vaccine Booster in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Recent breakthrough infection in vaccinated people has led some authorities to recommend a booster dose for patients fully vaccinated 5-8 months ago. We aimed to assess the humoral response of MHD patients following a booster dose with the BNT162b2 vaccine. METHODS: The study included 102 MHD patients vaccinated with 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. A third dose (booster) was recommended to all MHD patients in our center and was given to those who opted to receive it, resulting in a booster group and a control group that did not receive the booster. Previous exposure was excluded by testing for the presence of the anti-nucleocapsid antibody (SARS-CoV-2) or positive PCR. We assessed the humoral response before and after the booster dose. RESULTS: Of 66 patients in the booster group, 65 patients (98.5%) developed a positive antibody response, from 472.7 ± 749.5 to 16,336.8 ± 15,397.3, as compared to a sustained decrease in the control group (695.7 ± 642.7 to 383.6 ± 298.6), p < 0.0001. No significant adverse effects were reported. Prior antibody titers were positively correlated to IgG levels following the booster dose. There was a significant association between malnutrition-inflammation markers and the humoral response. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all MHD patients developed a substantial humoral response following the booster dose, which was significantly higher than levels reported for MHD patients following administration of 2 doses alone. Further studies and observations are needed to determine the exact timing and dosing schedule.

Humoral Response and SARS-CoV-2 Infection Risk following the Third and Fourth Doses of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Dialysis Patients.

The optimal SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule in dialysis patients and the potential need for a fourth vaccine dose are debatable. We prospectively assessed the humoral responses to three and four doses of BNT162b2 among dialysis patients. The study included 106 dialysis patients; 60 (56.6%) and 46 (43.4%) received 3 and 4 vaccine doses, respectively. Anti-spike (anti-S) antibody titers significantly increased after the third vaccine dose, followed by a decline, yet still remained higher than all previous measurements. The fourth vaccine dose led to another profound rise in anti-S titers. The absolute increase following the fourth dose correlated with response to the third dose. Infection risk however was similar between patients vaccinated with three or four doses.

Anemia in Patients With Diabetes and Prediabetes With Normal Kidney Function: Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Anemia is a known complication of diabetes mellitus (DM); however, its prevalence and prognostic relevance in patients with DM and pre-DM with normal kidney function have not been well defined. This study assessed the prevalence of anemia in patients with DM and pre-DM and evaluated its association with clinical outcomes during a 4-year follow-up period. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients with DM and pre-DM referred to the Meir Medical Center Endocrine Institute in 2015. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min or any other recognized cause of anemia were excluded. The risk of developing microvascular or macrovascular complications or of death during the 4-year follow-up period was determined. RESULTS: A total of 622 patients (408 with DM and 214 with pre-DM) were included. The mean age of the patients was 64 ± 10.6 years, and 70% were women. The baseline hemoglobin A1C level was 7.1% ± 1.7% (54 mmol/mol), and the eGFR was 86.1 ± 15.3 mL/min. At the time of inclusion, 77 patients (19%) with DM and 23 (11%) with pre-DM had anemia (hemoglobin level 11.9 ± 0.8 and 11.8 ± 0.8 g/dL, respectively), compared with normal hemoglobin levels of 13.8 ± 0.9 and 13.7± 0.9 g/dL, respectively, in the others. A multivariable analysis demonstrated an inverse correlation between baseline hemoglobin (as a continuous variable) and mortality (P = .035), microvascular complications (P = .003), and eGFR decline (P < .001) but not between baseline hemoglobin and macrovascular complications (P = .567). CONCLUSION: This study found a significant prevalence of anemia unrelated to renal failure, both in patients with DM and pre-DM. Anemia in these patients is associated with the development of microvascular complications, eGFR decline, and mortality. These results underscore the need for intensive lifestyle and pharmacologic interventions in these patients.

The Combined Prognostic Significance of Alkaline Phosphatase and Intracranial Arterial Calcifications in Hemodialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of intracranial arterial calcification (ICAC) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients is about 90%, and its severity is correlated with age, hemodialysis vintage, and mineral bone disease. Elevated concentrations of calcium and phosphorus are not sufficient for medial calcification because of inhibition by pyrophosphate. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) promotes calcification by hydrolyzing extracellular pyrophosphate. Epigenetic mechanisms involving ALP inhibition by apabetalone were investigated as a potential target for preventing vascular calcifications (VCs). This study assessed the combined impact of VCs and elevated serum ALP on mortality among chronic HD patients. METHODS: VCs represented by ICAC were measured simultaneously with mineral bone disease parameters including serum ALP of MHD patients who underwent noncontrast brain computed tomography from 2015 to 2018 in our institution. RESULTS: This retrospective study included 150 MHD patients (mean age 71.3 ± 12.1 years, 60.1% male). Of the total cohort, 12 (7.8%) had no brain calcifications and 69 (45.1%) had multiple intracranial calcifications. Considering the patients with normal ALP and no calcification as the reference group yielded adjusted odds ratios for all-cause mortality of 4.6 (95% CI: 1.7-12.7) among patients with brain calcifications and normal ALP (p = 0.003) and odds ratios for all-cause mortality of 6.1 (95% CI: 2.1-17.7) among patients with brain calcifications and elevated ALP (p= 0.001). CONCLUSION: We found an independent association between ICAC and the risk of death among MHD patients. The combined effect of ICAC and elevated ALP was associated with a higher odds ratio for all-cause mortality in MHD patients and may contribute to the risk stratification of these patients.

Tumor-like Lesions in Patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a rare small vessel vasculitis. It usually involves the respiratory tract and kidney. Rarely, tumor-resembling inflammatory changes ensue. OBJECTIVES: To report three unique cases of GPA presenting with tumor-like lesions in various organs. METHODS: We presented three cases of GPA. Case 1 presented with typical upper respiratory symptoms of GPA and a mediastinal mass. Case 2 presented with low back pain, a large retroperitoneal mass, and nodular skin lesions. Case 3 presented with epigastric pain and a paravertebral inflammatory mass. RESULTS: The patients were treated successfully with rituximab. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of this presentation of granulomatosis with polyangiitis, which is known as Tumefaction Wegener's granulomatosis.

Second cancers in MPN: Survival analysis from an international study.

One out of ten patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) develop a second cancer (SC): in such patients we aimed at assessing the survival impact of SC itself and of MPN-specific therapies. Data were therefore extracted from an international nested case-control study, recruiting 798 patients with SC diagnosed concurrently or after the MPN. Overall, 2995 person-years (PYs) were accumulated and mortality rate (MR) since SC diagnosis was 5.9 (5.1-6.9) deaths for every 100 PYs. A "poor prognosis" SC (stomach, esophagus, liver, pancreas, lung, ovary, head-and-neck or nervous system, osteosarcomas, multiple myeloma, aggressive lymphoma, acute leukemia) was reported in 26.3% of the patients and was the cause of death in 65% of them (MR 11.0/100 PYs). In contrast, patients with a "non-poor prognosis" SC (NPPSC) incurred a MR of 4.6/100 PYs: 31% of the deaths were attributed to SC and 15% to MPN evolution. At multivariable analysis, death after SC diagnosis was independently predicted (HR and 95% CI) by patient age greater than 70 years (2.68; 1.88-3.81), the SC prognostic group (2.57; 1.86-3.55), SC relapse (1.53; 10.6-2.21), MPN evolution (2.72; 1.84-4.02), anemia at SC diagnosis (2.32; 1.49-3.59), exposure to hydroxyurea (1.89; 1.26-2.85) and to ruxolitinib (3.63; 1.97-6.71). Aspirin was protective for patients with a NPPSC (0.60; 0.38-0.95). In conclusion, SC is a relevant cause of death competing with MPN evolution. Prospective data are awaited to confirm the role of cytoreductive and anti-platelet drugs in modulating patient survival after the occurrence of a SC.

Clinical and Radiological Characteristics of Patients Diagnosed with Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Treatment Options and Clinical Outcomes. A Retrospective Analysis 2004 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) tends to occur in young adults without underlying lung diseases and is usually followed by limited symptoms, while secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) is a complication of a pre-existing lung disease. Surprisingly, for such common conditions, there is a considerable inconsistency regarding management guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk factors for spontaneous pneumothoraxes and to summarize outcomes and complications based on our clinical experience. METHODS: This retrospective study group was comprised of 250 consecutive patients older than 18 years of age who were diagnosed with spontaneous pneumothorax and hospitalized at the Meir Medical Center (2004-2017). Data on demographic characteristics, indicating symptoms, chest X-rays, and chest computed tomography (CT) results were collected. Our experience and outcomes were then compared to a large multicenter study. RESULTS: Most of the patients were male (85%) and past or current smokers; 69% presented with PSP, while the rest were SSP. No occupational relation was noted. About 55% of the cases presented with a moderate or large pneumothorax (over 1/3 hemithorax). Most patients (56%) required chest tube drainage and 20% undergone surgery. Nearly 10% presented with a recurrent pneumothorax with the mean time to recurrence being 11 ± 20 days. Although the length of hospital stay of patients that underwent surgery was the longest (P < 0.001) for both PSP and SSP, the recurrence rate was actually reduced, suggesting some benefit for the surgical treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed that the traditional approach to the PSP treatment should be further considered, as previously suggested.

Computed Tomography Angiography Findings in Pulmonary Embolism Patients Vary Following Thrombolytic Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most frequently occurring cardiovascular disease. However, the clinical presentation in patients with PE is variable. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of radiological findings detected in contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) and their significance in patients with PE; and to assess whether the CTA findings differed in patients receiving tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) therapy from those who did not. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed CTA scans of 186 patients diagnosed with acute PE. Incidental findings on CTA scan were assessed, including mediastinal and parenchymal lymph nodes, pleural effusion, space-occupying lesions, consolidations, emphysema, and pericardial effusion. RESULTS: Patients receiving tPA (19.9%) were less likely to have pleural effusion (29.7% vs. 50.3%, P = 0.024). Other CTA findings did not differ between the tPA and non-tPA groups, including lung infiltrates (40.5% vs. 38.9, P = 0.857), space-occupying lesions (5.4% vs. 6.7%, P = 1), pericardial effusion (8.1% vs. 8.7%, P = 1), emphysema (21.6% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.557), lung (18.9% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.498), and mediastinal ( 24.3% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.883) lymph nodes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pleural effusion (unilateral or bilateral) was higher in patients not treated with tPA. Therefore, in patients with a borderline condition, the presence of pleural effusion could support the decision not to give tPA treatment.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia Among Young Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

There are limited data on the prevalence and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) among Israeli adults who experience premature acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of FH among young Israeli adults with ACS, examine the rates of lipid-lowering therapy administration, and determine low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels 1 year after ACS. Patients aged ≤55 years hospitalized for ACS at Meir Medical Center between 2018 and 2019 were included. Probable/definite FH was defined using the Dutch Lipid Clinic criteria. Outcomes included the proportion of patients with probable or definite FH, rate of use of lipid-lowering medications, LDL-C levels 1 year postadmission, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events during 30 months of follow-up. The study population comprised 687 young adults with a median age of 48.5 years. Definite/probable FH was present in 61 patients (8.9%). At 1 year of follow-up, the proportions of patients without FH who had LDL-C levels <70 and <55 mg/100 ml were higher than those of patients with FH (55.9% vs 18%, p <0.001 and 35.8% vs 11.5%, p <0.001, respectively). At 1 year of follow-up, only 47.5% and 22% of patients with FH were treated with ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor than were those without FH. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was significantly higher among patients with FH. In conclusion, clinically defined FH was present in nearly 1 of 11 patients with premature ACS. There is a necessity for more aggressive lipid-lowering therapies in patients with FH after experiencing ACS.

Humoral response and breakthrough infections with SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 variant in vaccinated maintenance hemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Breakthrough COVID-19 may occur in vaccinated people, and may result from declining vaccine effectiveness or highly transmittable SARS-CoV-2 variants, such as the B.167.2 (delta) variant. We investigated risk factors and outcomes for infection with the delta variant among vaccinated hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Patients on maintenance hemodialysis who received two doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine were analysed according to having developed COVID-19 (study group) or not (control group), in a retrospective, observational, comparative study. We compared risk-factors for developing breakthrough COVID-19 and assessed clinical outcomes, including 30-day mortality rates. RESULTS: Twenty-four cases of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared to 91 controls without infection. Breakthrough infection was associated with chronic immunosuppressive treatment, hematological malignancies, and low antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. All COVID-19 cases occurred at least 5 months after vaccination, and most were caused by the B.1.617.2 variant (at least 23/24 cases). COVID-19 was categorized as severe or critical disease in 11/24 patients (46%), and 54% required hospitalization and COVID-19-directed treatment. The source of infection was nosocomial in 6/24 cases (25%), and healthcare-related in 3/24 (12.5%). Mortality rate was 21%. Overall mortality was significantly higher in patients who developed COVID-19 than in controls (odds ratio for all-cause mortality 7.6, 95% CI 1.4-41, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Breakthrough COVID-19 with the B.1.617.2 variant can occur in vaccinated hemodialysis patients and is associated with immunosuppression and weaker humoral response to vaccination. Infections may be nosocomial and result in significant morbidity and mortality.

[Predictors of mortality among liver transplant candidates].

INTRODUCTION: Reports in the literature make a distinction between death on the waiting list for liver transplantation and mortality after transplant. Predicting survival at Listing with or without a transplant may assist in evaluating the option of living-donor liver transplantation. The model for end-stage liver disease, or MELD score was found to be a reliable predictor of 3-months mortality on the waiting list. However, with increasing waiting time and severe organ shortage, as is the case in Israel, the consistency of the MELD score in predicting mortality of liver transplant candidates is questionable. AIM: The authors sought to determine predicted survival in candidates for liver transplantation in Israel and define risk factors for mortality based on parameters available at the time of registration for transplant. METHODS: A survival analysis was performed including 197 candidates with chronic liver disease listed for transplant between the years 2001-2006 at the Rabin Medical Center. In addition, the authors used multivariate analysis to define risk factors for mortality based on demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters available at registration. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 50.7 months from registration of the 197 patients included in our study, 123 underwent transplant, while 74 patients were not transplanted. The median waiting time for transplant was 316 days. Overall, 85 (43%) patients died, including 57 before and 28 after transplant (p < 0.0001). Survival rates for the whole group were 67% and 54.6% for 1- and 5-years, respectively. In a multivariate analysis MELD score, recipient age, albumin level and the presence of hepatorenal syndrome were found as significant risk factors for mortality among registrants for liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: In Israel, with waiting time averaging nearly one year, about a third of the candidates will die before transplant and 54% will survive 5 years with and without a transplant. This information should indicate a wider use of living related liver transplantation. The MELD score is a significant predictor of mortality on the waiting list, even with the waiting time far exceeding the 3 months interval from listing, although this finding should be further verified in Larger studies.