Is it time to abandon episiotomy use? A randomized controlled trial (EPITRIAL).

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this trial was to evaluate whether avoidance of episiotomy can decrease the risk of advanced perineal tears. METHODS: In this randomized (1:1) parallel-group superiority trial, primiparous women underwent randomization into "avoidance of episiotomy" (the study group in which episiotomy was allowed only in cases of fetal distress) or "standard care." The primary outcome was the incidence of advanced (3rd- and 4th-degree) perineal tears. RESULTS: The participants were randomized into "standard care" (n = 337) vs. "no episiotomy" (n = 339) groups, not differing in any demographic or obstetric characteristics. Episiotomy rates were significantly lower in the study group (19.6%) compared with the standard care group (29.8%, p = 0.004). Five (1.5%) advanced tears were diagnosed in the study group vs. ten = 3.0% in the controls, yielding an odds ratio of 0.50 (95% CI 0.17-1.50) in favor of the "no episiotomy" group (p = 0.296). No differences were noted in any secondary outcomes. By per protocol analysis (omitting cases in which episiotomy was performed for indications other than fetal distress in the study group), a trend to decreased risk of advanced tears in the study group was noted (p = 0.0956). By per protocol analyses, no severe tears were noted in the 53 vacuum deliveries in the study group vs. 4/65 (6.2%) tears in the controls (p = 0.126). CONCLUSIONS: Since decreased use of episiotomy was not associated with higher rates of severe tears or any other adverse outcomes, we believe this procedure can be avoided in spontaneous as well as vacuum-assisted deliveries. Trial registration no. NCT02356237.

Double-Balloon Device for 6 Compared With 12 Hours for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether removal of a double-balloon device for cervical ripening for 6 compared with 12 hours in women with an unfavorable cervix will result in a shorter time to delivery, similar cervical ripening, and without affecting cesarean delivery rate. METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, cervical ripening was performed using a double-balloon device. Women were randomized to removal of the device after 6 compared with 12 hours. Primary outcome was time to delivery. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, Bishop score, and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. A sample size of 100 nulliparous and 100 parous women was required assuming a 95% CI, power of 80%, and mean decrease of 6 hours to delivery between the groups. RESULTS: From March 2017 through February 2019, 688 women were screened, 243 were found eligible, and 197 were randomized as follows: nulliparous cohort (n=101): removal after 6 hours (n=48) compared with removal after 12 hours (n=53); parous cohort (n=96): removal after 6 hours (n=49) compared with removal after 12 hours (n=47). Insertion-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the 6-hour group for both nulliparous (25.6±12.8 hours vs 31.4±15.2 hours, P<.04; mean difference 5.8, 95% CI 0.2-11.3), and parous cohorts (18.0±6.8 hours vs 22.6±8.2 hours, P=.003; mean difference 4.7, 95% CI 1.6-7.7). Bishop score change and cesarean delivery rate were similar between groups regardless of parity. The 12-hour group in the combined cohort was associated with higher rates of maternal intrapartum fever (2% vs 10%, P=.02; odds ratio 5.3, 95% CI 1.1-24.8). CONCLUSION: Insertion-to-delivery interval is shorter after 6 compared with 12 hours for both nulliparous and parous women. Cervical ripening with a double-balloon device may be achieved in 6 hours. The longer time was associated with a higher rate of intrapartum fever. Six hours should be considered as standard placement time for double-balloon catheters. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03045939.