International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measure instruments include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported goals (PRGs), which allow practitioners to measure symptoms and determine outcomes of treatment that matter to patients. METHODS: This is a structured review completed by the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC), sponsored by the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). The aim of this working group was to evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence for PROs and PRGs in the initial clinical work-up/evaluation and research arena for patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). RESULTS: The initial search generated 3589 non-duplicated studies. After abstract review by 4 authors, 211 full texts were assessed for eligibility by 2 writing group members, and 199 studies were reviewed in detail. Any disagreements on abstract or full-text articles were resolved by a third reviewer or during video meetings as a group. The list of POP PROs and information on PRGs was developed from these articles. Tables were generated to describe the validation of each PRO and to provide currently available, validated translations. CONCLUSIONS: All patients presenting for POP should be evaluated for vaginal, bladder, bowel and sexual symptoms including their goals for symptom treatment. This screening can be facilitated by a validated PRO; however, most PROs provide more information than needed to provide clinical care and were designed for research purposes.

Comparison between laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy and subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: A pilot study.

AIMS: The primary outcome was to evaluate the subjective success rates of two laparoscopic POP operation techniques: uterine-sparing surgery versus a subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy. METHODS: Prospective cohort of 45 women with symptomatic POP recruited between January and December 2010 who self-selected surgery group: group A (n = 15), sacral laparoscopic hysteropexy was performed and group B (n = 30), laparoscopically conducted subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy. All patients had a positive answer in the "Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence" questionnaire (EPIQ, question number 35) and also had a POPQ ≥2nd degree. The primary outcome was the subjective success rate, measured by a negative answer to the Q35 of EPIQ: "Do you have a sensation that there is bulge in vagina or that something is falling out from your vagina" and also by rating their symptoms improvement by the "Patient Global Impression of Improvement". The secondary outcome was the objective success rate assessed by pelvic examination: cure was considered when POPQ <2nd degree in all vaginal compartments at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Subjective success rate was significantly superior in group B both after 6 and 12 months (P = 0.001). Similarly, objective pelvic examination led to a significantly higher rate of successful apical outcome in group B after 6 and 12 months (P = 0.009 and P = 0.002, respectively). Neither major complications nor vaginal mesh erosions were registered. CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rate was significantly higher in the laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy group, compared with the laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy group.

Pelvic + Anatomy: A new interactive pelvic anatomy model. Prospective randomized control trial with first-year midwife residents.

Detailed knowledge of female pelvic floor anatomy is essential for midwifery and other professionals in obstetrics. Physical models have shown great potential for teaching anatomy and enhancing surgical skills. In this article, we introduce an innovative physical anatomy model called "Pelvic+" to teach anatomical relationships in the female pelvis. The Pelvic+ model's value was compared to a traditional lecture in 61 first-year midwifery students randomly allocated to either the Pelvic+ (n = 30) or a control group (n = 32). The primary outcome measure was a quiz comprised of 15 multiple choice questions on pelvic anatomy. Participants were assessed at baseline (Pre-Test), upon completion of the intervention (Post-Test1) and 4 months afterward (Post-Test2). Satisfaction with the approach was assessed at Post-Test1. Increase in knowledge was greater and the approach more accepted among resident midwives when Pelvic+ was used instead of standard lectures. Four months after the intervention, the improvement in knowledge was preserved in the Pelvic+ group. This randomized study demonstrates that the Pelvic+ simulator is more effective than classical learning for pelvic anatomy education, and offers a higher level of satisfaction among students during the educational process. Medical students training in obstetrics and gynecology, or any professional who specializes in the female pelvic floor might also benefit from incorporation of the Pelvic+ model into their training program.

Transperineal anal sphincter complex evaluation after obstetric anal sphincter injuries: With or without tomographic ultrasound imaging technique?

OBJECTIVES: "Significant" obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) have been defined as visible defects of at least 30° in at least 4/6 slices using tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) with transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). The objective of this study was to assess if TUI is mandatory for the evaluation of OASIS. METHODS: Patients with a history of OASIS were evaluated by performing 3D-endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and 3D-TPUS with and without TUI. Any damage to the internal (IAS) or external (EAS) anal sphincters was recorded and scored using the Starck's and the Norderval's systems. Intraobserver and inter-techniques correlations were calculated. RESULTS: From September 2012 to May 2015, 63 women, mean age 32.5 ± 4.6 years, with OASIS (3a: 26 pts., 41.3 %; 3b: 26 pts., 41.3 %; 3c: 6 pts., 9.5 %, 4: 4 pts., 6.3 %, "button hole" tear: 1 pt., 1.6 %). Inter-technique and intraobserver correlations were excellent (TUI: k = 0.9; sweeping technique: k = 0.85; EAUS: k = 0.9) in determining OASIS. Using the Starck's Score, excellent correlation was found for both TPUS modalities (TUI: k = 0.86; sweeping technique: k = 0.89). However, for the different individual parameters, the correlation was moderate for EAS depth (TUI: k = 0.44; sweeping technique: k = 0.5) and good for IAS depth (TUI: k = 0.7; sweeping technique: k = 0.78). Similar results were found using the Norderval's classification. CONCLUSIONS: OASIS can be assessed by TPUS without TUI technique, dragging the rendered box and following the anal canal from the anal verge to the anorectal junction in the longitudinal plane and describing findings.

[Pelvic floor disorders]. / Patología del suelo pélvico.

Fecal and urinary incontinence are frequently associated, together with pelvic organ prolapse. The most important risk factors for pelvic floor disorders are vaginal delivery and chronic constipation. Irrespective of the symptom prompting the patient to seek medical attention and the specialist consulted, symptoms in other compartments must be investigated because patients rarely report them spontaneously. Patients with pelvic floor disorders should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary group of specialists. Complete evaluation includes urodynamics, anal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and neurophysiologic study of the pelvic floor and is recommended in most patients, given that pelvic floor disorders have a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology and that all anatomic and functional abnormalities must be detected to provide the most appropriate treatment. Conservative treatment resolves or improves the problem in a large proportion of patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. Surgery should be indicated in selected patients with careful evaluation to identify preoperatively all anatomical and functional defects that can be surgically corrected. The identification of risk factors and better knowledge of the prevalence and pathophysiology of this health problem will allow preventive strategies to be established and improve therapeutic outcomes.

Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests.

The incontinence severity index (ISI) consists of two questions, regarding frequency and amount of leakage. It categorizes urinary incontinence (UI) into slight, moderate, severe, and very severe. The purpose of this study was to test its validity. The index was compared with the results of pad-weighing tests performed by 200 incontinent women referred to a hospital clinic and 103 at a primary care incontinence clinic. Inconvenience was scored by a six-level Likert scale. Mean pad-weighing results (grams per 24 hours, 95% confidence intervals) were 7 (4-10) for slight, 39 (26-51) for moderate, 102 (75-128) for severe, and 200 (131-268) for very severe UI. Spearman's correlation coefficient for pad-weighing results and severity index was 0.58 (p<0.01), and inconvenience increased significantly with increasing severity. The ISI demonstrated good criterion validity against 24-h pad tests. Good construct validity was indicated by a clear link between ISI and inconvenience.

Electrophysiologic studies and clinical findings in females with combined fecal and urinary incontinence: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Several clinical, urodynamic, and manometric findings suggest neurologic damage as a contributing factor in the development of combined fecal and urinary incontinence. In this study, we wanted to test the hypothesis of pudendal nerve neuropathy being a more frequent lesion in patients with double incontinence compared with patients with isolated fecal incontinence. PATIENTS: Ninety-three females with combined fecal and urinary incontinence and 36 females with isolated fecal incontinence were investigated. All patients underwent anal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, electromyography, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in the age, history of vaginal delivery, and chronic straining between both groups. However, the rate of postmenopausal females was higher in the combined fecal and urinary incontinence group (85 vs. 67 percent; P = 0.02). Menopause was an independent risk factor of having double incontinence (odds ratio, 1.4; P = 0.02). Concentric needle electromyography of the external anal sphincter revealed increased duration of the motor unit potentials in 43 and 53 percent of patients with combined fecal and urinary incontinence and isolated fecal incontinence, respectively (P = 0.28). An increased number of polyphasic motor unit potentials was detected in 52 and 58 percent (P = 0.6). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of bilateral (20 vs. 27 percent) or unilateral (23 vs. 14 percent) prolonged mean pudendal nerve terminal motor latency between both groups (P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Pudendal neuropathy is not a distinct characteristic of patients with double incontinence. The prevalence of pudendal neuropathy in these patients is similar to that observed in patients with isolated fecal incontinence. Others factors should be investigated to explain the common association of both types of incontinence.

[Prevalence of overactive bladder in Spain: a population-based study]. / Prevalencia de vejiga hiperactiva en España: estudio poblacional.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of the urinary symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder (OAB) in Spain based on the International Continence Society (ICS) 2002 consensus criteria as urinary urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia. METHODS: 1,669 real telephone interviews were conducted to adults aged > or = 40 years. The sample size estimation was made according to the prevalence for OAB described in the Milsom paper stratified by age and gender due to the high variability observed between ranges. Appearance and prevalence of main OAB symptoms, medical diagnostic and therapy due to these symptoms data were collected. RESULTS: the sample population was 1669 aged > or = 40 years, 50.6% women and 49.4% men. The overall prevalence of symptoms suggestive of OAB according to the OAB definition from ICS report 2002 was 21.5%, significantly higher in women (25.6%) than men (17.4%)(p<0.05). Adjusting these data to Spanish National Census of year 2000, the prevalence was 19.9%, being higher as well in women (23.6%) than men (115.4%). Urge urinary incontinence and stress urinary incontinence were superior in women (16.7% vs 10.4% and 33.1% vs 7.9% respectively)(p<0.01). Urinary frequency > 8 voids/day was referred by 9.8% of women and 7.9% of men interviewed. 62% of men and 52.4% of women reported they get up at night to void. A total of 52.1% of patients with urinary symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder reported they had consulted a doctor anytime before the interview due to urinary disorders and 16.7% was currently receiving treatment for some of these symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of urinary symptoms suggestive of Overactive Bladder is high in this study, in accordance with data from international studies. Urinary urgency, symptom which defines the pathology, is more prevalent in Spanish women than men. Further studies are needed to better assess OAB impact in the Spanish general population.

Surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence using a method for postoperative adjustment of sling tension (Remeex System).

We present a technique that allows postoperative adjustment of the sling tension in female patients with urinary stress incontinence (USI). Twenty-one female patients with urodynamically proven USI were prospectively evaluated. Subjective and objective evaluation was made preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter. Mean age was 63.5; mean parity was 2.3. All patients were postmenopausal and 13 (62%) had had previous surgery for USI. The operating time was 32 minutes (range 25-45). At a mean follow-up of 12 months (6-25), 19 patients (90.5%) were very satisfied. Two patients (9.5%) were considered failures but subjectively were satisfied and refused readjustment. One patient (4.7%) developed 'de novo' detrusor instability. In conclusion, this is a sling procedure for patients with previous failed surgery and those with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) with the peculiarity that the sling tension can be regulated postoperatively. The readjustment can be made in the office, months or even years after the procedure.

Clinical, urodynamic, and manometric findings in women with combined fecal and urinary incontinence.

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of fecal incontinence in patients with urinary incontinence, who were referred for urodynamic evaluation, and to compare clinical and manometric findings between double incontinence and isolated fecal incontinence. METHODS: Nine hundred women with urinary and/or fecal incontinence were prospectively investigated. Patients with double incontinence (group 1) were compared with 38 women with isolated fecal incontinence (group 2). Clinical data regarding obstetric and urogynecologic history, bowel habit, and type of fecal incontinence were collected. Urodynamics and anal manometry were performed. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (8.7%) presented double incontinence. A history of vaginal delivery and chronic straining was more frequent in patients with double incontinence (P=0.043). No differences were found in the severity of fecal incontinence. Physical examination showed a greater prevalence of rectocele (54% vs. 12%) in group 1. On urodynamics, 80% of women with double incontinence had stress urinary incontinence. Rectal sensation testing revealed a significantly higher rate of hyposensitivity in group 2 (22% vs. 43%). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports a close association between combined stress urinary and fecal incontinence, history of vaginal delivery, and chronic straining.