Open Versus Closed Operative Treatment for Tongue-Type Calcaneal Fractures: Case Series and Literature Review.

Because consensus on the optimal surgical treatment of tongue-type calcaneal fractures is lacking, this study aimed to compare outcomes and postoperative complications of open and closed surgical treatment of these fractures. For this cases series, all patients 18 years or older who underwent operative fixation of tongue-type calcaneal fractures at 2 level I trauma centers between 2004 and 2015 were considered eligible for participation. Data on explanatory and outcome variables were collected from medical records based on available follow-up. Additionally, a systematic literature review on surgical treatment of these fractures was conducted. Fifty-six patients (58 tongue-type fractures) were included. Open reduction internal fixation was performed in 33 fractures, and closed reduction internal (percutaneous) fixation was performed in 25. More wound problems and deep infections were observed with open treatment compared with the closed approach: 10 (30%) versus 3 (12%) and 4 (12%) versus 0 (0%) procedures, respectively. In contrast, revision and hardware removal predominated in patients with closed treatments: 4 (16%) versus 1 (3%) and 9 (36%) versus 8 (24%) procedures, respectively. The systematic literature review yielded 10 articles reporting on surgical treatment for tongue-type fractures, all showing relatively good outcomes and low complication rates with no definite advantage for either technique. Both open and closed techniques are suggested as accurate surgical treatment options for tongue-type calcaneal fractures. Surgical treatment should be individualized, considering both fracture and patient characteristics and the treating surgeon's expertise. We recommend attempting closed reduction internal fixation if deemed feasible, with conversion to an open procedure if satisfactory reduction or fixation is unobtainable.

Functional outcomes of traumatic midfoot injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Midfoot injuries are rare injuries, often the result of high-energy trauma and occurring in the context of multiple trauma. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after open reduction and internal fixation for midfoot injuries at a level 1 trauma center treating complex foot injuries. METHODS: Retrospective single level 1 center study with follow-up by questionnaire. All adult patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for Lisfranc and/or Chopart injuries between 2000 and 2016 were included and invited to complete the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Score, the EuroQOL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), and the EuroQOL five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Chart reviews were performed to collect demographic, injury, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: Forty patients with 45 midfoot injuries were included. Follow-up was available for 29 patients (31 feet), leading to a response rate of 83%. The majority of patients suffered high-energy trauma and nearly all patients had a concomitant injury. Secondary arthrodesis was performed in 7/45 injuries. Median AOFAS score was 64 (IQR 47-78). Higher injury severity score (ISS) was associated with poorer functionality as measured with the AOFAS Midfoot Score (p = 0.046), concomitant injuries were associated with lower quality of life (p = 0.01). EQ-5D scores were significantly lower when compared to the Dutch reference population (p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Injuries of the midfoot have negative effects on mid- to long-term quality of life after trauma, with considerable potential for long-term impaired functionality. When counseling patients with these rare injuries after high-energy trauma mechanisms or in the context of multiple trauma, realistic expectations on postoperative recovery should be given.