Closer to the Site of Action: Everolimus Concentrations in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Correlate Well With Whole Blood Concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus (EVE) is an immunosuppressive drug dosed according to therapeutic drug monitoring in renal transplant recipients. The primary site of action is within activated lymphocytes. EVE is a substrate of the efflux transporter ABCB1 also known as P-glycoprotein. Limited data exist regarding a possible association between whole blood and intralymphocyte concentrations of EVE and the potential influence of ABCB1. METHODS: Twelve renal transplant recipients (5 men and 7 women) treated with EVE underwent a pharmacokinetic investigation where EVE concentrations in whole blood and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were determined within a dosing interval. In addition, the activity of ABCB1 in PBMC was determined using the Rhodamine123 efflux assay and the patients' genotypes of ABCB1 were determined. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between EVE AUC0-12 in whole blood and in PBMC (r = 0.90, P < 0.01), and no association was demonstrated between the ABCB1 activity and EVE PBMC/whole blood ratio of trough concentrations (r = 0.23, P = 0.76). Furthermore, ABCB1 1236C>T, 3435C>T, and 2677G>T/A polymorphism did not influence EVE AUC0-12 PBMC/whole blood ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed a significant association between EVE whole blood and PBMC concentrations, suggesting that ABCB1-mediated efflux from PBMC to be of minor importance for the distribution of EVE.

The concentration of cyclosporine metabolites is significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is prevalent among kidney transplant recipients. The activity of drug metabolizing enzymes or transporters may be altered by diabetes leading to changes in the concentration of parent drug or metabolites. This study was aimed to characterize the effect of diabetes on the concentration of cyclosporine (CsA) and metabolites. METHODS: Concentration-time profiles of CsA and metabolites (AM1, AM9, AM4N, AM1c, AM19, and AM1c9) were characterized over a 12-hour dosing interval in 10 nondiabetic and 7 diabetic stable kidney transplant recipients. All patients were male, had nonfunctional CYP3A5*3 genotype, and were on combination therapy with ketoconazole. RESULTS: The average daily dose (±SD) of CsA was 65 ± 21 and 68 ± 35 mg in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects, respectively (P = 0.550). Cyclosporine metabolites that involved amino acid 1 (AM1, AM19, AM1c) exhibited significantly lower dose-normalized values of area under the concentration-time curve in patients with diabetes. Moreover, during the postabsorption phase (≥3 hours after dose), metabolite-parent concentration ratios for all metabolites, except AM4N, was significantly lower in diabetic patients. The pharmacokinetic parameters of ketoconazole were similar between the 2 groups thus excluding inconsistent ketoconazole exposure as a source of altered CsA metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that diabetes mellitus significantly affects the concentration of CsA metabolites. Because CsA is eliminated as metabolites via the biliary route, the decrease in the blood concentration of CsA metabolites during postabsorption phase would probably reflect lower hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme activity. However, other mechanisms including altered expression of transporters may also play a role. Results of cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring in diabetic patients must be interpreted with caution when nonspecific assays are used.

Computer-assisted cyclosporine dosing performs better than traditional dosing in renal transplant recipients: results of a pilot study.

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is widely used after organ transplantation. Its narrow therapeutic window and large pharmacokinetic variability makes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) demanding and frequent dose adjustments are needed, especially early after transplantation. The aim of the present pilot study was to compare accuracy of CsA TDM by experienced clinicians against a computer-assisted dosing model. Renal transplant recipients on CsA, prednisolone, and mycophenolate were included 2 weeks after transplantation, randomized (1:1) to either computer dosing (MAP-BE) or control (CONTR) and followed for at least 8 weeks. A maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian estimation method, applying a population pharmacokinetic model and the POSTHOC option in nonlinear mixed effects modeling, was used to individualize CsA doses in the MAP-BE group. Forty patients (31 men, 27.5% living donor) between 28 and 80 years were included. A total of 798 CsA concentration measurements and adherent dosing evaluations/adjustments were performed. During the entire study, blood concentrations were on average 10% +/- 5% from the predefined therapeutic target range in the MAP-BE group, as compared with 13% +/- 8% in the CONTR group (P = 0.042). However, there was no significant difference between groups regarding the percentage of CsA concentrations truly within the therapeutic windows [MAP-BE: 37% +/- 17%, CONTR: 33% +/- 15% (P = 0.57)] or in CsA dose [MAP-BE: 3.55 +/- 0.8, CONTR: 3.90 +/- 0.9 mg/kg/d (P = 0.26)]. Acute rejections were present in 4 and 3 patients, respectively (P = 1.00). The computer-assisted TDM-targeted CsA blood concentrations significantly better than experienced transplant physicians. A possible favorable effect on short- and long-term outcome needs to be verified in further, properly powered, clinical trials.

Declining intracellular T-lymphocyte concentration of cyclosporine a precedes acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: We investigated cyclosporine A (CsA) concentrations at the site of action, inside T-lymphocytes, to evaluate its applicability as a new supplementary therapeutic drug monitoring method after renal transplantation. METHOD: In this prospective single-center study, 20 kidney transplant recipients, mean age 54 (range 21-74) years, on CsA-based immunosuppression were included within 2 weeks posttransplant and followed for 3 months. Nine patients also had one full 12-hour pharmacokinetic profile performed. T-lymphocytes were isolated from 7 ml whole blood using Prepacyte and intracellular CsA concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography double mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: Seven patients (35%) experienced acute rejections (all biopsy verified) during the first three months posttransplantation. Intracellular CsA concentrations tended to decline 1 week prior to acute rejection and the decrease was significant (-27.1+/-14.6%, P=0.014) three days before the rejection episodes were recognized clinically. In addition, the intracellular CsA area under the curve 0-12 measured during stable phase was 182% higher in the rejection-free patients (P=0.004). There was no difference between patients experiencing rejection and the rejection-free patients with respect to CsA C2-levels, dose (mg/kg), human leukocyte antigen mismatch, donor age, recipient age, or ABCB1 genotyping. CONCLUSION: Intracellular CsA T-lymphocyte concentrations declined significantly 3 days prior to a rejection episode and there was a general lower intracellular exposure of CsA in recipients experiencing rejection. Intracellular measurement of CsA therefore seems to have a potential to further improve individualization of therapeutic drug monitoring. Larger studies are needed to elucidate the role for intracellular T-lymphocyte measurements in ordinary clinical care, for both CsA and other immunosuppressive drugs.

Cinacalcet's effect on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus, cyclosporine and mycophenolate in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The calcimimetic drug cinacalcet offers a novel therapeutic option to treat post-transplant hypercalcemia and hyperparathyroidism; however, the interaction with calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate has not been evaluated. METHODS: In the present study the effects of cinacalcet on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A (CsA), tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolate were investigated in 14 renal transplant recipients with stable renal function (mean creatinine 126.4 +/- 45.3 micromol/L). The patients were treated with either CsA (n = 8) or Tac (n = 6) in combination with mycophenolate/azathioprine and steroids. Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic investigations to measure CsA and its six main metabolites, Tac and mycophenolate concentrations were performed before and after 1-week treatment with 30 mg cinacalcet once daily. RESULTS: Cinacalcet treatment induced a significant 14.3 +/- 12.1% decrease in Tac AUC(0-12) (P = 0.039). Tac C(max), T(max) and T(1/2) also tended to decrease. The pharmacokinetics of CsA and mycophenolate were not significantly affected by concomitant treatment with cinacalcet. However, the secondary CsA metabolite, AM19, showed a significant increase of 9.0 +/- 9.5% during cinacalcet treatment (P = 0.040). Renal function decreased significantly from 78 +/- 11 to 72 +/- 12 mL/min (P = 0.019) and correlated with the increased levels of metabolite AM19 in the CsA group. Renal function was unchanged in the Tac group. CONCLUSION: Cinacalcet treatment showed a moderate effect on the Tac, but not CsA or mycophenolate, pharmacokinetics after 1-week concomitant treatment. This interaction appears to have minor clinical relevance. However, it is advisable to monitor renal function in CsA-treated patients due to the observed decrease in renal function.

Determination of ciclosporin A and its six main metabolites in isolated T-lymphocytes and whole blood using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A specific and sensitive method for determination of intracellular ciclosporin A (CsA) and its six main metabolites AM1, AM9, AM1c, AM1c9, AM19 and AM4N, in isolated T-lymphocytes and whole blood is described. T-lymphocytes were separated from whole blood using Prepacyte. The analytes were extracted and purified from isolated lymphocytes and whole blood by protein precipitation followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE). The analytes and the internal standard, ciclosporin C (CsC), were separated on a reversed phase C8 column (30 mm x 2.1mm, 3 microm) with a 10 mm x 2 mm, 5 microm Drop-In Guard Cartridge, using gradient elution chromatography and tandem ion trap mass spectrometry detection. The method has been validated in accordance with FDA guidelines and showed linear range from 0.25 to 500 ng/mL for CsA, 0.5 to 500 ng/mL for AM1, AM9 and AM19, 1 to 500 ng/mL for AM4N, AM1c and AM1c9 in intracellular matrix, and 2.5 to 3000 ng/mL for all analytes in whole blood. The applicability of the method is shown on patient samples.

A nationwide registry study to compare bleeding rates in patients with atrial fibrillation being prescribed oral anticoagulants.

AIMS: We aimed to evaluate bleeding risk in clinical practice in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) being prescribed dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban compared with warfarin. METHODS: Using nationwide registries (Norwegian Patient Registry and Norwegian Prescription Database), we identified AF patients with a first prescription of oral anticoagulants between January 2013 and June 2015. Patients were followed until discontinuation or switching of oral anticoagulants, death, or end of follow-up. The primary endpoint was major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. RESULTS: In total 32 675 AF patients were identified (58% men, median age 74 years): 11 427 patients used warfarin, 7925 dabigatran, 6817 rivaroxaban, and 6506 apixaban. After a median follow-up of 173 days (25th, 75th percentile 84, 340), 2081 (6.37%) patients experienced a first major or CRNM bleeding. Using a Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for baseline characteristics, use of apixaban [hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.80, P < 0.001] and dabigatran (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.84, P < 0.001) were associated with a lower risk of major or CRNM bleeding compared with warfarin whereas use of rivaroxaban was not (HR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.94-1.17, P = 0.400). Use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, whereas use of apixaban and dabigatran were associated with lower risk of intracranial bleeding, compared with warfarin. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort study in AF patients, apixaban and dabigatran were associated with a lower risk of major or CRNM bleeding compared with warfarin. The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher with rivaroxaban and dabigatran compared with warfarin.

Endomyocardial, intralymphocyte, and whole blood concentrations of ciclosporin A in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: In the early phases following heart transplantation a main challenge is to reduce the impact of acute rejections. Previous studies indicate that intracellular ciclosporin A (CsA) concentration may be a sensitive acute rejection marker in renal transplant recipients. The aims of this study were to evaluate the relationships between CsA concentrations at different target sites as potential therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) tools in heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Ten heart transplant recipients (8 men, 2 women) on CsA-based immunosuppression were enrolled in this prospective single-center pilot study. Blood samples were obtained once to twice weekly up to 12 weeks post-transplant. One of the routine biopsies was allocated to this study at each sampling time. Whole blood, intralymphocyte, and endomyocardial CsA concentrations were determined with validated HPLC-MS/MS-methods. Mann-Whitney U test was used when evaluating parameters between the two groups of patients. To correlate whole blood, intralymphocyte, and endomyocardial CsA concentrations linear regression analysis was used. RESULTS: Three patients experienced mild rejections. In the study period, the mean (range) intralymphocyte CsA trough concentrations were 10.1 (1.5 to 39) and 8.1 (1.3 to 25) ng/106 cells in the rejection and no-rejection group, respectively (P=0.21). Corresponding whole blood CsA concentrations were 316 (153 to 564) and 301 (152 to 513) ng/mL (P=0.33). There were no correlations between whole blood, intralymphocyte, or endomyocardial concentrations of CsA (P >0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The study did not support an association between decreasing intralymphocyte CsA concentrations and acute rejections. Further, there were no association between blood concentrations and concentrations at sites of action, potentially challenging TDM in these patients.

Urinary proteomic shotgun approach for identification of potential acute rejection biomarkers in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection (AR) episodes in renal transplant recipients are suspected when plasma creatinine is elevated and other potential causes out ruled. Graft biopsies are however needed for definite diagnosis. Non-invasive AR-biomarkers is an unmet clinical need. The urinary proteome is an interesting source in the search for such a biomarker in this population. METHODS: In this proof of principle study, serial urine samples in the early post transplant phase from 6 patients with biopsy verified acute rejections and 6 age-matched controls without clinical signs of rejection were analyzed by shotgun proteomics. RESULTS: Eleven proteins fulfilled predefined criteria for regulation in association with AR. They presented detectable regulation already several days before clinical suspicion of AR (increased plasma creatinine). The regulated proteins could be grouped by their biological function; proteins related to growth and proteins related to immune response. Growth-related proteins (IGFBP7, Vasorin, EGF and Galectin-3-binding protein) were significantly up-regulated in association with AR (P = 0.03) while proteins related to immune response (MASP2, C3, CD59, Ceruloplasmin, PiGR and CD74) tended to be up-regulated ( P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: The use of shotgun proteomics provides a robust and sensitive method for identification of potentially predictive urinary biomarkers of AR. Further validation of the current findings is needed to establish their potential clinical role with regards to clinical AR diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00139009.

A population pharmacokinetic model of ciclosporin applicable for assisting dose management of kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetic disposition of ciclosporin shows great intra- and interpatient variability, and that combined with a narrow therapeutic window makes therapeutic drug monitoring of ciclosporin necessary. The nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic program NONMEM predicts individual pharmacokinetic parameters based not only on individual patient observations but also on population characteristics and the patient's covariates. The aim of this model development is to potentially use it in the clinical setting to optimize ciclosporin dosing in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetic model of ciclosporin has been developed with NONMEM using full 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles from 29 renal transplant recipients, 3 months of daily follow-up data from an additional 11 recipients, and both 3 months of follow-up data and full 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles from nine patients. The internal validation of the model was based on data splitting and jack-knife methods. In addition, the model was validated for its clinical applicability on standard trough and 2-hour post-dose concentration data from 12 additional patients with 3 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The model that best described the ciclosporin data was a two-compartment model with first-order absorption process with lagged time. The population pharmacokinetic parameters were oral clearance (CL/F) = 26.9 L/h; central volume of distribution after oral administration (V(1)/F) = 24.4 L; absorption rate constant (k(a)) = 0.544 h-1; lag time = 0.460 h; peripheral volume of distribution = 1119 L and intercompartmental clearance after oral administration (Q/F) = 19.6 L/h. Three covariates had significant effect on a total of six pharmacokinetic parameters. These were bodyweight on V(1)/F and k(a), time after transplantation on k(a), and age on CL/F, k(a) and V(1)/F. Cytochrome P450 3A5 genotype was also a significant covariate but was not included in the final model since such information is not available in clinical practice. The external validation showed that the model was able to predict ciclosporin concentrations in the 12 new patients with an average predictive error of 17.4 +/- 14% when the standard sample concentrations from the previous week were given. CONCLUSION: A NONMEM pharmacokinetic model for ciclosporin in renal transplant recipients was successfully developed and validated for the first 3 months post-transplantation. The model showed good predictability in a new patient cohort. After further clinical validation, the model may be applicable as a clinical tool for optimizing ciclosporin dosing in renal transplant recipients in the early post-transplant period.

Reduced elimination of cyclosporine A in elderly (>65 years) kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Physiologic functions that may affect pharmacokinetics of drugs are altered in elderly patients. The current study was performed to elucidate the effect of age on cyclosporine A (CsA) pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients. METHOD: Twenty-five renal transplant recipients on CsA treatment were included in the study. CsA doses were adjusted by C2 monitoring. The patients were divided into two groups based on age; elderly: more than 65 years (n=11, mean 73 years) and younger: 18 to 64 years (n=14, mean 43 years). A full 12-hr pharmacokinetic profile was performed during stable phase. CsA whole blood and intracellular T-lymphocytes concentrations (first 6 hr) were measured. Genotyping of the CYP3A5*1/*3 and ABCB1 (C1236T, G2677T, C3435T) polymorphisms and quantification of whole blood mRNA ABCB1 expression were performed in all patients. RESULTS: Elderly patients achieved target C2 levels with lower CsA doses than the younger patients (4.3+/-0.8 vs. 6.1+/-2.1 mg/day/kg, P=0.025) because of lower clearance of CsA (22.7+/-5.1 vs. 30.5+/-11.1 L/hr, P=0.031). Elderly patients also showed 44% higher intracellular-to-whole blood CsA ratio than younger patients (P=0.02). Neither the CYP3A5*1, the ABCB1 genotypes nor mRNA ABCB1 expression revealed any significant influence on CsA pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION: The clearance of CsA decreased with increasing age. In addition, elderly patients had a significant larger proportion of the whole blood CsA concentration located at the site of action (within T lymphocytes). This indicates that in elderly recipients it might be safe to aim for an even lower whole blood target levels than current guidelines propose.