Mocetinostat for patients with previously treated, locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma and inactivating alterations of acetyltransferase genes.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated mocetinostat (a class I/IV histone deacetylase inhibitor) in patients with urothelial carcinoma harboring inactivating mutations or deletions in CREB binding protein [CREBBP] and/or E1A binding protein p300 [EP300] histone acetyltransferase genes in a single-arm, open-label phase 2 study. METHODS: Eligible patients with platinum-treated, advanced/metastatic disease received oral mocetinostat (at a dose of 70 mg 3 times per week [TIW] escalating to 90 mg TIW) in 28-day cycles in a 3-stage study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02236195). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. RESULTS: Genomic testing was feasible in 155 of 175 patients (89%). Qualifying tumor mutations were CREBBP (15%), EP300 (8%), and both CREBBP and EP300 (1%). A total of 17 patients were enrolled into stage 1 (the intent-to-treat population); no patients were enrolled in subsequent stages. One partial response was observed (11% [1 of 9 patients; the population that was evaluable for efficacy comprised 9 of the 15 planned patients]); activity was deemed insufficient to progress to stage 2 (null hypothesis: objective response rate of ≤15%). All patients experienced ≥1 adverse event, most commonly nausea (13 of 17 patients; 77%) and fatigue (12 of 17 patients; 71%). The median duration of treatment was 46 days; treatment interruptions (14 of 17 patients; 82%) and dose reductions (5 of 17 patients; 29%) were common. Mocetinostat exposure was lower than anticipated (dose-normalized maximum serum concentration [Cmax ] after TIW dosing of 0.2 ng/mL/mg). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, the current study represents the first clinical trial using genomic-based selection to identify patients with urothelial cancer who are likely to benefit from selective histone deacetylase inhibition. Mocetinostat was associated with significant toxicities that impacted drug exposure and may have contributed to modest clinical activity in these pretreated patients. The efficacy observed was considered insufficient to warrant further investigation of mocetinostat as a single agent in this setting.

Phase II study investigating the efficacy and safety of glesatinib (MGCD265) in patients with advanced NSCLC containing MET activating alterations.

OBJECTIVES: Dysregulated signaling by mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) and heightened AXL activation are implicated in the pathogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Glesatinib (MGCD265) is an investigational, oral inhibitor of MET and AXL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label, Phase II study investigated glesatinib (free-base suspension [FBS] capsule 1050 mg BID or spray-dried dispersion [SDD] tablet 750 mg BID) in patients with advanced, previously treated NSCLC across four cohorts grouped according to presence of MET activating mutations or amplification in tumor or ctDNA. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled: n = 28 and n = 8 with MET exon 14 skipping mutations in tumor tissue and ctDNA, respectively, and n = 20 and n = 12 with MET gene amplification in tumor tissue and ctDNA, respectively. Overall, ORR was 11.8 %, median progression-free survival was 4.0 months, and median overall survival was 7.0 months. Among patients with MET activating mutations, ORR was 10.7 % with tumor testing and 25.0 % with ctDNA testing. For MET amplification, responses were observed only in patients enrolled by tumor testing (ORR 15.0 %). Diarrhea (82.4 %), nausea (50.0 %), increased alanine aminotransferase (41.2 %), fatigue (38.2 %), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (36.8 %) were the most frequent adverse events assessed as related to study medication. Glesatinib exposure was similar with the SDD tablet and FBS capsule formulations. The study was terminated early by the sponsor due to modest clinical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Glesatinib had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced, pre-treated NSCLC with MET activating alterations. Modest clinical activity was observed, which likely reflects suboptimal drug bioavailability suggested by previously reported Phase I data, and pharmacodynamic findings of lower than anticipated increases in circulating soluble shed MET ectodomain (s-MET).

Quantification of disease progression and dropout for Alzheimer's disease.

This research aimed to quantitatively describe the natural progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on ADAScog scores in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. ADAS-cog data from 10 placebo-controlled clinical trials including more than 2,400 patients with up to 72 weeks of treatment were used. Different models describing the time course of ADAS-cog were evaluated. Patient characteristics potentially affect score changes were assessed. Furthermore, patient dropout patterns were characterized using parametric survival models. Covariate selection was performed to identify the risk factors associated with a higher dropout rate. ADAS-cog time course in mild-tomoderate AD patients receiving placebo was best described by a log-linear model, where the intercept represents the log-transformed ADAS-cog score at Week 10, the slope is the disease progression (i.e., natural increase of ADAS-cog score) on the log scale. Covariates influencing the intercept were baseline ADAS-cog score and baseline Mini Mental State Exam score. No covariates influenced the disease progression slope. A parametric log-normal model fit the dropout data best. Baseline ADAS-cog score and age were found to be significant predictors for dropout. AD disease and dropout models were both established. These models set up a quantitative basis for future clinical trial design and endpoint selection.

Phase I Study Evaluating Glesatinib (MGCD265), An Inhibitor of MET and AXL, in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Other Advanced Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Heightened signaling by mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) is implicated in tumorigenesis. Glesatinib is an investigational, oral inhibitor of MET and AXL. OBJECTIVE: This phase I study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and safety profile of glesatinib in patients with advanced or unresectable solid tumors. Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) were secondary objectives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four formulations of glesatinib glycolate salt (capsule, unmicronized, micronized, and micronized version 2 [V2] tablets) and two free-base formulations (free-base suspension [FBS] capsule and spray-dried dispersion [SDD] tablet), developed to enhance drug exposure and optimize manufacturing processes, were evaluated in patients with genetically unselected advanced/unresectable solid tumors. MTD, based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed during the first 21-day treatment cycle, was further evaluated in dose-expansion cohorts comprising patients with overexpression of MET and/or AXL, MET/AXL amplification, MET-activating mutations, or MET/AXL rearrangements for confirmation as the RP2D. RESULTS: Glesatinib was evaluated across 27 dose-escalation cohorts (n = 108). Due to suboptimal exposure with glesatinib glycolate salt formulations in the initial cohorts, investigations subsequently focused on the FBS capsule and SDD tablet; for these formulations, MTD was identified as 1050 mg twice daily and 750 mg twice daily, respectively. An additional 71 patients received glesatinib in the FBS and SDD dose-expansion cohorts. At MTDs, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (FBS, 83.3%; SDD, 75.0%), nausea (57.1%, 30.6%), vomiting (45.2%, 25.0%), increased alanine aminotransferase (45.2%, 30.6%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (47.6%, 27.8%). Exploratory pharmacodynamic analyses indicated target engagement and inhibition of MET by glesatinib. Antitumor activity was observed with glesatinib FBS 1050 mg twice daily and SDD 750 mg twice daily in tumors harboring MET/AXL alteration or aberrant protein expression, particularly in patients with non--small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In patients with NSCLC, the objective response rate was 25.9% in those with MET/AXL mutation or amplification and 30.0% in a subset with MET-activating mutations. All six partial responses occurred in patients with tumors carrying MET exon 14 deletion mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of single-agent glesatinib was acceptable. SDD 750 mg twice daily was selected as the preferred glesatinib formulation and dose based on clinical activity, safety, and PK data. Observations from this study led to initiation of a phase II study of glesatinib in patients with NSCLC stratified by type of MET alteration (NCT02544633). CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00697632; June 2008.

Phase I Study of Glesatinib (MGCD265) in Combination with Erlotinib or Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Oncogenic drivers in solid tumors include aberrant activation of mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) and AXL. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the safety and antitumor activity of glesatinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits MET and AXL at clinically relevant doses, in combination with erlotinib or docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The phase I portion of this open-label, multicenter study included two parallel arms in which ascending doses of oral glesatinib (starting dose 96 mg/m2) were administered with erlotinib or docetaxel (starting doses 100 mg once daily and 50 mg/m2, respectively) using a modified 3 + 3 design. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first 21-day treatment cycle. Enrollment focused on patients with solid tumor types typically associated with MET aberration and/or AXL overexpression. The primary objective was to determine the safety profile of the treatment combinations. Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) were also assessed. RESULTS: Ten dose levels of glesatinib across three glycolate formulations (unmicronized, micronized, or micronized version 2 [V2] tablets) available during the course of the study were investigated in 14 dose-escalation cohorts (n = 126). MTDs of unmicronized glesatinib plus erlotinib or docetaxel, and micronized glesatinib plus erlotinib were not reached. Micronized glesatinib 96 mg/m2 plus docetaxel exceeded the MTD. Further dosing focused on glesatinib micronized V2: maximum administered dose (MAD) was 700 mg twice daily with erlotinib 150 mg once daily or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. DLTs, acceptable at lower glesatinib (micronized V2) dose levels, occurred in two of five and two of six patients at the MADs of glesatinib + erlotinib and glesatinib + docetaxel, respectively. Across all cohorts, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (glesatinib + erlotinib: 84.1%; glesatinib + docetaxel: 45.6%), fatigue (46.4%, 70.4%), and nausea (30.4%, 35.1%). The objective response rate was 1.8% and 12.0% in all glesatinib + erlotinib and glesatinib + docetaxel cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of glesatinib plus erlotinib or docetaxel was acceptable and there were no PK interactions. MADs of glesatinib 700 mg twice daily (micronized V2) with erlotinib 150 mg once daily or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks exceeded the MTD by a small margin. Modest signals of efficacy were observed with these treatment combinations in non-genetically selected patients with advanced solid tumors. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00975767; 11 September 2009.

Effect of pioglitazone on HIV-1-related lipodystrophy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (ANRS 113).

BACKGROUND: Although thiazolidinediones have been shown to increase subcutaneous fat in congenital lipodystrophy, rosiglitazone did not show convincing results in HIV lipoatrophy. We assess a potential specific effect of pioglitazone in this setting. METHODS: One-hundred and thirty HIV-1-infected adults with self-reported lipoatrophy confirmed by physical examination were randomized to receive pioglitazone 30 mg once daily (n=64) or placebo (n=66) for 48 weeks. Changes in limb fat between weeks 0 and 48 were measured using dual-energy Xray absorptiometry. Subcutaneous and visceral fat was measured by single-slice computed tomography; fasting plasma measurements of glucose, insulin and lipids levels were recorded. RESULTS: Limb fat increased by 0.38 kg in the pioglitazone group and 0.05 kg in the placebo group at week 48 (mean difference 0.33 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.56; P=0.051) by intention-to-treat analysis. In patients not receiving stavudine, an increase of 0.45 kg versus 0.04 kg was observed (mean difference, 0.40 kg, 95% CI 0.12-0.69; P=0.013), but this was not seen in patients on stavudine (n=36; P=0.404). Overall, there was no significant difference in subcutaneous abdominal fat or in visceral fat areas on computed tomography at L4 vertebra. The lipid profile was not significantly different at week 48 except for levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, which was improved in the pioglitazone group (+0.08 mmol/l versus -0.08; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Pioglitazone 30 mg once daily for 48 weeks improved limb fat atrophy in antiretroviral-treated HIV-1-infected patients, although clinical benefits were not perceived by the patients. Treatment did lead to a favourable lipid profile, however, suggesting that this thiazolidinedione should be considered in the context of HIV-related lipoatrophy.

Population pharmacokinetic study of methotrexate in patients with lymphoid malignancy.

PURPOSE: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe dose-exposure relationships of methotrexate (MTX) in adults with lymphoid malignancy; this is in order to explore the interindividual variability in relationship with the different physiopathological variables. The final model was applied to the Bayesian estimation of MTX concentrations using two blood samples. METHODS: Fifty-one patients receiving 136 courses of MTX (1-6 per patient) were included in this study. The data was analysed using NONMEM software. A linear two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data. Setting mean parameters values and variabilities to population values, we obtained Bayesian prediction of MTX pharmacokinetic parameters and concentrations. The predictive performance was evaluated by comparing the Bayesian estimated and observed concentrations and the Bayesian estimated parameters with the individual final model estimated parameters. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetic parameters and the inter-subject variablities expressed as coefficient of variation were: the total body clearance CL, 7.1 l h-1 (22%), the volume of the central and peripheral compartments V1, 25.1 l (22.5%), V2, 2.7 l (64%), respectively, and the transfer constant Q, 2.7 (51%) l h-1. Inter-course variability was only significant on CL. Age and serum creatinine had significant effects on CL and was included in the final model. A good correlation was obtained between Bayesian estimated and experimental concentrations (r2=0.85).

Use of an indirect effect model to describe the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect by statins in hypercholesterolaemic patients.

Statins are the most commonly prescribed agents for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. This is due to their efficacy in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) level which is the primary goal of the treatment especially for patients with multiple risk factors or with established coronary heart diseases. The purpose of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model that describes the LDL-lowering process in patients with hypercholesterolaemia treated with atorvastatin, fluvastatin or simvastatin. A total of 100 patients were studied retrospectively. They received atorvastatin (n = 57), fluvastatin (n = 26) or simvastatin (n = 17). As no pharmacokinetic data were available, the absorption rate was fixed to 1/h and atorvastatin, simvastatin and fluvastatin elimination half-lives were fixed to 14, 2 and 2.5 h respectively. A total of 309 LDL levels were measured and the data were analysed by nonmem v. The time course of the LDL-lowering effect of statins was described by an indirect-response model with precursor (LDL synthesis, input rate K(in)) and response (circulating LDL, input and output rates K) compartments. The following parameters were estimated: LDL input rate (K(in)) 0.14 +/- 0.015 g/L/day (mean +/- SD); inhibition fraction of K(in) (INH) 0.21 +/- 0.017; and dose producing 50% increase of LDL removal (D50), 26 +/- 7.8, 1.3 +/- 0.48 and 15 +/- 5.25 mg for atorvastatin, simvastatin and fluvastatin, respectively. Gender, bodyweight, age, calories/day, sugar/day, lipids/day, hyperlipidaemia types and waist/hip circumference, renal and hepatic functions had no effect on the pharmacodynamic parameters. The pharmacodynamic parameters for the three statins were accurately estimated. The PK/PD model developed successfully predicted the time course of the LDL-lowering effect of statins.

A mutation in the drug transporter gene ABCC2 associated with impaired methotrexate elimination.

Human multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2, encoded by ABCC2) is involved in active efflux of anionic drugs such as methotrexate. MRP2 is expressed on the luminal side of hepatocytes and renal proximal tubular cells, indicating an important role in drug elimination. We postulated that loss-of-function mutations in ABCC2, which are involved in the Dubin-Johnson syndrome, may be associated with impaired methotrexate elimination and an increased risk of toxicity. We studied the biological phenotype and ABCC2 coding sequence in a patient receiving a high-dose methotrexate infusion for large B-cell lymphoma and who had an unusual pharmacokinetic profile, mainly characterized by a three-fold reduction in the methotrexate elimination rate. This resulted in severe methotrexate over-dosing and reversible nephrotoxicity. An inversion of the urinary coproporphyrin isomer I/III ratio (a specific biological marker of the Dubin-Johnson syndrome) was observed in this patient. Genetic analysis of ABCC2 identified a heterozygous mutation replacing a highly conserved arginine by glycine in the cytoplasmic part of the second membrane-spanning domain (position 412 of MRP2), a region associated with substrate affinity. This genetic variant was not found in a control population. Functional analysis in transiently transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells revealed a loss of transport activity of the G412 MRP2 mutant protein. An ABCC2 mutation altering MRP2-mediated methotrexate transport and resulting in impaired drug elimination and subsequent renal toxicity was identified. Candidates for methotrexate therapy should be considered for MRP2 functional testing.