Telemedicine Quality and Outcomes in Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

PURPOSE: Telestroke is one of the most frequently used and rapidly expanding applications of telemedicine, delivering much-needed stroke expertise to hospitals and patients. This document reviews the current status of telestroke and suggests measures for ongoing quality and outcome monitoring to improve performance and to enhance delivery of care. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken to examine the current status of telestroke and relevant quality indicators. The members of the writing committee contributed to the review of specific quality and outcome measures with specific suggestions for metrics in telestroke networks. The drafts were circulated and revised by all committee members, and suggestions were discussed for consensus. RESULTS: Models of telestroke and the role of telestroke in stroke systems of care are reviewed. A brief description of the science of quality monitoring and prior experience in quality measures for stroke is provided. Process measures, outcomes, tissue-type plasminogen activator use, patient and provider satisfaction, and telestroke technology are reviewed, and suggestions are provided for quality metrics. Additional topics include licensing, credentialing, training, and documentation.

Prospective, open-label safety study of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in wake-up stroke.

OBJECTIVE: It is estimated that one of four ischemic strokes are noticed upon awakening and are not candidates for intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) because their symptoms are >3 hours from last seen normal (LSN). We tested the safety of rtPA in a multicenter, single-arm, prospective, open-label study (NCT01183533) in patients with wake-up stroke (WUS). METHODS: We aimed to enroll 40 WUS patients with disabling deficits. Patients were 18 to 80 years of age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤25, and selected only on the appearance of noncontrast computed tomography (ie, over one-third middle cerebral artery territory hypodensity). Standard-dose (0.9mg/kg) intravenous rtPA had to be started ≤3 hours of patient awakening. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) with preplanned stopping rules and data safety board oversight. Other endpoints included: asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; clinical improvement in NIHSS; and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. RESULTS: Between October 2010 and October 2013, all 40 preplanned patients were enrolled (50% men) at five stroke centers. Four patients (10%) were subsequently determined to be mimics. Patients had a mean age of 60.8, median NIHSS of 6.5 (range, 2-24), and received thrombolysis at a mean time of 10.3 ± 2.6 LSN and 2.6 ± 0.6 hours from awakening with deficits. No sICH or parenchymal hematomas occurred. At 3 months, 20 of 38 (52.6%) patients achieved excellent recovery with mRS scores of 0 or 1 (2 patients were lost to follow-up). INTERPRETATION: Intravenous thrombolysis was safe in this prospective WUS study of patients selected by noncontrast CT. A randomized effectiveness trial appears feasible using a similar, pragmatic design. Ann Neurol 2016;80:211-218.

A Four-Year Experience of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Following Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator at a Comprehensive Stroke Center.

BACKGROUND: To describe the 4-year experience of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rate at a high-volume comprehensive stroke center. METHODS: All admitted adult (≥18 years) patients presenting with an ischemic stroke from 2010 to 2013 were included in this study. The primary outcome was sICH, defined as any hemorrhage with neurological deterioration (change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥4) within 36 hours of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) treatment, or any hemorrhage resulting in death. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and having a favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (≤2). RESULTS: A total of 1925 did not receive intravascular (IV) or intra-arterial (IA) therapy; only 451 received IV therapy; and 175 received both IV and IA therapies. In IV-only patients, the overall rate of sICH was 2.2%; in IV and IA patients, the rate was 5.7%; and in patients who received no therapy, the rate was .4%. The IV-only group had an sICH rate of .9% in 2013. There were no differences in the adjusted odds of dying in the hospital between the study groups. IV-only treatment offered significantly better odds of achieving a favorable functional outcome, compared to no therapy, among patients with moderate stroke severity, whereas IV and IA treatments offered significantly better odds among patients with severe strokes. The odds of achieving a favorable functional outcome by discharge were decreased by 97% if patients suffered an sICH (OR = .03, 95%CI = .004, .19). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increased risk of sICH with IV-tPA, treatment with IV-tPA continues to be associated with increased odds of a favorable discharge mRS.

Age ≥80 Years Is Not a Contraindication for Intra-Arterial Therapy after Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials confirmed the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial therapy (IAT) in the management of ischemic stroke. At a community hospital, we compared outcomes in patients aged ≥80 and patients in the age range 55-79 years receiving IAT following ischemic stroke. METHODS: Data were retrospectively abstracted for ischemic stroke patients ≥55 years treated with IAT at an urban comprehensive stroke center between 2010 and 2013. Baseline demographics, incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), in-hospital mortality, discharge modified Rankin scale (mRS) score (favorable ≤2) and improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS; decreased score at discharge) were compared between patients in the age range 55-79 and patients ≥80 years. Data were analyzed using univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: IAT was performed in 239 patients with ischemic stroke; 63 (26.4%) were ≥80 years. When compared to patients aged 55-79, the elderly patients were more often female and non-smokers, with a history of atrial fibrillation. No differences were observed in those ≥80 years compared to patients in the age range 55-79 years for sICH (10 vs. 5%, p = 0.23), mortality (24 vs. 18%, p = 0.28), favorable discharge mRS score (13 vs. 19%, p = 0.27), or improvement in NIHSS (83 vs. 92%, p = 0.10). The nonsignificant association of age with the outcomes persisted after adjusting for covariates and when analyzing the subset of patients who received IAT only. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that in a cohort not subject to the criteria of a clinical trial, age ≥80 years should not be a contraindication to IAT.

Telestroke network business model strategies.

Our objective is to summarize the evidence that supports the reliability of telemedicine for diagnosis and efficacy in acute stroke treatment, identify strategies for funding the development of a telestroke network, and to present issues with respect to economic sustainability, cost effectiveness, and the status of reimbursement for telestroke.

How a CT-Direct Protocol at an American Comprehensive Stroke Center Led to Door-to-Needle Times Less Than 30 Minutes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) following acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is dependent on its timely administration. In 2014, our Comprehensive Stroke Center designed and implemented a computed tomography-Direct protocol to streamline the evaluation process of suspected patients with AIS, with the aim of reducing door-to-needle (DTN) times. The objectives of our study were to describe the protocol development and implementation process, and to compare DTN times and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates before and after protocol implementation. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for patients with AIS receiving IV tPA between January 1, 2010, and May 31, 2015. The DTN times, examined as median times and time treatment windows, and sICH rates were compared pre- and postimplementation. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-five patients were included in the study. After protocol implementation, median DTN times were significantly reduced (38 vs 28 minutes; P < .001). The distribution of patients treated in the three time treatment windows described below changed significantly, with an increase in patients with DTN times of 30 minutes or less, and a decrease in patients with DTN times 31 to 60 minutes and over 60 minutes (P < .001). There were two cases of sICH prior to implementation and one sICH case postimplementation. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a protocol that streamlined the processing of suspected patients with AIS significantly reduced DTN time without negatively impacting patient safety.