Phase II study of idelalisib, a selective inhibitor of PI3Kδ, for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor idelalisib has been shown to block downstream intracellular signaling, reduce the production of prosurvival chemokines and induce apoptosis in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) cell lines. It has also been shown to inhibit regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in other tumor models. We hypothesized that inhibiting PI3Kδ would have both direct and indirect antitumor effects by directly targeting the malignant cells as well as modulating the inflammatory microenvironment. We tested this hypothesis in a phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 25 patients with relapsed/refractory HL with a median age of 42 years and who had previously received a median of five therapies including 18 (72%) with failed autologous stem cell transplant, 23 (92%) with failed brentuximab vedotin, and 11 (44%) with prior radiation therapy. Idelalisib was administered at 150 mg two times daily; an increase to 300 mg two times daily was permitted at the time of disease progression. RESULTS: The overall response rate to idelalisib therapy was 20% (95% confidence interval: 6.8%, 40.7%) with a median time to response of 2.0 months. Seventeen patients (68%) experienced reduction in target lesions with one complete remission and four partial remissions. The median duration of response was 8.4 months and median progression-free survival was 2.3 months. The most common grade ≥3 adverse event was elevation of alanine aminotransferase (two patients, 8%). Diarrhea/colitis was seen in three patients and was grade 1-2. There was one adverse event leading to death (hypoxia). CONCLUSIONS: Idelalisib was tolerable and had modest single-agent activity in heavily pretreated patients with HL. Rational combinations with other novel agents may improve response rate and duration of response. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT01393106.

Factors influencing outcome in advanced stage, low-grade follicular lymphoma treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center in the rituximab era.

BACKGROUND: The optimal initial therapy of follicular lymphoma (FL) remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare primary treatment strategies and assess the impact of maintenance rituximab and patterns of treatment failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with treatment-naive advanced stage, grade 1-2 FL treated at our center from 2004 to 2014. We included 356 patients treated on clinical trials or standard of care with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP, n = 119); R-CHOP with maintenance (R-CHOP + M, n = 65); bendamustine/rituximab (BR, n = 45); BR with maintenance (BR + M, n = 35); R(2) (n = 94). We compared baseline characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and analyzed prognostic factors using univariate and multivariate analysis adjusted for treatment. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4 years (range 0.2-15.0), the 3-year PFS was 60% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51% to 69%] for R-CHOP, 72% (59% to 82%) for R-CHOP + M, 63% (42% to 78%) for BR, 97% (80% to 100%) for BR + M and 87% (78% to 93%) for R(2). Patients treated with R-chemotherapy had more high-risk features than patients treated with R(2) but, by adjusted multivariate analysis, treatment with R(2) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39 (0.17-0.89), P = 0.02] was associated with a superior PFS. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status of one or more predicted inferior OS. Among patients treated with R-chemotherapy, maintenance was associated with the superior PFS [HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.21-0.68)]. By adjusted multivariate analysis, disease progression within 2 years [HR 5.1 (95% CI 1.57-16.83)] and histologic transformation (HT) [HR 11.05 (95% CI 2.84-42.93)] increased risk of death. CONCLUSION: Induction therapy with R(2) may result in disease control which is comparable with R-chemotherapy. Early disease progression and HT are predictive of inferior survival.

Patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma experiencing disease progression after treatment with brentuximab vedotin have poor outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a key therapeutic agent for patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). The outcomes of patients experiencing disease progression after BV are poorly described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed our institutional database to identify patients with cHL treated with BV who were either refractory to treatment or experienced disease relapse. We collected clinicopathologic features, treatment details at progression and outcome. RESULTS: One hundred patients met inclusion criteria, with a median age of 32 years (range 18-84) at progression after BV. The median number of treatments before BV was 3 (range 0-9); 71 had prior autologous stem cell transplant. The overall response rate (ORR) to BV was 57%, and the median duration of BV therapy was 3 months (range 1-25). After disease progression post-BV, the most common treatment strategies were investigational agents (n = 30), gemcitabine (n = 15) and bendamustine (n = 12). The cumulative ORR to therapy was 33% (complete response 15%). After a median follow-up of 25 months (range 1-74), the median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.5 and 25.2 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, no factors analyzed were predictive of PFS; age at progression >45 years and serum albumin <40 g/l at disease progression were associated with increased risk of death. Among patients who achieved response to therapy, allogeneic stem cell transplantation was associated with a non-significant trend toward superior OS (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BV-resistant cHL have poor outcomes. These data serve as a reference for newer agents active in BV-resistant disease.

A randomized trial of a single-dose rasburicase versus five-daily doses in patients at risk for tumor lysis syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a life-threatening disorder characterized by hyperuricemia and metabolic derangements. The efficacy of rasburicase, administered daily for 5 days, has been well established. However, the optimal duration of therapy is unknown in adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of rasburicase (0.15 mg/kg) administered as single dose followed by as needed dosing (maximum five doses) versus daily dosing for 5 days in adult patients at risk for TLS. RESULTS: Eighty of the 82 patients enrolled received rasburicase; 40 high risk [median uric acid (UA) 8.5 mg/dl; range, 1.5-19.7] and 40 potential risk (UA = 5.6 mg/dl; range, 2.4-7.4). Seventy-nine patients (99%) experienced normalization in their UA within 4 h after the first dose; 84% to an undetectable level (<0.7 mg/dl). Thirty-nine of 40 (98%) patients in the daily-dose arm and 34 of 40 (85%) patients in single-dose arm showed sustained UA response. Six high-risk patients within the single-dose arm required second dose for UA >7.5 mg/dl. Rasburicase was well tolerated; one patient with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency developed methemoglobinemia and hemolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Rasburicase is highly effective for prevention and management of hyperuricemia in adults at risk for TLS. Single-dose rasburicase was effective in most patients; only a subset of high-risk patients required a second dose.

Induction of apoptosis in human lung cancer cells following treatment with amifostine and an adenoviral vector containing wild-type p53.

Adenoviral delivery of the p53 gene is a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of lung cancer. Furthermore, amifostine is a cytoprotective agent and recent reports have described its potentiation of chemotherapy's antitumor activity in lung cancer. Therefore, we wished to investigate the ability of amifostine both alone and in combination with p53-based therapy to induce apoptosis, and to understand the mechanisms by which this apoptosis occurs. Using p53 null and wild-type p53 human lung cancer cells and normal human bronchial epithelial cells, we evaluated the effects of amifostine on proliferation and apoptosis. We then analyzed Adp53 in combination with amifostine and performed isobologram analysis. Expression of p53, p21(WAF1), Bax, Bak, bcl-2, as well as total and phosphorylated Cdc2 in the absence and presence of olomoucine, a phosphorylated Cdc2 kinase inhibitor, was then determined. Amifostine-induced apoptosis in human lung cancer cells in a dose-dependent fashion. The combination of amifostine and Adp53 significantly enhanced, with a supra-additive effect, the inhibition of proliferation of lung cancer cells. This enhancement of apoptosis by amifostine was associated with activation of p53 and dephosphorylation of Cdc2 proteins. Notably, olomoucine effectively prevented amifostine and/or Adp53-induced Cdc2 kinase activation and subsequent apoptosis. Our data shows that amifostine alone can induce apoptosis of human lung cancer cells, and that the combination of Adp53 with amifostine resulted in significantly higher levels of apoptosis. In addition, it appears that Cdc2 kinase plays an important role in the induction of apoptosis by amifostine and Adp53.

Efficacy and safety of antiretrovirals in HIV-infected patients with cancer.

At 30 years into the HIV infection epidemic, the optimal antiretroviral (ARV) regimen for infected patients with cancer remains unknown. We therefore sought to retrospectively study different ARV regimens used in this population. Data from HIV-infected patients seen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, USA, from 2001 to 2012 were reviewed. Patients received nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus protease inhibitors (PIs), non-NRTIs (NNRTIs), integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), or combinations of these. A total of 154 patients were studied. Most patients were male (80%), white (51%) and had haematological malignancies (HMs) (58%). NRTIs were combined with PIs (37%), NNRTIs (32%), INSTIs (19%) or combinations of these (11%). INSTIs were the most commonly used in patients with HM and in those receiving high-dose steroids or topoisomerase inhibitors (p <0.05). Side-effects occurred in 35%, 14%, 3% and 6% of patients receiving PIs, NNRTIs, INSTIs and combinations, respectively (p 0.001). Grade 3-4 adverse events were uncommon. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that INSTIs and NNRTIs were nine times (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-50.8) and 11 times (95% CI, 1.9-64.7) more likely to be effective at 6 months, respectively, than PIs. This is the largest reported analysis studying different ARV regimens in HIV-infected cancer patients. Combinations that included PIs were the least favourable. NNRTIs and INSTIs had comparable efficacy, but INSTIs appeared to be the better tolerated ARVs in patients with HM or those receiving various chemotherapeutic agents.