Epigenetic silencing of CHD5, a novel tumor-suppressor gene, occurs in early colorectal cancer stages.

BACKGROUND: Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5 (CHD5) is a family member of chromatin remodeling factors. The epigenetic silencing mechanisms of CHD5 in colorectal cancer have not been well studied. METHODS: Here we analyzed CHD5 methylation and mRNA expression in vitro and in clinical samples from African American patients. DNA and RNA were isolated from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) colon tissues. DNA was tested for methylation using methylation-specific polymerase chain reation (PCR) and bisulfite sequencing. RNA was used for mRNA quantification using qRT-PCR. The RKO cell line was treated with 5-Aza-dC and SAHA. RKO cells were also stably transfected with a CHD5-expressing vector. The transcriptional activity was studied in the 1 kb upstream region of the CHD5 promoter using the dual reporter assay. We performed cell proliferation, migration, and invasion assays using the RKO cell line. RESULTS: In most adenoma samples, CHD5 expression was not detected in contrast to normal tissues. In RKO cells, CHD5 silencing was associated with DNA methylation and repressive histone modifications. CHD5 expression was restored after treatment with 5-Aza-dC and SAHA. CHD5 reactivation reduced cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. The reporter assay indicated that the main regulatory region of the CHD5 promoter is encompassed in the -489 to -823 region with important transcriptional regulatory sites (TCF/LEF, SP1, and AP-2). CONCLUSIONS: The CHD5 gene is repressed in all types of adenomas, either epigenetically or by chromosomal deletion. CHD5 activity is regulated by DNA methylation and repressive histone modifications. CHD5 likely acts as a tumor-suppressor gene in early colorectal carcinogenesis.

Neuroanatomical evidence for a putative autocrine/paracrine signaling system involving nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, purinergic receptors, and nitric oxide synthase in the airways.

Nicotine in tobacco smoke is thought to stimulate sensory nerve fibers by receptors that are located on airway epithelial cells and on terminal branches of C-fiber afferents, but the exact neurochemical substrate that mediates the sensory effects of nicotine associated with cigarette smoking is not clear. ATP and nitric oxide (NO) have both been implicated in lung responsiveness to airborne chemicals such as nicotine. However, the neuroanatomical and functional relationships between nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), purinergic signaling, and NO are not known, and the main source of NO in the airways is not clear. In the present study, we performed RT-PCR to confirm the presence of mRNA for all three isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), neuronal (n-NOS), endothelial (e-NOS), and inducible (i-NOS), in the lung. Sequential double labeling was performed to assess the site of expression of the different NOS isoforms with respect to nAChRs and purinergic receptors (P2X3R) of the intrapulmonary airways. RT-PCR confirmed the presence of n-NOS, e-NOS, and i-NOS in the lung, and immunohistochemical studies verified their expression by epithelial cells at all levels of the intrapulmonary airways, including the terminal and respiratory bronchioles. Sequential double labeling demonstrated coexpression of n-NOS and/or i-NOS with nAChR- and P2X3R-expressing cells. These neuroanatomical findings suggest that bronchial epithelial cells may be a primary source of NO in the intrapulmonary airways and that the production and release of NO may be regulated by an autocrine/paracrine signaling system involving nAChRs and P2X3Rs.

Footprinting of mammalian promoters: use of a CpG DNA methyltransferase revealing nucleosome positions at a single molecule level.

Promoters are molecular 'modules', which are controlled as individual entities yet are often analyzed by nuclease digestion methodologies which, a priori, destroy this modularity. About 40% of mammalian genes contain CpG islands in their promoters and exonic regions, which are normally unmethylated. We developed a footprinting strategy to map the chromatin structure at unmethylated CpG islands by treatment of isolated nuclei with the CpG-specific DNA methyltransferase SssI (M.SssI), followed by genomic bisulfite sequencing of individual progeny DNA molecules. This gave single molecule resolution over the promoter region and allowed for the physical linkage between binding sites on individual promoter molecules to be maintained. Comparison of the p16 promoters in two human cell lines, J82 and LD419, expressing the p16 gene at 25-fold different levels showed that the two cell lines contain remarkably different, heterogeneously positioned nucleosomes over the promoter region, which were not distinguishable by standard methods using nucleases. Our high resolution approach gives a 'digitized' visualization of each promoter providing information regarding nucleosome occupancy and may be utilized to define transcription factor binding and chromatin remodeling.

The Escherichia coli dam DNA methyltransferase modifies DNA in a highly processive reaction.

The Escherichia coli dam adenine-N6 methyltransferase modifies DNA at GATC sequences. It is involved in post-replicative mismatch repair, control of DNA replication and gene regulation. We show that E. coli dam acts as a functional monomer and methylates only one strand of the DNA in each binding event. The preferred way of ternary complex assembly is that the enzyme first binds to DNA and then to S-adenosylmethionine. The enzyme methylates an oligonucleotide containing two dam sites and a 879 bp PCR product with four sites in a fully processive reaction. On lambda-DNA comprising 48,502 bp and 116 dam sites, E. coli dam scans 3000 dam sites per binding event in a random walk, that on average leads to a processive methylation of 55 sites. Processive methylation of DNA considerably accelerates DNA methylation. The highly processive mechanism of E. coli dam could explain why small amounts of E. coli dam are able to maintain the methylation state of dam sites during DNA replication. Furthermore, our data support the general rule that solitary DNA methyltransferase modify DNA processively whereas methyltransferases belonging to a restriction-modification system show a distributive mechanism, because processive methylation of DNA would interfere with the biological function of restriction-modification systems.

Neuronal expression of bitter taste receptors and downstream signaling molecules in the rat brainstem.

Previous studies have shown that molecules of the taste transduction pathway may serve as biochemical markers for chemoreceptive cells in respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that brainstem neurons contain signaling molecules similar to those in taste buds which may sense the chemical composition of brain extracellular fluids. We used the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Western blot and immunohistochemical techniques to evaluate presence of different bitter-responsive type 2 taste receptors (T2Rs), their associated G-protein α-gustducin, the downstream signaling molecules phospholipase C isoform ß2 (PLC-ß2) and transient receptor potential melastatin 5 (TRPM5) in the brainstem of rats. RT-PCR confirmed the mRNA coding for α-gustducin, PLC-ß2, TRPM5 and rT2R1 but not that of rT2R16, rT2R26 and rT2R38 in the medulla oblongata. Western blotting confirmed the presence of α-gustducin at the protein level in rat brainstem. Immunohistochemistry identified cells expressing α-gustducin and PLC-ß2 at multiple cardiorespiratory and CO(2)/H(+) chemosensory sites, including rostral ventral medulla, facial, parapyramidal, solitary tract, hypoglossal and raphe nuclei. In the medullary raphe, α-gustducin and PLC-ß2 were colocalized with a subpopulation of tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH)-immunoreactive serotonergic neurons, a subset of which has respiratory CO(2)/H(+) chemosensitivity. Presence of the T2R1 gene and other genes and proteins of the bitter taste transduction pathway in the brainstem implies additional functions for taste receptors and their effector molecules apart from their gustatory function.

Case-control study of vitamin D, dickkopf homolog 1 (DKK1) gene methylation, VDR gene polymorphism and the risk of colon adenoma in African Americans.

BACKGROUND: There are sparse data on genetic, epigenetic and vitamin D exposure in African Americans (AA) with colon polyp. Consequently, we evaluated serum 25(OH) D levels, vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and the methylation status of the tumor suppressor gene dickkopf homolog 1 (DKK1) as risk factors for colon polyp in this population. METHODS: The case-control study consisted of 93 patients with colon polyp (cases) and 187 healthy individuals (controls) at Howard University Hospital. Serum levels of 25(OH)D (including D3, D2, and total) were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. DNA analysis focused on 49 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the VDR gene. Promoter methylation analysis of DKK1 was also performed. The resulting data were processed in unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Cases and controls differed in vitamin D status (D(3)<50 nmol/L: Median of 35.5 in cases vs. 36.8 in controls nmol/L; P = 0.05). Low levels of 25(OH)D(3) (<50 nmol/L) were observed in 86% of cases and 68% of controls and it was associated with higher risks of colon polyp (odds ratio of 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.3-3.4). The SNP analysis showed no association between 46 VDR polymorphisms and colon polyp. The promoter of the DKK1 gene was unmethylated in 96% of the samples. CONCLUSION: We found an inverse association between serum 25(OH)D(3) and colon polyp in AAs. VDR SNPs and DKK1 methylation were not associated with colon polyp. Vitamin D levels may in part explain the higher incidence of polyp in AAs.

DNA methylation prevents CTCF-mediated silencing of the oncogene BCL6 in B cell lymphomas.

Aberrant DNA methylation commonly occurs in cancer cells where it has been implicated in the epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes. Additional roles for DNA methylation, such as transcriptional activation, have been predicted but have yet to be clearly demonstrated. The BCL6 oncogene is implicated in the pathogenesis of germinal center-derived B cell lymphomas. We demonstrate that the intragenic CpG islands within the first intron of the human BCL6 locus were hypermethylated in lymphoma cells that expressed high amounts of BCL6 messenger RNA (mRNA). Inhibition of DNA methyltransferases decreased BCL6 mRNA abundance, suggesting a role for these methylated CpGs in positively regulating BCL6 transcription. The enhancer-blocking transcription factor CTCF bound to this intronic region in a methylation-sensitive manner. Depletion of CTCF by short hairpin RNA in neoplastic plasma cells that do not express BCL6 resulted in up-regulation of BCL6 transcription. These data indicate that BCL6 expression is maintained during lymphomagenesis in part through DNA methylation that prevents CTCF-mediated silencing.

MBD family proteins: reading the epigenetic code.

Methylation of DNA in mammalian cells serves to demarcate functionally specialized regions of the genome and is strongly associated with transcriptional repression. A highly conserved family of DNA-binding proteins characterized by a common sequence motif is widely believed to convert the information represented by methylation patterns into the appropriate functional state. This family, the MBD family, has been characterized at both the biochemical and genetic levels. A key issue, given their highly similar DNA-binding surfaces, is whether the individual MBD proteins bind differentially to distinct regions within the genome and, if so, by what mechanism. Somewhat surprisingly, some MBD family members, such as MeCP2, have considerable selectivity for specific sequences. Other family members, such as MBD2, appear to bind with somewhat relaxed specificity to methylated DNA. Recent genetic and molecular experiments have shed considerable light on these and other issues relevant to the chromosomal biology of this interesting protein family.

Dnmt3a and Dnmt1 functionally cooperate during de novo methylation of DNA.

Dnmt3a is a de novo DNA methyltransferase that modifies unmethylated DNA. In contrast Dnmt1 shows high preference for hemimethylated DNA. However, Dnmt1 can be activated for the methylation of unmodified DNA. We show here that the Dnmt3a and Dnmt1 DNA methyltransferases functionally cooperate in de novo methylation of DNA, because a fivefold stimulation of methylation activity is observed if both enzymes are present. Stimulation is observed if Dnmt3a is used before Dnmt1, but not if incubation with Dnmt1 precedes Dnmt3a, demonstrating that methylation of the DNA by Dnmt3a stimulates Dnmt1 and that no physical interaction of Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a is required. If Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a were incubated together a slightly increased stimulation is observed that could be due to a direct interaction of these enzymes. In addition, we show that Dnmt1 is stimulated for methylation of unmodified DNA if the DNA already carries some methyl groups. We conclude that after initiation of de novo methylation of DNA by Dnmt3a, Dnmt1 becomes activated by the pre-existing methyl groups and further methylates the DNA. Our data suggest that Dnmt1 also has a role in de novo methylation of DNA. This model agrees with the biochemical properties of these enzymes and provides a mechanistic basis for the functional cooperation of different DNA MTases in de novo methylation of DNA that has also been observed in vivo.