Sealing Zone Failure Decreases the Long Term Durability of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has higher long term aneurysm related mortality compared with open surgery, mainly due to aneurysm rupture. Loss of stent graft-vessel apposition at the EVAR sealing zones is a potential cause of post-EVAR rupture. This study aimed to investigate sealing zone failure and its relation to post-EVAR rupture. METHODS: This was a retrospective structured review of pre-operative and post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans of 399 consecutive patients treated with standard bifurcated EVAR. The primary outcome was total loss of seal at last post-operative CT. Secondary outcomes were partial loss of seal, standard follow up detection, post-EVAR rupture, aneurysm sac development, and endoleaks. RESULTS: During a median follow up of 5.3 years, total and partial loss of seal occurred in 85 (21.3%) and 78 (19.5%) patients, respectively. Initial mean sealing zone lengths were within current recommendations but decreased over time, mainly due to vessel dilatation. Mean proximal sealing length at one month CT was 15.5 ± 10.5 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.6 - 18.5 mm) in the group with total loss of seal, 14.3 ± 6.9 mm (95% CI 12.2 - 16.4 mm) with partial loss of seal, and 23.2 ± 7.4 mm (95% CI 22.3 - 24.0 mm) with preserved seal through follow up (p < .001). Mean iliac sealing lengths were 22.4 ± 12.1 mm (95% CI 18.9 - 25.8 mm) if total loss and 21.8 ± 10.0 mm (95% CI 19.6 - 24.0 mm) if partial loss of seal vs. 34.7 ± 12.4 mm (95% CI 33.8 - 35.7 mm) if preserved seal. Larger vessel diameters were associated with loss of seal both in proximal and distal sealing zones. During the study period, 13 post-EVAR ruptures occurred, all preceded by CT findings of total (n = 7) or partial (n = 6) loss of seal. Aneurysm sac expansion was seen in 40% of patients with total loss of seal, 18% with partial loss of seal, and 6.6% with preserved seal. CONCLUSION: Loss of seal after EVAR is frequent and associated with post-EVAR rupture. Increased recommended sealing zones lengths and focus on sealing zones in surveillance may reduce post-EVAR ruptures and aneurysm related mortality.

Risk factors in 50-year-old men predicting development of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a potentially lethal condition associated with several well-known risk factors including age, smoking, and male sex. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors predicting future development of AAA, which could influence future prevention strategies. METHODS: This study collected the data sets of the Westmannia Cardiovascular Risk Factors Study (WICTORY) from 1990 to 1999 and combined them with cases of individuals who have undergone ultrasound examination of the infrarenal aortic diameter as part of the Västmanland County's ongoing AAA screening program that commenced in 2007 or for other purposes. The study analyzed 5817 men aged 50 years at the time they participated in WICTORY and who underwent an ultrasound examination of the infrarenal aorta on average 15 years later. RESULTS: The prevalence of AAA in our study was 2.6%. Age, smoking status, angina pectoris treatment, prior myocardial infarction, blood pressure treatment, body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and total cholesterol level were found to be associated with the development of AAA later in life in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, current smokers at age 50 years had 11 times higher risk for later development of AAA (hazard ratio [HR], 11.178; confidence interval [CI], 6.277-19.908; P < .001). Former smokers did not suffer a similar risk of AAA development. Elevated total cholesterol concentration at baseline was associated with later AAA development (HR, 1.275; CI, 1.119-1.451; P < .001), as were increasing age (HR, 1.702; CI, 1.153-2.512; P = .007) and waist circumference (HR, 1.019; CI, 1.002-1.037; P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: Both the well-known and the somewhat less established possible predictors for future development of AAA identified in this study can support improvement of strategic preventive measures toward specific risk groups and thereby possibly reduce the risk for development of AAA later in life or at least increase the possibility of an early diagnosis in patients with intact AAA.

Anxiety and disease awareness in individuals with heredity for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: The psychological consequences of being aware of an increased risk of developing abdominal aortic aneurysm as a first-degree relative of a person with abdominal aortic aneurysm are hitherto unexplored. This study investigates the awareness of heritability and anxiety in male and female adult offspring of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients compared to controls. Health-related quality of life among participants with aortic pathology was compared to participants with normal aortic diameters. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional point prevalence study based on the participants examined in the Detecting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in First Degree Relatives Trial (DAAAD; 752 adult offspring, 756 matched controls), 2020-2022. Questionnaires about health-related quality of life and study-specific questions regarding awareness of heritability were collected prior to the aortic ultrasound. RESULTS: Attendance rate was higher among individuals with heredity compared to controls (67% vs. 52%, p < 0.001). Of 1508 adult offspring examined, 65% reported having a close relative with abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% in controls). Female adult offspring reported higher awareness of heritability than controls (38% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), as did males (32% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). A slight majority of participants with awareness reported anxiety (54% of female offspring; 51% of male). There were no measured differences in health-related quality of life between the groups when standard health-related quality of life instruments were used. CONCLUSION: The higher-than-expected proportion of adult offspring with awareness of heritability and anxiety about such risk indicates that we fail to communicate risk to this group appropriately via the current channels of information within the healthcare system. This calls for the development of dedicated strategies for improved communication of abdominal aortic aneurysm risk to patients and their next of kin.

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in first-degree relatives: detecting AAA in adult offspring of AAA patients.

BACKGROUND: First-degree relatives of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) may have an increased risk of developing the disease. The primary aim was to report the prevalence of AAA in adult male and female offspring of patients with AAA. The secondary aim was to explore the efficiency of a registry-based detection route, and the third aim was to report contemporary prevalence in the population. METHODS: Adult offspring of individuals with AAA and matched controls were identified through national registries. The examination included questionnaires and ultrasound examinations of the infrarenal aorta. Aortic pathology was defined as an aortic diameter ≥25 mm, AAA ≥30 mm. RESULTS: The participation rate among male and female adult offspring was 64% (350/543) and 69% (402/583), respectively. A lower participation rate was found in male and female controls (51% and 52%). No difference in prevalence of AAA was observed between male adult offspring and controls (0.9%, c.i. 0.2 to 2.3%) or in the female population (prevalence of 0.2% in adult offspring and controls). Aortic pathology and previously diagnosed AAA were detected in 5.3% (c.i. 3.3 to 8.0%) of male adult offspring and 2.3% (c.i. 1.1 to 4.2%) in controls. Aortic pathology was more prevalent among adult offspring of females with AAA. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AAA in the general population is low, but aortic pathology is notably higher among male first-degree relatives. Increased awareness should be directed towards individuals with a possible hereditary predisposition, particularly offspring of females with AAA and older smokers. Risk factor-based targeted screening of adult offspring of patients with AAA after registry-based detection should be further explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT4623268.

Evaluating feasibility of using national registries for identification, invitation, and ultrasound examination of persons with hereditary risk for aneurysm disease-detecting abdominal aortic aneurysms in first degree relatives (adult offspring) to AAA patients (DAAAD).

BACKGROUND: Sweden and the UK invite all 65-year-old men to a population-based ultrasound-based screening program to detect abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). First-degree relatives of patients with AAA are reported to have an increased risk to develop AAA, both women and men, but are not invited to screening. The "Detecting AAA in First Degree Relatives to AAA patients" (DAAAD) was designed to detect the true prevalence in adult offspring to AAA patients and to evaluate if national registries could be used for identification of index persons and their adult children with a high risk for the disease. The aim of this study is to summarize the design and methodology for this registry-based study. METHODS: The study is based on a registry-based extraction and identification of a risk group in the population with a subsequent identification of their adult offspring. The targeted risk group suffers a heredity for a potentially lethal disease, AAA (n = 750) and matched control group without heredity for AAA is also identified and invited (n = 750). The participation rate in the population-based AAA screening program for men is 75% regionally. This population is younger and have a lower prevalence. A participation rate of 65% is considered clinically adequate. For the DAAAD study, a stratified analysis of the primary outcome, prevalence, will be performed for women and men separately. Two other planned projects are based on the material: firstly, evaluation of the anxiety for disease and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and, secondly, the cost-effectiveness of the study. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, this feasibility study will be instrumental in supporting the development of a possible new model to invite persons with high risk to develop hereditary rare diseases. To our knowledge, this is a unique, safe, and most likely to be a cost-efficient model to invite targeted risk groups for selected screening. If the study design and the results are shown to be cost-effective at the detected participation rate and prevalence, it should be further evaluated and adopted to a national screening program. The model also invites both women and men, which is unique for this specific patient group, considering that all population-based screening programs only include men. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at the website of Clinical Trials. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier, NCT4623268.