Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heart Rhythm ; 21(8): 1267-1276, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246567

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Long-term oral anticoagulation is the mainstay therapy for thromboembolic (TE) prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) could be a safe alternative to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with a very high TE risk profile. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of LAAO vs DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation at very high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category] score ≥ 5). METHODS: Data from patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 5 were extracted from a prospective multicenter database. To attenuate the imbalance in covariates between groups, propensity score matching was used (covariates: CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED [hypertension, abnormal renal or liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs or alcohol] scores), which resulted in a matched population of 277 patients per group. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, TE events, and clinically relevant bleeding during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 2381 patients, 554 very high risk patients were included in the study (mean age 79 ± 7 years; CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.8 ± 0.9; HAS-BLED score 3.0 ± 0.9). The mean follow-up duration was 25 ± 11 months. A higher incidence of the composite end point was documented with DOACs compared with LAAO (14.9 events per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group vs 9.4 events per 100 patient-years in the LAAO group; P = .03). The annualized clinically relevant bleeding risk was higher with DOACs (6.3% vs 3.2%; P = .04), while the risk of TE events was not different between groups (4.1% vs 3.2%; P = .63). CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients, LAAO had a similar stroke prevention efficacy but a significantly lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding when compared with DOACs. The clinical benefit of LAAO became significant after 18 months of follow-up.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Apêndice Atrial , Fibrilação Atrial , Pontuação de Propensão , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Apêndice Atrial/cirurgia , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Medição de Risco/métodos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Seguimentos , Estudos Prospectivos , Incidência , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Tromboembolia/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA