RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) infection rates continue to rise. Screening guidelines have largely focused on sexually active female individuals and men who have sex with men populations. Health care system testing and infection rates, particularly among heterosexual male individuals, are poorly understood. Our aim was to evaluate CT and GC testing and prevalence among 12- to 24-year-old patients in an urban federally qualified health center system. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed electronic health record data from 2017 to 2019 in a large system of federally qualified health centers in Denver, CO. Abstracted data included demographics, sexual activity, sexual orientation, and laboratory results. χ2 Tests were used to evaluate differences between groups. RESULTS: Of the 44,021 patients included, 37.6% were tested, 15.0% were positive for CT, and 3.4% were positive for GC. Heterosexual male patients had a testing rate of 22.8% and positivity rates of CT and GC at 13.1% and 3.0%, respectively. Among tested patients documented as not sexually active, 7.5% were positive for CT. Multiple or reinfections were detected in 29% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows low testing rates and high rates of CT and GC infections among all patients, including heterosexual male patients and those documented as not sexually active. Improved screening of these populations in the primary care setting may be key to combating the sexually transmitted disease epidemic.
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Chlamydia trachomatis , Feminino , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Saúde da População Urbana , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To measure the risk of influenza under-vaccination in children of vaccine-hesitant parents, referent to children of nonhesitant parents, in a sample of disadvantaged families in one influenza season. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study of English- and Spanish-speaking parents of 2-year-olds presenting at random for well, sick, or specialty visit care from August 1, 2019 to February 28, 2020. Parents answered demographic questions and the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines survey. We followed children until season's end, extracting vaccination data on April 30, 2020. We dichotomized vaccination status as unvaccinated or partially/fully vaccinated, analyzing data with multivariable Poisson regression; in secondary analyses, we conducted adjusted time-to-event analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 263 parents consented (response rate: 90%); our final sample included 255 dyads. Thirty-three (13%) parents were vaccine hesitant. In adjusted analyses, children of hesitant parents (n = 33) had a 195% increased risk (adjusted Risk Ratio 2.95; 95% confidence interval 1.91, 4.56) of being unvaccinated at season's end, referent to children of nonhesitant parents (n = 222). In time-to-event analyses, children of vaccine-hesitant parents were also more likely to be unvaccinated before influenza activity peaked (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Parental vaccine hesitancy tripled the risk of pediatric influenza nonvaccination in a sample of poor and minority families during the 2019 to 2020 influenza season. As parental vaccine hesitancy appears to exacerbate pediatric influenza vaccination disparities, future work should explore parental hesitancy with poor and minority stakeholders and tailor evidence-based interventions to benefit children from these communities who receive care at all practice sites.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Pais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , VacinaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea among adolescents continue to rise. We aimed to evaluate if a universal testing program for chlamydia and gonorrhea improved testing rates in an urban general pediatric clinic and an urban family medicine clinic within a system of federally qualified health care centers and evaluated the feasibility, cost, and logistic challenges of expanding implementation across 28 primary care clinics within a federally qualified health care centers system. METHODS: A universal testing quality improvement program for male and female patient 14 to 18 years old was implemented in a general pediatrics and family medicine clinic in Denver, Colorado. The intervention was evaluated by using a controlled pre-post quasi-experimental design. The difference in testing rates due to the intervention was assessed by using a difference-in-differences regression model weighted with the inverse probability of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 15 541 pediatric encounters and 5420 family medicine encounters were included in the analyses. In pediatrics, the unadjusted testing rates increased from 32.0% to 66.7% in the intervention group and from 20.9% to 28.9% in the comparison group. For family medicine, the rates increased from 38.5% to 49.9% in the intervention group and decreased from 26.3% to 24.8% in the comparison group. The intervention resulted in an adjusted increase in screening rates of 25.2% (P < .01) in pediatrics and 11.8% (P < .01) in family medicine. The intervention was well received and cost neutral to the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Universal testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea in primary care pediatrics and family medicine is a feasible approach to improving testing rates .
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Adolescente , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Colorado/epidemiologia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Assistência de Saúde UniversalRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We compared completion rates for adolescent immunization series administered at school-based health centers (SBHCs) to completion rates for series administered at community health centers (CHCs) within a single integrated delivery system. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from an immunization registry for patients aged 12-18 years. Patients were assigned to either an SBHC or a CHC during the study interval based on utilization. We used bivariate analysis to compare immunization series completion rates between the 2 groups and multivariate analysis to compare risk factors for underimmunization. We performed subanalyses by ages 12-15 years versus ages 16-18 years for human papillomavirus (HPV) and for the combination of HPV; tetanus, diptheria, and pertussis (Tdap); and tetravalent meningococcus virus. RESULTS: SBHC users had significantly higher completion rates (P<.001) for hepatitis B, Tdap, inactivated poliovirus, varicella, measles/mumps/rubella, and HPV for ages 16-18 years, and for the combination of HPV, Tdap, and MCV4 for ages 16-18 years. CHC users had higher completion rates for tetanus and diphtheria. CONCLUSIONS: SBHCs had higher completion rates than did CHCs for immunization series among those aged 12-18 years, despite serving a population with limited insurance coverage.
Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/organização & administração , Adolescente , Criança , Colorado , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , População UrbanaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To measure the frequency US pediatricians report screening and referring for social needs and identify pediatrician and practice-level predictors for screening and referral. METHODS: Data were from the American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey for October 2014 to March 2015 with a response rate of 46.6% (732/1570). Respondents reported on: 1) routine screening of low-income families for social needs, 2) attitudes toward screening, and 3) referral of low-income families for community resources. Results were analyzed by pediatrician and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Although most pediatricians (61.6%) thought that screening is important, fewer (39.9%) reported that screening is feasible or felt prepared addressing families' social needs (20.2%). The topics that pediatricians reported routinely asking low-income families about at visits (defined as ≥50% visits) were need for childcare (41.5%) and transportation barriers (28.4%). Pediatricians were less likely to report asking about housing (18.7%), food (18.6%), and utilities/heating (14.0%) insecurity. In multivariable analyses, pediatricians were more likely to report both that they screen and refer when they reported having more patients in financial hardship and having someone in the practice with the responsibility to connect low-income families to community services. Pediatricians who endorsed the importance of screening and who reported being prepared were also more likely to screen/refer. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of pediatricians report routinely screening for social needs. Pediatricians were more likely to report that they screen and refer if they had positive attitudes toward the importance of screening, felt prepared, and had support staff to assist families in need.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatras , Pobreza , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Adulto , Instituições de Caridade , Criança , Cuidado da Criança , Children's Health Insurance Program , Feminino , Assistência Alimentar , Calefação , Habitação , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Assistência Pública , Seguridade Social , Meios de Transporte , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine pediatricians' attitudes toward public policies for low-income children and the advocacy efforts for the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). METHODS: Data from the AAP Periodic Survey in October 2014 to March 2015 were used. Respondents ranked 1) attitudes toward government programs, and 2) attitudes toward AAP policies on: income support, housing, education, job training, food, and health care. Results were analyzed according to age, gender, practice location, practice region, type of practice setting, and percent of patients with economic hardship. RESULTS: Response rate was 47% (n = 650). Most respondents reported that for children, the government should guarantee health insurance (88.9%), and food and shelter (90.0%). Most also reported that the government should guarantee health insurance (68.9%) and food and shelter (63.9%) for every citizen and to take care of people who cannot take care of themselves. There was variation among the level of support on the basis of practice setting. In multivariable analyses related to supporting the role of government for children and citizens, not being from the Northeast was associated with lower odds of support of children as well as citizens; primary care practices in rural areas were less supportive of government involvement related to all citizens but similar for children; and those younger than 40 and 50 to 59 years of age were more supportive of government guaranteeing enough to eat and a place to sleep for children. More than 55% supported the AAP advocating for income support, housing, education, and access to health care. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians strongly support government policies that affect child poverty and the provision of basic needs to families. This support should be used to inform professional organizations, advocates, and policy-makers focused on children and families.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Defesa da Criança e do Adolescente , Programas Governamentais , Pediatras , Política Pública , Adulto , Criança , Proteção da Criança , Assistência Alimentar , Política de Saúde , Habitação , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Defesa do Paciente , Pediatria , Pobreza , Seguridade Social , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the organizational features of an international child health elective (ICHE) and to document the diversity of diagnoses observed by residents. DESIGN: Faculty from the Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, created a steering committee in 1999 to develop and direct an ICHE, including selecting residents, selecting and organizing sites, and creating objectives and a year-long preparatory curriculum. The elective was piloted in 2000 and repeated in 2002 and 2004. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Residents chose from 4 ICHE sites in Peru and Guatemala, where they observed clinical care in various clinical settings during a 4-week elective. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The ICHE was evaluated via written evaluations by faculty and residents as well as written and oral reports by participating residents. RESULTS: During the 2000 and 2004 electives, residents recorded clinical cases in a data-entry log. Of the patients logged, 18% had illnesses never seen before by the residents and 5.6% had illnesses in advanced stages not previously seen by the residents. Strong reciprocal relationships were created between the department and participating international institutions. Residents reported uniformly that the elective was a valuable element of their training. CONCLUSIONS: Planning and faculty involvement in ICHEs helps to ensure achievement of elective objectives. Well-organized ICHEs have the potential to augment resident education. The experience at our institution demonstrates that ICHEs can provide experience with a variety of medical systems, exposure to diverse pathophysiologic conditions, and opportunities for collaboration with international colleagues.
Assuntos
Currículo , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Pediatria/educação , Faculdades de Medicina , Colorado , Guatemala , Cooperação Internacional , PeruRESUMO
Poverty has profound and enduring effects on the health and well-being of children, as well as their subsequent adult health and success. It is essential for pediatricians to work to reduce child poverty and to ameliorate its effects on children. Pediatricians have important and needed tools to do this work: authority/power as physicians, understanding of science and evidence-based approaches, and first-hand, real-life knowledge and love of children and families. These tools need to be applied in partnership with community-based organizations/leaders, educators, human service providers, business leaders, philanthropists, and policymakers. Examples of the effects of pediatricians on the issue of child poverty are seen in Ferguson, Missouri; Denver, Colorado; and Rochester, New York. In addition, national models exist such as the American Academy of Pediatrics Community Pediatrics Training Initiative, which engages numerous pediatric faculty to learn and work together to make changes for children and families who live in poverty and to teach these skills to pediatric trainees. Some key themes/lessons for a pediatrician working to make changes in a community are to bear witness to and recognize injustice for children and families; identify an area of passion; review the evidence and gain expertise on the issue; build relationships and partnerships with community leaders and organizations; and advocate for effective solutions.
Assuntos
Pediatras , Papel do Médico , Pobreza , Pessoal Administrativo , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comportamento Cooperativo , Educação , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Política Pública , Seguridade Social , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Pais/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Provedores de Redes de Segurança , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/educação , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pais/educação , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/economia , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/etnologia , Vacinação/economia , Recusa de Vacinação/etnologiaRESUMO
Child poverty in the United States is widespread and has serious negative effects on the health and well-being of children throughout their life course. Child health providers are considering ways to redesign their practices in order to mitigate the negative effects of poverty on children and support the efforts of families to lift themselves out of poverty. To do so, practices need to adopt effective methods to identify poverty-related social determinants of health and provide effective interventions to address them. Identification of needs can be accomplished with a variety of established screening tools. Interventions may include resource directories, best maintained in collaboration with local/regional public health, community, and/or professional organizations; programs embedded in the practice (eg, Reach Out and Read, Healthy Steps for Young Children, Medical-Legal Partnership, Health Leads); and collaboration with home visiting programs. Changes to health care financing are needed to support the delivery of these enhanced services, and active advocacy by child health providers continues to be important in effecting change. We highlight the ongoing work of the Health Care Delivery Subcommittee of the Academic Pediatric Association Task Force on Child Poverty in defining the ways in which child health care practice can be adapted to improve the approach to addressing child poverty.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde da Criança/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Pediatria/organização & administração , Pobreza , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comportamento Cooperativo , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Seguridade Social , Serviço Social , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In 2008 the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that all children aged 6 months to 18 years receive annual influenza vaccine. Full pediatric influenza administration has proven difficult. We compared rates of full influenza immunization between a safety net health care system and CDC sentinel sites and evaluated sociodemographic factors associated with full influenza immunization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We matched influenza immunization data for 2008-2009 from a health care system immunization registry with patient demographic/billing data and compared rates to CDC sentinel sites using bivariate analysis. We evaluted immunization rates by patient characteristics using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Full influenza immunization was achieved in 32% of Denver Health (DH) children compared to 12% at the CDC sites (p<0.001). The largest differences occurred in children aged 11-12 and 13-18 years, 47% DH vs 12% CDC sites, and 33% DH vs 9% CDC sites respectively, (p<0.001 for both). In multivariate analysis, DH children were more likely to be immunized if they were Asian, Odds Ratio (OR) 1.59 95%CI (CI) 1.32-1.91, or Hispanic OR 1.18 CI 1.07-1.30, compared to white, spoke Spanish OR 1.19 CI 1.13-1.26, or other non-English language OR 2.05 CI 1.80-2.34, and had a greater number of visits for well care OR 2.86 CI 2.74-2.98 and sick/follow-up care OR 1.59 CI 1.56-1.62, during the influenza season. They were less likely to be immunized if they had commercial insurance OR 0.68 CI 0.62-0.75 or were uninsured OR 0.77 CI 0.72-0.80, compared to Medicaid/SCHIP. CONCLUSIONS: Using immunization registry prompts, standing orders, multiple sites and visit types for immunization, an integrated safety net health care system had higher full influenza immunization rates than the CDC sentinel sites singularly or collectively. These procedures can be applied elsewhere to improve influenza immunization rates.
Assuntos
Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , MasculinoRESUMO
Many medical authors and organizations have called for physician advocacy as a core component of medical professionalism. Despite widespread acceptance of advocacy as a professional obligation, the concept remains problematic within the profession of medicine because it remains undefined in concept, scope, and practice. If advocacy is to be a professional imperative, then medical schools and graduate education programs must deliberately train physicians as advocates. Accrediting bodies must clearly define advocacy competencies, and all physicians must meet them at some basic level. Sustaining and fostering physician advocacy will require modest changes to both undergraduate and graduate medical education. Developing advocacy training and practice opportunities for practicing physicians will also be necessary. In this article, as first steps toward building a model for competency-based physician advocacy training and delineating physician advocacy in common practice, the authors propose a definition and, using the biographies of actual physician advocates, describe the spectrum of physician advocacy.
Assuntos
Defesa do Consumidor , Papel do Médico , Política , Currículo , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Educação em Saúde , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Liderança , Modelos Educacionais , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The numbers and types of disruptions in insurance that children experience and the effects of these disruptions on health care measures have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to (1) describe the number and patterns of insurance disruptions within a population of children newly enrolling into the State Children's Health Insurance Program and (2) assess the relationship among insurance disruptions and sociodemographic characteristics of these children and their families to specific measures of access to care, unmet need, and health care utilization during the year before enrollment. METHODS: We conducted telephone interviews in families with children newly enrolling in the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Families reported on measures for each of the 12 months preceding enrollment. They were grouped by number of insurance disruptions in the year before enrollment: continuously uninsured, > or = 2 disruptions, 1 disruption, or continuously insured. RESULTS: Of 920 families contacted, 739 (80%) completed the interview and 710 had useable data. Thirty-five percent reported being continuously uninsured, 42% were intermittently insured (> or = 2 disruptions: 28%; 1 disruption: 14%), and 23% were continuously insured during the previous year. The most common patterns of change were between privately insured and uninsured (49%) and Medicaid and uninsured (40%). The continuously uninsured were more likely to be Hispanic and older in age. Multivariate modeling confirmed a gradient between greater insurance disruption and less access to care, less utilization, and greater unmet medical need. Using the continuously uninsured as a reference group, the adjusted odds ratio for having a medical home varied from 2.5 for those with > or = 2 disruptions to 4.5 for the continuously insured and from 1.9 to 3.2, respectively, for using any regular/routine care. The odds ratio for unmet need for a prescription medication was 0.9 for > or = 2 disruptions and 0.5 for those with continuous insurance coverage. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant disruption in insurance coverage in the year before State Children's Health Insurance Program enrollment. Most of these disruptions took the form of children previously enrolled in either Medicaid or private insurance becoming uninsured. Increasing numbers of disruptions were associated with less routine care and greater unmet medical need. These findings suggest that disruptions in insurance coverage for children should be minimized with the adoption of policies regarding continuous eligibility criteria for Medicaid and streamlining transitions between Medicaid, the State Children's Health Insurance Program, and private insurance.