Rural-urban disparities in patient satisfaction with oral health care: a provincial survey.

BACKGROUND: Identifying spatial variation in patient satisfaction is essential to improve the quality of care. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate rural-urban disparities in patient satisfaction and to determine the factors that could influence satisfaction with oral health care. METHODS: Data from 1788 parents/caregivers of children who participated in the Quebec Ministry of Health clinical study were subject to secondary analysis. The Perneger model of patient satisfaction was used as the conceptual framework for the study. Satisfaction with oral health care was measured using the WHO-sponsored International Collaborative Study of Oral Health Outcomes (ICS-II). Explanatory variables included predisposing factors and enabling resources. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, as well as bivariate and linear regression models. RESULTS: Individuals with higher income, dental insurance coverage, having a family dentist, reporting ease in finding a dentist, and having access to a private dental clinic were more satisfied with oral health care (p < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences between rural and urban Quebec residents in their ratings of patient satisfaction on four items, including dental office location (p = 0.013), dental equipment (p = 0.016), cost of dental treatment (p < 0.001), and cleanliness of dental office (p = 0.004), with greater satisfaction for urban dwellers. The multiple linear regression model showed that major determinants of patient satisfaction were being born in Canada, income ≥ 40,000$ CAD, having a family dentist, and having visited the dentist in the last year for regular checkups. However, ethnicity, having difficulty finding a dentist, and being in need of dental treatment negatively influenced patient satisfaction with oral health care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that Quebec rural-urban disparity exists in patient satisfaction with care and that determinants of health influence this outcome. Intensive and powerful knowledge dissemination activities are needed to mobilize policymakers in implementing public health strategies to reduce this disparity.

The McGill Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire revisited: Exploratory factor analysis of a binational sample.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the McGill Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire (MDSQ) in terms of dimensionality, item reduction and construct validity in a binational sample of complete denture wearers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses of baseline data from two studies on implant-retained overdentures: a quasi-experimental study in the United States (n = 145) and a randomised trial in Brazil (n = 120). All participants wore upper/lower dentures and responded at baseline to the MDSQ items concerning their original mandibular dentures. A putative model of the MDSQ items resulted in two question subsets: (a) overall satisfaction, retention/stability, aesthetics, cleaning, speech and comfort, plus general chewing ability; (b) mastication of specific foods. Analyses focused on the internal consistency of each subset and possible item reduction, using Cronbach's alpha (Cα), inter-item correlation and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). RESULTS: The 1st subset showed high inter-item correlation for most question combinations and no redundancy (r ≤ .8). An item on cleaning had low correlation, but its removal does not increase internal consistency (Cα ≥ .83). Results were similar for both studies, with EFA showing a single significant factor (namely "overall satisfaction, lower denture") able to explain nearly 54% of the variance. The 2nd subset also shows strong internal consistency (Cα ≥ .95) and inter-item correlation, with a single factor representing 65% of the variation. CONCLUSIONS: This study discloses the reliability and construct validity of the MDSQ for patient-centred evaluation of complete dental prostheses in the edentulous mandible. Findings also support the use of both "overall satisfaction" and "masticatory ability" as summary scores, for improved outcome assessment.

Patient perceptions of the mandibular three-implant overdenture: a practice-based study.

OBJECTIVES: Although three-implant overdentures have often been used in clinical practice, there are few studies to support this approach. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the magnitude of change in ratings of oral health-related quality of life and to assess patients' satisfaction ratings with mandibular three-implant overdentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This quasi-experimental study examined oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction with prosthesis in 135 edentate participants (mean age 61.6 ± 7.9 years) who received mandibular three-implant overdentures from 2006 to 2009 in a private practice in Quebec, Canada. Data were collected from individual's dental records and a follow-up survey. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20) was used to assess oral health-related quality of life at baseline and at follow-up. Satisfaction with the mandibular prostheses and perception of rocking movements were measured by use of a denture satisfaction questionnaire at follow-up. Descriptive statistics, bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Individuals who received mandibular three-implant overdentures had statistically significant improvements in all seven domains of the OHIP-20 from pre- to post-treatment (total OHIP change score -25.1 P < 0.001). Pre-treatment OHIP scores and rotational movement explained 58% of the variance in the OHIP's change score (P ≤ 0.05). More than three quarters of the sample population (75.6%) were completely satisfied with their three-implant overdentures, and 81.5% reported having no rocking movement. General satisfaction with the prostheses was not influenced by gender, type of fixture, or type of attachment. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of edentulism by three-implant overdentures has favourable patient-based outcomes, with negligible perceptions of rotational movement. However, further research is needed to compare the efficacy of this alternative to other treatment modalities, such as the two-implant overdenture.

Implant-assisted complete prostheses.

The current review was undertaken to obtain a better understanding of the knowledge base of implant-assisted complete dental prostheses (fixed and removable) in the treatment of the completely edentulous maxilla or mandible. Indications, advantages and disadvantages, complications and maintenance issues, as well as the cost-effectiveness of both treatments, are discussed to help clinicians in their therapeutic decision-making. In summary, when indicated and depending on the patients' needs, both removable and fixed implant-assisted prostheses are highly safe, reliable and satisfactory treatment modalities for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws. Careful and precise treatment planning is highly recommended to assist the clinician in preventing potential prosthetic failures. The review also reveals that there is still a need for data, generated using robust research methods, on some patient-based and clinical outcomes.

The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the difference in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients who received mandibular 2-implant overdentures and conventional dentures in a pragmatic international study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, data were gathered from 203 edentulous patients (mean age, 68.8; SD: 10.4 years) at eight centres in North America, South America and Europe. The patients were provided with new mandibular conventional dentures or implant overdentures supported by 2 implants and ball attachments and opposed by conventional dentures. At baseline and at 6 months post-treatment, patients rated their oral health-related quality of life using the OHIP-20. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of the participants in the implant group in North America reported improvement in both the psychological and the handicap domains, compared to those who received conventional dentures (93% vs. 52%; P < 0.05). In South America, 100% of participants who received implant overdentures reported improvement in physical pain, compared to 66% in the conventional group (P < 0.05). Differences in mean change scores among those who expressed improvement were not significantly different between sites or treatments. CONCLUSION: Mandibular 2-implant overdentures are more likely than conventional dentures to improve OHRQL for edentulous patients. Cultural differences were also observed in the impact of implant overdentures on the different domains of the OHIP-20.

Patient-reported outcomes and clinical performance of CAD/CAM removable dentures: A scoping review.

PURPOSE: This scoping review mapped the literature on CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and manufacturing) removable complete and partial dentures regarding patient and clinician-reported outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an electronic search of the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases (last update: March 2023). All clinical trials or observational studies investigating CAD/CAM removable dentures (conventional or implant-retained) were included. RESULTS: The search yielded 4035 records and led to 58 included studies. Results suggest that CAD/CAM complete and partial dentures, when compared to the conventional ones, can save time and resources while being rated either non-inferior or superior by patients and clinicians in most studies. However, consensus on which workflow offers fewer adjustments and postoperative sessions is still pending. CONCLUSION: The literature suggests that CAD/CAM complete and partial dentures can combine substantial time and cost savings with patient and clinician experiences at least comparable to the conventional prostheses. Given the low evidence level of existing studies, future well-designed randomized trials with large sample size are required to confirm those advantages.

Can patients detect peri­implant mucosal inflammation? Results from a multicentre randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of peri­implant soft tissue inflammation and aesthetics around single-tooth implants in the anterior maxillary region with three different implant-abutment interface designs. METHODS: Participants were randomized to one of three different types of implant-abutment interface designs [Conical (CI), flat-to-flat (FI), and Platform Switched (PS)]. Implants and provisional crowns with prefabricated titanium abutments were placed 5 months following extraction and/or ridge augmentation. Permanent ceramic crowns with zirconia abutments were placed after 12 weeks. To assess PROs, appearance and inflammation questionnaires were completed from provisional crown placement to the 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: Tooth appearance at the 3-year follow-up revealed a difference amongst CI, FI and PS implants (p=0.049; Kruskal-Wallis test). PS was rated better than FI (p=0.047) at 1 year for appearance of soft-tissue and satisfaction with colour. There were no differences for self-consciousness, smile and pain/discomfort while eating/hard food items. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants tended to rate the health of mucosa around PS implants as slighty better than the other two implant systems, the differences were minimal and inconsistent. Thus, patient satisfaction in terms self-perceived gingival health and esthetics was high for all 3 systems tested, suggesting that patients are unable to detect mucosal inflammation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Patients find it difficult to perceive mucosal inflammation; hence, it is recommended that patients attend implant follow-up visits, even if they do not perceive inflammation. The study suggests that there is a relationship between the PROs and the clinical outcomes of tested implants.

The impact of implant-retained overdentures on type-2 diabetic and non-diabetic edentulous patients: Satisfaction and quality of life in a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits of implant therapy for patients with diabetes, we compared (i) healthy, (ii) well controlled T2DM and (iii) poorly controlled T2DM patients, in terms of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and satisfaction with mandibular 2-implant overdentures over 12 months following restoration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, prospective, cohort study recruited 165 edentulous adults (HbA1c<12%) to receive two endosseous implants in the anterior mandible to support mandibular overdentures. Participants were enrolled as having T2DM or not, with T2DM participants divided according to HbA1c into well-controlled (<8.1%) and poorly controlled (≥ 8.1%) groups. Participants provided responses to the OHIP-20 (OHRQoL) and the McGill Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire, before implant therapy and 6 and 12 months after overdenture insertion using Locator attachments. HbA1c was measured at the same time points. The effect of groups and time was verified using generalized estimating equations (α=0.025). RESULTS: At 12 months, 137 participants provided responses. The two diabetes groups showed improvements in OHRQoL to the same extent as the non-diabetic control group at both 6 and 12 months. Patient satisfaction showed similar improvements with no between-group differences and similar increases identified at 6 and 12 months. HbA1c was not affected by time or groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dental implant therapy provided significant improvements in patient-perceived benefits of mandibular two-implant overdentures for T2DM individuals, which are similar to those found for healthy edentulous individuals. Importantly, those benefits extend to those individuals with poorly controlled glycaemia. The addition of 2-implant supported mandibular overdentures did not affect glycaemic status over 12 months following insertion. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: As risks for implant therapy relative to glycaemic status are better understood, this study documents that implant therapy may offer important benefits in QoL for T2DM patients independent of glycaemic status.

Effects of nocturnal wearing of dentures on the quality of sleep and oral-health-related quality in edentate elders with untreated sleep apnea: a randomized cross-over trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess whether the nocturnal wear of dentures has an effect on the quality of sleep and oral-health-related quality of life of the edentulous elderly with untreated sleep apnea. METHODS: A single-blind randomized cross-over design with two sequences and two periods was used. Participants (n = 77) were randomly assigned either to sequence 1 (nocturnal wear followed by nocturnal nonwear of the denture for 30-30 days) or sequence 2 (nocturnal nonwear followed by nocturnal wear of denture for 30-30 days). The primary sleep outcome was the quality of sleep, assessed through sleep fragmentation measured as Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and respiratory arousal from portable polysomnography. Secondary outcomes were daytime sleepiness, sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) and oral-health-related quality of life measured by validated questionnaires. RESULTS: The mean paired difference in AHI scores for the period of wearing versus not wearing dentures at night was small 1.0 event per hour (p = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -2.0 to 4.1). The mean respiratory arousal index was higher when wearing dentures at night than when not wearing dentures at night, with a mean paired difference of 2.3 events per hour (p = 0.05; 95% CI = 0.0 to 4.6). No difference in sleepiness and PSQI were noted. Wearing dentures at night resulted in a statistically significantly higher mean score of psychological discomfort when compared to not wearing dentures at night. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide some support to usual practice guidelines to remove dentures at night in edentulous elders suffering from sleep apnea. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01868295.

Efficient resource use in simplified complete denture fabrication.

PURPOSE: Conventional dentures will remain the only treatment available to most edentulous people for the foreseeable future. In this study, we compared the efficiency of two methods of making complete conventional dentures-the traditional academic standard (T) and a simplified technique (S) used in private practice. We have previously shown that they produce similar levels of patient satisfaction and denture quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were gathered during a randomized controlled clinical trial of 122 subjects from initial examination until 6-month follow-up. For this report, the direct costs of providing one set of conventional complete dentures by T or S techniques were estimated. All materials used were recorded and their cost was calculated in Canadian dollars (CAN$). The costs of fabrication in an outside laboratory were added. Clinician's labor time was recorded for every procedure. Between-group comparisons for each clinical procedure were carried out with independent t-tests. The number of patients in each group who needed postdelivery treatment was compared with Chi-square tests. The effect of group assignment and of treatment difficulty on outcomes was analyzed with multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean total cost of the T method was significantly greater than S (CAN$166.3; p < 0.001), and clinicians spent 90 minutes longer (p < 0.001) on clinical care. The difficulty of the case had no significant influence on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the S method is the more cost-efficient method and that there are no negative consequences that detract from the cost savings.

Resin-bonded cantilever partial dentures are effective in terms of patient satisfaction in the restoration of the mandibular shortened dental arch.

SUBJECTS: The study sample was derived from dental hospital patients awaiting the provision of a mandibular bilateral free-end removable partial denture (RPD). Inclusion criteria included the following: (1) maximum of 8 remaining mandibular teeth; (2) 1 to 2 anterior teeth spaces allowed, provided they were restorable using resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (FPDs); and (3) plaque score of 20% or less. Exclusion criteria were the following: (1) presence of maxillary molars; (2) maxillary tooth or teeth that would be unopposed by a proposed mandibular prosthesis; and (3) medical condition that precluded active treatment or prescribed diet. Before randomization, all potentially eligible participants had received a preparatory treatment including oral hygiene and restorative and periodontal treatment, if necessary. Sixty participants (25 men and 35 women;median age 67 years; range 39-81 years) were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated into 2 treatment groups (n = 30 per group) matched for age and sex. The dates of the recruitment to the study were not given, but all new prostheses were constructed and fitted between June 1995 and July 1997. KEY EXPOSURE/STUDY FACTOR: The primary treatment of interest was the distal cantilever resin-bonded FPDs. The control treatment was RPDs. Cantilever resin-bonded FPDs restored 1 occlusal unit, up to but not beyond the second premolar, using single pontic cantilevers from a single abutment whenever possible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient satisfaction was assessed using self-administrated questionnaires, piloted for this study, at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year after the provision of the new prostheses. A lower median satisfaction score indicated a higher level of satisfaction. These questionnaires included items about overall satisfaction with teeth, appearance of teeth, ability to chew, and bite and level of satisfaction, as well as comfort with the prosthesis. MAIN RESULTS: The mandibular shortened dental arches opposed a complete maxillary denture in 51 participants, opposed partial maxillary dentures in 7 participants, and opposed natural maxillary teeth in only 2 participants. Fifty-two patients attended the 3-month and 1-year follow-up assessments. There were no differences in the baseline satisfaction of the 2 treatment groups. The within-group changes in summary satisfaction scores indicated significantly higher satisfaction for both treatment groups from baseline (median FPD = 17.5, RPD = 16.5) to the 3-month (median FPD = 13.5, RPD = 13.0) and 1-year follow-up assessments (median FPD = 11.0, median RPD = 13.0). No between-group differences were detected (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P < .05). Improvements in levels of general satisfaction with teeth (P = .05) and the appearance of teeth (P = .12) were significant only for the FPD group. Significant improvements in perceived masticatory ability and perceived levels of comfort were found in both groups (P < or = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that resin-bonded cantilever FPDs are an effective means of restoring a mandibular shortened dental arch in terms of patient comfort and acceptance compared to treatments with RPDs.

Adiposity and gingival crevicular fluid tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels in children.

AIM: To investigate whether adiposity is associated with gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels in children. We also examined whether this relationship is mediated through plasma fasting insulin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This preliminary study used cross-sectional data from the baseline-visit of the Quebec Adipose and Lifestyle InvesTigation in Youth cohort, which is an ongoing longitudinal study investigating the natural history of obesity in Quebec children. Study participants (76 girls and 102 boys) include children aged 8-10 years and their families, living in the Montreal and Quebec City areas. TNF-alpha level was measured in pooled samples (N=4) for each child by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay. Height and weight were measured. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight/height(2) (kg/m(2)). Sex/age-specific BMI was categorized into normal (<85th percentile), overweight (85th-95th percentile) and obese (>or=95th percentile) defined by the 2000 US-CDC growth charts. Insulin resistance was measured using fasting plasma insulin in children. Data analysis involved descriptive and multiple linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Our results suggest that obesity in boys was associated with a 37% increase of GCF-TNF-alpha level. However, when accounting for insulin resistance this association was reduced and disappeared while the model's goodness of fit improved. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for the link between adiposity in children and GCF-TNF-alpha level, which appears to be mediated by insulin resistance.

Rotational movements of mandibular two-implant overdentures.

OBJECTIVES: Clinicians have reported that their patients complain that their mandibular two-implant overdentures (IOD) rotate. Therefore, we studied the frequency and severity of rotation of IODs with two-ball attachments, how rotation may influence perceived satisfaction ratings of chewing ability, and the factors that are involved in the rotation of IODs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-nine participants were recruited and asked to rate their general satisfaction of their IODs, as well as their ability to chew foods, the existence of any mandibular denture rotation, and to what degree denture rotation bothered them. Data on participant sociodemographic, anatomical, and prosthesis characteristics were also collected. Student's t-test and logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the differences between participants who did (R group) and did not report (NR group) denture rotation. RESULTS: Thirty-seven of 79 participants were aware of rotational movement in their IODs. These patients were significantly less satisfied with their chewing ability than those who felt no rotation (69.1 mm R group vs. 82.9 mm), and discomfort caused by the rotation bothered them moderately (39/100 mm). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the arrangement of the anterior teeth and the length of the denture are significantly associated with awareness of denture rotation. Thirty-eight percent in the R group and 31% in the NR group had non-scheduled visits. CONCLUSIONS: Rotational movement with a mandibular two-IOD has a negative effect on perceived chewing ability and is associated with anterior tooth arrangement and denture length.

Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine systematically the data published on the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures from the patient's perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and The Cochrane Systematic Reviews Database were searched and complemented by hand searching. All randomized-controlled trials published in English or French up to April 2007 were included, in which conventional dentures and mandibular implant overdentures in adult edentulous individuals were compared. The outcomes of interest were patient satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life. Random effects models were used to pool the effect sizes (ES) of all included studies. RESULTS: Ten publications of seven randomized-controlled trials were identified and eight were included in the meta-analysis. When compared with mandibular conventional dentures, implant overdentures were rated to be more satisfactory at a clinically relevant level [pooled ES 0.80, z=3.56, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.36-1.24, P=0.0004], but a statistical heterogeneity was found (chi(2)=31.63, df=5, P<0.00001, I(2)=84%). The pooled ES for oral health quality of life was -0.41 (z=1.31, 95% CI, -1.02 to 0.20; P=0.19, chi(2)=11.53, df=2, P<0.003, I(2)=83%). There was a lack of evidence to show the impact of mandibular implant overdenture on perceived general health. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, although mandibular implant-retained overdentures may be more satisfying for edentulous patients than new conventional dentures, the magnitude of the effect is still uncertain. There is a need for additional evidence including cost-effectiveness analyses on the impact of mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures.

Implant overdentures for edentulous elders: study of patient preference.

BACKGROUND: Studies show that elders wearing implant overdentures have improved nutrition and quality of life. However, upfront costs of this therapy are high, and the income of elderly edentulous populations is low. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed (i) to measure the preferences of edentulous patients for mandibular two-implant overdentures using Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) and Willingness-To-Accept (WTA), (ii) to assess the effect of long-term financing on WTP and (iii) to assess the desired role of health care plans in financing dental prostheses. METHODS: Edentulous elders (68-79 years; n = 36) wearing maxillary dentures and either a mandibular conventional denture (CD, n = 13) or a two-implant overdenture with ball attachments (IOD, n = 23) participated in this study. All had received their prostheses 2 years previously, as part of a randomised clinical trial. A three-part questionnaire was completed during a 20-min interview with a trained researcher. RESULTS: Forty-six per cent (6/13) of the CD wearers and 70% (16/23) of the IOD wearers were willing to pay three times more than the current cost of conventional dentures for implant prostheses. These percentages were increased to 77% (CD) and 96% (IOD) if participants could pay for implant overdentures in monthly instalments. Eighty-six per cent (31/36) of all participants in both groups (21/23 IOD; 10/13 CD) thought that the government should cover at least some of the cost of implant overdentures. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, the majority of elderly edentate individuals who have not experienced mandibular two-implant overdenture therapy are willing to pay the cost, particularly when payment can be made in monthly instalments.

Sex differences in denture satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES: Males and females differ in their responses to many health conditions and treatments. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to determine whether there are differences in the way that male and female edentulous elders rate their satisfaction with new mandibular implant overdentures (IODs) and conventional dentures (CDs), at 6 and 12 months following delivery. METHODS: Edentulous elders (n=256) were randomly assigned to receive maxillary conventional dentures and either mandibular overdentures supported by two implants with ball attachments or conventional dentures. Participants rated their general satisfaction, as well as other features of their dentures (comfort, stability, ability to chew, aesthetics, etc.) prior to treatment and 6 and 12 months after delivery. RESULTS: Ratings of satisfaction with IODs were significantly higher than with CDs. Six months after delivery, females in the CD group rated their general satisfaction and satisfaction with ability to chew and aesthetics significantly lower than did the males. The sex differences in the CD group remained at 12 months after delivery. However, males and females in the IOD group rated their general satisfaction and all six subcategories equally. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly females are less satisfied with conventional dentures than elderly males with regards to aesthetics and ability to chew, but equally satisfied with implant overdentures. At 6 and 12 months after delivery, elderly edentulous males and females wearing mandibular implant overdentures were significantly more satisfied than those wearing conventional dentures.

New technologies in health care. Part 1: A moral and ethical predicament.

With the rapid evolution of technology and the development and marketing of new procedures in dentistry, dentists have difficulty keeping pace with all of this new technology and information. How do these clinicians know whether a new product, technique or technological advance is good and should be recommended? At what point do they have an obligation to inform their patients about new procedures supported by research? This first report of a 2-part series investigates the ethical aspects of these issues and describes some of the professional ethical dilemmas and obligations involved when new therapies are offered to the public.

New technologies in health care. Part 2: A legal and professional dilemma.

With the constant introduction and marketing of new dental technologies, dentists sometimes have difficulty deciding whether a new technology will be beneficial to their patients. At the same time, these clinicians are professionally and legally obligated to inform their patients about all appropriate therapeutic alternatives. In this second article of a 2-part series, we review these obligations, as well as provide information about where dentists can find the necessary scientific evidence on which to base an informed decision.

Research approaches in prosthodontics.

Many current studies of prosthodontic treatment use patient-based outcomes. Traditionally, these outcomes are measured using quantitative methods. However, qualitative research methods can provide important information that cannot be found using quantitative techniques. In this article, the authors review quantitative and qualitative research studies. Differences, advantages and disadvantages of each method are highlighted. Prosthodontic researchers are encouraged to combine these methods to benefit from the potential of each of these approaches.

Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques? A 10-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The use of a simplified method (S) of fabricating complete dentures has been shown to be more cost-efficient than the traditional method (T), and there are no negative consequences that detract from the cost savings in the short term. However, it is not clear whether this remains constant over a decade. The objective of this study was to clarify patients' perspectives and determine any differences between the dentures fabricated with these two different techniques after a decade of use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Edentate individuals participated in a randomized controlled clinical trial and completed a 6-month follow-up from 2001 to 2003 (T group n = 50; S group n = 54). For this 10-year follow-up, they were interviewed by telephone. The assessment included whether the denture was still in use or replaced, the condition of the dentures, patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Between and within-group differences and the factors that cause deterioration of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) were determined. RESULTS: Among 54 responders (25 T and 29 S), 14T and 21S kept the original dentures. Both groups were similar in ratings of satisfaction and OHRQoL (maxilla T: 80.0 S: 86.0, p = 0.36; mandibular; T: 66.1 S: 72.3, p = 0.48; OHRQoL T: 111.1 S: 108.5, p = 0.46). Irrespective of fabrication method, discomfort, chewing difficulty and esthetics were the factors that deteriorate OHRQoL (adjusted r = 0.76, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the simplified method remains more cost-efficient than the traditional method over a 10-year period. (IRB approval: A09-E71-12 B McGill University, trial registry: ClinicalTrial.org; NCT02289443).