A phase I open-label dose-escalation study of the anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody LJM716 in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or head and neck and HER2-overexpressing breast or gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) is important in maintaining epidermal growth factor receptor-driven cancers and mediating resistance to targeted therapy. A phase I study of anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody LJM716 was conducted with the primary objective to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose for expansion (RDE), and dosing schedule. Secondary objectives were to characterize safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity. METHODS: This open-label, dose-finding study comprised dose escalation, followed by expansion in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus, and HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer or gastric cancer. During dose escalation, patients received LJM716 intravenous once weekly (QW) or every two weeks (Q2W), in 28-day cycles. An adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model was used to guide dose escalation and establish the RDE. Exploratory pharmacodynamic tumor studies evaluated modulation of HER3 signaling. RESULTS: Patients received LJM716 3-40 mg/kg QW and 20 mg/kg Q2W (54 patients; 36 patients at 40 mg/kg QW). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported during dose-escalation. One patient experienced two DLTs (diarrhea, hypokalemia [both grade 3]) in the expansion phase. The RDE was 40 mg/kg QW, providing drug levels above the preclinical minimum effective concentration. One patient with gastric cancer had an unconfirmed partial response; 17/54 patients had stable disease, two lasting >30 weeks. Down-modulation of phospho-HER3 was observed in paired tumor samples. CONCLUSIONS: LJM716 was well tolerated; the MTD was not reached, and the RDE was 40 mg/kg QW. Further development of LJM716 is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registry number NCT01598077 (registered on 4 May, 2012).

A comparison of the natriuretic and kaliuretic effects of cicletanine and hydrochlorothiazide in prehypertensive and hypertensive humans.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the single-dose effects of thiazide-type diuretics cicletanine and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), on natriuresis and kaliuresis in prehypertensive and treatment-naïve, stage 1 hypertensive patients and to explore the impact of GRK4 gene polymorphisms on thiazide-induced urinary electrolyte excretion. METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period, four-treatment, balanced incomplete block, cross-over study in male patients assigned to treatment sequences consisting of placebo, cicletanine 50 mg, cicletanine 150 mg, and HCTZ 25 mg, doses used to treat hypertension. Cumulative urine samples were collected predosing and over 24 h after dosing in each period to compare urine electrolyte excretion profiles of potassium (UKV), sodium (UNaV), magnesium, calcium, phosphate, chloride, and pH among groups. Each treatment was administered to 18 different patients in each period, and an equal number of patients had less than and at least three GRK4 allele variants. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, mean UKV was significantly increased with HCTZ 25 mg (12.7 mmol/day; P ≤ 0.001), cicletanine 50 mg (4.6 mmol/day; P = 0.026), and cicletanine 150 mg (5.5 mmol/day; P = 0.011), and mean UNaV was significantly increased with HCTZ 25 mg (102.2 mmol/day; P ≤ 0.001), cicletanine 50 mg (21.7 mmol/day; P = 0.005), and cicletanine 150 mg (57.9 mmol/day; P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: All treatments had more natriuresis, diuresis, and kaliuresis than placebo, and both doses of cicletanine had less kaliuresis than HCTZ. These findings suggest that cicletanine is a favorable and well tolerated option for the treatment of hypertension with an improved safety profile compared with HCTZ.

Comparison of T cell immune responses induced by vectored HIV vaccines in non-human primates and humans.

Following the disappointing outcome of the phase IIb test-of-concept step study in which Merck's adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) HIV-1 clade B gag/pol/nef vaccine failed to demonstrate efficacy in HIV high-risk individuals, an extensive review of the trial and preclinical studies which supported the trial is ongoing. One point of interest is how well preclinical nonhuman primate immunogenicity studies predicted what was observed in humans. Here we compare the HIV-1-specific cellular immune responses elicited in nonhuman primates and human clinical trial subjects to several HIV-1 vaccine candidates. We find that although rhesus macaques are immunologically more responsive to vaccination than humans, the hierarchy in potency of single-modality prime-boost regimens using several vector approaches (adenovirus, DNA, and pox vectors) was well predicted. Vaccine approaches using complex formulations such as novel adjuvants (DNA+CRL1005) or mixed-modality prime-boost (DNA/Ad5; Ad5/ALVAC) did not correlate as well between rhesus macaques and humans. Although the immunogenicity of the vaccines and vaccine regimens evaluated were not all accurately predicted, testing in rhesus macaques generally offers an indispensable tool for ranking the immunological potential of HIV-1 vaccine candidates.