Is trimodal therapy the current standard for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence and future perspectives of bladder-sparing treatment for MIBC. METHODS: A non-systematic literature search in Medline/Pubmed was performed in October 2023 with the following keywords "bladder cancer", "bladder-sparing", "trimodal therapy", "chemoradiation", "biomarkers", "immunotherapy", "neoadjuvant chemotherapy", "radiotherapy". RESULTS: Urology guidelines recommend radical cystectomy as the standard curative treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer, reserving radiotherapy for patients who are unfit or who want to preserve their bladder. Given the morbidity and mortality of cystectomy and its impact on quality of life and bladder function, modern oncologic therapies are increasingly oriented toward organ preservation and maximizing functional outcomes while maintaining treatment efficacy. Trimodal therapy, which incorporates maximal transurethral resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy, is an effective regimen for bladder function preservation in well-selected patients. Despite the absence of comparative data from randomized trials, the two approaches seem to provide comparable oncologic outcomes. Studies are evaluating the expansion of eligibility criteria for trimodal therapy, the optimization of radiotherapy and immunotherapy delivery to further improve outcomes, and the validation of biomarkers to guide bladder preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Trimodal therapy has shown acceptable outcomes for bladder preservation; therefore, it provides a valid treatment option in well-selected patients.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Kidney Cancer: Ready for Prime Time?

The standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is surgery. However, a number of patients will not be candidates for surgical treatment or will reject this therapeutic approach. Therefore, alternative approaches are required. Historically, radiotherapy has been considered an ineffective treatment for RCC due to the radioresistance of renal tumour cells to conventional fractionation and the increased rate of toxicity. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a radiotherapy technique that provides a non-invasive ablative treatment with remarkable rates of local control in both primary tumours and metastases in several locations, with a low associated morbidity due to the highly conformal dose and the use of image-guided techniques. Current evidence shows that a higher dose per fraction, achieving a higher biological effective dose, can overcome the radioresistance of RCC cells. Therefore, SBRT, as well as the combination of SBRT and new emerging immune therapies, has a potential role in the local treatment of primary RCC and oligometastatic RCC patients.

Interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of squamous cell anal carcinoma: A retrospective single institution analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcome of patients receiving interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) after pelvic radiation therapy for treatment of an anal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-one patients were identified: 13, six, and two with stages I, II, and III tumors, respectively. After receiving received pelvic irradiation +/- concurrent chemotherapy, patients were delivered a PDR-BT boost to the residual tumor, with intention to deliver a minimal total dose of 60 Gy. The greatest dimension of residual tumor at the time of brachytherapy procedure was 12.5 mm (range: 0-20 mm). Brachytherapy implantation was performed according to the Paris system, only one plane implant being used. RESULTS: Median dose delivered through BT was 20 Gy (range: 10-30 Gy). Median number of pulses was 48 (range: 20-80 pulses). Median treated volume was 9 cm(3) (range: 5-16 cm(3)). Median dose per pulse was 40 cGy (range: 37.5-50 cGy). No Grade 3 or more acute toxicity was reported. No Grade 3 or more delayed toxicity was seen among 18 patients with more than 6 months follow-up. Median followup was 47 months (range: 6-73 months). Twenty patients (95%) were alive at last follow-up. Tumor relapses were experienced in four patients (19%), including local relapse in three patients (14%). CONCLUSION: With almost 4 years median followup, this study confirms previous data suggesting that PDR-BT is effective and safe in this indication. Local control rate and toxicity were in the range of what was seen with continuous low-dose-rate BT.