Contact allergy to SIDAPA baseline series allergens in patients with eyelid dermatitis: An Italian multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Eyelid dermatitis is a frequent reason of dermatological consultation. Its aetiology is not univocal, being contact dermatitis, both allergic and irritant, the most frequent. The primary sources of allergen exposure include cosmetics, metals, and topical medications, from direct, indirect, or airborne contact. OBJECTIVES: To define the frequency of positive patch test reactions to SIDAPA baseline series allergens, to document positive allergens, and to precise the final diagnosis in patients with eyelid involvement. METHODS: A total of 8557 consecutive patients from 12 Italian Dermatology Clinics underwent patch testing with SIDAPA baseline series in 2018 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) with eyelid involvement with or without other involved sites (E-Group) and (ii) without eyelid involvement (NE-Group). The final diagnosis and the frequency of positive relevant patch test reactions were evaluated. RESULTS: E-Group consisted of 688 patients (females 78.6%, mean age 45.3 years), 8.0% of 8557 consecutively patch-tested patients. The final diagnosis in E-Group was ADC in 42.4%, ICD in 34.2%, and AD in 30.5%. The highest reaction rates were elicited by nickel sulphate and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone in both E-Group and NE-Group, even if these allergens were significantly more frequently positive in NE-Group patients than in E-Group ones. Positive patch test reactions to fragrance Mix II, dimethylaminopropylamine, and sorbitan sesquiolate were significantly more frequent in E-Group patients than in NE-Group ones. CONCLUSIONS: Eyelid dermatitis is a frequent dermatological complaint. Allergic contact dermatitis is the most frequent diagnosis commonly caused by nickel sulphate, isothiazolinones, and fragrances. The surfactants dimethylaminopropylamine and sorbitan sesquioleate are emerging causes of eyelid allergic contact dermatitis.

Thyroid Autoimmunity in CSU: A Potential Marker of Omalizumab Response?

The response of severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) to omalizumab largely depends on the autoimmune or autoallergic endotype of the disease. Whether thyroid autoimmunity may predict omalizumab response along with total IgE in CSU is still unclear. Three hundred and eighty-five patients (M/F 123/262; mean age 49.5 years; range 12-87 years) with severe CSU were studied. Total IgE levels and thyroid autoimmunity (levels of anti-thyroid peroxidase [TPO] IgG) were measured before omalizumab treatment. Based on the clinical response, patients were divided into early (ER), late (LR), partial (PR) and non (NR) responders to omalizumab. Thyroid autoimmunity was detected in 92/385 (24%) patients. Altogether, 52%, 22%, 16% and 10% of patients were ER, LR, PR and NR to omalizumab, respectively. Response to omalizumab was not associated with thyroid autoimmunity (p = 0.77). Conversely, we found a strongly positive association between IgE levels and omalizumab response (p < 0.0001); this association was largely driven by early response (OR = 5.46; 95% CI: 2.23-13.3). Moreover, the predicted probabilities of early response strongly increased with increasing IgE levels. Thyroid autoimmunity alone cannot be used as a clinical predictor of omalizumab response. Total IgE levels remain the only and most reliable prognostic marker for omalizumab response in patients with severe CSU.

Phenotypic switch from atopic dermatitis to psoriasis during treatment with upadacitinib.

We report phenotypic switching from atopic dermatitis to psoriasis in a 44-year-old man during treatment with upadacitinib. The patient also had experienced a similar course with dupilumab. This case exemplifies mutual antagonism between atopic dermatitis and psoriasis in predisposed individuals.

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management and course of chronic urticaria.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically disrupts health care around the globe. The impact of the pandemic on chronic urticaria (CU) and its management are largely unknown. AIM: To understand how CU patients are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; how specialists alter CU patient management; and the course of CU in patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our cross-sectional, international, questionnaire-based, multicenter UCARE COVID-CU study assessed the impact of the pandemic on patient consultations, remote treatment, changes in medications, and clinical consequences. RESULTS: The COVID-19 pandemic severely impairs CU patient care, with less than 50% of the weekly numbers of patients treated as compared to before the pandemic. Reduced patient referrals and clinic hours were the major reasons. Almost half of responding UCARE physicians were involved in COVID-19 patient care, which negatively impacted on the care of urticaria patients. The rate of face-to-face consultations decreased by 62%, from 90% to less than half, whereas the rate of remote consultations increased by more than 600%, from one in 10 to more than two thirds. Cyclosporine and systemic corticosteroids, but not antihistamines or omalizumab, are used less during the pandemic. CU does not affect the course of COVID-19, but COVID-19 results in CU exacerbation in one of three patients, with higher rates in patients with severe COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic brings major changes and challenges for CU patients and their physicians. The long-term consequences of these changes, especially the increased use of remote consultations, require careful evaluation.

Factors Associated with Affective Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis.

The aim of this study was to detect demographic and clinical factors associated with affective symptoms and quality of life in patients with severe atopic dermatitis. First, one-way analyses of variance and correlations were performed to compare a large set of qualitative and quantitative clinical variables. Three final multivariable regression models were performed, with depression/anxiety subscales and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores as dependent variables, and the factors that were statistically significant on univariate analyses as independent ones. More severe anxiety symptoms and poorer quality of life (p < 0.01) were significantly associated with more severe depressive symptoms. Female sex and disturbed sleep (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with more severe anxiety. Finally, previous treatment with cyclosporine (p = 0.03) or methotrexate (p = 0.04), more severe depressive symptoms (p < 0.01), itch (p = 0.03), impaired sleep (p < 0.01) and perceived severity of dermatological illness (p < 0.01) were significant predictors of low quality of life. This study shows a complex interplay between the severity of atopic dermatitis, poor quality of life and presence of clinically relevant affective symptoms. These results will help dermatologists to identify patients who need psychiatric consultation within the framework of a multidisciplinary approach.

Quality of life in patients with allergic and immunologic skin diseases: in the eye of the beholder.

Allergic and immunologic skin diseases negatively impact the quality of life (QoL) of affected patients with detrimental consequences. Nonetheless, in everyday clinical practice the evaluation of QoL is often overlooked. Considering the increasing prevalence of atopic dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, hereditary angioedema, cutaneous mastocytosis, and urticaria, it is essential to determine the effects of allergic and immunologic skin diseases on QoL. A joint meeting (GET TOGETHER 2021) of the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC) and the Italian Society of Allergological, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology (SIDAPA) aimed to summarize the features of the main QoL tools used in these diseases and to describe the extent of QoL impairment as well as the impact of treatments on QoL, particularly biologic therapies. The assessment of QoL in patients with allergic and immunologic skin diseases relies on generic, organ-specific and disease-specific questionnaires. While generic and organ-specific questionnaires allow comparison between different diseases, disease-specific questionnaires are designed and validated for specific cohorts: the QoL Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD) and the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS) in atopic dermatitis, the ACD-11 in allergic contact dermatitis, the Angioedema QoL Questionnaire (AE-QoL) and the Hereditary Angioedema QoL questionnaire (HAE-QoL) in hereditary angioedema, the Mastocytosis QoL Questionnaires (MCQoL e MQLQ) in cutaneous mastocytosis, and the Chronic Urticaria QoL questionnaire (CU-Q2oL) in urticaria. Among the many factors that variably contribute to QoL impairment, pruritus can represent the leading cause of patient discomfort. Biologic therapies significantly ameliorate QoL in atopic dermatitis, hereditary angioedema, mastocytosis and chronic urticaria. In general, adequate management strategies are essential for improving QoL in patients with allergic and immunologic skin diseases.

Patch testing of budesonide in Italy: The SIDAPA baseline series experience, 2018-2019.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide was included in the European Baseline Series in 2000 as the most suitable marker forcorticosteroid hypersensitivity. In the last two decades, a decreasing trend of budesonide allergy has been observed. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to budesonide in a large, Italian patch test population, characterizing patients according to MOAHLFA index and evaluating the benefit with extended readings of budesonide patch test. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient demographics and patch test results over a 2-year period (2018-2019) was performed at 14 patch test clinics in Italy. RESULTS: Ninety out of 14 544 (0.6%) patients reacted to budesonide 0.01% pet.. Positive reactions were mild in 54.4% and late readings at day 7 showed new positive reactions in 37.8% of patients. The MOAHLFA index showed a significant positive association with male gender, atopic dermatitis, and age >40 years and a significant negative association with hand and face dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: We documented a low prevalence of budesonide allergy in Italy, confirming its decreasing trend recently reported in the literature. Nevertheless, budesonide needs to be maintained in the baseline series for its good ability to detect corticosteroid sensitization.

Effectiveness of dupilumab for the treatment of nummular eczema phenotype of atopic dermatitis in adults.

Nummular eczema (NE) is currently considered as one of the clinical phenotypes of atopic dermatitis (AD) of the adult. In this multicentre study, 30 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) affected with nummular-like AD were treated with dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody against the receptor for interleukin(IL)-4 and IL-13. The evaluation of the results after 16 weeks of treatment showed a significant improvement of the disease, as demonstrated by reduction in Eczema Area Severity Score (EASI), visual analogue score (VAS) of pruritus, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores. Conjunctivitis in one patient was the only side effect. In conclusion, dupilumab seems to be an effective and safe treatment in NE phenotype of AD of the adult.

Which Factors Are Associated with Persistence of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Patients Affected by Atopic Dermatitis despite 2-Year Treatment with Dupilumab?

Background: Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent inflammatory skin disease whose course is often complicated by the presence of concomitant anxiety and depressive disorders. Dupilumab has been demonstrated to be largely effective in AD. The aims of the present study were to (1) to verify the effectiveness of 2-year dupilumab treatment on the depressive and anxiety symptoms of patients affected by AD and (2) to identify predictors of the persistence of psychiatric symptoms despite maintenance treatment with dupilumab. Methods: A total of 331 patients with severe AD were assessed at baseline and at different times over 2 years by a large set of rating scales, including the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Paired sample t-tests were performed to verify the effectiveness of dupilumab on the severity of AD and mental health items. Two binary logistic regression models were then used to identify the predictors of the persistence of clinically significant depression and anxiety, defined by a score ≥ 8 on each sub-scale of the HADS. Results: After 2 years of treatment with dupilumab, the patients benefited, showing a significant improvement in both the dermatological disease and comorbid depression/anxiety (p < 0.001 for all scales). Overall, 17.5% and 13% of patients, respectively, reported residual depressive and anxiety symptoms after the 2-year treatment with dupilumab. The baseline predictors of the persistence of clinically significant depressive symptoms after the 2-year treatment with dupilumab were found to be a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.012), a lower impact of dermatological disease on quality of life (p = 0.015), and more severe depressive symptoms (p < 0.01), while for anxiety, the only predictor was found to be female gender (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Using a multidisciplinary approach, at baseline, dermatologists should more closely monitor patients who are at a greater risk of maintaining residual psychiatric symptoms despite therapy, such as those with more severe depressive symptoms and those who are overweight.

Mental health in patients affected by atopic dermatitis: which effects of treatment with dupilumab?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease. Patients with AD are prone to develop anxiety and mood disorders. Aim of this study is to investigate if treatment with dupilumab may improve mental health status of patients affected by AD. A total of 66 patients with severe AD were included: 24 subjects were candidate or have just started (one month) treatment with dupilumab, and 42 have been in treatment for one year. 25.8%, 30.3%, and 45.5% of the total sample showed, respectively, clinically significant anxiety, depression, and symptoms of Internet addiction. Patients with anxiety symptoms resulted to have more severe AD, more sleep problems ( P  = 0.028), less quality of life ( P  = 0.001), more severe depressive symptoms ( P  < 0.001), to be more frequently women ( P  = 0.016), to be less frequently treated with dupilumab for one year ( P  = 0.025). Similarly, patients with clinically significant depressive symptoms resulted to have more severe AD, more sleep problems ( P  = 0.003), less quality of life ( P  < 0.001), more severe anxiety symptoms ( P  < 0.001), to be less frequently treated with dupilumab for one year ( P  = 0.008). Patients with AD treated for one year with dupilumab showed a better mental health profile in terms of less severe anxiety and depression with respect to their counterparts.

A Multidisciplinary Approach Is Beneficial in Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly heterogeneous chronic inflammatory skin disorder that is frequently associated with a plethora of comorbidities. AD is, therefore, considered a systemic disease impacted by a considerable burden and leading to poor quality of life, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Since atopic and non-atopic comorbidities can further worsen the disease course, accurate establishment of the patient's individual intrinsic risk profile and needs is crucial and may help in guiding the selection of the best treatment option. Better quality of care for patients with AD can be delivered through a multidisciplinary team led by a dermatologist, for comprehensive patient management. The implementation of a multidisciplinary approach for AD could enhance the delivery of optimised and safe treatments, improve the standard of care and patient outcomes in the short and long term, and prevent or delay the lifelong impact of uncontrolled AD. Understanding the unmet needs, assessing correctly the patient risk profile and enhancing the shared patient-physician decision-making process can lead to disease control and quality-of-life improvement, especially in the context of the introduction of newer treatment for AD. This narrative review is a call for more data to establish standardised patient profiles and multidisciplinary strategies in AD management. In view on the fast-evolving treatments for AD, this review aims at highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to a comprehensive assessment and holistic care in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Paradoxical Psoriasis: An Updated Review of Clinical Features, Pathogenesis, and Treatment Options.

The definition of paradoxical psoriasis (PP) encompasses 2 main scenarios, namely, (i) new-onset psoriasis in patients treated for a different disease and (ii) worsening as well as phenotypical change of pre-existing psoriasis. Originally restricted to the appearance of an untoward psoriasiform reaction under TNF inhibitors, the term has gained new meaning, with the progressive observation of psoriasis-like eruptions also with other medications. Although the conceptual framework of PP has expanded, a molecular and clinicotherapeutic classification is still lacking. In addition, a certain degree of confusion surrounds the correct terminology to indicate these eruptions. In this paper, evidence on the epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of PP is reviewed, providing a perspective on possible pathogenesis-driven therapeutic approaches.

Comparison of Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib for Atopic Dermatitis Between Dupilumab-Exposed and Dupilumab-Naïve Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Upadacitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients [Formula: see text] 12 years of age. In real life, upadacitinib currently represents a valid therapeutic option for patients failing available systemic therapies, in particular patients who discontinued dupilumab because of lack of efficacy or occurrence of adverse events. The objectives of the present study were to compare the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in patients affected by AD who had previously failed dupilumab therapy versus biologic naïve patients. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-centre, observational, real-life study was conducted in four Italian dermatological referral centres (Milan, Perugia, Naples and Vicenza). Baseline characteristics included age, sex, AD history and severity, prior treatments, comorbidities and concomitant therapies. AD severity was assessed at baseline and at week 4 (W4), W16, W24 and W52, using Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) scores. Full blood count, hepatic and renal function, lipid panel, and muscle enzymes [lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatine phosphokinase (CPK)] were assessed at baseline and at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients (72 males, 63.7%; mean age: 37.22 ± 16.8 years) were included in the analysis, all patients were in treatment and underwent follow-up period until W16, whilst 91 (80.5%) and 75 (66.4%) patients were in treatment and in follow-up period until W24 and W52, respectively. Mean EASI score significantly changed from 24.30 ± 10.27 to 1.28 ± 4.34, 0.74 ± 2.31 and 0.25 ± 1.34 at W16, W24 and W52, respectively (p < 0.0001). Specifically, at W16 the percentage of patients achieving EASI-75, EASI-90 and EASI-100 was 85.21, 76.35 and 66.11%, respectively. At W24, EASI-75, EASI-90 and EASI-100 were reached by 88.54, 85.42, and 78.37% of patients, respectively. Finally, 90.1% of patients achieved EASI-75, 88.3% achieved EASI-90 and 83.0% achieved EASI-100 at W52. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the clinical effectiveness of upadacitinib treatment in adult patients in a real-world setting with moderate-to-severe AD who had discontinued dupilumab due to poor effectiveness or adverse events and who were biologic naïve; therefore, previous treatments do not seem to affect the response to upadacitinib treatment.

Drug Survival of Upadacitinib and Predicting Factors of Discontinuation in Adult Patients Affected by Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Italian Multicenter Analysis.

Background: Limited real-world data are available on upadacitinib drug survival in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To investigate upadacitinib drug survival, and the reasons and predictors of drug discontinuation in AD patients. Methods: All consecutive patients aged 18-75 years, affected by moderate-to-severe AD, and treated with upadacitinib for more than 1 month at dermatological clinics were included during November 2020-August 2023. Upadacitinib survival was investigated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the predictors through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 325 adult AD patients (mean (SD) age, 38.6(15.6) years) had a 1-year and 1.5-year upadacitinib drug survival of 91.5% and 80.2%, respectively. The main reasons for drug discontinuation (25/325, 7.7%) were adverse events (4.9%), including cutaneous or infectious diseases (1.5%), such as acne and herpes zoster; blood test changes (1.2%), including hypercholesterolemia, creatine phosphokinase or liver enzyme elevation, and lymphopenia; urinary or respiratory infections (0.9%); deep venous thrombosis (0.3%); malignancies (0.3%); loss of consciousness (0.3%); and arthralgias (0.3%); followed by ineffectiveness (0.6%). No specific characteristic was significantly associated with an increased risk of upadacitinib discontinuation. Conclusions: Our findings show that upadacitinib was effective in moderate-to-severe AD after more than 1 year of continuous treatment but point to the need for clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients.