Trunk and head displacements stabilized to perform both horizontal and vertical saccadic eye movements.

Vision is crucial for humans to interact with their surrounding environment, and postural sway is reduced to allow short eye movements. However, the extent of subtle changes in postural control for horizontal and vertical eye movements remains unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of vertical and horizontal eye movements on head and trunk control in young adults. Fifteen healthy adults (23.4 ± 4.7 years) stood upright in three conditions for 60 s: fixation, horizontal, and vertical guided eye movements. In fixation, participants had to fixate on a stationary target. In both the horizontal and vertical eye movements, the target was presented with a frequency of 0.5 Hz and a visual angle of 11°. Eye displacement was monitored using a SMI eye tracker (ETG2.0) and trunk and head sway were monitored using infrared markers (Optotrak 3020, NDI). The mean sway amplitude was lower in both directions for eye movements and lowest in the vertical direction compared to the fixation condition. The sway area was also lower in vertical eye movement than in the fixation condition. We also found that the sway reduction was greater at head than at trunk level. The median frequency sway in the anterior-posterior direction was higher in both eye movements than in fixation. Based upon these results, we suggest that to perform short eye movements, postural sway is more strongly controlled at the head level than at the trunk and in vertical eye movements than in horizontal movements.

Haptic Information Improvement on Postural Sway is Information-Dependent But Not Influenced by Cognitive Task.

Young adults reduce their sway in both light touch (LT) and anchor systems (AS), however, the cognitive involvement in these tasks is unknown. This study investigated postural control in young adults standing upright using either LT or AS, concomitantly with a cognitive task (counting). Nine adults (26 ± 7.4 years) stood in the upright tandem stance with eyes closed, with/without LT, AS (force <2 N), and a cognitive task. The mean sway amplitude of the trunk, right wrist, and shoulder ellipse area, as well as the mean force during LT and AS were obtained. The cognitive task did not influence the magnitude of trunk sway or the mean force in the LT and AS conditions. The trunk sway magnitude was reduced in the AS and even further in LT. Wrist and shoulder variability was larger in the AS than in the LT. Based on these results, we conclude that enhanced sensory cues provided by LT and AS reduce trunk sway with little or no attentional demands.

Visually guided eye movements reduce postural sway in dyslexic children.

Dyslexic children present poorer postural control performance than their peers, perhaps due to different patterns of eye movements. It has been shown that guided eye movements decrease magnitude of body sway in young and older adults, but there is no evidence whether the search for visual information that occurs during eye movements affects postural control in dyslexic children. The aim of this study was to examine the use of guided eye movements and its pattern in the performance of postural control of dyslexic children during upright quiet stance. Twelve children with dyslexia (10.8 ± 1.1 years old) and 12 non-dyslexic children (10.4 ± 1.5 years old) participated in this study. All children were instructed to maintain an upright quiet stance for 60 s either fixating on a target (fixation condition) displayed 1 m ahead in the center of a monitor at eye level, or performing eye movements to follow a target displayed on one side of a monitor, then disappearing and reappearing immediately on the opposite side with a frequency of 0.5 Hz (guided condition). Three trials for each condition were registered. Body sway was measured with an IRED (OPTOTRAK) placed on the children's back. Eye movements were tracked using eye-tracking glasses (ETG 2.0 - SMI). Dyslexic children swayed with larger amplitude under both fixation and guided conditions than non-dyslexic children. Both dyslexic and non-dyslexic children reduced postural sway magnitude under the guided compared to the fixation condition. All children were able to modulate eye movement according to the conditions (fixation and guided) and no difference in eye movements was observed between dyslexic and non-dyslexic children. Eye movements are modulated similarly based upon the visual conditions in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children, and dyslexic children are capable of using available visual information during eye movements to improve postural control, though they do not equal the performance of non-dyslexic children. Eye movement patterns seem not to be related to poor performance of postural control in dyslexic children.