Safety of systemic anti-cancer treatment in oncology patients with non-severe COVID-19: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The viral pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted cancer patient management around the world. Most reported data relate to incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe COVID-19. The safety of systemic anti-cancer therapy in oncology patients with non-severe COVID-19 is an important matter in daily practice. METHODS: ONCOSARS-1 was a single-center, academic observational study. Adult patients with solid tumors treated in the oncology day unit with systemic anti-cancer therapy during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium were prospectively included. All patients (n = 363) underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological testing after the first peak of the pandemic in Belgium. Additionally, 141 of these patients also had a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test during the pandemic. The main objective was to retrospectively determine the safety of systemic cancer treatment, measured by the rate of adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. RESULTS: Twenty-two (6%) of the 363 eligible patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and/or serology. Of these, three required transient oxygen supplementation, but none required admission to the intensive care unit. Hematotoxicity was the only adverse event more frequently observed in SARS-CoV-2 -positive patients than in SARS-CoV-2-negative patients: 73% vs 35% (P < 0.001). This association remained significant (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, P = 0.009) even after adjusting for performance status and type of systemic treatment. Hematological adverse events led to more treatment delays for the SARS-CoV-2-positive group: 55% vs 20% (P < 0.001). Median duration of treatment interruption was similar between the two groups: 14 and 11 days, respectively. Febrile neutropenia, infections unrelated to COVID-19, and bleeding events occurred at a low rate in the SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. CONCLUSION: Systemic anti-cancer therapy appeared safe in ambulatory oncology patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were, however, more treatment delays in the SARS-CoV-2-positive population, mainly due to a higher rate of hematological adverse events.

Palmar fasciitis and polyarthritis, a rare paraneoplastic syndrome related to ovarian cancer.

Palmar fasciitis and polyarthritis syndrome (PFPAS) is an uncommon disorder characterized by diffuse inflammation of the palmar fascia, tendon sheaths, and joints of the fingers and wrists, which rapidly progresses to flexion contracture of the hands. This paraneoplastic syndrome, originally linked to ovarian carcinoma, has also been associated with multiple different malignancies. As PFPAS usually precedes the detection of cancer, its symptoms should raise the suspicion of an underlying malignancy and should be thoroughly investigated.

Treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in Belgium: a real world data analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Abiraterone acetate + prednisone (AAP) and docetaxel have proven their efficacy in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in clinical trials. However, real-world data are scarce. The goal of this study is to evaluate real-world data on the efficacy and safety of these therapies in mHSPC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 93 patients from 21 different centres were retrospectively reviewed. Primary and secondary endpoints were radiographic and PSA progression-free survival (RPFS - PSA-PFS) and cancer specific and overall survival (CSS - OS), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Differences in oncological outcome and AEs were evaluated between three treatment groups: ADT only (N=26) - ADT + AAP (N=48) - ADT + docetaxel (N=19). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS: Median RPFS was 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9-17) for ADT only, 21 months (95% CI: 19-23) for ADT + AAP and 12 months (95% CI: 11-14) for ADT + docetaxel (p = 0.004). The 1-year PSA-PFS, CSS and OS were 73.5%, 90.7% and 88.7%, respectively, with no significant differences between the three groups. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were not observed more frequently. CONCLUSION: Retrospective real-world data show a significantly longer RPFS for mHSPC patients treated with ADT + AAP compared to ADT only or ADT + docetaxel at short-term follow-up. This can aid in counselling of mHSPC patients in daily clinical practice.

A single course of 2-chloro-deoxyadenosine does not eradicate leukemic cells in hairy cell leukemia patients in complete remission.

The nucleoside analog 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) has recently emerged as a most promising treatment for hair-cell leukemia (HCL). The response rates are high regardless of prior therapy, and the duration of complete responses (CR) after a single course of treatment is longer than with any other therapeutic agent. We investigated the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) in ten HCL patients treated in our institution with 2-CdA. The presence of residual leukemic cells was investigated in patients in CR following one course of treatment, using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and heavy-chain immunoglobulin genes (IgH), or TCR delta derived clonospecific probes. Eight patients achieved a complete remission after a single course of treatment, as evaluated at 6 months. Among these patients, seven are still in CR with a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 6-20 months) and one has relapsed after 15 months. Using PCR, all the evaluable patients remaining in CR showed persistent evidence of detectable MRD with no sign of decrease over the observation period. From this small series, we conclude that a single course of 2-CdA does not eradicate HCL and that persistence of residual leukemic cells appears to be common in patients in complete morphologic remission. Whether persistence of MRD will have an impact on long-term outcome, or whether HCL patients in morphologic CR with persistent MRD will remain so, is a matter of longer follow-up.

Severe anal condylomata acuminata following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case report.

We report the case of a 37 years old male patient who developed severe anal condylomata acuminata after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Anal warts were particularly disabling, refractory to the treatment and finally imposed diversion colostomy. The role of cellular immunodeficiency observed after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as etiology of anal condylomata is discussed.

Acute myeloid leukemia: lack of predictive value of sequential quantitative MR imaging during treatment.

PURPOSE: To assess the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in monitoring treatment response in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bulk T1 and T2 were determined with at least four MR imaging examinations (strictly timed) during the first 6 weeks of treatment in 29 patients with AML (age range, 16-75 years; 15 female, and 14 male). Bulk T1 and T2 in responder (n = 22) and nonresponder (n = 7) patients were compared. RESULTS: Relative to pretreatment bulk T1 values, bulk T1 had increased a mean of 11% at week 1 and had decreased a mean of 7% and 39% at weeks 2 and 6, respectively. Values in nonresponder patients were not statistically significantly different (+11%, -14%, -38%). CONCLUSION: MR imaging of lumbar bone marrow in patients with AML demonstrated statistically significant changes in bulk T1 during treatment that correlated with changes in cellularity. However, neither the early increase in bulk T1 nor the rate or magnitude of the subsequent decrease in bulk T1 were indicative of a positive response to treatment.

Infectious complications after 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine therapy.

Infection is a common adverse event after therapy with nucleoside analogs, including 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (CdA). However, the incidence of CdA-related infections has been poorly documented. In this study we compare, in the same patient population, the incidence of infectious episodes during the 6-month period before CdA to their incidence during the 6 months after initiating therapy. Ninety-five patients with hematological malignancies were studied. The incidence of infectious episodes almost doubled after CdA (0.87 vs. 0.47 during the pre-CdA period). The following factors were associated with an increased risk of infection after therapy: a history of previous chemotherapy, infection during the pre-CdA period and a diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia or of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Age, neutrophil and lymphocyte count at onset of CdA and time interval between diagnosis and therapy with CdA did not correlate with the infectious risk. The pattern of infections was modified after therapy with an increase of herpes virus infections ( 1 vs. 8 episodes, p=0.04) and of fever of unknown origin (6 vs. 17 episodes, p=0.03). In conclusion, a population at high risk for developing infectious complications after CdA therapy can be identified. Specific measures aimed at reducing the incidence of infectious events should concentrate on this population.