Immunological responses to exogenous insulin.

Regardless of purity and origin, therapeutic insulins continue to be immunogenic in humans. However, severe immunological complications occur rarely, and less severe events affect a small minority of patients. Insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) may be detectable in insulin-naive individuals who have a high likelihood of developing type 1 diabetes or in patients who have had viral disorders, have been treated with various drugs, or have autoimmune disorders or paraneoplastic syndromes. This suggests that under certain circumstances, immune tolerance to insulin can be overcome. Factors that can lead to more or less susceptibility to humoral responses to exogenous insulin include the recipient's immune response genes, age, the presence of sufficient circulating autologous insulin, and the site of insulin delivery. Little proof exists, however, that the development of insulin antibodies (IAs) to exogenous insulin therapy affects integrated glucose control, insulin dose requirements, and incidence of hypoglycemia, or contributes to beta-cell failure or to long-term complications of diabetes. Studies in which pregnant women with diabetes were monitored for glycemic control argue against a connection between IAs and fetal risk. Although studies have shown increased levels of immune complexes in patients with diabetic microangiopathic complications, these immune complexes often do not contain insulin or IAs, and insulin administration does not contribute to their formation. The majority of studies have shown no relationship between IAs and diabetic angiopathic complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. With the advent of novel insulin formulations and delivery systems, such as insulin pumps and inhaled insulin, examination of these issues is increasingly relevant.

Recommendations on risk-based strategies for detection and characterization of antibodies against biotechnology products.

The appropriate evaluation of the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals is of major importance for their successful development and licensure. Antibodies elicited by these products in many cases cause no detectable clinical effects in humans. However, antibodies to some therapeutic proteins have been shown to cause a variety of clinical consequences ranging from relatively mild to serious adverse events. In addition, antibodies can affect drug efficacy. In non-clinical studies, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) can complicate interpretation of the toxicity, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Therefore, it is important to develop testing strategies that provide valid assessments of antibody responses in both non-clinical and clinical studies. This document provides recommendations for antibody testing strategies stemming from the experience of contributing authors. The recommendations are intended to foster a more unified approach to antibody testing across the biopharmaceutical industry. The strategies proposed are also expected to contribute to better understanding of antibody responses and to further advance immunogenicity evaluation.

Recommendations for the validation of immunoassays used for detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products.

Most biological drug products elicit some level of anti-drug antibody (ADA) response. This antibody response can, in some cases, lead to potentially serious side effects and/or loss of efficacy. In humans, ADA often causes no detectable clinical effects, but in the instances of some therapeutic proteins these antibodies have been shown to cause a variety of clinical consequences ranging from relatively mild to serious adverse events. In nonclinical (preclinical) studies, ADA can affect drug exposure, complicating the interpretation of the toxicity, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Therefore, the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins is a concern for clinicians, manufacturers and regulatory agencies. In order to assess the immunogenic potential of biological drug molecules, and be able to correlate laboratory results with clinical events, it is important to develop reliable laboratory test methods that provide valid assessments of antibody responses in both nonclinical and clinical studies. For this, method validation is considered important, and is a necessary bioanalytical component of drug marketing authorization applications. Existing regulatory guidance documents dealing with the validation of methods address immunoassays in a limited manner, and in particular lack information on the validation of immunogenicity methods. Hence this article provides scientific recommendations for the validation of ADA immunoassays. Unique validation performance characteristics are addressed in addition to those provided in existing regulatory documents pertaining to bioanalyses. The authors recommend experimental and statistical approaches for the validation of immunoassay performance characteristics; these recommendations should be considered as examples of best practice and are intended to foster a more unified approach to antibody testing across the biopharmaceutical industry.

Optimization and validation of a flow cytometric method for immunophenotyping peripheral blood lymphocytes from cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).

BACKGROUND: Guidelines published by the Food and Drug Administration and Center for Human Medicinal Products describe the need to assess immunotoxic effects in nonclinical studies that evaluate drug toxicity, including the use of immunophenotyping to measure immunotoxicity. We are not aware of previous studies, however, that have validated methods for immunophenotyping peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in whole blood samples from cynomolgus monkeys. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to optimize and validate a flow cytometric assay for immunophenotyping lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of cynomolgus monkeys. METHODS: A series of prevalidation experiments were done to determine optimal reagents, volumes, timing, and other procedural details of the flow cytometric assay. Using the optimized method, we then determined precision, interindividual variation, laboratory-to-laboratory variability, and sample stability. Stabilized human blood was used as a positive control for staining, processing, and analysis. The percentage and number of pan-T cells (CD3+), T-helper cells (CD3+4+), T cytotoxic/suppressor cells (CD3+8+), natural killer cells (CD3-16+), and B-cells (CD3-20+) were determined in 146 male and 140 female, clinically healthy monkeys and reference intervals were calculated. RESULTS: By doing 4-color staining with a lyse-wash method, intra- and interassay precision were <5% for all lymphocyte subsets. Variability between technicians and laboratories was minimal (CVs<3%). Samples were stable for up to 24 hours after staining and fixing. CONCLUSIONS: The validated method is extremely robust and can be performed under good laboratory practice conditions to support nonclinical studies. Reference intervals for lymphocyte subsets were similar to those previously reported.

The effect of insulin antibodies on the metabolic action of inhaled and subcutaneous insulin: a prospective randomized pharmacodynamic study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the development of high- or low-affinity insulin antibodies (IABs) on postprandial glucose tolerance, duration of insulin action, and clinical safety in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving inhaled insulin (Exubera). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study consisted of a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial in which 47 patients with type 1 diabetes received NPH insulin twice daily plus either premeal inhaled insulin (INH group; n = 24) or pre-meal subcutaneous regular insulin (SC group; n = 23) for 24 weeks. Meal challenge and euglycemic clamp studies were performed on consecutive days at baseline, week 12, and week 24. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: For the INH and SC groups, mean (+/-SD) IAB levels were 3.5 +/- 3.9 and 2.6 +/- 4.1 muU/ml at baseline, respectively, compared with 101.4 +/- 140.4 and 4.3 +/- 9.4 microU/ml at week 24. At week 24, the changes from baseline were similar for the INH and SC groups for maximal plasma glucose concentration (C(max)) (adjusted ratio for treatment group difference 0.99 [90% CI 0.95-1.03]), area under the plasma glucose concentration time curve (adjusted ratio for treatment group difference 0.98 [0.88-1.08]), and duration of insulin action (adjusted treatment group difference 29 min [-49 to 108]). No adverse events were attributed to IABs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 1 diabetes treated with inhaled insulin, development of high- or low-affinity IABs did not impair postprandial glucose tolerance, alter the time-action profile of insulin, or impact tolerability. No clinical relevance of IABs was identified in this study.

Antibody response to inhaled insulin in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. An analysis of initial phase II and III inhaled insulin (Exubera) trials and a two-year extension trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare antibody responses to inhaled human insulin vs. sc human insulin and to determine whether insulin antibody binding is associated with adverse clinical consequences. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Insulin antibody data from initial phase II/III trials were analyzed comparing the efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin with various agents, including sc insulin. Additionally, data from a 24-month extension of the phase III studies were examined. Data were pooled into the following three groups based on insulin treatment status at baseline: patients with type 1 diabetes, and patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin and not using insulin at baseline. Ig class analysis was also performed on randomly selected sera from type 1 patients at the end of the initial trials. RESULTS: In the initial trials, greater insulin antibody binding was observed in patients receiving inhaled insulin vs. sc insulin. The greatest antibody responses to inhaled insulin were observed in patients with type 1 diabetes [nonparametric comparison of medians at the end of the study, 22.0% binding (unadjusted 95% confidence interval: 19.5, 24.5)], and the lowest responses were observed in non-insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes in which there was no difference in median values at the end of the study. There were no correlations between antibody binding and glycemic control (measured using glycosylated hemoglobin), insulin dose requirements, hypoglycemic events, or pulmonary function (measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide). Antibody responses were IgG in type. Differences in antibody levels observed in patients with type 1 vs. type 2 diabetes were maintained over the 24-month extension trials. Peak antibody levels across all groups were generally observed after 6-12 months of insulin therapy. Inhaled insulin therapy was not associated with a greater incidence of allergy or other hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSION: Inhaled insulin was observed to produce a larger antibody response than sc insulin. Insulin antibody binding has not been associated with adverse clinical consequences in trials to date.

Development and validation of radioligand binding assays to measure total, IgA, IgE, IgG, and IgM insulin antibodies in human serum.

Radioligand binding assays for total and Ig classes of insulin antibodies (IAB) were developed and validated. For each assay, insulin-extracted serum samples were incubated with radiolabeled insulin in the presence and absence of high levels of unlabeled insulin to determine nonspecific binding and total binding, respectively. To measure total IAB, antibody-bound insulin was precipitated with a polyethylene glycol solution, washed, and counted in a gamma-counter. To measure IgG IAB, samples were treated with protein G-Sepharose beads, centrifuged, washed, and counted. For the measurement of IgA, IgE, and IgM IAB, IgG was removed from the samples and treated with anti-IgA, -IgE, or -IgM conjugated to Sepharose beads, centrifuged, washed, and counted. The acid/charcoal extraction of bound and unbound insulin from serum samples was optimized. Specificity and binding capacity of the protein G and antibody-bound beads were evaluated and optimized. The linear region of the total and IgG IAB assays was determined using serum samples containing high levels of insulin antibodies. The limit of quantitation, limit of detection, and precision for all the assays were also determined.

Synthesis and characterization of rhenium and technetium-99m labeled insulin.

A (99m)Tc-labeled insulin analogue was synthesized through a direct labeling method in which the [(99m)Tc(CO)(3)](+) core was combined with a protected insulin derivative (9) bearing a M(I) chelate linked to the first amino acid of the B-chain (B1). Regioselective labeling was achieved by careful control over the pH and the reaction time. Following a TFA-anisole mediated deprotection step (decay-corrected yield of 30 +/- 11%, n = 4), the identity of the final (99m)Tc-labeled product was confirmed by HPLC. Displacement of (125)I-insulin from the insulin receptor (IR) by the Re analogue 6 was similar to that of native insulin (17.8 nM vs 11.7 nM, respectively). The extent of autophosphorylation and Akt activation, as indicated by production of phospho-Akt (pAkt), showed no statistical difference between 6 and native insulin in both assays. These results support the use of the reported (99m)Tc-insulin derivative as a tracer for studying insulin biochemistry in vivo.

Development and Validation of a Quasi-Quantitative Bioassay for Neutralizing Antibodies Against CP-870,893.

The human monoclonal antibody CP-870,893 is a CD40 receptor agonist currently being developed for the treatment of cancer. A bioassay to measure neutralizing antibodies (Nab) to CP-870,893 in 5% human serum matrix was developed and validated utilizing the Daudi cell line and flow cytometric detection. Additionally, samples from CP-870,893 treated cynomolgus monkeys were analyzed in the bioassay and compared to results obtained using a competitive receptor-binding (CRB) Nab immunoassay to determine if the CRB assay may be used in place of the bioassay. Treatment of Daudi cells for 2 d with CP-870,893 leads to a concentration-dependent increase in CD54 cell surface expression. The presence of antidrug Nab attenuates CP-870,893 binding to CD40 and the induction of CD54. An anti-idiotype monoclonal antibody (Mab) and a monkey sera pool were identified as positive controls for neutralization of CP-870,893. During development, it was observed that the assay robustness was altered by culture media and FBS substitutions. For validation the following parameters were established: cutpoint factors in the presence (0.779) and absence (1.282) of 50 ng/ml CP-870,893, linear region of the concentration-response (1-100 ng/ml CP-870,893), intra- and inter-assay precision (CV

Development and validation of a canine T-cell-dependent antibody response model for immunotoxicity evaluation.

A T-cell dependent antibody response (TDAR) model to evaluate compounds for potential immunotoxicity in dogs has not been reported. The objective of these studies was to develop and validate a dog TDAR model using the T-cell dependent antigen, keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Studies were conducted to determine the appropriate dose of KLH, immunization route and kinetics of the antibody response to KLH in the dog. To validate the sensitivity of this method, we investigated the TDAR to KLH in the dog with a known immunosuppressive drug, cyclosporine (Neoral). The results of this study demonstrate that a robust primary IgM and IgG response to KLH can be generated in dogs and the IgG response was sensitive to cyclosporine treatment.

Prevention of organ allograft rejection by a specific Janus kinase 3 inhibitor.

Because of its requirement for signaling by multiple cytokines, Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) is an excellent target for clinical immunosuppression. We report the development of a specific, orally active inhibitor of JAK3, CP-690,550, that significantly prolonged survival in a murine model of heart transplantation and in cynomolgus monkeys receiving kidney transplants. CP-690,550 treatment was not associated with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or lymphoproliferative disease. On the basis of these preclinical results, we believe JAK3 blockade by CP-690,550 has potential for therapeutically desirable immunosuppression in human organ transplantation and in other clinical settings.