RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To date, a systematic review of the evidence regarding the association between vitamin D and allergic diseases development has not yet been undertaken. OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation when compared to no supplementation in pregnant women, breastfeeding women, infants, and children for the prevention of allergies. METHODS: Three databases were searched through January 30, 2016, including randomized (RCT) and nonrandomized studies (NRS). Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the certainty in the body of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Among the 1932 articles identified, one RCT and four NRS were eligible. Very low certainty in the body of evidence across examined studies suggests that vitamin D supplementation for pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and infants may not decrease the risk of developing allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis (in pregnant women), allergic rhinitis (in pregnant women and infants), asthma and/or wheezing (in pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and infants), or food allergies (in pregnant women). We found no studies of primary prevention of allergic diseases in children. CONCLUSION: Limited information is available addressing primary prevention of allergic diseases after vitamin D supplementation, and its potential impact remains uncertain.
Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade/prevenção & controle , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Fatores Etários , Aleitamento Materno , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez , Viés de Publicação , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of allergic diseases in infants is approximately 10% reaching 20 to 30% in those with an allergic first-degree relative. Prebiotics are selectively fermented food ingredients that allow specific changes in composition/activity of the gastrointestinal microflora. They modulate immune responses, and their supplementation has been proposed as an intervention to prevent allergies. OBJECTIVE: To assess in pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, and infants (populations) the effect of supplementing prebiotics (intervention) versus no prebiotics (comparison) on the development of allergic diseases and to inform the World Allergy Organization guidelines. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies assessing the effects of prebiotic supplementation with an intention to prevent the development of allergies. RESULTS: Of 446 unique records published until November 2016 in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, 22 studies fulfilled a priori specified criteria. We did not find any studies of prebiotics given to pregnant women or breastfeeding mothers. Prebiotic supplementation in infants, compared to placebo, had the following effects: risk of developing eczema (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.15), wheezing/asthma (RR, 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.80), and food allergy (RR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.08 to 1.00). There was no evidence of an increased risk of any adverse effects (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.10). Prebiotic supplementation had little influence growth rate (MD: 0.92 g per day faster with prebiotics, 95% CI: 0 to 1.84) and the final infant weight (MD: 0.10 kg higher with prebiotics, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.29). The certainty of these estimates is very low due to risk of bias and imprecision of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available evidence on prebiotic supplementation to reduce the risk of developing allergies is very uncertain.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade/prevenção & controle , Prebióticos , Aleitamento Materno , Suplementos Nutricionais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Lactente , Razão de Chances , Prebióticos/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Viés de Publicação , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Food allergies are believed to be on the rise, and currently, management relies on the avoidance of the food. Hen's egg allergy is after cow's milk allergy the most common food allergy; eggs are used in many food products and thus difficult to avoid. A technological process using a combination of enzymatic hydrolysis and heat treatment was designed to produce modified hen's egg with reduced allergenic potential. Biochemical (SDS-PAGE, Size exclusion chromatography and LC-MS/MS) and immunological (ELISA, immunoblot, RBL-assays, animal model) analysis showed a clear decrease in intact proteins as well as a strong decrease of allergenicity. In a clinical study, 22 of the 24 patients with a confirmed egg allergy who underwent a double-blind food challenge with the hydrolysed egg remained completely free of symptoms. Hydrolysed egg products may be beneficial as low-allergenic foods for egg-allergic patients to extent their diet.
Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Ovo/imunologia , Proteínas do Ovo/efeitos adversos , Ovos/efeitos adversos , Tolerância Imunológica , Animais , Especificidade de Anticorpos/imunologia , Galinhas , Pré-Escolar , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Proteínas do Ovo/química , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrólise , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Lactente , Masculino , Muramidase/química , RatosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Parents and health staff perceive hen's egg allergy (HEA) as a common food allergy in early childhood, but the true incidence is unclear because population-based studies with gold-standard diagnostic criteria are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To establish the incidence and course of challenge-confirmed HEA in children, from birth until the age of 24 months, in different European regions. METHODS: In the EuroPrevall birth cohort study, children with a suspected HEA and their age-matched controls were evaluated in 9 countries, using a standardized protocol including measurement of HE-specific immunoglobulin E-antibodies in serum, skin prick tests, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC). RESULTS: Across Europe, 12 049 newborns were enrolled, and 9336 (77.5%) were followed up to 2 years of age. In 298 children, HEA was suspected and DBPCFC was offered. HEA by age two was confirmed in 86 of 172 challenged children (mean raw incidence 0.84%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.67-1.03). Adjusted mean incidence of HEA was 1.23% (95% CI 0.98-1.51) considering possible cases among eligible children who were not challenged. Centre-specific incidence ranged from United Kingdom (2.18%, 95% CI 1.27-3.47) to Greece (0.07%). Half of the HE-allergic children became tolerant to HE within 1 year after the initial diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The largest multinational European birth cohort study on food allergy with gold-standard diagnostic methods showed that the mean adjusted incidence of HEA was considerably lower than previously documented, although differences in incidence rates among countries were noted. Half of the children with documented HEA gained tolerance within 1 year postdiagnosis.
Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Ovo/epidemiologia , Ovos/efeitos adversos , Animais , Galinhas , Estudos de Coortes , Hipersensibilidade a Ovo/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Ovo/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Incidência , Masculino , Vigilância da População , Testes CutâneosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is one of the most commonly reported childhood food problems. Community-based incidence and prevalence estimates vary widely, due to possible misinterpretations of presumed reactions to milk and differences in study design, particularly diagnostic criteria. METHODS: Children from the EuroPrevall birth cohort in 9 European countries with symptoms possibly related to CMA were invited for clinical evaluation including cows' milk-specific IgE antibodies (IgE), skin prick test (SPT) reactivity and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. RESULTS: Across Europe, 12 049 children were enrolled, and 9336 (77.5%) were followed up to 2 years of age. CMA was suspected in 358 children and confirmed in 55 resulting in an overall incidence of challenge-proven CMA of 0.54% (95% CI 0.41-0.70). National incidences ranged from 1% (in the Netherlands and UK) to <0.3% (in Lithuania, Germany and Greece). Of all children with CMA, 23.6% had no cow's milk-specific IgE in serum, especially those from UK, the Netherlands, Poland and Italy. Of children with CMA who were re-evaluated one year after diagnosis, 69% (22/32) tolerated cow's milk, including all children with non-IgE-associated CMA and 57% of those children with IgE-associated CMA. CONCLUSIONS: This unique pan-European birth cohort study using the gold standard diagnostic procedure for food allergies confirmed challenge-proven CMA in <1% of children up to age 2. Affected infants without detectable specific antibodies to cow's milk were very likely to tolerate cow's milk one year after diagnosis, whereas only half of those with specific antibodies in serum 'outgrew' their disease so soon.
Assuntos
Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/epidemiologia , Proteínas do Leite/efeitos adversos , Distribuição por Idade , Alérgenos/imunologia , Animais , Bovinos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Método Duplo-Cego , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Proteínas do Leite/imunologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Distribuição por Sexo , Testes Cutâneos/métodosRESUMO
Assessing maternal dietary habits across Europe during pregnancy in relation to their national pregnancy recommendations. A collaborative, multi-centre, birth cohort study in nine European countries was conducted as part of European Union funded EuroPrevall project. Standardised baseline questionnaire data included details of food intake, nutritional supplement use, exposure to cigarette smoke during pregnancy and socio-demographic data. Pregnancy recommendations were collected from all nine countries from the appropriate national organisations. The most commonly taken supplement in pregnancy was folic acid (55.6 % Lithuania-97.8 % Spain) and was favoured by older, well-educated mothers. Vitamin D supplementation across the cohort was very poor (0.3 % Spain-5.1 % Lithuania). There were significant differences in foods consumed in different countries during pregnancy e.g. only 2.7 % Dutch mothers avoided eating peanut, while 44.4 % of British mothers avoided it. Some countries have minimal pregnancy recommendations i.e. Lithuania, Poland and Spain while others have similar, very specific recommendations i.e. UK, the Netherlands, Iceland, Greece. Allergy specific recommendations were associated with food avoidance during pregnancy [relative rate (RR) 1.18 95 % CI 0.02-1.37]. Nutritional supplement recommendations were also associated with avoidance (RR 1.08, 1.00-1.16). Maternal dietary habits and the use of dietary supplements during pregnancy vary significantly across Europe and in some instances may be influenced by national recommendations.
Assuntos
Anormalidades Congênitas/prevenção & controle , Suplementos Nutricionais , Comportamento Alimentar , Ácido Fólico/administração & dosagem , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Comparação Transcultural , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Política Nutricional , Necessidades Nutricionais , Cuidado Pré-Concepcional , Gravidez , Saúde da MulherRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oral food challenge (OFC) is the criterion standard for diagnosis of acute food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES). No diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers are available, and OFC assessment criteria are not validated. OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical-hematological changes and predictors of severity of FPIES reactions at OFC. METHODS: This was an observational multicenter prospective study. Children aged 0 to 18 years diagnosed with acute FPIES were recruited at follow-up OFC in 12 tertiary centers in Spain and Italy. OFC outcomes (as positive/negative/inconclusive and mild/moderate/severe) were assessed on the basis of published "2017 FPIES Consensus" criteria. Clinical characteristics were recorded, and full blood cell count was done at baseline, reaction onset, and 4 hours later. Regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of severe reactions at OFC. RESULTS: A total of 81 children had positive OFC (mild in 11% [9 of 81], moderate in 61% [49 of 81], and severe in 28% [23 of 81]). Increase in neutrophils and reduction in eosinophils, basophils, and lymphocytes were observed (P < .05). OFC was inconclusive in 19 cases despite objective signs or neutrophilia. Regression analysis showed that a 2-day OFC protocol where only 25% of an age-appropriate portion is given on day 1 (not sex, age, culprit food, cumulative dose, and previous reaction severity) was associated with reduced odds of severe reaction compared with giving multiple doses in a single day. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct hematological changes may help support FPIES diagnosis. Current OFC assessment criteria may not capture the broad spectrum of acute FPIES presentations. This 2-day protocol may be associated with a reduced risk of severe reactions. Future work should aim to develop safer OFC and non-OFC diagnostics for FPIES.
RESUMO
The evidence of efficacy of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for respiratory allergy has been demonstrated by a number of meta-analyses. However, the daily practice of AIT is quite different from controlled trials, facing challenges in terms of selection of patients, practical performance, and, of particular importance, use of allergen extracts of inadequate quality. We here performed a survey, named the Allergen Immunotherapy Decision Analysis (AIDA), to evaluate which criteria are used by specialists to choose a product for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with respiratory allergy. A questionnaire composed of 14 items to be ranked by each participant according to the importance attributed when choosing SLIT products was submitted to 444 Italian specialists. The responses of the 169 (38.1%) physicians, who answered all questions, were analysed. Most of the respondents were allergists (79%), followed by pulmonologists (10.8%), both allergists and pulmonologists (4.8%), and otorhinolaryngologists (3%); 59.8% of the respondents were males and 40.2% were females. The age distribution showed that 89.9% of the respondents were aged between 35 and 64 years. All respondents usually prescribed AIT products in their clinical practice: 31.4% used only SLIT, whereas 69.2% used both subcutaneous and sublingual administration. The rankings, expressed as means, attributed by physicians for each of the 14 items were as follows: level of evidence-based medicine (EBM ) validation of efficacy (3.44), level of EBM validation of safety (4.30), standardization of the product (5.37), efficacy based on personal experience (5.82), defined content(s) of the major allergen(s) in micrograms (5.96), scientific evidence for each single allergen (6.17), safety based on personal experience (6.32), ease of administration protocol (8.08), cost and terms of payment (e.g. instalments) (9.17), dose personalization (9.24), patient preference (9.25), ease of product storage (9.93), reimbursement (10.12), and availability of a helpline or on-line assistance from the manufacturer (11.89). These attitudes need to be taken into consideration by regulatory agencies as well as by producers.
Assuntos
Dessensibilização Imunológica , Prescrições , Adulto , Idoso , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imunoterapia Sublingual , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Cow's milk is a common cause of food allergy in children. Children usually outgrow cow's milk allergy by the age of 3-5 years, but some will have persistent symptoms beyond childhood. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies to assess the evidence supporting the use of oral immunotherapy in IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy to inform the World Allergy Organization guidelines. Of 1034 screened articles published until May 2011, five RCTs and five observational studies fulfilled a priori specified inclusion criteria. RCTs including 218 patients showed that oral immunotherapy, compared to elimination diet alone, increased the likelihood of achieving full tolerance of cow's milk [relative risk: 10.0 (95% CI: 4.1-24.2)]. Adverse effects of immunotherapy include frequent local symptoms (16% of doses), mild laryngospasm [relative risk: 12.9 (1.7-98.6)], mild asthma [rate ratio: 3.8 (2.9-5.0)], reactions requiring oral glucocorticosteroids [relative risk: 11.3 (2.7-46.5)] or intramuscular epinephrine injection [rate ratio 5.8 (1.6-21.9)]. Results of observational studies were consistent with those of RCTs. Despite the availability of RCTs, the overall low quality of evidence leaves important uncertainty about anticipated effects of immunotherapy due to very serious imprecision of the estimates of effects and the likelihood of publication bias for some of the critical outcomes. A potentially large benefit of oral immunotherapy in patients with cow's milk allergy may be counterbalanced by frequent and sometimes serious adverse effects. Additional, larger RCTs measuring all patient-important outcomes are still needed.
Assuntos
Imunoterapia , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/terapia , Animais , Bovinos , Imunoglobulina E/imunologiaRESUMO
It is unclear why some children develop food allergy. The EuroPrevall birth cohort was established to examine regional differences in the prevalence and risk factors of food allergy in European children using gold-standard diagnostic criteria. The aim of this report was to describe pre-, post-natal and environmental characteristics among the participating countries. In nine countries across four major European climatic regions, mothers and their newborns were enrolled from October 2005 through February 2010. Using standardized questionnaires, we assessed allergic diseases and self-reported food hypersensitivity of parents and siblings, nutrition during pregnancy, nutritional supplements, medications, mode of delivery, socio-demographic data and home environmental exposures. A total of 12,049 babies and their families were recruited. Self-reported adverse reactions to food ever were considerably more common in mothers from Germany (30%), Iceland, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands (all 20-22%) compared with those from Italy (11%), Lithuania, Greece, Poland, and Spain (all 5-8%). Prevalence estimates of parental asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema were highest in north-west (Iceland, UK), followed by west (Germany, the Netherlands), south (Greece, Italy, Spain) and lowest in central and east Europe (Poland, Lithuania). Over 17% of Spanish and Greek children were exposed to tobacco smoke in utero compared with only 8-11% in other countries. Caesarean section rate was highest in Greece (44%) and lowest in Spain (<3%). We found country-specific differences in antibiotic use, pet ownership, type of flooring and baby's mattress. In the EuroPrevall birth cohort study, the largest study using gold-standard diagnostic criteria for food allergy in children worldwide, we found considerable country-specific baseline differences regarding a wide range of factors that are hypothesized to play a role in the development of food allergy including allergic family history, obstetrical practices, pre- and post-natal environmental exposures.
Assuntos
Família , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Adulto , Alérgenos/imunologia , Estudos de Coortes , Exposição Ambiental , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/complicações , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/imunologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common autosomal recessive genetic pathology of the Caucasian race and it affects nearly 100,000 people worldwide (many have not been diagnosed) and, in Italy, there are about 6000 patients. In the last few years, telemedicine has proved to be an effective home care tool for patients suffering from chronic pathologies. The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic has caused an increase of communications through mobile devices. Aim: To evaluate the role of telemonitoring during the pandemic phase of Covid-19. Materials and methods: 34 (M 15, F 19) (M 44%, F 56%) Cystic Fi-brosis patients were evaluated; Median age ± SD 30.97±10.59 Median FEV1 2020 74.76; number of trasmission and hospital admissions. Results: It was evident that the absolute number of telemedicine visits increased from 1456 to 1605 in the pandemic year (10% more). Conclusions: Telemedicine became an important tool for home management of patients, in particular about chronic diseases. Telemonitoring, an integral part of telemedicine, underlined its effectiveness in all health emergency phase.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fibrose Cística , Telemedicina , Criança , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Fibrose Cística/terapia , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , PandemiasRESUMO
Abstract: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common genetic disease in Caucasian people. Nutritional status represents an important key in the progression of the pulmonary disease in CF. People with better nutritional status, generally, maintain good levels of physical activity. Generally Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) analysis is frequently used as a method of body composition assessment, due to easy of use, safety and low cost of this procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate nutritional parameters in cystic fibrosis patient. We performed a single group cohort study. The study examined change in nutritional values in people with CF who practice sport or not, measured by bio-impedance analysis (BIA). Inclusion criteria were people with CF diagnosis confirmed. Primary outcome was evaluate body composition and the correlation with the rate of physical activity. A total of 32 patients were included in the analysis. The most important data was a correlation between Phangle and Body cellular mass index (BCMI) Pvalue<0.01, expecially in patients who had a good levels of aerobic and anaerobic session-training. Patients who did strong physical activity training had a statistically significant values of correlation with nutritional status. Further study were necessary to find association between exercise capa city and body mass index.
Assuntos
Fibrose Cística , Estado Nutricional , Composição Corporal , Estudos de Coortes , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Impedância Elétrica , HumanosRESUMO
This is the third and last article in the series about the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines and its application in the field of allergy. We describe the factors that influence the strength of recommendations about the use of diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic interventions: the balance of desirable and undesirable consequences, the quality of a body of evidence related to a decision, patients' values and preferences, and considerations of resource use. We provide examples from two recently developed guidelines in the field of allergy that applied the GRADE approach. The main advantages of this approach are the focus on patient important outcomes, explicit consideration of patients' values and preferences, the systematic approach to collecting the evidence, the clear separation of the concepts of quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, and transparent reporting of the decision process. The focus on transparency facilitates understanding and implementation and should empower patients, clinicians and other health care professionals to make informed choices.
Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Humanos , Avaliação das NecessidadesRESUMO
The aim of this Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN) consensus report is to provide recommendations and suggestions for assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including health-related quality of life in patients with urticaria. We recommend that PROs should be used both in clinical trials and routine practice for the evaluation of urticaria patients. We suggest that PROs should be considered as the primary outcome of future clinical trials. Two validated and disease-specific instruments for assessing PROs are available, the urticaria activity score (for symptoms) and the chronic urticaria questionnaire on quality of life CU-Q(2)oL. This latter tool, CU-Q(2)oL, is available in many languages and should be preferred, where available, over more generic instruments for assessing urticaria-specific effects on quality of life. CU-Q(2)oL is only suited for the investigation of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Similar instruments for other forms of urticaria have yet to be developed and validated. Also, tools for assessing other chronic spontaneous urticaria PROs besides quality of life and symptoms are needed.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Urticária/fisiopatologia , Urticária/terapia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Urticária/psicologiaRESUMO
Cow milk allergy is the most frequent allergy in the first years of life. Milk from other mammalian species has been suggested as a possible nutritional alternative to cow milk, but in several cases, the clinical studies showed a high risk of cross-reactivity with cow milk. In the goat species, αS1-casein (αS1-CN), coded by the CSN1S1 gene, is characterized by extensive qualitative and quantitative polymorphisms. Some alleles are associated with null (i.e., CSN1S1 0(1)) or reduced (i.e., CSN1S1 F) expression of the specific protein. The aim of this work was to obtain new information on goat milk and to evaluate its suitability for allergic subjects, depending on the genetic variation at αs1-CN. Individual milk samples from 25 goats with different CSN1S1 genotypes were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate PAGE and immunoblotting, using monoclonal antibodies specific for bovine α-CN and sera from children allergic to cow milk. A lower reaction was observed to 2 goat milk samples characterized by the CSN1S1 0(1)0(1) and 0(1)F genotypes. Moreover, a fresh food skin prick test, carried out on 6 allergic children, showed the lack of positive reaction to the 0(1)0(1) milk sample and only one weak reactivity to the 0(1)F sample. The risk of cross-reactivity between cow and goat milk proteins suggests the need for caution before using goat milk for infant formulas. However, we hypothesize that it can be used successfully in the preparation of modified formulas for selected groups of allergic patients. The importance of taking the individual goat CN genetic variation into account in further experimental studies is evident from the results of the present work.
Assuntos
Caseínas/genética , Cabras/genética , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/genética , Animais , Caseínas/efeitos adversos , Bovinos , Criança , Genótipo , Humanos , Leite/química , Polimorfismo GenéticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The impact of diet on cow's milk allergy (CMA) duration and whether exposure to residual amounts of cow's milk protein influences the onset of tolerance are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the dietary factors influencing disease duration in a randomized cohort. METHODS: We randomly switched the formula of symptomatic patients from the Milan Cow's Milk Allergy Cohort to one of three treatment groups according to the quarterly rotation of rice hydrolysate formula, extensively hydrolysed cow's milk formula and soy-based formula. In this intention-to-treat, randomized analysis, a hazard ratio (HR) estimation model was used to analyse dietary impact on disease duration. RESULTS: Seventy-two children aged a mean of 14.1+/-8.6 months at diagnosis were followed up for a median of 26 months. Fifty-one reached tolerance at a mean of 34.1+/-15.2 months. The mean duration of disease was 40.2+/-4.8 months with milk hydrolysate, 24.3+/-3.6 months with rice and 24.3+/-2.6 months with soy. Dietary choice independently predicted shorter duration of disease [adjusted HRs 3.09 (P=0.007) for rice, 2.54 (P=0.02) for soy, both against milk hydrolysate]. In 50 children not co-sensitized to soy, diet choice impacted the duration of disease more strongly [adjusted HRs 8.02 (P=0.006) for rice, 6.53 (P=0.015) for soy, both against milk hydrolysate]. DISCUSSION: Patients not exposed to cow's milk protein residue achieve cow's milk tolerance earlier than patients who follow an extensively hydrolysed cow's milk diet. This may be due to residual antigenicity in hydrolysed milks. As the effect of dietary intervention is stronger in patients not sensitized to soy, we infer that when atopic disease has progressed to multiple sensitizations, the elimination of allergenic exposure may not be sufficient to reduce the duration of CMA.
Assuntos
Glycine max/imunologia , Fórmulas Infantis/administração & dosagem , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/dietoterapia , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/fisiopatologia , Oryza/imunologia , Hidrolisados de Proteína/imunologia , Alérgenos/imunologia , Animais , Bovinos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dietoterapia , Humanos , Lactente , Fórmulas Infantis/química , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/epidemiologia , Proteínas do Leite/química , Proteínas do Leite/imunologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The GA(2)LEN taskforce on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) published in 2009 a position paper concerning PROS and HRQoL assessment in clinical trials on allergy. Because of the specificity of this topic in asthma and rhinitis, specific recommendations are needed. The aim of this position paper is to define PROs and their meaning in asthma and rhinitis research, explore the available tools to provide criteria for a proper choice, identify patient-related factor which could influence PROs assessment, define specific recommendations for assessment, analysis and results spreading, underline the unexplored areas and unmet needs. PROs assessment is gaining increasing importance, and it must be performed with a rigorous methodological procedure and using validated tools. This approach enables to better understand patient-related factors influencing clinical trials and real-life management outcomes, identify patients subgroups that can benefit from specific treatment and management plan and tailor treatment to address PROs (not only physician-defined targets) to improve asthma and rhinitis management.
Assuntos
Asma , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Rinite Alérgica Perene , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/psicologia , Diretrizes para o Planejamento em Saúde , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Rinite Alérgica Perene/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Perene/psicologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/psicologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The aim of this Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN) consensus report is to provide recommendations for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) evaluation in clinical trials for allergic diseases, which constitute a global health problem in terms of physical, psychological economic and social impact. During the last 40 years, PROs have gained large consideration and use in the scientific community, to gain a better understanding of patients' subjective assessment with respect to elements concerning their health condition. They include all health-related reports coming from the patient, without involvement or interpretation by physician or others. PROs assessment should be performed by validated tools (disease-specific tools when available or generic ones) selected taking into account the aim of the study, the expected intervention effects and the determinant and confounding factors or patient-related factors which could influence PROs. Moreover, each tool should be used exclusively in the patient population following the authors' indications without modification and performing a cross-cultural validation if the tool must be used in a language that differs from the original. The result analysis also suggests that the relevance of PROs results in any interventional study should include a pre-post assessment providing information concerning statistical differences within or among groups, rates of response for the PROs and a minimal important difference for the population. The report underlines the importance of further investigation on some topics, such as the quality assessment of existing PROs tools, the definition of inclusion and exclusion criteria and a more extensive evaluation of the correlation between PROs, besides health-related quality of life, and clinical data.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Hipersensibilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: The true prevalence and risk factors of food allergies in children are not known because estimates were based predominantly on subjective assessments and skin or serum tests of allergic sensitization to food. The diagnostic gold standard, a double-blind placebo-controlled food provocation test, was not performed consistently to confirm suspected allergic reactions in previous population studies in children. This protocol describes the specific aims and diagnostic protocol of a birth cohort study examining prevalence patterns and influential factors of confirmed food allergies in European children from different regions. METHODS: Within the collaborative translational research project EuroPrevall, we started a multi-center birth cohort study, recruiting a total of over 12 000 newborns in nine countries across Europe in 2005-2009. In addition to three telephone interviews during the first 30 months, parents were asked to immediately inform the centers about possible allergic reactions to food at any time during the follow-up period. RESULTS: All children with suspected food allergy symptoms were clinically evaluated including double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge tests. We assessed sensitization to different food allergens by measurements of specific serum immunoglobulin E and skin prick tests, collect blood, saliva or buccal swabs for genetic tests, breast milk for measurement of food proteins/cytokines, and evaluate quality-of-life and economic burden of families with food allergic children. CONCLUSIONS: This birth cohort provides unique data on prevalence, risk factors, quality-of-life, and costs of food allergies in Europe, leading to the development of more informed and integrated preventative and treatment strategies for children with food allergies.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Método Duplo-Cego , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Humanos , Testes Imunológicos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , PrevalênciaRESUMO
To review current clinical evidence for the use of antibiotics in paediatric upper paediatric respiratory infections, repeated PubMed searches using the template algorithm -rhinosinusitis/otitis/ tonsillitis AND ()- with the settings: -Humans; English; All Child 0-18; Clinical trial; Review; Methanalysis; Guideline; Last 10 years- for the following comparators: antibiotic; amoxicillin; clavulanate; penicillin; cephalosporin; macrolide; erythromycin; rokitamycin; clindamycin; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefopodoxime, cefdinir, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone. The authors clinical experience in the paediatric allergy unit of a University hospital was also drawn upon. A narrative review was drafted to update paediatricians on the topic. Many paediatric studies and guidelines were retrieved satisfying current evidence-based medicine standards. There are stringent indications for antibiotic use in URTIs. The paediatric use is widespread raising doubts on their appropriate prescription in many countries. Evidence for the efficacy of antibiotic treatment for paediatric URTIs is available and this treatment should be included in individualised patient protocols on the basis of the clinical literature. Caution must be posed at the local level taking in account epidemiologic and microbiologic data to avoid overprescription.