Ethical considerations when employing fake identities in online social networks for research.

Online social networks (OSNs) have rapidly become a prominent and widely used service, offering a wealth of personal and sensitive information with significant security and privacy implications. Hence, OSNs are also an important--and popular--subject for research. To perform research based on real-life evidence, however, researchers may need to access OSN data, such as texts and files uploaded by users and connections among users. This raises significant ethical problems. Currently, there are no clear ethical guidelines, and researchers may end up (unintentionally) performing ethically questionable research, sometimes even when more ethical research alternatives exist. For example, several studies have employed "fake identities" to collect data from OSNs, but fake identities may be used for attacks and are considered a security issue. Is it legitimate to use fake identities for studying OSNs or for collecting OSN data for research? We present a taxonomy of the ethical challenges facing researchers of OSNs and compare different approaches. We demonstrate how ethical considerations have been taken into account in previous studies that used fake identities. In addition, several possible approaches are offered to reduce or avoid ethical misconducts. We hope this work will stimulate the development and use of ethical practices and methods in the research of online social networks.

Malicious source code detection using a translation model.

Modern software development often relies on open-source code sharing. Open-source code reuse, however, allows hackers to access wide developer communities, thereby potentially affecting many products. An increasing number of such "supply chain attacks" have occurred in recent years, taking advantage of open-source software development practices. Here, we introduce the Malicious Source code Detection using a Translation model (MSDT) algorithm. MSDT is a novel deep-learning-based analysis method that detects real-world code injections into source code packages. We have tested MSDT by embedding examples from a dataset of over 600,000 different functions and then applying a clustering algorithm to the resulting embedding vectors to identify malicious functions by detecting outliers. We evaluated MSDT's performance with extensive experiments and demonstrated that MSDT could detect malicious code injections with precision@k values of up to 0.909.

Co-Membership-based Generic Anomalous Communities Detection.

Nowadays, detecting anomalous communities in networks is an essential task in research, as it helps discover insights into community-structured networks. Most of the existing methods leverage either information regarding attributes of vertices or the topological structure of communities. In this study, we introduce the Co-Membership-based Generic Anomalous Communities Detection Algorithm (referred as to CMMAC), a novel and generic method that utilizes the information of vertices co-membership in multiple communities. CMMAC is domain-free and almost unaffected by communities' sizes and densities. Specifically, we train a classifier to predict the probability of each vertex in a community being a member of the community. We then rank the communities by the aggregated membership probabilities of each community's vertices. The lowest-ranked communities are considered to be anomalous. Furthermore, we present an algorithm for generating a community-structured random network enabling the infusion of anomalous communities to facilitate research in the field. We utilized it to generate two datasets, composed of thousands of labeled anomaly-infused networks, and published them. We experimented extensively on thousands of simulated, and real-world networks, infused with artificial anomalies. CMMAC outperformed other existing methods in a range of settings. Additionally, we demonstrated that CMMAC can identify abnormal communities in real-world unlabeled networks in different domains, such as Reddit and Wikipedia.

A supervised machine learning model for imputing missing boarding stops in smart card data.

Public transport has become an essential part of urban existence with increased population densities and environmental awareness. Large quantities of data are currently generated, allowing for more robust methods to understand travel behavior by harvesting smart card usage. However, public transport datasets suffer from data integrity problems; boarding stop information may be missing due to imperfect acquirement processes or inadequate reporting. This study introduces a supervised machine learning method to impute missing boarding stops based on ordinal classification using GTFS timetable, smart card, and geospatial datasets. A new metric, Pareto Accuracy, is suggested to evaluate algorithms where classes have an ordinal nature. The results are based on a case study in the city of Beer Sheva, Israel, consisting of one month of smart card data. We show that our proposed method is robust to irregular travelers and significantly outperforms well-known imputation methods without the need to mine any additional datasets. The data validation from another Israeli city using transfer learning shows the presented model is general and context-free. The implications for transportation planning and travel behavior research are further discussed.

Scientometric trends for coronaviruses and other emerging viral infections.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is the most rapidly expanding coronavirus outbreak in the past 2 decades. To provide a swift response to a novel outbreak, prior knowledge from similar outbreaks is essential. RESULTS: Here, we study the volume of research conducted on previous coronavirus outbreaks, specifically SARS and MERS, relative to other infectious diseases by analyzing >35 million articles from the past 20 years. Our results demonstrate that previous coronavirus outbreaks have been understudied compared with other viruses. We also show that the research volume of emerging infectious diseases is very high after an outbreak and decreases drastically upon the containment of the disease. This can yield inadequate research and limited investment in gaining a full understanding of novel coronavirus management and prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of the outcome of the current COVID-19 outbreak, we believe that measures should be taken to encourage sustained research in the field.

Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action.

BACKGROUND: The academic publishing world is changing significantly, with ever-growing numbers of publications each year and shifting publishing patterns. However, the metrics used to measure academic success, such as the number of publications, citation number, and impact factor, have not changed for decades. Moreover, recent studies indicate that these metrics have become targets and follow Goodhart's Law, according to which, "when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." RESULTS: In this study, we analyzed >120 million papers to examine how the academic publishing world has evolved over the last century, with a deeper look into the specific field of biology. Our study shows that the validity of citation-based measures is being compromised and their usefulness is lessening. In particular, the number of publications has ceased to be a good metric as a result of longer author lists, shorter papers, and surging publication numbers. Citation-based metrics, such citation number and h-index, are likewise affected by the flood of papers, self-citations, and lengthy reference lists. Measures such as a journal's impact factor have also ceased to be good metrics due to the soaring numbers of papers that are published in top journals, particularly from the same pool of authors. Moreover, by analyzing properties of >2,600 research fields, we observed that citation-based metrics are not beneficial for comparing researchers in different fields, or even in the same department. CONCLUSIONS: Academic publishing has changed considerably; now we need to reconsider how we measure success.