RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Based on the NCCN Guidelines for Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS), treatment of extremity STS (ESTS) includes radiation therapy (RT) and surgical resection for tumors that are high-grade and >5 cm. ââThe aim of this study was to describe the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), concordance with NCCN Guidelines recommendations, and outcomes in patients with ESTS. METHODS: Patients with ESTS diagnosed from 2006 through 2018 were identified in SEER registries. The analytic cohort was restricted to patients with high-grade tumors >5 cm without nodal or distant metastases who received limb-sparing surgery. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics associated with receipt of RT were analyzed using adjusted regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted accelerated failure time models were used to examine disparities in cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Of 2,249 patients, 29.0% (n=648) received neoadjuvant RT, 49.7% (n=1,111) received adjuvant or intraoperative RT, and 21.3% (n=476) did not receive RT. In adjusted analyses, lower nSES was associated with lower likelihood of receiving RT (odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57-0.87]; P<.001). Low nSES was associated with worse cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.01-1.40]; P=.04). Race and ethnicity were not significant predictors of receipt of RT or cancer-specific survival in the fully adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Patients from lower nSES areas were less likely to receive NCCN Guideline-recommended RT for their ESTS and had worse cancer-specific survival. Efforts to better define and resolve disparities in the treatment and survival of patients with ESTS are warranted.
Assuntos
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles , Humanos , Extremidades/patologia , Etnicidade , Terapia Combinada , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Given persistent racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes, this study explores racial differences in disease-specific mortality and surgical management among patients with microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS-MI). METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried for patients aged 18+ years with DCIS-MI between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018. The study cohort was divided into non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. Disease-specific mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 3400 patients were identified, of which 569 (16.7%) were NHB and 2831 (83.3%) were NHW. Compared with NHW patients, NHB patients had more positive lymph nodes (7.6% vs. 3.9% p < 0.001). In addition, NHB women were more likely to undergo axillary lymph node dissection (6.0% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.044) and receive chemotherapy (11.8% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001). There were no racial differences in breast surgery type (p = 0.168), reconstructive surgery (p = 0.362), or radiation therapy (p = 0.342). Overall, NHB patients had worse disease-specific mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-4.14) with mortality risks diverging from NHW women after 3 years (6 years rate ratio [RR] 2.12, 95% CI: 1.13-4.34; 9 years RR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.24-4.35). CONCLUSIONS: NHB women with DCIS-MI present with higher nodal disease burden and experience worse disease-specific mortality than NHW women.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Programa de SEER , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/etnologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/mortalidade , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Mastectomia/mortalidade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Black women have higher breast cancer mortality rates than other groups, with Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) being more common among AAs with a worse prognosis. Our study seeks to explore differences among Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) vs. White (NHW) women, with Stage IV TNBC, focusing on survival and treatment patterns. METHODS: SEER database was queried for TNBC patients diagnosed with metastatic disease from 2012 to 2016. Neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) was defined using the Yost index based on income, education, housing, and employment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate receipt of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards model analysis. RESULTS: 25,761 TNBC cases were identified with 1420 being metastatic (5.5%). Bone was the most common site for metastasis, with patients' age being 63.7 years for NHW vs. 59.5 years for NHB. NHB women had the highest percentage of low nSES (62.3% vs 29.3%; p value = 0.001). On univariate analysis, fewer NHBs received radiation compared to NHWs (27.1 vs. 32.6%; p value = 0.040). On multivariate analysis, all women were less likely to undergo treatment if unmarried (p value < 0.01). NHB women had lower median survival compared to NHW women (13 vs. 15 months; p value < 0.01). Receipt of surgery and chemotherapy reduced the risk of mortality (p value < 0.01). CONCLUSION: NHB women had lower median survival with metastatic TNBC. Race was associated with different treatment utilization. With a mortality differential between NHW and NHB women with metastatic TNBC, more investigation is needed to inform strategies to reduce this disparity.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , População Branca , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/terapia , População Negra , Etnicidade , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are few studies on surgical management in patients with de novo metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). The objective of this study is to examine the association between modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with de novo stage IV IBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program was queried for patients ≥18 years old with cT4d/pT4d pathology, histology type 8530 and 8533 with distant disease between 2010 and 2016. The sample was divided into two groups: (1) the MRM group, defined as MRM or mastectomy with at least ten lymph nodes removed, and (2) the no-surgery group. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were compared between the groups on bivariable analysis. After propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional-hazards model examined DSS. RESULTS: 1293 patients were included in the study, of whom 240 underwent MRM. A higher percentage in the MRM group had only one metastatic site (69.8% versus 52.2%), received chemotherapy (88.3% versus 66.1%) and radiation (58.8% versus 26.0%) compared with the no-MRM group. MRM was associated with an increase in DSS compared with no MRM [HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.50-0.80), p < 0.001]. Patients with MRM had a 5-year DSS rate of 31.4% compared with 17.7% for patients not undergoing surgery (p = 0.001). Survival time was 38 months (range 27-45 months) for the MRM group versus 27 months (22-29 months) for the no-MRM group. CONCLUSION: MRM in patients with de novo metastatic IBC may improve DSS in a subset of patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Inflamatórias Mamárias , Mastectomia Radical Modificada , Adolescente , Humanos , Neoplasias Inflamatórias Mamárias/cirurgia , Mastectomia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Radioterapia AdjuvanteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown a lower receipt of treatment among minority women with non-metastatic breast cancer. Those who refuse surgery have increased disease-specific mortality, contributing to disproportionately higher breast cancer mortality in non-Hispanic black (NHB) and Hispanic women. This study aimed to assess surgery refusal in these groups, identify factors associated with surgery refusal, and characterize the association between surgery refusal and survival. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data from 2005 to 2015 for NHB and Hispanic women with a diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer (n = 113,987) was divided into data of those who underwent surgery and data of those who refused surgery. Sociodemographic and tumor clinical/pathologic differences were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression of predictors of surgery refusal and Cox-proportional hazard model of disease-specific mortality. RESULTS: Of 799 patients who refused surgery, 562 were NHB and 237 were Hispanic. The percentage of patients refusing surgery increased from 0.6% in 2005 to 0.9% in 2015. The women who refused surgery were more likely to be older than 81 years, less likely to be married, and more likely to be uninsured or have Medicaid. The refusers presented with more advanced disease and more frequent estrogen receptor-positivity (ER+) and progesterone receptor-positivity (PR+) subtype on histology. Breast cancer-specific mortality increased significantly with surgery omission. Surgery refusal was independently associated with NHB race. CONCLUSION: Surgery refusal among NHB and Hispanic women with potentially curable non-metastatic breast cancer is rising, especially among NHB women, women older than 60 years, single women, and women with a later stage of disease at diagnosis. Additional studies are needed to analyze qualitative data in these populations and their underlying health beliefs, communication needs, and possible use of alternative medicine.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Receptores de Estrogênio , Receptores de Progesterona , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to examine the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and receipt of low-value breast cancer procedures. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Low value procedures included: (1) axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with limited nodal disease receiving breast conservation therapy (BCT); (2) contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPM); and (3) sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) in patients ≥70 years old with clinically node negative early-stage hormone-positive breast cancer. The cohort was divided by nSES. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis compared the groups. RESULTS: The study included 412 959 patients. Compared to patients in high nSES areas, residing in neighborhoods with low nSES (odd ratio [OR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-2.42) and middle nSES (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.56) was associated with a higher probability of undergoing low value ALND. Conversely, patients in low SES neighborhoods were less likely to receive low value SLNB (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.94) or CPM than (low nSES OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.73-0.77); middle nSES OR 0.91 (0.89-0.92) those in high SES neighborhoods. CONCLUSION: In the SEER Program, low nSES was associated with a lower probability of low value procedures except for ALND utilization.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Idoso , Axila/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Classe SocialRESUMO
Men, particularly those of underserved groups, bear a disproportionate cancer burden. Knowledge about cancer and screening is associated with adherence to screening guidelines. However it is possible that a correlation exists between an individual's education attainment and ability to gain knowledge from health education. Men were recruited from Ohio counties with significant cancer disparities and asked to participate in three education sessions. Measures included a baseline survey collecting demographic information and pre- and post-intervention knowledge assessments about each of the topics. Paired t tests were used to determine whether there were statistically significant changes in mean scores after the intervention. Repeated measures of variance (ANOVA) conducted through generalized linear models (GLM) were used to determine if scores varied significantly by educational attainment. Appalachian men, regardless of level of educational attainment, had significant increases in knowledge for all topics. African American men with at least some college education demonstrated significant increases in knowledge for all three topics, while those with no college education had significant increases for only two topics. College education had a significant effect on scores for one topic among the Appalachian men and all three topics among the African American men. The interaction between change in score and higher educational attainment was significant for only one topic among Appalachian men and no topics among African American men. Higher educational attainment was associated with greater increases in knowledge scores for only one topic among Appalachian men and no topics among African American men. Culturally tailored health educational interventions are a promising approach to reducing disparities in cancer screening and outcomes among men of underserved groups. While all groups demonstrated increases in mean knowledge scores after participating in the educational intervention, there was not a significant association between educational attainment and increases in knowledge scores. Future research is needed to explore additional approaches to delivering health education and increasing the knowledge of men with lower levels of educational attainment.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Neoplasias , Escolaridade , Educação em Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , OhioRESUMO
African Americans and Appalachians experience greater incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer due to factors, such as reduced prevalence of screening. An educational session (the Screen to Save Initiative) was conducted to increase intent to screen for colorectal cancer among African Americans and Appalachians in Ohio. Using a community-based approach, from April to September 2017, 85 eligible participants were recruited in Franklin County and Appalachia Ohio. Participants completed a knowledge assessment on colorectal cancer before and after participating in either an educational PowerPoint session or a guided tour through an Inflatable Colon. Logistic regression models were used to determine what factors were associated with changes in colorectal cancer knowledge and intent to screen for colorectal cancer. The majority (71.79%) of participants gained knowledge about colorectal cancer after the intervention. Multivariate results showed that race (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11-0.80 for African Americans versus White participants) and intervention type (OR = 5.97; 95% CI: 1.94-18.43 for PowerPoint versus Inflatable Colon) were associated with a change in knowledge. The association between education and intent to screen was marginally statistically significant (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.16-1.13 for college graduate versus not a college graduate). A change in colorectal cancer knowledge was not associated with intent to screen. Future educational interventions should be modified to increase intent to screen and screening for colorectal cancer. Further research with these modified interventions should aim to reduce disparities in CRC among underserved populations while listening to the voices of the communities.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Neoplasias Colorretais , Região dos Apalaches/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Intenção , Ohio/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A subset of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by aggressive disease, rapid relapse, and mortality within 24 months of diagnosis, termed "rapid relapse" TNBC (rrTNBC). The objective of this study is to define the association between sociodemographic variables and surgical management among rrTNBC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. METHODS: TNBC patients diagnosed from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014 with local or regional disease were identified in SEER. Patients were stratified as rrTNBC, defined as disease specific mortality ≤ 24 months after diagnosis, and non-rrTNBC. Chi-squared tests, t tests, and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the association of rapid relapse with sociodemographic variables and surgical management. RESULTS: The cohort included 8% (1378/17,369) rrTNBCs. A higher proportion of rrTNBC patients had no surgery (11.7%) compared with non-rrTNBC (2.6%). Omission of axillary staging among patients who had surgery was 6.2% rrTNBC versus 4.5% non-rrTNBC. Black race (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.43; p = 0.01; white ref), Medicaid or no insurance (Medicaid OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31-1.79; p < 0.001; no insurance OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.31-2.32; p < 0.001; private ref), single status (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.39; p = 0.03; married ref), no breast (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.77-3.11; p < 0.001; mastectomy ref), and no axillary surgery (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.13-1.83; p = 0.003 axillary surgery ref) were associated with rapid relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid or no insurance, single status, black race, and no surgery are associated with higher odds of rrTNBC in SEER. These results indicate an interplay between socioeconomic factors, clinical and genomic variables may be disproportionately contributing to worse outcomes among a subset of TNBC patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Programa de SEER , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity has increased significantly in recent decades, particularly among younger women, and is a known risk factor for endometrial cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the trend in the prevalence of obesity and the incidence of type I endometrial cancer over time in various age categories to determine whether an ecological relationship exists. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used. The overall trend in the incidence of type 1 endometrial cancer and prevalence of obesity were observed over time from 1988 to 2016 and further categorized by age group (<45, 45-54, and ≥55 years). RESULTS: The prevalence of obesity has increased for all women, but most significantly for women younger than 45 years with a 16.3% increase among women aged 20 to 34 years and a 17.9% increase for women aged 35 to 44 years. The incidence of endometrial cancer has also increased across all age categories, and although it has increased in patients younger than 45 years by more than 14-fold (from <0.1 per 100,000 in 1988 to 1.4 per 100,000 in 2016), a more pronounced increase of 63-fold and 50-fold was observed among women aged 45 to 54 years (0.2 per 100,000 in 1988 to 12.6 per 100,000 in 2016) and women aged 55 years and older (from 0.6 per 100,000 in 1988 to 30 per 100,000 in 2016), respectively. The mean age of women diagnosed as having endometrial cancer also decreased from 64.1 years from 1988 to 1990 to 61.0 years from 2014 to 2016. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of obesity has increased significantly in women of all ages. This increase, particularly among women aged <45 years, occurred simultaneously with an increase in the incidence of endometrial cancer in young women, with an even more pronounced increase among women aged ≥45 years.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/epidemiologia , Epidemias , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe age-specific cervical cancer incidence rates based on demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: Women with cervical cancer in the SEER program were grouped into 3 age categories. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and incidence rates were obtained for each age group. RESULTS: Older women (≥65 years) had higher incidence rates of cervical cancer than women <65 years with the highest rates in black women ≥75 years. Older black women had more adverse factors at diagnosis than similarly aged white and younger black women. There was a higher incidence rate of cervical cancer in women with lower socioeconomic status (SES), with the highest rates in older black women. However, the incidence rates were similar for older black women regardless of SES. CONCLUSION: Older black have the highest cervical cancer incidence rates, regardless of SES, suggesting an age and race disparity when compared to younger and white women.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Programa de SEERRESUMO
Objective: To examine potential ethnic disparities in cancer incidence and survival rates among the oldest old using data from the SEER Program.Design: Cases diagnosed with one of the leading four cancer sites (lung and bronchus, colon and rectum, female breast, prostate) and four cancer sites (stomach, liver and intrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder, and cervical) that disproportionally affect Hispanics were reported to one of 18 SEER registries. Differences in cancer incidence were examined for cases aged ≥85 years diagnosed during the most recent 5-year time period (2009-2013) and, to examine changes over time, from 1992 to 2013. Five-year relative cancer survival probability was examined for Hispanics and non-Hispanics aged ≥85 years diagnosed 2006-2012.Results: From 2009 to 2013, non-Hispanics aged ≥85 years had higher incidence rates compared to Hispanics for colon and rectum, lung and bronchus, female breast, and prostate cancers. Five-year survival probability for cancers of all stages combined was higher for non-Hispanics than Hispanics in this age group. However, Hispanics had higher survival probability of colon and rectum and lung and bronchus cancers diagnosed at regional (colon and rectum: 67.2% vs. 60.5%; lung and bronchus: 15.9% vs. 12.7%) and distant (colon and rectum: 5.4% vs. 3.8%; lung and bronchus: 2.8% vs. 2.2%) stages than non-Hispanics, respectively.Conclusion: Ethnic differences in cancer incidence and survival probability exist for the ≥85 population. Continued efforts are needed to understand and reduce ethnic disparities in cancer prevention and treatment for this population.
Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/etnologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Programa de SEER , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Mama , Colo , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Pulmão , Masculino , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Próstata , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of a second primary cancer after endometrial cancer according to histological subtype. METHODS: Using data from the 13 National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries we identified women diagnosed with a primary endometrial cancer between 1992 and 2014. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for second primary cancer risk (all anatomical sites combined and for individual anatomical sites) among patients with endometrial cancer compared with the general population, in the overall study population and according to histological subtype. RESULTS: Among 96 256 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer, 8.4% (n=8083) developed a second primary cancer. The risk of second primary cancer was higher among patients with endometrial cancer than in the general population (SIR=1.05, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.07). We observed significantly higher second primary cancer risk among women with high grade endometrioid (SIR=1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.19), serous (SIR=1.24, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.38), carcinosarcoma (SIR=1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.35), mixed epithelial (SIR=1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40), and sarcoma (SIR=1.28, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.45) compared with the general population, but not for women with low grade endometrioid (SIR=1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.03) or clear cell (SIR=1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.33) endometrial cancer. Women with low grade endometrioid endometrial cancer had significantly lower second primary cancer risks in the gum and other mouth (SIR=0.57, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.97), lung and bronchus (SIR=0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.77), and lymphocytic leukemia (SIR=0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93) while women with high risk endometrial cancer histological subtypes experienced significantly higher second primary cancer risk at several anatomical sites. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of developing second primary cancersat all anatomic sites combined and at individual anatomical sites varied according to histological subtype. Clinicians should be aware that women with different histological subtypes carry different second primary cancer risks .
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/classificação , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/etiologia , Ohio/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The results from studies of loud noise exposure and acoustic neuroma are conflicting. A population-based case-control study of 451 acoustic neuroma patients and 710 age-, sex-, and region-matched controls was conducted in Sweden between 2002 and 2007. Occupational exposure was based on historical measurements of occupational noise (321 job titles summarized by a job exposure matrix) and compared with self-reported occupational noise exposure. We also evaluated self-reported noise exposure during leisure activity. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios. There was no statistically significant association between acoustic neuroma and persistent occupational noise exposure, either with or without hearing protection. Exposure to loud noise from leisure activity without hearing protection was more common among acoustic neuroma cases (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.06, 2.03). Statistically significant odds ratios were found for specific leisure activities including attending concerts/clubs/sporting events (odds ratio = 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.09, 3.04) and participating in workouts accompanied by loud music (odds ratio = 2.84, 95% confidence interval: 1.37, 5.89). Our findings do not support an association between occupational exposure to loud noise and acoustic neuroma. Although we report statistically significant associations between leisure-time exposures to loud noise without hearing protection and acoustic neuroma, especially among women, we cannot rule out recall bias as an alternative explanation.
Assuntos
Neuroma Acústico/etiologia , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Dispositivos de Proteção das Orelhas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Atividades de Lazer , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuroma Acústico/epidemiologia , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Ruído Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorrelato , Suécia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
To inform clinical management of glioblastoma patients, we estimated the relative prevalence (present at glioblastoma diagnosis) and incidence (newly diagnosed) of comorbid conditions among these patients and their matched controls. We identified 2,424 glioblastoma patients registered in the Swedish National Cancer Registry between 1993 and 2006. Next, 12,120 randomly sampled population-based controls were individually matched to cases on age, sex and calendar year of diagnosis. We then evaluated patient discharge data for selected potential comorbid conditions. Seizures (odds ratio (OR) 31.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.7-40.3) and cerebral edema (OR 25.0, 95% CI 5.5-114) were the most prevalent conditions at diagnosis. Beginning 30 days after diagnosis, increased risks of incident deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio (HR) 119.7, 95% CI 60.8-211.0) and pulmonary embolism (HR 92.4, 95% CI 48.3-176.6) were observed. Risks of incident cardiovascular diseases including heart failure (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.6-6.1), coronary artery disease (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.7-3.2), and myocardial infarction (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4) were also elevated among glioblastoma patients. In this first population-based study of both prevalent and incident comorbid conditions among glioblastoma patients, we have quantified risk of those conditions related to the tumor and its treatment-based on nationwide registry data. However, for incident conditions we cannot distinguish between the effects of the tumor and the effects of treatment. A novel finding was the elevated risk of cardiovascular disease among glioblastoma patients; glioblastoma patients should be monitored for signs of cardiovascular disease.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Glioblastoma/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico , Humanos , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Suécia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Patients with breast cancer residing in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities often face poorer outcomes (eg, mortality) compared with individuals living in neighborhoods without persistent poverty. OBJECTIVE: To examine persistent neighborhood poverty and breast tumor characteristics, surgical treatment, and mortality. DESIGN, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort analysis of women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018, and followed up until December 31, 2020, was conducted. Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, and data analysis was performed from August 2023 to March 2024. EXPOSURE: Residence in areas affected by persistent poverty is defined as a condition where 20% or more of the population has lived below the poverty level for approximately 30 years. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: All-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: Among 312â¯145 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [13.3] years), 20â¯007 (6.4%) lived in a CT with persistent poverty. Compared with individuals living in areas without persistent poverty, patients residing in persistently impoverished CTs were more likely to identify as Black (8735 of 20â¯007 [43.7%] vs 29â¯588 of 292â¯138 [10.1%]; P < .001) or Hispanic (2605 of 20â¯007 [13.0%] vs 23â¯792 of 292â¯138 [8.1%]; P < .001), and present with more-aggressive tumor characteristics, including higher grade disease, triple-negative breast cancer, and advanced stage. A higher proportion of patients residing in areas with persistent poverty underwent mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection. Living in a persistently impoverished CT was associated with a higher risk of breast cancer-specific (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17) and all-cause (AHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.18) mortality. As early as 3 years following diagnosis, mortality risks diverged for both breast cancer-specific (rate ratio [RR], 1.80; 95% CI, 1.68-1.92) and all-cause (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.56-1.70) mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study of women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer between 2010 and 2018, living in neighborhoods characterized by persistent poverty had implications on tumor characteristics, surgical management, and mortality.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Pobreza , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Características da Vizinhança/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Programa de SEERRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oral cavity and pharynx cancer (OCPC) incidence increases significantly, our objective was to determine whether selected sociodemographic and clinical factors were associated with HPV+ OCPCs overall and by oropharyngeal and non-oropharyngeal sites. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program data were used in this study. Specifically, univariate and logistic regression models were used to examine the relationships between HPV+ and HPV- OCPC cases and age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, factors of neighborhood socioeconomic status (i.e., nSES/Yost index) and rurality/urbanity, first malignancy status, histology, reporting source, stage at diagnosis, and OCPC anatomic site. The same approach was used to identify risk factors for HPV positivity for oropharyngeal and non-oropharyngeal OCPCs separately. RESULTS: In all OCPCs, cases that were male, <80 years old, lived in the four highest nSES categories, diagnosed with a non-"gum and other mouth" OCPC (ref = hypopharynx), not locally staged at diagnosis, and a first malignancy had higher odds of being HPV+. Cases that were American Indian/Alaska Native and Asian or Pacific Islander (ref = White), Spanish-Hispanic-Latino ethnicity, non-married/partnered, and not reported by a hospital/clinic had lower odds of being HPV+. Associations were maintained in oropharyngeal OCPCs and only age and race remained significant for non-oropharyngeal OCPCs. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic and clinical differences in HPV+ and HPV- OCPC, overall and for (non)oropharyngeal, cases exist. IMPACT: Identification of OCPC and (non)oropharyngeal risk factors for HPV positivity may assist in discovering high-risk groups that should receive enhanced public health efforts to reduce the U.S. OCPC burden.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Bucais , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias Faríngeas , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Papillomavirus Humano , Neoplasias Faríngeas/complicações , Neoplasias Faríngeas/epidemiologia , Incidência , Programa de SEERRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, enforced social distancing initiatives have highlighted differences in social distancing practices and the resulting loneliness in various populations. The objective of this study was to examine how cancer history and social distancing practices relate to loneliness during COVID-19. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Participants from previous studies (N = 32,989) with permission to be re-contacted were invited to complete a survey online, by phone, or by mail between June and November 2020. Linear and logistic regression models were used to determine the associations between cancer history, social distancing, and loneliness. RESULTS: Among the included participants (n = 5729), the average age was 56.7 years, 35.6% were male, 89.4% were White, and 54.9% had a cancer history (n = 3147). Individuals with a cancer history were more likely to not contact people outside of their household (49.0% vs. 41.9%, p<0.01), but were less likely to feel lonely (35.8% vs. 45.3%, p<0.0001) compared to those without a cancer history. Higher adherence to social distancing behaviors was associated with higher odds of loneliness among individuals with (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38) and without a cancer history (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study can inform efforts to support the mental health of individuals susceptible to loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Solidão , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Distanciamento Físico , Neoplasias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Individuals' communities impact cancer disparities and are intimately related to social determinants of health. Studies show that personal factors affect treatment refusals for a potentially curable cancer, but few studies have investigated whether community-based characteristics affect the receipt of surgery. METHODS: We used Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program registries from 2010 to 2015 to examine differences in rates of surgery refusal among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer. The community factor measures were based on county-level factors. Sociodemographic and community differences were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 tests and analysis of variance. Multivariate logistic regression of predictors of surgery refusal and the Cox proportional hazard model of disease-specific mortality were performed. RESULTS: Surgery refusers among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic all races lived in counties with lower rates of educational attainment, median family and household income, and higher rates of poverty, unemployment, foreign-born, language isolation, urban population, and women more than 40 years old having mammography in last 2 years. Multivariate analysis shows surgery refusal rates increased in counties having a high percentage of urban population and declined in counties with an increased percentage of less than high school level education, unemployment, and median household income. Breast cancer-specific mortality increased significantly with surgery refusal. CONCLUSION: Residence in counties with the lowest socioeconomic status and disproportionately populated by racial and ethnic minorities is associated with surgery refusal. Given the high mortality associated with refusing surgery, culturally sensitive education on the benefits of care may be appropriate.