Younger age of dementia diagnosis in a Hispanic population in southern California.

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies of US Hispanics, largely performed on the East Coast, have found a younger age of dementia onset than in White non-Hispanics. We performed a cross-sectional study to examine clinical and sociodemographic variables associated with age of dementia diagnosis in older Hispanics and White, non-Hispanics in southern California. METHODS: Two hundred ninety (110 Hispanic and 180 White non-Hispanic) community dwelling, cognitively symptomatic subjects, aged 50 years and older, were assessed and diagnosed with probable Alzheimer's disease or probable vascular dementia. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype was assessed in a subset of cases. Analysis of variance and multiple stepwise linear regression were used to assess main effects and interactions of ethnicity with dementia severity (indexed by mini mental state examination scores) and other sociodemographic and clinical variables on age of dementia diagnosis. RESULTS: Hispanics were younger by an average of 4 years at the time of diagnosis, regardless of dementia subtype, despite a similar prevalence of the APOE ε4 genotype. The earlier age at diagnosis for Hispanics was not explained by gender, dementia severity, years of education, history of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, or diabetes. Only ethnicity was significantly associated with age of onset. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that US Hispanics living in the southwestern USA tend to be younger at the time of dementia diagnosis than their White non-Hispanic counterparts. As this is not explained by the presence of the APOE ε4 genotype, further studies should explore other cultural, medical, or genetic risk factors influencing the age of dementia onset in this population.

Challenges to screening and evaluation of memory impairment among Hispanic elders in a primary care safety net facility.

OBJECTIVE: Implement a memory impairment screening procedure for elderly Hispanic primary care patients, and analyze its yield and challenges to further triage and diagnostic evaluation. METHODS: Three hundred twenty nine Hispanic patients aged ≥60 years or proxy informants were enrolled from outpatient primary care clinics at an urban safety-net medical center. Patients were screened for memory impairment using the WHO-UCLA AVLT; for those without consent capacity, proxies were given the IQCODE. Bilingual research assistants conducted in-person or telephone screening. Age, gender, education, comorbidities, acculturation, overall health, access to care, and memory concerns were assessed as potential predictors of memory impairment. Based on identified implementation challenges, a multi-disciplinary stakeholder committee proposed revised approaches to increase diagnostic evaluation and sustainability. RESULTS: Of 677 eligible patients approached, 329 (49%) were screened, and 77 (23%) met criteria for memory impairment using the WHO-UCLA AVLT (N=60) or the IQCODE (N=17). Only male gender and higher comorbidity uniquely predicted memory impairment (ps<0.05). Few screen-positive patients declined further triage and evaluation, but a substantial proportion could not be subsequently contacted. Challenges to implementing a memory screening program included staff time and adequate clinic space for in-person screening; challenges to follow-up of positive screening results included inability to contact patients and lack of primary care continuity to facilitate further triage and referral. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-fourth of primary care Hispanic elders screened as memory-impaired, but few factors predicted positive screening. Stakeholder-guided adaptations are needed-particularly in resource-constrained settings-to overcome challenges to further diagnostic evaluation and referral.

Neuropsychiatric and behavioral symptoms in a community sample of Hispanics with Alzheimer's disease.

The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare neuropsychiatric symptoms in a sample of 367 community-dwelling subjects: 70 Hispanics and 230 non-Hispanic white patients with Alzheimer's disease, and 22 Hispanics and 45 non-Hispanic white healthy age-matched controls. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were common among all patients with Alzheimer's disease. In the Alzheimer's disease groups, Hispanic subjects presented to the initial assessment with more symptoms than non-Hispanic white subjects did. In comparison to the non-Hispanic white population, the proportion of Hispanics with neuropsychiatric and behavioral symptoms was higher. These findings have implications for differential sociocultural presentations of Alzheimer's disease among ethnic/racial groups.

Psychological Frailty in the Aging Patient.

There is little written in the geriatric literature about the concept of psychological frailty which encompasses cognitive, mood, and motivational components. The concept is intended to consider brain changes that are beyond normal aging, but not necessarily inclusive of disease, that result in decreased cognitive or mood resilience in the presence of modest stressors, and may eventually lead to negative health outcomes in a manner parallel to physical frailty, an entity well known to clinicians. Most work exploring the interface between cognition, mood, and physical frailty has demonstrated a bidirectional association between the two domains. Psychological symptoms or deficits have been described as either worsening the degree of physical frailty, or physical frailty has been viewed as a risk to a worsening cognition or depression. However, psychological frailty, a consequence of age-altered brain function, has not been studied for itself. By what possible mechanism does the brain reveal its loss of resiliency under modest stress and how can this be visualized? Are there markers that predate a psychological decline that might permit a preventive intervention which could delay the appearance of negative health outcomes such as reduced functional capacity or increased dependency? The present review will explore these concepts and possibilities.

Brain health: the importance of recognizing cognitive impairment: an IAGG consensus conference.

Cognitive impairment creates significant challenges for patients, their families and friends, and clinicians who provide their health care. Early recognition allows for diagnosis and appropriate treatment, education, psychosocial support, and engagement in shared decision-making regarding life planning, health care, involvement in research, and financial matters. An IAGG-GARN consensus panel examined the importance of early recognition of impaired cognitive health. Their major conclusion was that case-finding by physicians and health professionals is an important step toward enhancing brain health for aging populations throughout the world. This conclusion is in keeping with the position of the United States' Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that reimburses for detection of cognitive impairment as part the of Medicare Annual Wellness Visit and with the international call for early detection of cognitive impairment as a patient's right. The panel agreed on the following specific findings: (1) validated screening tests are available that take 3 to 7 minutes to administer; (2) a combination of patient- and informant-based screens is the most appropriate approach for identifying early cognitive impairment; (3) early cognitive impairment may have treatable components; and (4) emerging data support a combination of medical and lifestyle interventions as a potential way to delay or reduce cognitive decline.

Reduction in distractibility with AF102B and THA in the macaque.

Distractibility in primates may be influenced by central cholinergic systems. Two cholinomimetics, the m-1 muscarinic agonist (+/-)-cis-2-methyl-spiro(1,3-oxathiolane-5,3')quinuclidine (AF102B, civemeline) and the cholinesterase inhibitor tetrahydroaminoacridine (THA, tacrine), were compared to vehicle controls for effects on distractibility in an automated visuospatial attention task. The task required visual pursuit of a moving target amongst distractor stimuli that acted to impair performance and was executed by seven healthy adult bonnet macaque monkeys. Task accuracy and reaction time were measured 1.5 h after systemic administration of each substance. For the seven-subject group at individually titrated best doses, accuracy increased significantly relative to vehicle for both drugs. Reaction time at best dose decreased for both drugs, but not significantly. Muscarinic agonists and cholinesterase inhibitors may reduce distractibility in primates.