New-Onset Diabetes After Transplantation: Results From a Double-Blind Early Corticosteroid Withdrawal Trial.

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is an important complication following kidney transplantation. Data from the 5-year early steroid withdrawal double-blind randomized trial were analyzed to determine if steroid avoidance reduced the NODAT risk. Incidence, timing and risk factors for NODAT were evaluated using eight definitions. By American Diabetes Association definition, 36.3% of patients on chronic corticosteroids (CCS) and 35.9% on early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) were diagnosed with NODAT by 5 years. The definition combining fasting blood glucose ≥126 mg/dL on two occasions or treatment identified slightly more cases of NODAT: CCS (39.3%) and CSWD (39.4%). Through 5 years posttransplant, the proportion of NODAT patients requiring treatment were similar (CSWD 22.5% vs. CCS 21.5%); however, insulin therapy was lower with CSWD (3.7% vs. 11.6%; p = 0.049). By multivariate analysis, only age, but not corticosteroid use, was a significant risk factor for NODAT for more than one definition. Numerical, but not statistically significant trends toward lower NODAT rates with CSWD were observed through 5 years for insulin use, HbA1c ≥6.0% and ≥6.5% on two occasions. This prospective, randomized trial of CSWD indicates that CSWD has a limited impact in reducing NODAT when compared to low-dose prednisone (5 mg/day from month 6 to 5 years).

Effect of corticosteroid withdrawal on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil exposure in a randomized multicenter study.

As corticosteroid-sparing protocols are increasingly utilized in kidney transplant recipients, it is crucial to understand potential drug interactions between tacrolimus (TAC) and the effect of corticosteroid withdrawal as well as to characterize dose adjustments of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in this setting. This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study included 397 patients who were randomized on posttransplant day 8 to receive either placebo (CSWD) or corticosteroid continuance (CCS). TAC trough levels at week two posttransplant were significantly greater in the CSWD group whereas TAC doses were comparable to the CCS group. This interaction was not observed in the African American subgroup. Higher serum creatinine and potassium levels were also observed in the CSWD group. MMF dose was significantly reduced in the CSWD group by the investigators because of decreased WBC counts, mostly outside of study protocol criteria, despite similar incidence of neutropenia and reported cytomegalovirus infection. Understanding TAC and MMF exposure in the context of corticosteroid-sparing protocols should allow for improved dosing of immunosuppressants and better management of posttransplant patients.

Conversion of stable kidney transplant recipients from a twice daily Prograf-based regimen to a once daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen.

UNLABELLED: Modified release (MR) tacrolimus is an extended release formulation administered once daily (qD). The purpose of this pharmacokinetic (PK) study was to evaluate tacrolimus exposure in stable kidney transplant recipients converted from Prograf twice a day to MR tacrolimus qD. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter study with a crossover design. Eligible patients were 18 to 65 years of age, more than 6 months posttransplant with stable renal function, and received stable Prograf doses more than 2 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients received Prograf twice a day through day 7; 24-hour PK profiles were obtained on days 1 and 7. Patients were converted to the same milligram-for-milligram daily dose of MR tacrolimus qD in the morning on day 8; 24-hour PK profiles were obtained for MR tacrolimus on days 8, 14, and 21. Laboratory and safety parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: Most patients (67 of 70) completed all 5 PK profiles. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the MR tacrolimus vs Prograf comparison at steady state (days 14 and 21 vs days 1 and 7) were 90.7 and 99.4 for AUC0-24 and 82.7 and 91.9 for Cmin. MR tacrolimus was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of Prograf. AUC0-24 was highly correlated to Cmin for Prograf (day 1, r = 0.80; day 7, r = 0.84) and MR tacrolimus (day 14, r = 0.92; day 21, r = 0.86). Renal function remained stable after conversion to MR tacrolimus. CONCLUSION: The steady state PK of MR tacrolimus are equivalent to Prograf after a milligram-for-milligram conversion in stable kidney transplant recipients. The results provide evidence to support a safe 1:1 conversion from Prograf twice a day to MR tacrolimus.

Conversion of stable liver transplant recipients from a twice-daily Prograf-based regimen to a once-daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen.

INTRODUCTION: Modified release (MR) tacrolimus is an extended release formulation administered once daily. The purpose of this pharmacokinetic (PK) study was to evaluate tacrolimus exposure in stable liver transplant recipients converted from Prograf twice a day to MR tacrolimus once daily. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter study with a single sequence, four-period crossover design. Eligible patients were 18 to 65 years of age, >6 months posttransplant with stable renal and hepatic function and receiving stable doses of Prograf twice a day for >2 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients received Prograf twice a day on days 1 to 14 and 29 to 42. Patients were converted to the same milligram-for-milligram daily dose of MR once daily on days 15 to 28 and 43 to 56. Twenty-four-hour PK profiles were obtained on days 14, 28, 42, and 56. Laboratory and safety parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 70 patients, 62 completed all four PK profiles. The AUC0-24 of tacrolimus was comparable for Prograf twice a day (days 14 and 42) and MR tacrolimus once daily (days 28 and 56). The 90% confidence intervals for MR tacrolimus versus Prograf at steady state (days 28 and 56 vs days 14 and 42) was 0.85 to 0.92 for AUC0-24. MR tacrolimus was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of Prograf. AUC0-24 was highly correlated to Cmin for Prograf (day 14, r = .93; Day 42, r = .89) and for MR tacrolimus (day 28, r = .93; day 56, r = .92). Renal and liver function remained stable. One patient experienced acute rejection. CONCLUSION: The steady-state tacrolimus exposure of MR tacrolimus once daily is equivalent to Prograf twice a day after a milligram-for-milligram conversion in stable liver transplant recipients.

4-Aminopyridine in multiple sclerosis: prolonged administration.

In an earlier study, we demonstrated efficacy of single oral doses of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) in improving motor and visual signs in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients for a mean of 4.97 hours. We attempted to determine whether efficacy could safely be prolonged using multiple daily doses over several days by administering 7.5 to 52.5 mg 4-AP to 17 temperature-sensitive MS patients in one to three daily doses at 3- to 4-hour intervals over 1 to 5 days in a double-blind study. Nine of these patients were also tested with identically appearing placebo. Thirteen of the 17 patients (76%) given 4-AP showed clinically important motor and visual improvements compared with three of nine in the placebo group. Average peak improvement scores were 0.40 for 4-AP and 0.12 for placebo. Seventy percent of the daily 4-AP improvements lasted 7 to 10 hours. The improvements for two consecutive doses of 4-AP lasted a mean of 7.07 hours (83% of the average 8.53-hour treatment-observation period) compared with 2.36 hours for placebo (26% of the average 9.06-hour treatment-observation period). No serious side effects occurred. 4-AP is a promising drug for the symptomatic treatment of MS.

Relationship of FK506 whole blood concentrations and efficacy and toxicity after liver and kidney transplantation.

FK506 (tacrolimus) is a safe and effective immunosuppressant for the prevention of organ rejection after organ transplantation. FK506 has a relatively narrow therapeutic index and the correlation of dose to blood concentration is poor as a result of moderate variability in pharmacokinetic parameters between patients. Therapeutic monitoring of whole blood FK506 drug concentrations has been used in an effort to determine whether a relationship exists between concentrations of FK506 in the blood and the development of toxicity or the risk for organ rejection. An analysis of the relationship between FK506 blood levels and the occurrence of toxicity and rejection was carried out using data from four recent clinical trials. Trough FK506 levels within a 7-day window before the onset of rejection or toxicity were analyzed using logistic regression models. In kidney transplant patients (n=92), a significant correlation between FK506 levels and the incidence of both toxicity (P=0.01) and rejection (P=0.02) was seen. In liver transplant patients from three clinical trials, FK506 levels correlated well with the incidence of toxicity (P < or = 0.01); however, there was no significant relationship between FK506 levels and the incidence of rejection. It is concluded that therapeutic monitoring of whole blood FK506 levels may be useful for minimizing the risks of both toxicity and rejection in kidney transplant patients and for minimizing the risk of toxicity in liver transplant recipients.

Effect of tacrolimus (FK506) and sirolimus (rapamycin) mono- and combination therapy in prolongation of renal allograft survival in the monkey.

BACKGROUND: Our previous studies confirmed that tacrolimus (FK506) and sirolimus [rapamycin (RAPA)], in combination, are not antagonistic but are synergistic in the prolongation of heart and small bowel grafts in the rodent. The aim of this study was to confirm further the synergistic effect of combined FK506 and RAPA in the more clinically relevant model, kidney transplantation in monkeys. METHODS: A total of 60 male Vervet monkeys were randomly assigned to 10 groups (n> or =5). Monkeys with renal allografts were treated with different doses of FK506 and/or RAPA orally for 60 days. Graft survival, body weight, clinical biochemistry determinations, oral glucose tolerance test, trough levels of the two drugs, and histopathology were investigated. RESULTS: Low doses of FK506 (1 or 4 mg/kg) combined with RAPA (0.5 mg/kg) produced synergistic effect in the prolongation of renal graft survival [combination index (CI) = 0.292, 0.565]. There were no additive or synergistic drug-associated toxicities such as hyperglycemia, nephrotoxicity, and hyperlipidemia. There also was no pharmacological antagonism. CONCLUSION: Concomitant therapy of low-dose (drug-optimal) FK506 and RAPA produced a synergistic effect in the prolongation of kidney allograft survival in Vervet monkeys without additive drug-associated toxicities.

Tacrolimus (FK506) and sirolimus (rapamycin) in combination are not antagonistic but produce extended graft survival in cardiac transplantation in the rat.

Combined use of tacrolimus (FK506) with sirolimus (rapamycin [RAPA]) was examined in a model of vascularized heart allograft in the rat. For prevention of acute rejection, three different combinations of low doses of FK506 and RAPA from day 1 up to day 14 after transplantation produced significantly longer cardiac allograft survival than each agent alone (P<0.05). Identical results were observed in a model of reversal of ongoing acute rejection, where two combinations of low doses of FK506 and RAPA from day 4 up to day 18 after surgery also demonstrated significantly longer graft survival than each immunosuppressant alone (P<0.05). All the low-dose-treated groups in these two models presented significantly longer heart graft survival than naive controls (P<0.05), confirming that both agents are potent immunosuppressants in the models chosen. These results also indicate that, in contrast with in vitro studies, the combined use of FK506 and RAPA in vivo did not produce antagonism, but rather had synergistic effect in prolonging the allograft survival as compared with each agent alone. It appears likely that the abundance of FKBP-12 available for binding in vivo prevents inhibitive competition of the two agents for their receptor.

FK-506 and methotrexate prevent graft-versus-host disease in dogs given 9.2 Gy total body irradiation and marrow grafts from unrelated dog leukocyte antigen-nonidentical donors.

FK-506 was evaluated either alone or combined with methotrexate (MTX) for prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in dogs given 9.2 Gy total body irradiation and dog leukocyte antigen-nonidentical unrelated marrow grafts. Studies with marrow autografts showed gut toxicity and weight loss to be major side effects of FK-506. There was no hematopoietic toxicity with FK-506. In an initial allograft study, 5 dogs were given FK-506 intramuscularly at 0.3 mg/kg/day from days 0 to 8 and then orally at 0.5 mg/kg/day. All 5 died, 3 with intussusception most likely due to FK-506 toxicity, 1 with graft failure, and 1 with GVHD. Subsequently, the FK-506 dose was reduced and these drug schedules were used: FK-506 days 0-8 at 0.15 mg/kg/day i.m. and then orally at 0.5 mg/kg/day until day 90, with or without MTX intravenously at 0.4 mg/kg days 1, 3, 6, and 11. Twenty allografts were done, 10 with FK-506 alone, and 10 with MTX/FK-506. Results were compared with those in concurrent and historical controls given either no immunosuppression (n = 64), MTX (n = 114), CsA (n = 15), or MTX/CsA (n = 17). Five of 20 current dogs died with intussusception, too early to be evaluated for GVHD. The 10 dogs given FK-506 alone survived significantly better than those not given immunosuppression but not differently from those given short-term MTX or CsA alone. Three died from toxicity, 2 with graft failure, and 4 with GVHD. Only 1 dog became a long-term survivor, and this dog inadvertently received a single dose of MTX on day 7. Two of 10 dogs given MTX/FK-506 died from toxicity, 1 died with graft failure, 2 died with GVHD, and 5 became long-term survivors, a result that is significantly better than seen with either drug alone and similar to that seen with MTX/CsA. Four of the 5 survivors had no clinical GVHD. FK-506 blood levels were 15-35 ng/ml between days 8 and 15, when gut toxicity was most severe. Thereafter, levels were approximately 5 ng/ml. In conclusion, FK-506 prolonged survival of recipients of dog leukocyte antigen-nonidentical unrelated marrow grafts. When FK-506 was combined with MTX, graft-host tolerance was induced in 50% of dogs, even though FK-506 was stopped on day 90.

Compromised kidney graft rejection response in Vervet monkeys after withdrawal of immunosuppressants tacrolimus and sirolimus.

BACKGROUND: In nonprimates, organ allografts are often not rejected after withdrawal of immunosuppression. In this study, we examined whether such a phenomenon also occurs in primates. METHODS: Vervet monkeys were transplanted with renal allografts and treated for 60 days with tacrolimus, or tacrolimus plus sirolimus. The drugs were totally withdrawn on day 61. The survival of the monkeys was monitored, and their response to donor- or third party-derived alloantigens was examined in vivo and in vitro. RESULTS: The majority (80-100%) of the grafts survived for at least additional 30 days with no signs of acute rejection. The compromised rejection is donor-specific, because recipient monkeys failed to reject a donor-derived skin graft, but a third-party skin graft was rejected. In vitro mixed lymphocyte reaction and interleukin-2 production in the mixed lymphocyte reaction between the recipients and their donors or between the recipients and a third party had no discernable patterns, and thus did not reflect the in vivo status of the immune system. Although the recipients could not reject the graft acutely after drug withdrawal, the kidney grafts and the donor-derived skin grafts had pathological findings of chronic rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The rejection response of the monkeys to an established graft after withdrawal of immunosuppression is compromised. The compromised rejection is specific and is not due to a permanent alteration of the immune system by the initial drug treatment. The allografts are not inert but have low levels of interaction with the recipient immune system.

Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Our clinical trial was designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants for renal transplantation. METHODS: A randomized three-arm, parallel group, open label, prospective study was performed at 15 North American centers to compare three immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus + azathioprine (AZA) versus cyclosporine (Neoral) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus tacrolimus + MMF. All patients were first cadaveric kidney transplants receiving the same maintenance corticosteroid regimen. Only patients with delayed graft function (32%) received antilymphocyte induction. A total of 223 patients were randomized, transplanted, and followed for 1 year. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline demography between the three treatment groups. At 1 year the results are as follows: acute rejection 17% (95% confidence interval 9%, 26%) in tacrolimus + AZA; 20% (confidence interval 11%, 29%) in cyclosporine + MMF; and 15% (confidence interval 7%, 24%) in tacrolimus + MMF. The incidence of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy was 12% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 11% in the cyclosporine + MMF group, and 4% in the tacrolimus + MMF group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival. Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower incidence of hyperlipidemia through 6 months posttransplant. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus requiring insulin was 14% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 7% in the cyclosporine + MMF and 7% in the tacrolimus + MMF groups. CONCLUSIONS: All regimens yielded similar acute rejection rates and graft survival, but the tacrolimus + MMF regimen was associated with the lowest rate of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy.

Randomized trial of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine oral solution (modified) plus mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at 2 years.

BACKGROUND: A previous report described the 1-year results of a prospective, randomized trial designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants in kidney transplantation. Recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were treated with tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine oral solution (modified) (CsA)+MMF, or tacrolimus+azathioprine (AZA). Results at 1 year revealed that optimal efficacy and safety were achieved with a regimen containing tacrolimus+MMF. The present report describes results at 2 years. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, or tacrolimus+AZA. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function. Patients were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: The results at 2 years corroborate and extend the findings of the previous report. Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing tacrolimus experienced improved kidney function. New-onset insulin dependence remained in four, three, and four patients in the tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, and tacrolimus+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients with delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis who were treated with tacrolimus+MMF experienced a 23% increase in allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (P=0.06). Patients randomized to tacrolimus+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF compared with those administered CsA+MMF. CONCLUSIONS: All three immunosuppressive regi-mens provided excellent safety and efficacy. How-ever, the best results overall were achieved with tacrolimus+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients who develop delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis. Renal function at 2 years was better in the tacrolimus treatment groups compared with the CsA group.

Glucocorticoids fail to enhance the effect of FK506 and methotrexate in prevention of graft-versus-host disease after DLA-nonidentical, unrelated marrow transplantation.

Several steroid receptor-associated heat shock proteins can bind to FK506 as immunophilins. This has led to speculation that the steroid receptor and immunophilin signal transduction pathways are functionally interrelated. Indeed, in vitro work showed that FK506 treatment of intact L929 cells which were stably transfected with various reporter plasmids resulted in a potentiation of glucocorticoid hormone-induced glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene transcription. These findings have raised the possibility of additive or synergistic immunosuppressive effects of FK506 and glucocorticoids. We tested this hypothesis in a canine model of GVHD prevention. Two groups of dogs were given 9.2 Gy total body irradiation followed by hematopoietic grafts from unrelated DLA-nonidentical donors. Among the first group of four recipients which were given FK506 and glucocorticoids, one rejected the graft, while three developed acute GVHD and died from associated complications between days 14 and 34. In the second group of nine recipients which were given FK506, glucocorticoids and methotrexate (MTX), only one dog became a long-term survivor while eight dogs died between days 21-114 with GVHD (n = 5) or FK506-associated toxicities (n = 3). Thus, addition of glucocorticoids to FK506 or FK506/MTX showed neither synergistic nor additive effects with respect to GVHD prevention in this model, and no survival advantages were seen compared to previously reported results with FK506 alone or FK506 and MTX in combination, respectively.

Cortical blindness: a rare complication of cyclosporine therapy.

We report a bone marrow transplant patient who developed a reversible episode of cortical blindness, a rare complication of cyclosporine therapy. We review previously reported cases and the mechanisms involved in this complication.

Assessment of myocardial hypertrophy by echocardiography in adult patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine therapy for prevention of acute GVHD.

The incidence of myocardial hypertrophy was determined in a comparative study of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression for prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation. Patients were evaluated for clinical and echocardiographic abnormalities at baseline (prior to pretreatment conditioning and the first dose of study drug) and at 5-8 weeks after transplant when stable levels of oral tacrolimus or cyclosporine had been achieved. Left ventricular geometry and performance were assessed by echocardiography which included 2-D measurements and one Doppler measurement. Derived echocardiographic measurements and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were also determined. A cut-off of <111 g/m(2) was used for the upper limit of normal for LVMI. Forty-four patients were included in this study (21 tacrolimus and 23 cyclosporine), of which 31 were evaluable for a comparison with both baseline and post-transplant values. There was no significant difference in the changes from baseline for mean left ventricular mass (LVM) or LVM index (LVMI) between treatment groups. Also, within the tacrolimus group there were no significant changes for these variables from baseline to post-transplant evaluations. Within the cyclosporine group there were significant increases from baseline for mean LVM (P = 0.011) and LVMI (P = 0.007). The incidence of myocardial hypertrophy (change of LVMI from <111 g/m(2) baseline to >111 g/m(2) post transplant) was 20% in the tacrolimus group and 56% in the cyclosporine group (P = 0.109). Changes in the LVMI from baseline to post baseline were greater with cyclosporine than with tacrolimus therapy, and there was no evidence that tacrolimus causes myocardial hypertrophy or significant clinical changes in adult bone marrow transplant patients. The increase in LVMI after transplant in the cyclosporine group was greater than in the tacrolimus group but was not associated with any significant clinical events.

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in BMT patients.

The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus following its administration as monotherapy or in combination with corticosteroids or methotrexate to 31 BMT patients are presented. All patients received i.v. tacrolimus initially and were subsequently switched to p.o. dosing. Patients received methotrexate by i.v. bolus on post-transplantation days 1, 3, 6 and 11. Patients were started on i.v. corticosteroids beginning on post-transplantation day 7. The noncompartmental pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus based on whole blood concentrations were determined following the i.v. and p.o. doses and were not different at steady-state compared to a single dose. The mean terminal elimination half-life of tacrolimus was 18.2 h following i.v. administration; the total body clearance was 71 ml/h/kg, the volume of distribution was 1.67 1/kg. Co-administration of methylprednisolone or methotrexate did not significantly alter tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. The p.o. bioavailability was 31-49%. Trough blood concentrations (Cmin) at 0 h (pre-dose) and 12 h (post-dose) correlated well to AUC(0-12)indicating that, as in solid organ transplantation, Cmin was a good index of drug exposure. Correlation at 0 h (r = 0.92) and at 12 h (r = 0.93) indicate that either time point can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring in patient management.

Tacrolimus (FK506) and methotrexate regimens to prevent graft-versus-host disease after unrelated dog leukocyte antigen (DLA) nonidentical marrow transplantation.

We previously reported an synergism between methotrexate and tacrolimus (FK506) in preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in dogs given DLA-nonidentical unrelated marrow grafts after 9.2 Gy of total body irradiation (TBI). Methotrexate was given at 0.4 mg/kg i.v. on days 1, 3, 6 and 11 and FK506 at 0.15 mg/kg/day i.m. on days 0-8 and 0.5 mg/kg/day orally on days 9-90. Half of the dogs became long-term survivors. A major toxicity was gastrointestinal, and 25% of dogs died with intussusception. The current study addresses the problem of intussusception by making changes in drug doses used. In one group of dogs, FK506 was reduced to 0.075 mg/kg i.m. on days 1-8, while methotrexate was administered per original schedule. In a second group, methotrexate was reduced to a single dose on day 7, while FK506 was either administered per the original or reduced-dose schedule. None of the 17 current dogs developed intussusception, however, all but two dogs died with GVHD (n = 12) or graft failure (n = 3). Only two dogs survived after transient GVHD. Results show that there is little room for maneuvering FK506 or methotrexate doses, and hopes of reducing gastrointestinal toxicity by dose modifications while retaining the ability to prevent GVHD were not fulfilled.

Lack of interaction between tacrolimus (FK506) and methotrexate in bone marrow transplant recipients.

Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide lactone effective in the control of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). An interaction between high-dose methotrexate and a macrolide antibiotic (pristinamycin) leading to prolonged methotrexate exposure has been described. Because a randomized prospective trial comparing tacrolimus with cyclosporine (both in combination with methotrexate) following allogeneic BMT showed the tacrolimus plus methotrexate regimen to be more effective in prevention of GVHD, we assessed methotrexate pharmacokinetics in a subgroup of the participants of this trial to evaluate the possibility that an interaction of FK506 and methotrexate was the explanation for the clinical findings. Mean and median methotrexate levels at various time-points after the day 1 and 6 methotrexate doses were comparable in the tacrolimus and cyclosporine cohorts and were elevated in only three of 70 study patients. Area under the curve (AUC) concentrations were also similar after the day 1 and 6 methotrexate doses. Thus, no significant interaction between tacrolimus and methotrexate is apparent and the differences in efficacy between tacrolimus and cyclosporine are unlikely to be attributable to pharmacologic interactions with methotrexate.

Clinical utility of monitoring tacrolimus blood concentrations in liver transplant patients.

The relationship between the dose of tacrolimus, trough tacrolimus blood concentration, and selected clinical endpoints (acute rejection, nephrotoxicity, and other toxicities) were examined in a prospective, multicenter clinical trial to validate the use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for monitoring whole-blood concentrations of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients. A total of 111 subjects from six transplant centers were evaluated over 12 weeks posttransplantation. In addition to trough tacrolimus blood concentrations, hematocrit, ALT, AST, GGTP, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, BUN, serum potassium, serum magnesium, blood glucose, and serum albumin were also measured. The relationship between trough tacrolimus blood concentrations and clinical endpoints was analyzed using both a logistic regression model and a Cox proportional hazard model. By logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant (p = 0.0465) relationship between increasing trough tacrolimus blood concentrations and decreasing risk of acute rejection was demonstrated over a 7-day time window. Nephrotoxicity and other toxicities also demonstrated statistically significant relationships with trough tacrolimus blood concentrations. The results of the Cox analysis were consistent with the logistic regression analysis. Using receiver operator characteristic curves, trough tacrolimus concentrations as measured by the ELISA method were able to differentiate the occurrence of nephrotoxicity and toxicity from nonevents. To minimize nephrotoxicity of tacrolimus, it is necessary to maintain trough blood concentrations below 15 ng/ml. This study demonstrates that the ELISA method used to measure tacrolimus blood concentrations in this study provides information of predictive value for managing the risk of nephrotoxicity, other toxicity, and rejection in liver transplant patients.

The effect of hepatic enzyme inducers on busulfan neurotoxicity and myelotoxicity.

Anticonvulsants are commonly used empirically to prevent seizures in patients receiving high-dose busulfan in preparation for bone marrow transplantation. This study evaluates the effects of two anticonvulsants with enzyme-inductive properties, phenytoin and phenobarbital, and an enzyme inducer without anticonvulsant properties, Aroclor 1254, on the myelotoxicity and acute neurotoxicity of busulfan in a murine model. To assess the neuroprotective effects of these agents, we studied the effects of a single dose of 100 mg/kg i.p. busulfan, previously shown in this model to be uniformly lethal due to neurotoxicity. A significantly greater proportion of mice survived when pretreated with phenytoin or phenobarbital as compared with Aroclor 1254 pretreatment or an untreated control group. Busulfan myelotoxicity was studied in another group of mice treated with 135-150 mg/kg given in divided doses over 6 days. The proportion of animals surviving the otherwise myeloablative effects of this regimen were significantly improved by Aroclor 1254, high-dose phenytoin, and phenobarbital pretreatment. We conclude that anticonvulsants offer protection from the acute neurotoxicity of busulfan. However, these enzyme-inducing agents may reduce the myelosuppressive effects as well. These results suggest that an inducible enzyme system such as microsomal or glutathione S-transferases plays an important role in busulfan metabolism, warranting concern over concomitant administration of agents that either induce or inhibit these enzymes.