Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients aged 60-79 years in Germany (1998-2018): a registry study.

Incidences of diseases treated with transplantation frequently peak at higher age. The contribution of age to total risk of transplantation has not been estimated amidst an aging society. We compare outcomes of 1,547 patients aged 70-79 years and 9,422 patients aged 60-69 years transplanted 1998-2018 for myeloid, lymphoid and further neoplasia in Germany. To quantify the contribution of population mortality to survival, we derive excess mortality based on a sex-, year- and agematched German population in a multistate model that incorporates relapse and graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). Overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS) and GvHD-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS) is inferior in patients aged 70-79 years, compared to patients aged 60-69 years, with 36% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 34-39%) versus 43% (41-44%), 32% (30- 35%) versus 36% (35-37%) and 23% (21-26%) versus 27% (26-28%) three years post-transplant (P<0.001). Cumulative incidences of relapse at three years are 27% (25-30%) for patients aged 70-79 versus 29% (29-30%) (60-69 years) (P=0.71), yet the difference in non-relapse mortality (NRM) (40% [38-43%] vs. 35% [34-36%] in patients aged 70-79 vs. 60-69 years) (P<0.001) translates into survival differences. Median OS of patients surviving >1 year relapse-free is 6.7 (median, 95% CI: 4.5-9.4, 70-79 years) versus 9 (8.4-10.1, 60-69 years) years since landmark. Three years after RFS of one year, excess NRM is 14% (95% CI: 12-18%) in patients aged 70-79 versus 12% [11-13%] in patients aged 60-69, while population NRM is 7% (6-7%) versus 3% (3-3%). Mortality for reasons other than relapse, GvHD, or age is as high as 27% (24-29%) and 22% (22-23%) four years after transplantation. In conclusion, survival amongst older patients is adequate after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Multicenter development of a PET-based risk assessment tool for product-specific outcome prediction in large B-cell lymphoma patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy.

PURPOSE: The emergence of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fundamentally changed the management of individuals with relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, real-world data have shown divergent outcomes for the approved products. The present study therefore set out to evaluate potential risk factors in a larger cohort. METHODS: Our analysis set included 88 patients, treated in four German university hospitals and one Italian center, who had undergone 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) before CAR T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel or axicabtagene ciloleucel. We first determined the predictive value of conventional risk factors, treatment lines, and response to bridging therapy for progression-free survival (PFS) through forward selection based on Cox regression. In a second step, the additive potential of two common PET parameters was assessed. Their optimal dichotomizing thresholds were calculated individually for each CAR T-cell product. RESULTS: Extra-nodal involvement emerged as the most relevant of the conventional tumor and patient characteristics. Moreover, we found that inclusion of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) further improves outcome prediction. The hazard ratio for a PFS event was 1.68 per unit increase of our proposed risk score (95% confidence interval [1.20, 2.35], P = 0.003), which comprised both extra-nodal disease and lymphoma burden. While the most suitable MTV cut-off among patients receiving tisagenlecleucel was 11 mL, a markedly higher threshold of 259 mL showed optimal predictive performance in those undergoing axicabtagene ciloleucel treatment. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrates that the presence of more than one extra-nodal lesion and higher MTV in LBCL are associated with inferior outcome after CAR T-cell treatment. Based on an assessment tool including these two factors, patients can be assigned to one of three risk groups. Importantly, as shown by our study, metabolic tumor burden might facilitate CAR T-cell product selection and reflect the individual need for bridging therapy.

Impact of busulfan versus treosulfan dose intensity in myelofibrosis undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.

One key aspect of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is pretransplant conditioning, balancing risk for relapse versus non-relapse mortality. Conditioning regimens with different alkylators at different doses can influence outcome, but data are missing for myelofibrosis, a challenging cohort of patients usually presenting at older age and with comorbidities. We evaluated in a multicenter retrospective study the comparative efficacy and safety of busulfan versus treosulfan in combination with fludarabine for myelofibrosis patients undergoing HCT. This study included 1115 patients (busulfan, n = 902; treosulfan, n = 213) receiving first HCT between 2005 and 2021. Patients were generally balanced for key patient characteristics. Overall survival at 4 years was 62% for the busulfan group versus 58% for the treosulfan group (p = .22). Impact on outcome was dose-dependent. Overall survival was 65% (95% CI, 61%-69%) for reduced intensity busulfan versus 69% (95% CI, 54%-84%) for reduced intensity treosulfan, 53% (95% CI, 44%-63%) for higher intensity busulfan, and 55% (95% CI, 46%-63%) for higher intensity treosulfan. Incidence of relapse was similar across intensity groups. In multivariable analysis, the hazard for death (with reduced intensity busulfan as reference) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.39-2.01) for reduced intensity treosulfan (p = .77), 1.42 (95% CI, 0.96-2.10) for higher intensity busulfan (0.08), and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.14-2.26) for higher intensity treosulfan (p = .006). In terms of non-relapse mortality, comparison was not significantly different, while the hazard ratio for higher intensity treosulfan was 1.48 (95% CI, 0.98-2.23; p = .06). Here, we showed comparable outcomes and improved survival in myelofibrosis undergoing HCT with reduced intensity busulfan or treosulfan.

Single-Center Experience of Patients with Plasma Cell Leukemia in the Era of New Therapeutics.

INTRODUCTION: Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) can occur de novo as primary PCL (pPCL), or in patients with prior diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) as secondary PCL (sPCL). In 2021, the diagnostic criteria have been revised, establishing a new cut-off of ≥5% plasma cells in the peripheral blood. Lacking specific clinical trials, PCL is treated similarly to MM; however, outcome for patients with PCL remains poor. Here, we report outcomes for patients with pPCL and sPCL in the era of novel agents. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis and identified 19 patients (11 pPCL, 8 sPCL) who have been treated for PCL between 2010 and 2022 at University Hospital Essen. RESULTS: Patients with pPCL had a median overall survival (OS) of 37.8 months (95% CI: [15.4; 52.3] months) from diagnosis, with a median time to next treatment (TTNT) of 18.4 (2.0; 22.9) months. All patients were treated with a proteasome-inhibitor (PI)-based induction therapy, and the majority was consolidated with an autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). Five of these patients received a tandem transplantation. Patients with sPCL had a median OS of only 1.5 months after diagnosis of PCL. Only 1 patient achieved a remission with daratumumab and subsequent allogenic SCT. CONCLUSION: With our study, we add evidence for a PI-based induction therapy followed by a consolidating autologous SCT for patients with pPCL and give further evidence that a tandem transplant concept might be beneficial. The diagnosis of sPCL remains devastating and needs new therapeutic approaches.

Outcomes after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in young adults in Germany.

Young adults (YA) represent a minority among recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In order to describe the outcome of YA following HSCT in Germany, 9299 patients who were registered with the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation were included in this retrospective analysis of the years 1998-2019. The impact of the variables, such as patient age and sex, sex differences, stem cell source, donor type, conditioning, year of HSCT, the diagnosis, and the achieved remission status were tested in univariable and multivariable analysis for overall, event-free and relapse-free survival as well as for the cumulative incidences of non-relapse and therapy-related mortality. Altogether, the outcome of YA after HSCT improved over time and was determined by the underlying disease, the age at disease onset, stem cell source, and donor type. Patients were most likely to die from relapse, and survival of HSCT recipients after 10 years was reduced by more than half in comparison to the general population of YA. Deeper understanding of modifiable risk factors may be gained by studies comparing the outcome of YA post-HSCT with that of children, adolescents and elderly patients. A deliberate and strong patient selection may further improve mortality rates.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis Aged 70 Years or Older: A Study from the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation.

Current consensus recommends hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with myelofibrosis with intermediate or high-risk disease and age of less than 70 years. However, a higher chronological age should not be prohibitive for the eligibility decision in general, acknowledging that current life expectancy for the general population aged 70 years is ∼15 years, and current numbers of patients transplanted at 70 years or older is steadily increasing. The following study aimed to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of HCT in 115 myelofibrosis patients aged 70 years or older. This is a retrospective multicenter study, using the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (DRST). Adult myelofibrosis patients were included who received HCT up until 2021. Patients with secondary leukemia were excluded. Main endpoints were HCT demographics over time and outcomes after HCT (including overall survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival). Numbers of HCT increased over the past decade, with a significant spike since 2019. Comorbidity status of transplanted patients improved over time, while reduced-intensity conditioning was the preferred HCT platform, especially in most recent years. The 3-year overall survival was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-65%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 7% (95% CI, 3%-13%) and the 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 22% (95% CI, 14%-31%). The 3-year graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival was 37% (95% CI, 27%-47%). Driver mutation genotype (in particular, non-CALR/MPL genotype) appeared to be the only variable that was significantly and independently associated with better survival in multivariable analysis, whereas neither comorbidity index nor dose intensity of pre-transplant conditioning appeared to influence outcome. This study demonstrated feasibility of curative treatment with HCT for myelofibrosis aged 70 or older, with significant increases in HCT numbers and improved fitness of older adults over recent years.

Outcome Prediction in Patients With Large B-cell Lymphoma Undergoing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy.

The introduction of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has led to a fundamental shift in the management of relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma. However, our understanding of risk factors associated with non-response is still insufficient and the search for predictive biomarkers continues. Some parameters measurable on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) may be of additional value in this context. A total of 47 individuals from three German university centers who underwent re-staging with PET prior to CAR T-cell therapy were enrolled into the present study. After multivariable analysis considering tumor characteristics and patient factors that might affect progression-free survival (PFS), we investigated whether metabolic tumor volume (MTV) or maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) further improve risk stratification. Their most suitable cut-offs were determined by Cox and logistic regression. Forward selection identified extra-nodal disease as the most predictive factor of those routinely available, and we found it to be associated with significantly inferior overall survival after CAR T-cell treatment (P = 0.012). Furthermore, patients with MTV and SUVmax higher than the optimal threshold of 11 mL and 16.7, respectively, experienced shorter PFS (P = 0.016 and 0.002, respectively). Hence, these risk factors might be useful for selection of individuals likely to benefit from CAR T-cell therapy and their management.

Survival outcomes in a prospective randomized multicenter Phase III trial comparing patients undergoing anatomical segmentectomy versus standard lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer up to 2 cm.

OBJECTIVES: The oncological equivalence of anatomical segmentectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. Primary aim of this study was survival outcomes in combination with improved quality of life after segmentectomy compared with lobectomy in patients with pathological stage Ia NSCLC (up to 2 cm, 7th edition) MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase III trial to confirm the non-inferiority of segmentectomy to lobectomy in regard to prognosis (trial No. DRKS00004897). Patients were randomized to undergo either segmentectomy or lobectomy and followed up for 5-years survival and tumor recurrence. The 5-year hazard ratio comparing lobectomy with segmentectomy was required to remain above 0.5. RESULTS: Between October 2013 and June 2016, 108 patients with verified or suspected NSCLC up to 2 cm diameter were enrolled; 54 were assigned to lobectomy and 54 (1 drop-out) to segmentectomy. In-hospital and 90 days mortality was 0% in both groups. Overall survival at 5 years was 86.52% in the lobectomy compared to 78.21% in the segmentectomy group (HR = 0.61, (95% CI 0.23-1.66), p-value of non-inferiority test, p-ni = 0.687). Disease free survival was 77.29% for the lobectomy and 77.96% for the segmentectomy patients (HR = 1.50, (95% CI 0.60-3.76), p-ni = 0.019). At a median follow-up of 5 years, no differences were noted in either the locoregional or distant recurrent disease in both groups (9.4% vs 7.4%, p-ni = 0.506). CONCLUSION: Overall survival, locoregional and distant recurrences was not significantly difference for patients undergoing either segmentectomy or lobectomy for stage Ia NSCLC. The targeted non-inferiority of segmentectomy to lobectomy could not be proven for primary endpoint overall survival, but was significant for the secondary endpoint of disease free survival.