Usefulness of systolic time intervals in coronary artery disease.

This review summarizes current knowledge concerning the value of systolic time intervals in coronary artery disease. Although the usual pattern of prolongation of the preejection period (PEP) and shortening of the left ventricular ejection time (LVET) characteristic of left ventricular failure is seen in acute myocardial infarction, the systolic time intervals (as well as all other measures) are profoundly influenced by adrenergic hyperactivity characteristics of this disorder. Adrenergic stimulation normally shortens both the PEP and LVET indexes and decreases the PEP/LVET ratio. The degree of shortening of electromechanical systole (QS2) is directed related to the excessive adrenergic tone. Patients with the greatest systolic time interval abnormalities have a poorer prognosis, a greater incidence of congestive heart failure and more abnormalities of directly measured indexes of left ventricular performance. The systolic time intervals are useful for assessing left ventricular performance in chronic coronary artery disease as well. In chronic coronary artery disease the PEP/LVET ratio and angiographically determined left ventricular ejection fraction are closely correlated ( r = -0.76), but the level of this correlation is less than that in other forms of left ventricular disease. The left ventricular ejection time index is prolonged after exercise in patients with angina pectoris when compared with findings in normal subjects. Failure of the ischemic ventricle to respond to adrenergic stimulation is the most likely mechanism. Addition of the postexercise left ventricular ejection time to standard treadmill stress testing identifies a significant number of patients (23 percent) who would have had false negative results by electrocardiographic criteria alone. In addition, this index provides confirmatory evidence in those with apparently positive electrocardiographic test data. The systolic time intervals have been useful in assessing both medical and surgical therapy in coronary artery disease. The test can be performed repeatedly and provides a measure of both left ventricular performance and extent of adrenergic hyperactivity. Thus, evaluation of therapy represents the most useful future application of systolic time intervals.

Enhanced diagnostic power of exercise testing for myocardial ischemia by addition of postexercise left ventricular ejection time.

To improve both the sensitivity and specificity of the multistage treadmill test, postexercise systolic time intervals were prospectively studied in 73 patients with angina-like chest pain and normal resting ST-T segments. The decision to perform coronary angiography was made independent of the exercise test. Twenty-three patients had normal coronary arteries and 50 had more than 50 percent reduction of luminal diameter of one or more major coronary arteries. The systolic time intervals were measured before and 2,4,6,8 and 10 minutes after exercise. Of all the systolic time intervals, the 4 minute postexercise left ventricular ejection time proved most discriminating between normal subjects and those with coronary artery disease. The deviations of this interval from the normal regression with heart rate both before and after exercise were used to calculate the net delta left ventricular ejection time after exercise. A net increase of more than 31 msec represented 2 standard deviations above normal. Twenty-three (46 percent) of the patients with coronary artery disease had an abnormal net delta ejection time after exercise. Twenty-five (50 percent) had a positive electrocardiographic response with a 9 percent false positive rate. Thirteen (26 percent) had only a positive postexercise net delta ejection time so that a total of 76 percent of patients with coronary artery disease were identified. Thus, measurement of the postexercise net delta ejection time a simple and useful adjunct to multistage treadmill testing.

Systolic time intervals in atrial fibrillation.

Forty patients with atrial fibrillation and 20 patients with congestive heart failure and sinus rhythm were studied. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 20 patients with atrial fibrillation in whom systolic time intervals were measured. Twenty to 50 beats were analyzed. Five of the patients had high-fidelity measurements of left ventricular pressure simultaneous with determination of systolic time intervals. Analysis of the systolic time intervals for the entire group showed that the preejection period lengthened at faster heart rates and that the left ventricular ejection time was relatively constant at slower heart rates. This resulted in a progressive increase in the ratio of preejection period over left ventricular ejection time (PEP/LVET) as the heart rate increased. The rate of increase in PEP/LVET was minimal below a heart rate of 75 beats per minute. The increase in preejection period at faster heart rates is due to greater isovolumic developed pressure without a corresponding increase in left ventricular dp/dt. Group B consisted of 40 additional patients (20 with atrial fibrillation and 20 with sinus rhythm). In group B, the total electromechanical systole corrected for heart rate (QS2I) and the levels of digoxin in the blood were compared. The QS2I was significantly shorter in atrial fibrillation (497 +/- 5 msec vs 528 +/- 4 msec; P less than 0.01), while the levels of digoxin in the blood were identical (0.9 +/- 0.1 vs 1.0 +/- 0.1 ng/ml). The results of this study must be considered when systolic time intervals are to be employed in patients with atrial fibrillation.