The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mastectomy Outcomes for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Single center studies have shown that during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many patients had surgical procedures postponed or modified. We studied how the pandemic affected the clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomies in 2020. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we compared clinical variables of 31,123 and 28,680 breast cancer patients who underwent a mastectomy in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Data from 2019 served as the control, and data from 2020 represented the COVID-19 cohort. RESULTS: Fewer surgeries of all kinds were performed in the COVID-19 year than in the control (902,968 vs. 1,076,411). The proportion of mastectomies performed in the COVID-19 cohort was greater than in the control year (3.18% vs. 2.89%, <0.001). More patients presented with ASA level 3 in the COVID-19 year vs. the control (P < .002). Additionally, the proportion of patients with disseminated cancer was lower during the COVID-19 year (P < .001). Average hospital length of stay (P < .001) and time from operation to discharge were shorter in the COVID vs. control cohort (P < .001). Fewer unplanned readmissions were seen in the COVID year (P < .004). CONCLUSION: The ongoing surgical services and mastectomies for breast cancer during the pandemic produced similar clinical outcomes to those seen in 2019. Prioritization of resources for sicker patients and the use of alternative interventions produced similar results for breast cancer patients who underwent a mastectomy in 2020.

Reduced antiarrhythmic efficacy of verapamil in isolated rat hearts in the presence of elevated extracellular calcium.

An isolated heart method that has been proposed to aid in ascertaining the involvement of L-type calcium channel blockade in the mechanism of action of novel antiarrhythmic drugs involves increasing the calcium concentration in the perfusion buffer. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of this method using an established L-type calcium channel blocker, verapamil. Isolated rat hearts were perfused with normal calcium (1.4 mM) Krebs solution containing drug vehicle only, a normal calcium solution containing verapamil (300 nM), or a high calcium (2.8 mM) solution containing verapamil. The occurrence of ventricular fibrillation during a subsequent period of regional myocardial ischemia was monitored. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation was significantly reduced from 80% in controls to 20% by perfusion with verapamil in normal calcium Krebs solution (P < 0.05). Perfusion with the high calcium solution increased the incidence of ventricular fibrillation in the presence of verapamil to 40% (P > 0.05 versus controls). We conclude that the antiarrhythmic effect of verapamil in isolated hearts can be attenuated by increasing the calcium content of the perfusion solution, but a twofold increase in the calcium concentration failed to fully restore susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation to that observed in verapamil-free controls.