Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing and Utilizing Medicaid Smartphone Services: Perspectives of Peer Support Specialists and Patients with a Diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness.

Access to smartphone and data plan services may impact levels of connection and opportunities for health management for patients with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness. Such smartphone-based services provide opportunities that extend the reach of physical and mental health care programs. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators faced by individuals with mental health challenges when accessing Medicaid SafeLink smartphones and data plans. Interview guides were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect qualitative data on 18 participants' experiences with SafeLink services. Two main themes were identified- barriers and facilitators. Sub-themes included monthly data limits, followed by account management (barriers), opportunities for safety, and connection (facilitators). Massachusetts SafeLink policies provide individuals with an opportunity for smartphone ownership. However, results imply that expanding the current policy's usage limits may provide additional opportunities for connection and access to health services.

Estimates of Gaps in Supportive Housing Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Older Adults with Serious Mental Illness in New York City Boroughs: Manhattan, Bronx, and Brooklyn.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate gaps in supportive housing services for racially and ethnically diverse older adults with SMI residing in supportive housing. METHODS: This study had a total of 753 respondents split into two diagnostic groups, the Delusional and Psychotic Disorders Group, and the Mood (Affective) Disorder Group. Demographic and primary ICD diagnosis data (F2x and F3x) were extracted from medical records. Three elements were measured: supportive housing service needs, fall prevention, and activities in daily living and instrumental activities in daily living. Descriptive statistics (i.e., frequencies and percentages) were used in assessing the demographic characteristics of the sample. RESULTS: Respondents had reasonable fall prevention measures in place, did not have challenges carrying out activities in daily living or instrumental activities of daily living and did not need homecare services (n = 515, 68.4%). Respondents needed support managing chronic medical conditions (n = 323, ∼43%). Approximately 57% of the total respondents in this study (n = 426) reported the need for hearing, vision, and dental services. Respondents showed high levels of food insecurity (n = 380, 50.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the most extensive study of racially and ethnically diverse older adults with SMI residing in supportive housing. Three areas of unmet need were found: accessing hearing, vision, and dental services, managing chronic health conditions, and food insecurity. These findings can be used to develop new research programs addressing the needs of older adults with SMI and improve late-life circumstances for older adults with SMI.

Positive Organizational Psychology Factors as Serial Multiple Mediators of the Relationship between Organization Support and Job Satisfaction Among Peer Support Specialists.

BACKGROUND: Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of peer support specialists in helping people with severe mental illness increase community tenure, decrease hospitalization, boost treatment satisfaction, improve social functioning, and increase quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate positive organizational psychology constructs as serial multiple mediators of the relationships between perceived organizational support and job satisfaction among peer support specialists. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one peer support specialists from the Texas statewide peer certification training programs and the National Association of Peer Supporters participated in the present study. These peer support specialists completed an online survey composed of self-report measures related to perceived organizational support, positive organizational psychology factors, and job satisfaction. A serial multiple mediation (SMMA) analysis was conducted to evaluate autonomous motivation to work, work engagement, and organizational commitment as mediators of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job satisfaction. RESULTS: The SMMA model accounted for 49% of the variation in job satisfaction scores (R2 =. 49, f2 = 0.96 [> 0.35], a large effect size). Autonomous motivation to work, work engagement, and organizational commitment were significantly associated with job satisfaction after controlling for the effect of perceived organizational support. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived organizational support increased autonomous motivation to work, work engagement, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction. Peer support specialists are integral members of the interdisciplinary mental health treatment team. Leaders of community-based mental health and rehabilitation agencies who are committed to hire and retain peer support specialists must provide strong organizational support and develop interventions to increase peer support specialists' autonomous motivation to work, work engagement, and organizational commitment as a job retention and career development strategy.

Assessing the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a School-Aged Program that Supports Physical Activity and Wellness.

The prevalence of anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents aged 4 to 18 years has nearly doubled after the first year of the pandemic. However, only one in five adolescents diagnosed with anxiety is treated. We R H.O.P. E. is a school-based mental health program that includes evidence-based principles designed to engage children and adolescents in anxiety treatment, including wellness and emotional regulation, and the emotional CPR method. We R H.O.P. E. augments traditional services provided by school administrators, school social workers, school teachers, and school nurses. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of We R H.O.P. E.

Attitudes and Beliefs on Aging Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Serious Mental Illness.

Older adults with serious mental illness (SMI) experience increased medical comorbidities, disability, and early mortality, but little is known about how they perceive the process of aging. This study explored attitudes and beliefs about aging among n = 20 middle aged and older adults (M = 59.8 years; range 47-66) with SMI in a state psychiatric hospital. We conducted semistructured interviews using the Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire (AAQ) and analyzed narrative accounts using a grounded theory approach. The mean scores of overall attitudes toward aging and of the subscale of perception of psychological growth were both positive compared to a neutral rating (p = 0.026 and p = 0.004, respectively). Study participants rated their experience on the subscales of psychosocial loss and physical health change as neutral. Despite substantial psychiatric, medical, and functional disabilities, older adults with SMI in this study of psychiatric inpatients perceived the process of aging as generally positive, suggesting resilience and potential positive emotional growth in older age.

Recommendations for Defining and Reporting Adherence Measured by Biometric Monitoring Technologies: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal adherence to data collection procedures or a study intervention is often the cause of a failed clinical trial. Data from connected sensors, including wearables, referred to here as biometric monitoring technologies (BioMeTs), are capable of capturing adherence to both digital therapeutics and digital data collection procedures, thereby providing the opportunity to identify the determinants of adherence and thereafter, methods to maximize adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe the methods and definitions by which adherence has been captured and reported using BioMeTs in recent years. Identifying key gaps allowed us to make recommendations regarding minimum reporting requirements and consistency of definitions for BioMeT-based adherence data. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 2014 and 2019, which deployed a BioMeT outside the clinical or laboratory setting for which a quantitative, nonsurrogate, sensor-based measurement of adherence was reported. After systematically screening the manuscripts for eligibility, we extracted details regarding study design, participants, the BioMeT or BioMeTs used, and the definition and units of adherence. The primary definitions of adherence were categorized as a continuous variable based on duration (highest resolution), a continuous variable based on the number of measurements completed, or a categorical variable (lowest resolution). RESULTS: Our PubMed search terms identified 940 manuscripts; 100 (10.6%) met our eligibility criteria and contained descriptions of 110 BioMeTs. During literature screening, we found that 30% (53/177) of the studies that used a BioMeT outside of the clinical or laboratory setting failed to report a sensor-based, nonsurrogate, quantitative measurement of adherence. We identified 37 unique definitions of adherence reported for the 110 BioMeTs and observed that uniformity of adherence definitions was associated with the resolution of the data reported. When adherence was reported as a continuous time-based variable, the same definition of adherence was adopted for 92% (46/50) of the tools. However, when adherence data were simplified to a categorical variable, we observed 25 unique definitions of adherence reported for 37 tools. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that quantitative, nonsurrogate, sensor-based adherence data be reported for all BioMeTs when feasible; a clear description of the sensor or sensors used to capture adherence data, the algorithm or algorithms that convert sample-level measurements to a metric of adherence, and the analytic validation data demonstrating that BioMeT-generated adherence is an accurate and reliable measurement of actual use be provided when available; and primary adherence data be reported as a continuous variable followed by categorical definitions if needed, and that the categories adopted are supported by clinical validation data and/or consistent with previous reports.

Prevalence of lifetime nonmedical opioid use among U.S. Health Center Patients aged 45 years and older with psychiatric disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Despite recent concerns over the increase in opioid misuse among aging adults, little is known about the prevalence of lifetime nonmedical opioid use in underserved, vulnerable middle-aged and older patients with psychiatric disorders. This study aims to determine the lifetime prevalence of nonmedical opioid use among underserved, vulnerable U.S. adults aged ≥45 years with psychiatric disorders. METHOD: A nationally representative sample (n = 3,294) was obtained from the 2014 Health Center Patient Survey which collects data on psychiatric disorders, opioid use, and other health information from underserved, vulnerable U.S. primary care populations. Predictor variables included self-reported panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder. The outcome variable was self-reported lifetime nonmedical opioid use. Frequencies, counts, and unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were conducted with the cross-sectional survey dataset. RESULTS: Patients with bipolar disorder had the highest lifetime nonmedical opioid use rate (20.8%), followed by schizophrenia (19.3%), panic disorder (16.5%), and generalized anxiety disorder (14.5%). Nonmedical opioid use was significantly associated with bipolar disorder (OR 3.46, 95% CI [1.33, 8.99]) and generalized anxiety disorder (OR 2.03 95% CI [1.08, 3.83]). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate a high prevalence of lifetime nonmedical opioid use in underserved, vulnerable middle-aged and older health center patients with psychiatric disorders. Given the prevalence, health center professionals should monitor, prevent, and treat new or reoccurring signs and symptoms of nonmedical opioid use in this high-risk group of aging patients with psychiatric disorders.

Peer Support Specialists and Service Users' Perspectives on Privacy, Confidentiality, and Security of Digital Mental Health.

As the digitalization of mental health systems progresses, the ethical and social debate on the use of these mental health technologies has seldom been explored among end-users. This article explores how service users (e.g., patients and users of mental health services) and peer support specialists understand and perceive issues of privacy, confidentiality, and security of digital mental health interventions. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted among service users (n = 17) and peer support specialists (n = 15) from a convenience sample at an urban community mental health center in the United States. We identified technology ownership and use, lack of technology literacy including limited understanding of privacy, confidentiality, and security as the main barriers to engagement among service users. Peers demonstrated a high level of technology engagement, literacy of digital mental health tools, and a more comprehensive awareness of digital mental health ethics. We recommend peer support specialists as a potential resource to facilitate the ethical engagement of digital mental health interventions for service users. Finally, engaging potential end-users in the development cycle of digital mental health support platforms and increased privacy regulations may lead the field to a better understanding of effective uses of technology for people with mental health conditions. This study contributes to the ongoing debate of digital mental health ethics, data justice, and digital mental health by providing a first-hand experience of digital ethics from end-users' perspectives.

An Update of Peer Support/Peer Provided Services Underlying Processes, Benefits, and Critical Ingredients.

The purpose of this article is to delineate the current state-of-the-knowledge of peer support following the framework employed in the 2004 article (Solomon, Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004;27(4):392-401 1). A scoping literature was conducted and included articles from 1980 to present. Since 2004, major growth and advancements in peer support have occurred from the development of new specializations to training, certification, reimbursement mechanisms, competency standards and fidelity assessment. Peer support is now a service offered across the world and considered an indispensable mental health service. As the field continues to evolve and develop, peer support is emerging as a standard of practice throughout various, diverse settings and shows potential to impact clinical outcomes for service users throughout the globe. While these efforts have enhanced the professionalism of the peer workforce, hopefully this has enhanced the positive elements of these services and not diluted them.

Effectiveness of a Digital Peer Support Training Program Designed for Rapid Uptake Among Peer Support Specialists Pilot Study.

Peer telemental health recently became Medicaid reimbursable during the COVID-19 crisis, increasing the need for standardized training on digital peer support (DPS) services. DPS has the potential to reduce barriers to services and expand the reach of peer support specialists. The 4-h Digital Peer Support Training program was developed to train peer support specialists for rapid uptake in providing digital peer support during the COVID-19 crisis. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the 4-h DPS course for peer support specialists. Surveys were administered to examine pre-post changes in DPS course for participants (N = 75) related to attitudes/ beliefs towards DPS, ability to use/ engage in DPS, and organizational readiness to implement DPS. Data were analyzed by conducting paired samples t-tests. Linear mixed models were used to explore significant results further. Statistically significant (< .05) changes were observed related to readiness to use DPS, attitudes/ beliefs towards DPS, and ability to use/ engage in DPS. The 4-h DPS course may be beneficial in providing diverse groups of peer support specialists with a standardized training framework. Widespread dissemination of the DPS short course may be beneficial in rapidly equipping peer support specialists with the skills and resources needed to expand the reach of peer support services during the COVID-19 crisis and beyond.

Effectiveness of a Digital Peer Support Training Program Designed for Rapid Uptake Among Peer Support Specialists Pilot Study.

Peer telemental health recently became Medicaid reimbursable during the COVID-19 crisis, increasing the need for standardized training on digital peer support (DPS) services. DPS has the potential to reduce barriers to services and expand the reach of peer support specialists. The 4-h Digital Peer Support Training program was developed to train peer support specialists for rapid uptake in providing digital peer support during the COVID-19 crisis. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the 4-h DPS course for peer support specialists. Surveys were administered to examine pre-post changes in DPS course for participants (N = 75) related to attitudes/ beliefs towards DPS, ability to use/ engage in DPS, and organizational readiness to implement DPS. Data were analyzed by conducting paired samples t-tests. Linear mixed models were used to explore significant results further. Statistically significant (< .05) changes were observed related to readiness to use DPS, attitudes/ beliefs towards DPS, and ability to use/ engage in DPS. The 4-h DPS course may be beneficial in providing diverse groups of peer support specialists with a standardized training framework. Widespread dissemination of the DPS short course may be beneficial in rapidly equipping peer support specialists with the skills and resources needed to expand the reach of peer support services during the COVID-19 crisis and beyond.

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Utility of Peer-supported Ecological Momentary Assessment Among People with Serious Mental Illness: a Pilot Study.

To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial validity of using smartphone-based peer-supported ecological momentary assessment (EMA) as a tool to assess loneliness and functioning among adults with a serious mental illness diagnosis. Twenty-one adults with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness (i.e., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or treatment-refractory major depressive disorder) and at least one medical comorbidity (i.e., cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and/or high cholesterol) aged 18 years and older completed EMA surveys via smartphones once per day for 12-weeks. Nine peer support specialists prompted patients with SMI to complete the EMA surveys. Data were collected at baseline and 12-weeks. EMA acceptability (15.9%) was reported, and participants rated their experience with EMA methods positively. EMA responses were correlated with higher social support at 3 months. Higher levels of EMA-measured loneliness were significantly correlated with levels of social support, less hope, and less empowerment at 3 months. Lastly, those who contacted their peer specialist reported higher levels of loneliness and lower levels of functioning on that day suggesting that participants were able to use their peers for social support. Peer-supported EMA via smartphones is a feasible and acceptable data collection method among adults with SMI and appears to be a promising mobile tool to assess loneliness and functioning. These preliminary findings indicate EMA-measured loneliness and functioning are significantly predicted by baseline variables and such variables may impact engagement in EMA. EMA may contribute to future research examining the clinical utility of peer support specialists to alleviate feelings of loneliness and improve functioning.

Advancing the Science of Recovery: The Utility of the Recovery Assessment Scale in the Prediction of Self-Directed Health and Wellness Outcomes in Adults with a Diagnosis of a Serious Mental Illness.

Adults with serious mental illness commonly experience comorbid chronic physical conditions and experience a reduced life expectancy of 10-25 years compared to the general population (Saha et al. in Arch Gen Psychiatry 64(10):1123-31.  2007; Hayes et al. in Acta Psychiatr Scand 131(6):417-25. 2015; Walker et al. in JAMA Psychiatry 72(4):334-41. 2015). Dimensions of personal recovery may have real-world implications that extend beyond functional and mental health outcomes to impact the self-directed health and wellness of adults with serious mental illness. This study examined the predictive utility of the Recovery Assessment Scale with respect to medical self-efficacy, self-management, psychiatric symptoms, and community functioning for adults with serious mental illness. Data were derived from a secondary analysis of baseline and 10-month data collected from a randomized control trial with adults aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, or major depressive disorder (N=56). A linear regression was conducted to examine the predictive value of total baseline RAS scores on self-efficacy at 10 months while controlling for study group. This model significantly predicted self-efficacy (F (2, 53) = 13.28, p < .001) and accounted for 36.1% of the variance. Total baseline RAS scores significantly predicted self-efficacy (ß = 059, p < .001); specifically, higher baseline RAS scores were associated with greater self-efficacy. A greater degree of recovery may facilitate greater medical self-efficacy in managing chronic disease in people diagnosed with a serious mental illness. Future intervention approaches may consider recovery-focused therapeutic targets such as peer support to promote self-efficacy to manage chronic diseases in people with serious mental illness.

Assessing a digital peer support self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of digital peer support integrated medical and psychiatric self-management intervention ("PeerTECH") for adults with a serious mental illness. METHODS: Twenty-one adults with a chart diagnosis of a serious mental illness (i.e., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or treatment-refractory major depressive disorder) and at least one medical comorbidity (i.e., cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and/or high cholesterol) aged 18 years and older received the PeerTECH intervention in the community. Nine peer support specialists were trained to deliver PeerTECH. Data were collected at baseline and 12-weeks. RESULTS: This pilot study demonstrated that a 12-week, digital peer support integrated medical and psychiatric self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness was feasible and acceptable among peer support specialists and patients and was associated with statistically significant improvements in self-efficacy to manage chronic disease and personal empowerment. In addition, pre/post non-statistically significant improvements were observed in psychiatric self-management, medical self-management skills, and feelings of loneliness. CONCLUSIONS: This single-arm pre/post pilot study demonstrated preliminary evidence peer support specialists could offer a fidelity-adherent digital peer support self-management intervention to adults with serious mental illness. These findings build on the evidence that a digital peer support self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness designed to improve medical and psychiatric self-management is feasible, acceptable, and shows promising evidence of improvements in clinical outcomes. The use of technology among peer support specialists may be a promising tool to facilitate the delivery of peer support and guided evidence-based self-management support.People with serious mental illness (SMI; defined as individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, or treatment-refractory major depressive disorder) are increasingly utilizing peer support services to support their health and recovery. Peer support is defined as shared knowledge, experience, emotional, social, and/or practical assistance to support others with similar lived experiences (Solomon, 2004). Most recently the definition also includes the provision of evidence-based peer-supported self-management services (Fortuna et al., 2020). Mental health peer support can augment the traditional mental health treatment system through providing support services to maintain recovery between clinical encounters (Solomon, 2004) and is classified by the World Health Organization as an essential element of recovery (World, Health, and Organization, About social determinants of health, 2017).

Pain intensity and mental health quality of life in veterans with mental illnesses: the intermediary role of physical health and the ability to participate in activities.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the intermediary role of physical health quality of life and ability to participate social roles and activities in the relationship between pain intensity and mental health quality of life in veterans with mental illnesses. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional correlational design study. Our participants are 156 veterans with self-reported mental illness (Mage = 37.85; SDage = 10.74). Descriptive, correlation, and mediation analyses were conducted for the current study. RESULTS: Pain intensity was negatively correlated with physical health QOL, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and mental health QOL. Physical health QOL and ability to participate in social roles and activities were positively associated with mental health QOL, respectively. Physical health QOL was positively correlated with a ability to participate in social roles and activities. Study results indicate that the effect of pain intensity on mental health QOL can be explained by physical health QOL and ability to participate. CONCLUSIONS: Specific recommendations for practitioners include implementing treatment goals that simultaneously focus on physical health and ability to participate in social roles and activities for clients who present with both physical pain and low mental health QOL.

COVID-19, Social Isolation, and Mental Health Among Older Adults: A Digital Catch-22.

One of the most at-risk groups during the COVID-19 crisis is older adults, especially those who live in congregate living settings and seniors' care facilities, are immune-compromised, and/or have other underlying illnesses. Measures undertaken to contain the spread of the virus are far-reaching, and older adults were among the first groups to experience restrictions on face-to-face contact. Although reducing viral transmission is critical, physical distancing is associated with negative psychosocial implications, such as increased rates of depression and anxiety. Promising evidence suggests that participatory digital co-design, defined as the combination of user-centered design and community engagement models, is associated with increased levels of engagement with mobile technologies among individuals with mental health conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted shortcomings of existing technologies and challenges in their uptake and usage; however, strategies such as co-design may be leveraged to address these challenges both in the adaptation of existing technologies and the development of new technologies. By incorporating these strategies, it is hoped that we can offset some of the negative mental health implications for older adults in the context of physical distancing both during and beyond the current pandemic.

Preliminary Outcomes of an Older Peer and Clinician co-Facilitated Pain Rehabilitation Intervention among Adults Aged 50 Years and Older with Comorbid Chronic Pain and Mental Health Conditions.

The present study aimed to examine the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness of an older peer and clinician co-facilitated Behavioral Activation for Pain Rehabilitation (BA-PR) intervention among adults aged 50 years and older with comorbid chronic pain and mental health conditions. This was a mixed-methods research design with eight participants aged 55 to 62 years old with mental health conditions including schizophrenia spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, personality disorder, and adjustment disorder. The quantitative data were assessed from observational methods, a pain rating scale and related measures. We used semi-structured interviews for qualitative feedback on experiences with the BA-PR intervention after participation. Overall, the participants had positive experiences following receipt of the BA-PR intervention. The recruitment and adherence rates for participants were 72.7% and 100%, respectively. Approximately 75% of the participants remained enrolled in the study. Findings from a paired t-test showed the BA-PR intervention was linked to significantly reduced prescription opioid misuse risk, t (7) = 2.42, p < 0.05. There were also non-significant reductions in pain intensity and depression severity, in addition to improvements in active and passive pain coping strategies and behavioral activation.The BA-PR intervention is the first pain rehabilitation intervention specifically designed for middle-aged and older adults with comorbid chronic pain and mental health conditions. Our findings indicate promise for the BA-PR intervention to potentially reduce prescription opioid misuse risk, pain, and depressive symptoms. However, a quasi-experimental study is needed before rigorous effectiveness testing.

Loneliness and its Association with Health Behaviors in People with a Lived Experience of a Serious Mental Illness.

To explore the association between loneliness and efficacy to engage in health behaviors that are known to reduce the risk of early mortality in people with serious mental illness (SMI). This secondary data analysis was based on a cross-sectional study of 113 participants with SMI residing in New Hampshire. Ordinary Least Squares regressions were used to examine bivariate relationships between variables of interest. Participants had a primary mental health diagnosis of major depressive disorder (37.2%), schizophrenia spectrum disorder (28.3%), bipolar disorder (29.2%), or posttraumatic stress disorder (5.3%). High levels of loneliness were associated with low levels of self-efficacy to manage chronic diseases (p = 0.0001), as well as low levels of self-efficacy to manage psychological well-being (R2 = .31; F = 9.49, p = 0.0001; RMSE = 1.66). Loneliness may serve as a barrier to healthy behaviors, and thus, contribute to early mortality among people with SMI. The growing body of literature that demonstrates the importance of addressing loneliness in people with SMI should stimulate policymakers and researchers to target loneliness as a mechanism to address early mortality in people with SMI.

Peer and Non-Peer Co-Facilitation of a Health and Wellness Intervention for Adults with Serious Mental Illness.

Peer specialists, or individuals with lived experience of mental health conditions who support the mental health recovery of others, often work side-by-side with traditional providers (non-peers) in the delivery of treatment groups. The present study aimed to examine group participant and peer provider experiences with peer and non-peer group co-facilitation. Data from a randomized controlled trial of Living Well, a peer and non-peer co-facilitated intervention for medical illness management for adults with serious mental illness, were utilized. A subset of Living Well participants (n = 16) and all peer facilitators (n = 3) completed qualitative interviews. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using a general inductive approach and thematic analysis. The complementary perspectives of the facilitators, teamwork between them, skillful group pacing, and peer facilitator self-disclosure contributed to a warm, respectful, and interactive group atmosphere, which created an environment conducive to social learning. Guidelines for successful co-facilitation emerging from this work are described.