Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas.

The rapid disruption of tropical forests probably imperils global biodiversity more than any other contemporary phenomenon. With deforestation advancing quickly, protected areas are increasingly becoming final refuges for threatened species and natural ecosystem processes. However, many protected areas in the tropics are themselves vulnerable to human encroachment and other environmental stresses. As pressures mount, it is vital to know whether existing reserves can sustain their biodiversity. A critical constraint in addressing this question has been that data describing a broad array of biodiversity groups have been unavailable for a sufficiently large and representative sample of reserves. Here we present a uniquely comprehensive data set on changes over the past 20 to 30 years in 31 functional groups of species and 21 potential drivers of environmental change, for 60 protected areas stratified across the world's major tropical regions. Our analysis reveals great variation in reserve 'health': about half of all reserves have been effective or performed passably, but the rest are experiencing an erosion of biodiversity that is often alarmingly widespread taxonomically and functionally. Habitat disruption, hunting and forest-product exploitation were the strongest predictors of declining reserve health. Crucially, environmental changes immediately outside reserves seemed nearly as important as those inside in determining their ecological fate, with changes inside reserves strongly mirroring those occurring around them. These findings suggest that tropical protected areas are often intimately linked ecologically to their surrounding habitats, and that a failure to stem broad-scale loss and degradation of such habitats could sharply increase the likelihood of serious biodiversity declines.

Male Aggregation in Dwarf Tyrant-Manakins and What It Tells Us about the Origin of Leks.

Despite considerable research on lek-breeding birds, many aspects of the evolution of the lek social system, including the origin of male aggregation, remain unresolved. Originally, clusters may have formed passively as a by-product of independent but concurrent responses by males to some external stimulus (e.g., a concentration of display sites, prominent food source, or a travel corridor commonly used by females) that drew them at a particular time to a site where they might increase their probabilities of encountering females. In contrast, male aggregation may have been active, with a male purposely seeking to associate with another male (or males) because proximity to that male allowed him to enhance his own reproductive success by improving his ability to attract females (i.e., learning from his associate) or to intercept females attracted to that male. To identify factors important in the formation of male aggregations, I studied these alternatives in the Dwarf Tyrant-Manakin (Tyranneutes stolzmanni), a species in which some breeding males occupy solitary courts where they attempt to attract females for reproduction, whereas other males occupy courts clustered into leks, where they interact to attract females. I compared habitat characteristics and resource availability at courts of grouped and solitary males as well as certain traits of the males in an attempt to distinguish between passive or active lek formation in this species. Little evidence suggests that Dwarf Tyrant-Manakins are passively clustered as a result of common attraction to or use of a limited or unevenly distributed resource. Several observations suggest the contrary. Evidence for the active aggregation of males is more promising, suggesting that males may associate with other males on the basis of their vocal behavior. The issue is confounded, however, by the observation that male call behavior appears to change with a change in social status. A definitive answer for T. stolzmanni will require additional analyses of vocal behavior as well as of the characteristics of the vocalizations themselves. Finally, the behavior and social organization of this species may reflect characteristics of the ancestral manakin line that gave rise to both the Tyrant and Core clades of modern manakins.

DELAYED MATURATION, NEOTENY, AND SOCIAL SYSTEM DIFFERENCES IN TWO MANAKINS OF THE GENUS CHIROXIPHIA.

Long-tailed manakins (Chiroxiphia linearis) and swallow-tailed manakins (C. caudata) are closely related, sexually dichromatic, lek-breeding species in which male mating success is highly skewed. Males of both species delay plumage maturation. Before reaching the definitive state, they wear a sequence of feather coats less conspicuous than that of the adult. Nondefinitive plumages probably enhance male survival in the two species; in C. caudata they may also enhance breeding success of young males, who may be fully reproductively mature their first year. In C. linearis testicular development is retarded along with that of plumage, although males may be physiologically capable of breeding prior to the acquisition of the definitive plumage. This difference probably reflects differences in the social systems of the two species. Five hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of delayed plumage maturation. The sexual-selection, cryptic-breeder, and winter-adaptation hypotheses suggest that it functions primarily to enhance survival of young males. The juvenile- and female-mimicry hypotheses emphasize enhancement of immediate mating success. Support is provided for all but the female-mimicry hypothesis; it is argued that data are more consistent with juvenile mimicry and a neotenic origin of nondefinitive plumages.