RESUMO
AIM: The incidence of complex pelvic organ prolapse in female patients is about 38%, and this disorder entails social and sexual restrictions. Treatment for this disorder is complex because it can enhance other, latent, problems. The aim of the present study is to describe a new robotic-assisted technique to simultaneously treat prolapses of different compartments with the use of a single titanized polypropylene mesh. METHOD: All patients referred from January 2018 to March 2019 to the Proctologic and Pelvic Floor Clinical Centre who were affected by complex pelvic organ prolapse underwent modified robotic ventral rectopexy with a folded single mesh (RVR-FSM). The anatomical and functional outcomes were respectively evaluated using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) grading system and Wexner scores of constipation and incontinence. The satisfaction rate was investigated using a five-point scale (1 = not satisfied to 5 = extremely satisfied). RESULTS: Twenty-two women underwent RVR-FSM with a homogeneous follow-up of 12 months. The mean total operation time was 148 min, without any robot-related or other intraoperative complications. No mesh-related complications occurred. The POP-Q grade improved for every patient, with complete resolution of bulging symptoms in 21 patients (95.4%) at 1 year of follow-up. The Wexner constipation score showed a significant improvement, while the incontinence score slightly improved at 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of a single mesh that can be folded was shown to provide significant improvement in functional and anatomical results associated with patient satisfaction. The robotic approach allows surgeons to perform an easier procedure with correct and deep mesh fixation.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Laparoscopia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Incontinência Urinária , Humanos , Feminino , Resultado do Tratamento , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/complicações , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Constipação Intestinal/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária/complicações , Telas Cirúrgicas , Laparoscopia/métodosRESUMO
Haemorrhoids, a common ailment afflicting mostly Western patients, can produce bothersome symptoms, in particular pain, pruritus, and bleeding. There is a wide choice of surgical treatment options available for haemorrhoids in patients that cannot be treated with medical therapy, such as those that are prolapsed. Many patients refuse surgery due to the fear of potential complications; to overcome this obstacle, novel alternative techniques have been developed in recent years that are focussed on ligation or occlusion of haemorrhoidal arterial blood flow. We describe a patient who developed recto-sigmoidal ischaemia after embolization of the haemorrhoidal arteries, known as the "emborrhoid" technique, with persistence of rectal bleeding and progressive rectal stenosis.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Hemorroidas/terapia , Enteropatias/etiologia , Isquemia/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is one of the most common anorectal benign disorder affecting millions of people around the world. Grade I-II HD are generally treated with a conservative approach with topical products such as creams and ointments considered a safe and effective option to treat mild symptoms. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a topical medical device (Lenoid™; International Health Science [IHS] - Biofarma Group, Mereto di Tomba, Udine, Italy) in patients affected by symptomatic HD. METHODS: This study is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, 2-weeks clinical trial. Patients affected by I-II grade symptomatic HD were enrolled in the study and then randomly assigned to Lenoid™ arm (LA) or placebo arm (PA), respectively. Patients were evaluated before and after intervention through clinical examination and disease-specific questionnaires assessing symptoms such as pain, tenesmus, pruritus and anal discharge. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were screened and 60 (30 in each group) were enrolled into the study. All patients belonging to LA showed a statistically significant improvement of each symptom after 7 and 14 days of treatment when compared to PA (P<0.001). Furthermore, subjective improvement of change in overall assessment of disease was observed in the LA but not in the PA. No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The tested product was found safe and effective in improving clinical signs and symptoms in patients with grade I-II HD.
Assuntos
Hemorroidas , Humanos , Hemorroidas/complicações , Hemorroidas/tratamento farmacológico , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Prurido/tratamento farmacológico , Pomadas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Breast fibroadenomas are a common benign tumour in women that may need to be surgically excised. A mammary-like fibroadenoma can exceptionally be found in the pathological report after an anal polyp removal. A 60-year-old woman presented with huge anal polyp of 25 mm. It was surgically removed transanally. Histologic examination revealed a breast fibroadenoma pattern with glandular structures. Proctologist specialists must be aware that mammary-like tumours are a possible differential diagnosis for anal masses despite their rarity in the literature.
RESUMO
Introduction: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy was originally defined as a rectal mucosectomy. The aims of our retrospective, single-center study were to demonstrate if the excised specimen comprises only the mucosa or more wall rectal layers and if the latter excision should be considered a technical mistake with an increase in complications. Materials and Methods: We histopathologically analyzed surgical samples from patients who underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy performed between 2014 and 2019. Patients were divided into three groups, according to the stapler used: Group A (single PPH®), Group B (double PPH®), and Group C (CPH34 HV™). We evaluated the actual wall layers included in the stapled rectal ring. For every specimen, we reconstructed the history of the corresponding patient and the incidence of complications. Results: Of the 137 histological slides available, 13 were only mucosectomies (9.5%), and 124 presented also the submucosa and muscularis propria (90.5%)-50/58 patients in Group A, 28/28 in Group B, and 46/51 in Group C. No statistically significant difference in the rate of complications was found when stratifying patients according to the thickness of the resection [mucosectomy (M) or "full thickness" (FT)]. Discussion: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is not a simple mucosectomy but a resection of the rectal wall with almost all its layers. This concept defines the entity of the surgical procedure and excludes a direct correlation with an increased rate of complications.
RESUMO
Aim: Hemorrhoidectomy is still the most effective surgical treatment for hemorrhoidal disease, but it is, however, associated with complications such as pain and stenosis. We proposed to break the "vicious circle" of "pain-sphincteric spasm-stenosis-pain" with the postoperative use of self-mechanical anal dilation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with hemorrhoidal disease presenting with a minimum of piles of three quadrants, treated with radiofrequency hemorrhoidectomy between January 2018 and December 2019. All the patients that at 3 weeks presented sphincteric spasms with painful defecation, were considered. Thirty-nine patients performed the cycle of self-mechanical anal dilation (Group A). This group was 1:1 matched with homogeneous patients from our historical cohort of patients (Group B). The primary endpoint was the pain evaluation, secondary endpoints: WCS, overall satisfaction of the patient, anal sphincter spasm, scarring, and the incidence of postoperative stenosis. Results: In Group A mean VAS was 3.25 after 14 days of application and 1.15 at the end of the application. In Group B mean VAS was persistently higher, with a mean VAS of 5 (p = 0.000002) and 3.38 (p = 0.0000000000009). In Group A we observed an improvement of symptoms at the end, with a good overall satisfaction (Group A 7.4 vs. Group B 5.9; p = 0.0000007) and a better mean WCS (Group A WCS 2.8 vs. Group B WCS 4.18; p = 0.0001). Stenosis was observed in 3/39 patients of Group B (7.7%). Conclusions: Self-mechanical anal dilation improves the pain in the late postoperative course, minimizing the risk of anal stenosis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: External hemorrhoidal thrombosis is a common disease with an acute anal pain as the major symptom. It is astonishing the lack of studies which investigates the most effective treatment and there are not guidelines. Furthermore, nobody has ever evaluated this peculiar condition in an elderly population. METHODS: We have considered 87 patients aged >75 years who were visited and treated for this condition in our clinic, dividing them in three groups according the curative option chosen together with them after anamnesis and an interview: a conservative medical treatment (Group A), an immediate incision and evacuation of the thrombus (Group B) and the excision of hemorrhoid with the thrombus, with hemorrhoidectomy technique (Group C). The mean follow-up was 12.3 months. We analyzed immediate pain relief and time of remission of symptoms, bleeding, recurrences and major complications. RESULTS: The Group A presented a remission of symptoms in 11.8 days, Group B in 1.58 ad Group C in 7.8 days. The recurrence rate was very similar for the first two options (19.4% and 16.1%) and lower in the excision group (no recurrence during follow-up). Bleeding is the common adverse event observed with a high frequency in the immediate incision and evacuation of thrombus, less common in hemorrhoidectomy, that did not present major complication. Surgical option is often refused by elderly patient evaluating comorbidities in the fear of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment for EHT in elderly is safe and effective, but not the most common choice for fear of complications. Medical treatment or immediate incision of thrombus can be preferred and well accepted by elderly even if followed by a higher rate of recurrences.
Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador , Hemorroidectomia , Hemorroidas/terapia , Trombose/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hemorroidas/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombose/complicações , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Routine pathologic examination of specimens is a common practice with ill-defined value. The present study is the first to investigate the incidence and cost of incidental microscopic lesions in both haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy specimens. Pathological reports of specimens obtained from haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy procedures performed from January 2003 to May 2017 were analysed. Specimens resulting from patients treated for any disease other than haemorrhoids alone were excluded from the study. Unexpected diagnoses in the pathological report were defined as incidental diagnoses. A cost analysis was then performed. In the considered period we performed a total of 3017 procedures complying with our criteria. We found 65 (2.15%) unexpected lesions. Of the incidental diagnosis, 30 (0.99%) altered either the follow-up or the treatment. The incidences of both findings were extremely higher in haemorrhoidectomies specimens (p < 0.0001). We estimated that the cost of 14 years of routine pathological examination of haemorrhoids specimens was 133,351.4 euros, each consequential incidental diagnosis costing 4445.03 euros. The incidence of unexpected lesions in routine pathologic examination of haemorrhoidectomy and haemorrhoidopexy specimens is low but not negligible. The vast majority of incidental findings were found among haemorrhoidectomy specimens. Even though the real value of routine pathological examination of haemorrhoids specimens is still uncertain, from a clinical standpoint we were glad to suggest each patients the best follow-up and/or treatment. Future studies should assess preoperative patient's risk stratification and careful intraoperative macroscopic inspection strategies for selective pathology examination of haemorrhoids specimens.