Can General Practitioners Be More Productive? The Impact of Teamwork and Cooperation with Nurses on GP Activities.

The integration of primary care organizations and interprofessional cooperation is encouraged in many countries to both improve the productive and allocative efficiency of care provision and address the unequal geographical distribution of general practitioners (GPs). In France, a pilot experiment promoted the vertical integration of and teamwork between GPs and nurses. This pilot experiment relied on the staffing and training of nurses; skill mixing, including the authorization to shift tasks from GPs to nurses; and new remuneration schemes. This article evaluates the overall impact of this pilot experiment over the period 2010-2017 on GP activities based on the following indicators: number of working days, patients seen at least once, patients registered, and visits delivered. We control for endogeneity and reduce selection bias by using a case-control design combining coarsened exact matching and difference-in-differences estimates on panel data. We find a small positive impact on the number of GP working days (+1.2%) following enrollment and a more pronounced effect on the number of patients seen (+7.55%) or registered (+6.87%). However, we find no effect on the number of office and home visits. In this context, cooperation and teamwork between GPs and nurses seem to improve access to care for patients.

Préférences des médecins généralistes vis-à-vis des mesures incitatives associées aux dépistages des cancers.

INTRODUCTION: General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the delivery of preventive and screening services for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Yet, their current provision of screening services remains low and varies considerably across screening contexts and GPs. This study investigates the determinants of GPs' involvement in cancer screening activities using discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology. METHODS: A representative sample of 402 GPs was recruited in France between March and April 2014. The participants completed 12 choice tasks designed to elicit their preferences for 5 cancer screening attributes aimed at increasing their supply of cancer screening services. RESULTS: GPs are sensitive to both financial and non-financial incentives, such as a compensated training and systematic transmission of information about screened patients, aimed to facilitate communication between doctors and patients. There is also evidence that the preferences differ across screening contexts: GPs appear to be relatively more sensitive to financial incentives for being involved in colorectal cancer screening, whereas they have higher preference for non-financial incentives in breast and cervical cancers. CONCLUSION: Our study provides new findings for policymakers interested in prioritizing levers to increase the supply of cancer screening services in general practice.

[General practitioners' preferences towards incentive measures linked with cancer screening] / Préférences des médecins généralistes vis-à-vis des mesures incitatives associées aux dépistages des cancers.

INTRODUCTION: General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the delivery of preventive and screening services for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Yet, their current provision of screening services remains low and varies considerably across screening contexts and GPs. This study investigates the determinants of GPs' involvement in cancer screening activities using discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology. METHODS: A representative sample of 402 GPs was recruited in France between March and April 2014. The participants completed 12 choice tasks designed to elicit their preferences for 5 cancer screening attributes aimed at increasing their supply of cancer screening services. RESULTS: GPs are sensitive to both financial and non-financial incentives, such as a compensated training and systematic transmission of information about screened patients, aimed to facilitate communication between doctors and patients. There is also evidence that the preferences differ across screening contexts: GPs appear to be relatively more sensitive to financial incentives for being involved in colorectal cancer screening, whereas they have higher preference for non-financial incentives in breast and cervical cancers. CONCLUSION: Our study provides new findings for policymakers interested in prioritizing levers to increase the supply of cancer screening services in general practice.

Supplemental Health Insurance and Healthcare Consumption-A Dynamic Approach to Moral Hazard.

We analyze the existence and persistence of moral hazard over time to test the assumption of pent-up demand. We consider the effects of supplemental health insurance provided by a private insurer when added to compulsory public insurance that is already supplemented by private insurance. Using original panel data from a French mutuelle, we study the influence of insurance on all of the dimensions of healthcare expenditures: (1) the probability of using health care, (2) the number of uses conditional on use, and (3) the per unit cost of care. To conduct this study, we control, to the extent possible, for endogeneity because of adverse selection using the characteristics of our panel data. Our study allows us to confirm a positive and significant effect of the extra complementary health insurance on healthcare consumption, primarily in terms of the probability of using care. More interestingly, our results show that these effects are principally transitory mainly for the probability of using dental care and optical care and depend on income. Finally, we show that individuals did not postpone health care before enrollment. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Obstacles to the uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings: what remains to be achieved by French national programmes?

BACKGROUND: In France, equality in access to screening has been one of the main thrusts of public policies implemented between 2009 and 2013 (the national cancer plan). Our aim in this study was to analyse the obstacles to and levers for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening uptake and their trends over time. METHODS: Based on representative data from the French Health Care and Health Insurance Survey (three independent, cross-sectional surveys: 2006, 2008, and 2010), multivariate logistic regressions were used to model the association between the nonuse of screening for the three cancers and various independent variables. Then, interactions with survey year dummies allowed the changes in the determinants of these cancer screenings over time to be estimated. RESULTS: Whereas the incentives for screening were strengthened during the period considered, cervical and breast cancer screenings decreased, and colorectal cancer screenings increased sharply (from 18.2% (95% CI = [17.0-19.4]) in 2006 to 38.9% (95% CI = [37.4-40.5] in 2010. Under-users of the three cancer screenings were primarily unskilled workers (ORcervix = 1.64 [1.38-1.95]), individuals without complementary health insurance (ORbreast = 2.05 [1.68-2.51]), or individuals with free complementary health insurance who more rarely use outpatient care. Moreover, individuals reporting either risky behaviours, namely heavy smokers (ORcolorectal = 1.70) and high-risk drinkers (ORcervix = 1.42) or very safe behaviours, namely neither smoking nor drinking, underused screenings. Despite the implementation of national programmes for breast and colorectal cancer screenings, the disparities and inequalities in screening uptake did not decrease over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the need for additional primary prevention efforts targeting the identified under-users by focusing on, for instance, individuals with a very healthy lifestyle. Health authorities could also intensify their efforts to promote increased access to screening for the most disadvantaged individuals.

Building a composite score of general practitioners' intrinsic motivation: a comparison of methods.

OBJECTIVE: Pay-for-performance programmes have been widely implemented in primary care, but few studies have investigated their potential adverse effects on the intrinsic motivation of general practitioners (GPs) even though intrinsic motivation may be a key determinant of quality in health care. Our aim was to compare methods for developing a composite score of GPs' intrinsic motivation and to select one that is most consistent with self-reported data. STUDY DESIGN: A postal survey. SETTING: French GPs practicing in private practice. MAIN MEASURE: Using a set of variables selected to characterize the dimensions of intrinsic motivation, three alternative composite scores were calculated based on a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and a two-parameter logistic model (2-PLM). Weighted kappa coefficients were used to evaluate variation in GPs' ranks according to each method. RESULTS: The three methods produced similar results on both the estimation of the indicators' weights and the order of GP rank lists. All weighted kappa coefficients were >0.80. The CFA and 2-PLM produced the most similar results. CONCLUSIONS: There was little difference regarding the three methods' results, validating our measure of GPs' intrinsic motivation. The 2-PLM appeared theoretically and empirically more robust for establishing the intrinsic motivation score. Code JEL C38, C43, I18.

Comparing GPs according to their model of practice: are multiprofessional group practices associated with more favourable working conditions?

In the generalized context of general practitioner shortages and transitions towards team-based primary care, we investigated how the different practising models relate to general practitioners' labour supply. More precisely, we analysed the association between practice models-solo, groups of general practitioners, and multiprofessional groups-and their reported labour supply and level of satisfaction with work-life balance. We used a French cross-sectional survey from 2018 that surveyed a representative national sample of 3,032 self-employed general practitioners about their working conditions. We found that the model of practice was significantly associated with differences in physician labour supply at the intensive margin and that group practice appeared to be positively associated with general practitioners' reported satisfaction with work-life balance. In terms of weekly working time, only practice in groups of general practitioners was associated with a significantly lower labour supply. However, general practitioners in groups-whether groups of general practitioners or multiprofessional groups-reported more annual leave and seemed more willing to diversify their activity by devoting more time to secondary activities, including salaried activities. Consistently, general practitioners working in groups were also more likely than solo practitioners to report being satisfied with their work-life balance. Although group practice, whether multiprofessionnal or not, seems to be well suited to meeting the new aspirations of general practitioners, those working in multiprofessional groups are associated with a higher level of weekly work supply, which might justify special attention from the public authorities.

General Practitioners activity patterns: the medium-term impacts of Primary Care Teams in France.

Faced with the fragmentation of the French primary care system, public policies aim to promote multiprofessional teamwork to improve both delivery efficiency and health professionals' working conditions. Thus, a practice-level add-on payment backed by cooperation commitments is implemented to foster and sustain the development of multiprofessional primary care groups (MPCGs). We study the impact of practising in MPCGs for general practitioners (GPs) in terms of the supply of care, practice patterns and income. Based on this quasiexperimental framework with a panel dataset covering the period 2005-2017, we account for the selection into MPCGs by combining a difference-in-differences design with propensity score matching to prebalance samples. We show that GPs in MPCGs increased their patient list more rapidly than control GPs (+10% increase of encountered patients) without increasing their provision of services (number of visits and drug prescriptions) more rapidly. Instead, compared to control GPs, MPCG GPs had a significantly faster reduction in the average number of visits (+5.5% reduction) and the euro-amounts of drug prescriptions per patient (+7.2% reduction) and other prescriptions. The growth of these effects between the short and medium term moreover suggests that the properties of multi-professional coordination and cooperation need time to develop.

What determines the income gap between French male and female GPs - the role of medical practices.

BACKGROUND: In many OECD countries, the gender differences in physicians' pay favour male doctors. Due to the feminisation of the doctor profession, it is essential to measure this income gap in the French context of Fee-for-service payment (FFS) and then to precisely identify its determinants. The objective of this study is to measure and analyse the 2008 income gap between males and females general practitioners (GPs). This paper focuses on the role of gender medical practices differentials among GPs working in private practice in the southwest region of France. METHODS: Using data from 339 private-practice GPs, we measured an average gender income gap of approximately 26% in favour of men. Using the decomposition method, we examined the factors that could explain gender disparities in income. RESULTS: The analysis showed that 73% of the income gap can be explained by the average differences in doctors' characteristics; for example, 61% of the gender income gap is explained by the gender differences in workload, i.e., number of consultations and visits, which is on average significantly lower for female GPs than for male GPs. Furthermore, the decomposition method allowed us to highlight the differences in the marginal returns of doctors' characteristics and variables contributing to income, such as GP workload; we found that female GPs have a higher marginal return in terms of earnings when performing an additional medical service. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study help to understand the determinants of the income gap between male and female GPs. Even though workload is clearly an essential determinant of income, FFS does not reduce the gender income gap, and there is an imperfect relationship between the provision of medical services and income. In the context of feminisation, it appears that female GPs receive a lower income but attain higher marginal returns when performing an additional consultation.

Trajectories and individual determinants of repeated seasonal flu vaccination use over the long term using data from the French E3N cohort.

Despite the implementation of incentive policies to promote seasonal flu vaccination for more than 20 years in France, the coverage of high-risk individuals remains largely insufficient. While there is extensive literature on the determinants of vaccination in a given year, it rarely considers the specificity of flu vaccination, which must be repeated every autumn to remain effective. We aim to fill this gap by focusing on the flu vaccination behavior of high-risk individuals (65 years and older, chronic diseases) over a 15-year period. Based on data from 87,820 women in the French E3N cohort, we used sequence analysis methods (localized Optimal Matching) to identify typical seasonal flu vaccination profiles based on individual trajectories from 2004 to 2018. Then, using a multinomial model, we studied the individual determinants associated with the different patterns of vaccination use identified. Sequence analysis resulted in a partition of 8 clusters, which can be summarized into 4 typical behaviors: almost half of the women get vaccinated against flu each year (43%); conversely, another important share never get vaccinated against flu (32%); some do not get vaccinated for several years and then get vaccinated every year (20%); and finally, a minor share discontinued vaccination (5%). Thus, once women start getting vaccinated they generally continue every year. Nonetheless, this is a double-edged sword, as an important share of women considered at risk refrain from being vaccinated for more than a decade. Determinants associated with regular vaccination are being more at risk (age, weight, and chronic diseases), being in contact with physicians, being more educated, being in couple, having children, not smoking, and undergoing breast cancer screening.

Trajectories and individual determinants of regular cancer screening use over a long period based on data from the French E3N cohort.

Despite several incentive policies for cancer screenings over the last two decades, the overall and regular use of cancer screenings remains insufficient in France. While the individual determinants of cancer screening uptake have been fairly well studied, the literature has rarely focused on the regularity of screening uptake, which is key to early cancer detection. We aimed to address this issue by studying cancer screening behaviors over 15 years, emphasizing the regularity and diversity of use. Using data from 40,021 women in the French E3N cohort, we studied the individual trajectories of screenings for breast, colorectal and cervical cancer between 2000 and 2014. We employed optimal matching methods to identify typical behaviors of use for each cancer screening. Then, we determined the associations between the identified behavior screening patterns for the different cancer screenings and, finally, assessed the associated individual determinants with logistical and multinomial models. We found that screening behaviors were fairly stable over time, with few typical screening patterns for each cancer. Overall, once a woman starts screening, she continues, and once she stops, she no longer returns. Cancer screening behaviors appear consistent; in particular, insufficient use of mammography appears to be associated with long-term nonuse of other cancer screenings. Factors associated with low or nonuse of screening are overall common between cancer screenings and are similar to those identified in the literature of screening use at a single point in time. Ultimately, these barriers prevent some women from entering a screening process in the long run, ultimately reinforcing social inequalities in health. Targeting women with insufficient mammography uptake may reach women outside of cancer screening settings more generally and, thus, both increase the overall uptake of cancer screening and reduce social inequalities in cancer screening.

General practitioners' income and activity: the impact of multi-professional group practice in France.

France has first experimented, in 2009, and then generalized a practice level add-on payment to promote Multi-Professional Primary Care Groups (MPCGs). Team-based practices are intended to improve both the efficiency of outpatient care supply and the attractiveness of medically underserved areas for healthcare professionals. To evaluate its financial attractiveness and thus the sustainability of MPCGs, we analyzed the evolution of incomes (self-employed income and wages) of General Practitioners (GPs) enrolled in a MPCG, compared with other GPs. We also studied the impacts of working in a MPCG on GPs' activity through both the quantity of medical services provided and the number of patients encountered. Our analyses were based on a quasi-experimental design, with a panel dataset over the period 2008-2014. We accounted for the selection into MPCG by using together coarsened exact matching and difference-in-differences (DID) design with panel-data regression models to account for unobserved heterogeneity. We show that GPs enrolled in MPCGs during the period exhibited an increase in income 2.5% higher than that of other GPs; there was a greater increase in the number of patients seen by the GPs' (88 more) without involving a greater increase in the quantity of medical services provided. A complementary cross-sectional analysis for 2014 showed that these changes were not detrimental to quality in terms of bonuses related to the French pay-for-performance program for the year 2014. Hence, our results suggest that labor and income concerns should not be a barrier to the development of MPCGs, and that MPCGs may improve patient access to primary care services.

French pediatricians' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs towards and practices in the management of weight problems in children.

A representative sample of 611 French pediatricians was interviewed on their knowledge, attitudes, beliefs towards and practices regarding childhood obesity through a 39-item Likert format questionnaire. A vast majority of the respondents regarded obesity as an illness (86.4%), 70.2% were aware that without any treatment an obese child has a high risk to remain obese in adulthood, 84% reported that managing obesity is part of their responsibility in the routine practice and 89.3% affirmed to systematically inform parents of obese children on health risks associated with obesity. At the same time, 82.4% were convinced that managing obesity is bound to fail and only 46.5% that it is professionally gratifying. However, doctors who followed a vocational training dedicated to obesity felt themselves more efficient in managing childhood obesity (p<0.01), those who knew the national recommendations were also less likely to report that the management of childhood obesity leads to a failure (p<0.05). Probably one of the main result of our study concerns doctors' perception of the relative impact of the different etiologic factors of obesity. Beside sedentary life, poor eating behavior, lack of parental concern and heredity which are cited by more than three-fourth of the pediatricians, an economic situation more and more insecure and a food industry increasingly more powerful are reported for the first time by doctors themselves, respectively by 59.9% and 60.8% of them, to kill the goodwill of health professionals. These findings reinforce the idea that the solution to the obesity problem does not lie just within the doctor's office and stress the need for prompt regulatory actions to curb obesity.

Gender differences in the incomes of self-employed French physicians: The role of family structure.

In most developed countries, the average income of female physicians remains much lower than that of their male counterparts. This paper analyses how much of the gender earnings gap among French self-employed physicians can be attributed to women's family responsibilities, choice of medical specialty, and opportunity to charge extra billings. The question is of growing concern for regulators because it may influence patients' future access to care. We used an exhaustive administrative database that merges information on the medical activity, earnings, and family structure of self-employed doctors in 2005, 2008, and 2011. Using the 2011 database, results suggest that when demographic and professional characteristics are controlled, female physicians still exhibit an annual earnings gap that varies according to family structure: having young children worsens the situation of female physicians, particularly GPs. Using our panel datasets from 2005, we show that there is a 'carer effect' of having children for female doctors that exacerbates the gender income gap, particularly for GPs. We do not highlight any real strategic behaviour of female specialists authorised to charge extra fees to increase their extra billings after a birth to maintain their previous income.

Impact assessment of a pay-for-performance program on breast cancer screening in France using micro data.

BACKGROUND: A voluntary-based pay-for-performance (P4P) program (the CAPI) aimed at general practitioners (GPs) was implemented in France in 2009. The program targeted prevention practices, including breast cancer screening, by offering a maximal amount of €245 for achieving a target screening rate among eligible women enrolled with the GP. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the French P4P program (CAPI) on the early detection of breast cancer among women between 50 and 74 years old. METHODS: Based on an administrative database of 50,752 women aged 50-74 years followed between 2007 and 2011, we estimated a difference-in-difference model of breast cancer screening uptake as a function of visit to a CAPI signatory referral GP, while controlling for both supply-side and demand-side determinants (e.g., sociodemographics, health and healthcare use). RESULTS: Breast cancer screening rates have not changed significantly since the P4P program implementation. Overall, visiting a CAPI signatory referral GP at least once in the pre-CAPI period increased the probability of undergoing breast cancer screening by 1.38 % [95 % CI (0.41-2.35 %)], but the effect was not significantly different following the implementation of the contract. CONCLUSION: The French P4P program had a nonsignificant impact on breast cancer screening uptake. This result may reflect the fact that the low-powered incentives implemented in France through the CAPI might not provide sufficient leverage to generate better practices, thus inviting regulators to seek additional tools beyond P4P in the field of prevention and screening.

What are GPs' preferences for financial and non-financial incentives in cancer screening? Evidence for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers.

General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the delivery of preventive and screening services for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. In practice, GPs' involvement varies considerably across types of cancer and among GPs, raising important questions about the determinants of GPs' implication in screening activities: what is the relative impact of financial and non-financial incentives? Are GPs' preferences for financial and non-financial incentives cancer-specific? Is there preference heterogeneity and how much does it differ according to the screening context? This study investigates the determinants of GPs' involvement in cancer screening activities using the discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology. A representative sample of 402 GPs' was recruited in France between March and April 2014. Marginal rates of substitution were used to compare GPs' preferences for being involved in screening activities across three types of cancers: breast, cervical, and colorectal. Variability of preferences was investigated using Hierarchical Bayes mixed logit models. The results indicate that GPs are sensitive to both financial and non-financial incentives, such as a compensated training and systematic transmission of information about screened patients, aimed to facilitate communication between doctors and patients. There is also evidence that the level and variability of preferences differ across screening contexts, although the variations are not statistically significant on average. GPs appear to be relatively more sensitive to financial incentives for being involved in colorectal cancer screening, whereas they have higher and more heterogeneous preferences for non-financial incentives in breast and cervical cancers. Our study provides new findings for policymakers interested in prioritizing levers to increase the supply of cancer screening services in general practice.

Effect of pay-for-performance on cervical cancer screening participation in France.

Pay-for-performance (P4P) has been increasingly used across different healthcare settings to incentivize the provision of targeted services. In this study, we investigated the effect of a nationwide P4P scheme for general practitioners implemented in 2012 in France, on cervical cancer screening practices. Using data from a nationally representative permanent sample of health insurance beneficiaries, we analyzed smear test use of eligible women for the years 2006-2014. Our longitudinal sample was an unbalanced panel comprising 180,167 women eligible from 1 to 9 years each. We took into account that during our study period some women were exposed to another incentive for screening participation: the implementation in 2010 of organized screening (OS) in a limited number of areas. To evaluate the effect of P4P, we defined three different measures of smear utilization. For each measure, we specified binary panel-data models to estimate annual probabilities and to compare each estimate to the 2011 baseline level. To explore the combined effect of P4P and OS in areas exposed to both incentives, we computed interaction terms between year dummies and area of residence. We found that P4P had a modest positive effect on recommended screening participation. This effect is likely to be transient as annual smear use, both for the whole sample and among women overdue for screening, increased only in 2013 and decreased again in 2014. The combined effect of P4P and OS on screening participation was not cumulative during the first years of coexistence.