Prevalence of CYP2D6 structural variation in large retrospective study.

CYP2D6 is a highly polymorphic gene with clinically important structural variations. Commonly, only exon 9 is assayed on clinical pharmacogenomics panels, as it allows for accurate functional characterization even in the presence of a CYP2D6::CYP2D7 conversion. However, this method does not capture CYP2D7::CYP2D6 (CYP2D6*13) conversions, possibly leading to inaccurate phenotype assignment. The study's purpose was to determine the frequency of structural variations in CYP2D6 utilizing multiple copy number variation (CNV) assay locations to quantify the potential impact on clinical phenotype classification. A retrospective analysis was conducted of de-identified pharmacogenomics data submitted through the Translational Software, Inc. platform. Samples with CYP2D6 CNV data for exon 9 and at least one additional CNV location (5'UTR, exon 1, intron 2, exon 5 or intron 6) were included. CYP2D7::CYP2D6 and CYP2D6::CYP2D7 conversions were classified according to PharmVar nomenclature. The CYP2D6 copies were capped at four total copies to account for assay limitations in detecting more than four copies. A total of 106,474 samples were included for analysis. CYP2D7::CYP2D6 conversions were present in approximately 2.44% of samples, and 5.84% of samples had CYP2D6::CYP2D7 conversions. Many samples did not have a CYP2D7 conversion detected (91.5%; 97,462/106,474). A full gene deletion was detected in 0.15%, and 5.98% had a duplication or multiplication present. This retrospective study underscores the importance of testing more than one CNV site for CYP2D6 . Over 2% of patients were found to have a CYP2D7::CYP2D6 conversion. This translates into potentially misclassified phenotype classification and incongruent clinical recommendations.

Evolution of pharmacogenomic services and implementation of a multi-state pharmacogenomics clinic across a large rural healthcare system.

Introduction: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) aims to maximize drug benefits while minimizing risk of toxicity. Although PGx has proven beneficial in many settings, clinical uptake lags. Lack of clinician confidence and limited availability of PGx testing can deter patients from completing PGx testing. A few novel PGx clinic models have been described as a way to incorporate PGx testing into the standard of care. Background: A PGx clinic was implemented to fill an identified gap in provider availability, confidence, and utilization of PGx across our health system. Through a joint pharmacist and Advanced Practice Provider (APP) collaborative clinic, patients received counseling and PGx medication recommendations both before and after PGx testing. The clinic serves patients both in-person and virtually across four states in the upper Midwest. Results: The majority of patients seen in the PGx clinic during the early months were clinician referred (77%, n = 102) with the remainder being self-referred. Patients were, on average, taking two medications with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines. Visits were split almost equally between in-person and virtual visits. Conclusion: Herein, we describe the successful implementation of an interdisciplinary PGx clinic to further enhance our PGx program. Throughout the implementation of the PGx clinic we have learned valuable lessons that may be of interest to other implementors. Clinicians were actively engaged in clinic referrals and early adoption of telemedicine was key to the clinic's early successes.

Progression of precision statin prescribing for reduction of statin-associated muscle symptoms.

Background: Statins are among the most commonly prescribed medications, and improve patient outcomes by lowering cholesterol levels, but also have side effects. Variations in statin response can be attributed to a handful of factors that include pharmacogenetics. Methods: While not a true review article, this work was written using various search engines and terms and previous and newly published Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for statins to provide a historical perspective in addition to the current status of statin-related pharmacogenetics and future perspectives. Results: This article provides historical background on statins and associated adverse effects, reviews pharmacogenetic implications, applies clinical decision support, incorporates the latest CPIC guidelines and addresses future implications. Conclusion: Statins are a beneficial medication, but not without risk. Pharmacogenomics can help mitigate some risk factors. Clinical decision support, implementation, research and guidelines will continue to influence statin prescribing.