Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Malar J ; 16(1): 249, 2017 06 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28610579

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malaria is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in malaria-endemic areas. Indoor residual spray is an effective intervention to control malaria, but high community-level coverage is needed to maximize its impact. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using thirty-four two-stage cluster surveys (e.g., demographic and health surveys) and lot quality assurance sampling, indoor residual spray was estimated at the community level (i.e. enumeration-area) across sub-Saharan Africa since 2010. For communities receiving indoor residual spray a logistic regression predicted whether community-level coverage exceeded 50% or not. Household-level coverage was equitable both in terms of wealth and urban/rural, with poorer and rural houses more likely to be sprayed than richer and urban houses. Coverage of indoor residual spray at the community level is poor across the continent, with 54% of communities receiving the intervention not reaching 50% coverage. Having >50% coverage at the community-level was not associated with increasing the number of houses sprayed in the country. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation and monitoring of indoor residual coverage at small geographical scales need to improve greatly to receive maximum benefit of the intervention.


Assuntos
Repelentes de Insetos/administração & dosagem , Malária/prevenção & controle , Controle de Mosquitos/métodos , Mosquitos Vetores , Adolescente , Adulto , Aerossóis , África Subsaariana , Animais , Pré-Escolar , Análise por Conglomerados , Feminino , Habitação , Humanos , Renda , Lactente , Mosquiteiros Tratados com Inseticida , Modelos Logísticos , Malária/transmissão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Controle de Mosquitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Mosquitos Vetores/efeitos dos fármacos , Controle de Qualidade , Saúde da População Rural , Saúde da População Urbana , Adulto Jovem
2.
Malar J ; 16(1): 479, 2017 Nov 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29166907

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quantifying mosquito biting rates for specific locations enables estimation of mosquito-borne disease risk, and can inform intervention efforts. Measuring biting itself is fraught with ethical concerns, so the landing rate of mosquitoes on humans is often used as a proxy measure. Southern coastal Ecuador was historically endemic for malaria (Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax), although successful control efforts in the 2000s eliminated autochthonous transmission (since 2011). This study presents an analysis of data collected during the elimination period. METHODS: Human landing catch (HLC) data for three mosquito taxa: two malaria vectors, Anopheles albimanus and Anopheles punctimacula, and grouped Culex spp. were examined for this study. These data were collected by the National Vector Control Service of the Ministry of Health over a 5-year time span (2007-2012) in five cities in southern coastal Ecuador, at multiple households, in all months of the year, during dusk-dawn (18:00-6:00) hours, often at both indoor and outdoor locations. Hurdle models were used to determine if biting activity was fundamentally different for the three taxa, and to identify spatial and temporal factors influencing bite rate. Due to the many different approaches to studying and quantifying bite rates in the literature, a glossary of terms was created, to facilitate comparative studies in the future. RESULTS: Biting trends varied significantly with species and time. All taxa exhibited exophagic feeding behavior, and outdoor locations increased both the odds and incidence of bites across taxa. Anopheles albimanus was most frequently observed biting, with an average of 4.7 bites/h. The highest and lowest respective months for significant biting activity were March and July for An. albimanus, July and August for An. punctimacula, and February and July for Culex spp. CONCLUSIONS: Fine-scale differences in endophagy and exophagy, and temporal differences among months and hours exist in biting patterns among mosquito taxa in southern coastal Ecuador. This analysis provides detailed information for targeting vector control activities, and household level vector prevention strategies. These data were collected as part of routine vector surveillance conducted by the Ministry of Health, and such data have not been collected since. Reinstating such surveillance measures would provide important information to aid in preventing malaria re-emergence.


Assuntos
Anopheles/fisiologia , Ritmo Circadiano , Culex/fisiologia , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/epidemiologia , Mosquitos Vetores/fisiologia , Animais , Equador/epidemiologia , Comportamento Alimentar , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/etiologia , Modelos Biológicos , Estações do Ano , Especificidade da Espécie , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA