Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 365(21): 1990-2001, 2011 Nov 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22111718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Daily inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for young children at risk for asthma exacerbations, as indicated by a positive value on the modified asthma predictive index (API) and an exacerbation in the preceding year, but concern remains about daily adherence and effects on growth. We compared daily therapy with intermittent therapy. METHODS: We studied 278 children between the ages of 12 and 53 months who had positive values on the modified API, recurrent wheezing episodes, and at least one exacerbation in the previous year but a low degree of impairment. Children were randomly assigned to receive a budesonide inhalation suspension for 1 year as either an intermittent high-dose regimen (1 mg twice daily for 7 days, starting early during a predefined respiratory tract illness) or a daily low-dose regimen (0.5 mg nightly) with corresponding placebos. The primary outcome was the frequency of exacerbations requiring oral glucocorticoid therapy. RESULTS: The daily regimen of budesonide did not differ significantly from the intermittent regimen with respect to the frequency of exacerbations, with a rate per patient-year for the daily regimen of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.22) versus a rate of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.20) for the intermittent regimen (relative rate in the intermittent-regimen group, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.35; P=0.60). There were also no significant between-group differences in several other measures of asthma severity, including the time to the first exacerbation, or adverse events. The mean exposure to budesonide was 104 mg less with the intermittent regimen than with the daily regimen. CONCLUSIONS: A daily low-dose regimen of budesonide was not superior to an intermittent high-dose regimen in reducing asthma exacerbations. Daily administration led to greater exposure to the drug at 1 year. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; MIST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00675584.).


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Budesonida/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Administração Oral , Broncodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Budesonida/efeitos adversos , Pré-Escolar , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Prednisolona/uso terapêutico , Sons Respiratórios/efeitos dos fármacos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Falha de Tratamento
2.
Lancet ; 377(9766): 650-7, 2011 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21324520

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Daily inhaled corticosteroids are an effective treatment for mild persistent asthma, but some children have exacerbations even with good day-to-day control, and many discontinue treatment after becoming asymptomatic. We assessed the effectiveness of an inhaled corticosteroid (beclomethasone dipropionate) used as rescue treatment. METHODS: In this 44-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial we enrolled children and adolescents with mild persistent asthma aged 5-18 years from five clinical centres in the USA. A computer-generated randomisation sequence, stratified by clinical centre and age group, was used to randomly assign participants to one of four treatment groups: twice daily beclomethasone with beclomethasone plus albuterol as rescue (combined group); twice daily beclomethasone with placebo plus albuterol as rescue (daily beclomethasone group); twice daily placebo with beclomethasone plus albuterol as rescue (rescue beclomethasone group); and twice daily placebo with placebo plus albuterol as rescue (placebo group). Twice daily beclomethasone treatment was one puff of beclomethasone (40 µg per puff) or placebo given in the morning and evening. Rescue beclomethasone treatment was two puffs of beclomethasone or placebo for each two puffs of albuterol (180 µg) needed for symptom relief. The primary outcome was time to first exacerbation that required oral corticosteroids. A secondary outcome measured linear growth. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00394329. RESULTS: 843 children and adolescents were enrolled into this trial, of whom 288 were assigned to one of four treatment groups; combined (n=71), daily beclomethasone (n=72), rescue beclomethasone (n=71), and placebo (n=74)-555 individuals were excluded during the run-in, according to predefined criteria. Compared with the placebo group (49%, 95% CI 37-61), the frequency of exacerbations was lower in the daily (28%, 18-40, p=0·03), combined (31%, 21-43, p=0·07), and rescue (35%, 24-47, p=0·07) groups. Frequency of treatment failure was 23% (95% CI 14-43) in the placebo group, compared with 5·6% (1·6-14) in the combined (p=0·012), 2·8% (0-10) in the daily (p=0·009), and 8·5% (2-15) in the rescue (p=0·024) groups. Compared with the placebo group, linear growth was 1·1 cm (SD 0·3) less in the combined and daily arms (p<0·0001), but not the rescue group (p=0·26). Only two individuals had severe adverse events; one in the daily beclomethasone group had viral meningitis and one in the combined group had bronchitis. INTERPRETATION: Children with mild persistent asthma should not be treated with rescue albuterol alone and the most effective treatment to prevent exacerbations is daily inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids as rescue medication with albuterol might be an effective step-down strategy for children with well controlled, mild asthma because it is more effective at reducing exacerbations than is use of rescue albuterol alone. Use of daily inhaled corticosteroid treatment and related side-effects such as growth impairment can therefore be avoided. FUNDING: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.


Assuntos
Albuterol/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Beclometasona/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Adolescente , Albuterol/efeitos adversos , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Beclometasona/efeitos adversos , Broncodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Prednisona/administração & dosagem
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 115(6): 1238-48, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15940141

RESUMO

Breast-feeding is the preferred method of infant nutrition for numerous reasons. However, its role in the prevention of allergic disease remains controversial. Reasons for this controversy include methodological differences and flaws in the studies performed to date, the immunologic complexity of breast milk itself and, possibly, genetic differences among patients that would affect whether breast-feeding is protective against the development of allergies or is in fact sensitizing. The preponderance of evidence does suggest, however, that there would be much to lose by not recommending breast-feeding. In general, studies reveal that infants fed formulas of intact cow's milk or soy protein compared with breast milk have a higher incidence of atopic dermatitis and wheezing illnesses in early childhood. Consistent with these findings, exclusive breast-feeding should be encouraged for at least 4 to 6 months in infants at both high and low risk of atopy and irrespective of a history of maternal asthma.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade/prevenção & controle , Leite Humano/imunologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Animais , Asma/etiologia , Asma/genética , Asma/prevenção & controle , Aleitamento Materno/efeitos adversos , Dieta , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/genética , Lactente , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Lactação , Metanálise como Assunto , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/genética , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/prevenção & controle , Proteínas do Leite/efeitos adversos , Leite Humano/química , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco , Proteínas de Soja/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA